Articles | Volume 25, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1545-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1545-2025
Research article
 | 
04 Feb 2025
Research article |  | 04 Feb 2025

Biomass burning emission analysis based on MODIS aerosol optical depth and AeroCom multi-model simulations: implications for model constraints and emission inventories

Mariya Petrenko, Ralph Kahn, Mian Chin, Susanne E. Bauer, Tommi Bergman, Huisheng Bian, Gabriele Curci, Ben Johnson, Johannes W. Kaiser, Zak Kipling, Harri Kokkola, Xiaohong Liu, Keren Mezuman, Tero Mielonen, Gunnar Myhre, Xiaohua Pan, Anna Protonotariou, Samuel Remy, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Philip Stier, Toshihiko Takemura, Kostas Tsigaridis, Hailong Wang, Duncan Watson-Parris, and Kai Zhang

Related authors

A satellite-observed climatology of global temporal autocorrelations can be related to aerosol lifetimes
Nick Schutgens, Elisabeth J. Andrews, Antti Arola, Yusuf Bhatti, Guanliang Fu, Otto Hasekamp, Pekka Kolmonen, Antti Lipponen, Tero Mielonen, Leighton Reygare, and Andrew M. Sayer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2656,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2656, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Exploring biases in the GISS ModelE Earth system model brown carbon representation with in-situ flight observations
Maegan A. DeLessio, Kostas Tsigaridis, and Susanne E. Bauer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 7325–7359, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7325-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7325-2026, 2026
Short summary
The Met Office Unified Model and JULES Global Atmosphere and Land 9.0 configuration
Martin R. Willett, Melissa E. Brooks, Andrew Bushell, Paul Earnshaw, Charline Marzin, Samantha Smith, Lorenzo Tomassini, Nathan Luke Abraham, Martin Best, John M. Edwards, Kalli Furtado, Catherine Hardacre, Alan J. Hewitt, Ben Johnson, Adrian Lock, Jane P. Mulcahy, James Manners, Alistair Sellar, Peter Sheridan, Warren Tennant, Kwinten Van Weverberg, Vidya Varma, and Michael Whitall
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2425,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2425, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Convective controls on anvil cloud evolution in the ICON km-scale global climate model
Mathilde Ritman, William Jones, and Philip Stier
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 7105–7126, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7105-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7105-2026, 2026
Short summary
East Asian Anthropogenic Aerosols Strongly Influence Past and Present Southern African Hydroclimate and Ecosystem Changes
Bosi Sheng, Massimo A. Bollasina, Alexandre S. Gagnon, Laura J. Wilcox, Thomas P. S. Reynolds, Christopher T. S. Beckett, Haolin Wang, Qingxiang Li, Pierre Nabat, Robert J. Allen, Bjørn H. Samset, Joonas Merikanto, Geeta G. Persad, Toshihiko Takemura, Kostas Tsigaridis, Sharar Ahmadi, Maxwell T. Elling, Knut von Salzen, Daniel M. Westervelt, Naga Oshima, and Tsuyoshi Koshiro
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2198,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2198, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary

Cited articles

AeroCom: Finalized Benchmark Data, AeroCom [data set], https://aerocom.met.no/data, last access: 22 January 2025. 
Anderson, K., Chen, J., Englefield, P., Griffin, D., Makar, P. A., and Thompson, D.: The Global Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System version 1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7713–7749, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7713-2024, 2024. 
Andreae, M. O., Rosenfeld, D., Artaxo, P., Costa, A. A., Frank, G. P., Longo, K. M., and Silva-Dias, M. A. F.: Smoking Rain Clouds over the Amazon, Science, 303, 1337–1342, 2004. 
Bauer, S. E., Koch, D., Unger, N., Metzger, S. M., Shindell, D. T., and Streets, D. G.: Nitrate aerosols today and in 2030: a global simulation including aerosols and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5043–5059, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5043-2007, 2007. 
Download
Short summary
We compared smoke plume simulations from 11 global models to each other and to satellite smoke amount observations aimed at constraining smoke source strength. In regions where plumes are thick and background aerosol is low, models and satellites compare well. However, the input emission inventory tends to underestimate in many places, and particle property and loss rate assumptions vary enormously among models, causing uncertainties that require systematic in situ measurements to resolve.

Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint