Articles | Volume 21, issue 3
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1683–1695, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1683-2021
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1683–1695, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1683-2021

Research article 09 Feb 2021

Research article | 09 Feb 2021

Observations on aerosol optical properties and scavenging during cloud events

Observations on aerosol optical properties and scavenging during cloud events
Antti Ruuskanen1, Sami Romakkaniemi1, Harri Kokkola1, Antti Arola1, Santtu Mikkonen2,3, Harri Portin1,a, Annele Virtanen2, Kari E. J. Lehtinen1,2, Mika Komppula1, and Ari Leskinen1,2 Antti Ruuskanen et al.
  • 1Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
  • 2Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
  • 3Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
  • acurrent address: Helsinki Region Environmental Services Authority, P.O. Box 100, 00066 HSY, Finland

Correspondence: Antti Ruuskanen (antti.ruuskanen@fmi.fi)

Abstract

Long-term statistics of atmospheric aerosol and especially cloud scavenging were studied at the Puijo measurement station in Kuopio, Finland, during October 2010–November 2014. Aerosol size distributions, scattering coefficients at three different wavelengths (450, 550, and 700 nm), and absorption coefficient at wavelength 637 nm were measured with a special inlet system to sample interstitial and total aerosol in clouds. On average, accumulation mode particle concentration was found to be correlated with temperature with the lowest average concentrations of 200 cm−3 around 0 C increasing to 800 cm−3 at 20 C. The scavenging efficiencies of both scattering and absorbing material were observed to have a slightly positive temperature correlation in in-cloud measurements. At 0 C, the scavenging efficiencies of scattering and absorbing material were 0.85 and 0.55 with slopes of 0.005 and 0.003 C−1, respectively. Scavenging efficiencies were also studied as a function of the diameter at which half of the particles are activated into cloud droplets. This analysis indicated that there is a higher fraction of absorbing material, typically black carbon, in smaller sizes so that at least 20 %–30 % of interstitial particles within clouds consist of absorbing material. In addition, the PM1 inlet revealed that approximately 20 % of absorbing material was observed to reside in particles with ambient diameter larger than  1 µm at relative humidity below 90 %. Similarly, 40 % of scattering material was seen to be in particles larger than 1 µm. Altogether, this dataset provides information on the size-dependent aerosol composition and in-cloud scavenging of different types of aerosol. The dataset can be useful in evaluating how well the size-dependent aerosol composition is simulated in global aerosol models and how well these models capture the in-cloud scavenging of different types of aerosol in stratus clouds.

1 Introduction

Aerosol particles in the atmosphere induce radiative forcing by absorbing and scattering light (direct effect) and by modifying cloud properties by acting as seeds for cloud droplets (indirect effect) (Lohmann and Feichter, 2005). The interaction of aerosols with radiation depends highly on their physicochemical properties, such as size, morphology, and chemical composition. These properties are source-specific and evolve during the life cycle of aerosol in the atmosphere. Aerosol particles can grow by condensation, coagulate with each other, undergo phase change, or get cloud-processed, i.e. grow in clouds due to chemical processes and coagulation until they are finally removed from the atmosphere through dry or wet deposition. If the atmospheric lifetime of an aerosol particle is long, it can travel long distances from the emission source regions and cause radiative forcing over areas with low natural aerosol sources, like for example black carbon (BC) over Arctic areas (Chaubey et al., 2010; Latha et al., 2005). To estimate the radiative forcing of the anthropogenic aerosol, all these processes from aerosol formation to their removal must be understood and resolved.

Although aerosol properties may change already at relative humidity (RH) below 100 % due to microphysical processing, aerosol properties undergo a much faster change within clouds where a fraction of submicron aerosol particles are grown into cloud droplets with sizes of the order of 10 µm in diameter (Väisänen et al., 2016; Anttila et al., 2012). In order to be cloud-processed, an aerosol particle must be able to act as a cloud condensation nucleus (CCN). The CCN activity of an aerosol particle depends on its size and hygroscopicity (Swietlicki et al., 2008). Inorganic salts, such as sulfates, nitrates, and ammonium, are known to be hygroscopic while, for example, pure black carbon is highly non-hygroscopic (McMeeking et al., 2011). Typically, hygroscopic particles such as sulfate are known to be efficient scatterers of light, whereas insoluble compounds such as BC absorb light efficiently (e.g. Bergstrom et al., 2002). Therefore, in the case of particles of the same size, the scattering aerosols are scavenged by cloud droplets more frequently, and this has also been observed in several studies (Browse et al., 2012; Berkowitz et al., 2011; Verheggen et al., 2007; Cozic et al., 2007; Komppula et al., 2005). On average, if cloud formation leads to wet scavenging of aerosol, this results in less numerous, more absorbing, and smaller aerosol particles. As a result, the direct cooling effect through light scattering is decreased compared to the warming effect of absorbing aerosols.

The optical and CCN properties of BC-containing particles are influenced by their size and the mixing state. Fors et al. (2011) and Väisänen et al. (2016) found that in externally mixed ambient aerosol the accumulation mode typically contains a higher fraction of hygroscopic particles than the Aitken mode. Due to ageing processes, atmospheric BC particles contain a varying fraction of other chemical components (inorganics, water, water-soluble organics), and these compounds may enhance the light absorption of the particles (Bond et al., 2006). A coating of BC may also increase the CCN activity through elevated hygroscopicity (Liu et al., 2013), although the enhancement depends on the amount of coating and is not always extensive (Cappa et al., 2012). However, because of such a mixing, it is not straightforward to determine whether the overall role of BC-containing particles in the atmosphere is always warming or whether these particles cause negative forcing through the Twomey effect.

Experimental information about physical, optical, and chemical properties of aerosols is achieved from long-term in situ measurements which have been and are being conducted in several places throughout the world (e.g. Collaud Coen et al., 2013; Asmi et al., 2013). The effect of clouds or precipitation on aerosol optical properties has also been studied in several campaigns (Zhang et al., 2012; Berkowitz et al., 2011; Hyvärinen et al., 2011; Chaubey et al., 2010; Marcq et al., 2010; Yamagata et al., 2009; Cozic et al., 2007; Latha et al., 2005) and by conducting model calculations (e.g. Browse et al., 2012; Croft et al., 2009). Wet scavenging of different compounds has significant importance on global aerosol composition. As scavenging of different compounds depends on where the compounds reside in the aerosol size spectrum, there is a need for measurements on how the chemical compounds are partitioned between the interstitial aerosol and cloud droplets. However, such long-term measurements are conducted only in a few locations related to low-altitude clouds or mountain stations. For example, a handful of studies have been carried out in which cloud-scavenging efficiency of black carbon has been studied as reviewed by Yang et al. (2019).

The partitioning of aerosol particles between the interstitial and activated (i.e. cloud droplet) phases can be studied by parallel measurements of the interstitial and cloud-activated aerosols. In such studies, different methods have been used: an interstitial inlet with a cut-off diameter low enough to remove cloud droplets, a counterflow virtual impactor (CVI) to extract cloud droplets (Noone et al., 1988) and ice particles from mixed-phase clouds (Mertes et al., 2007), and a total-air inlet, which samples both the interstitial and activated phases (Weingartner et al., 1999). In principle, the most suitable instrument to study the properties of activated aerosols is the CVI, which samples only large particles (or cloud droplets) with enough kinetic energy to pass through the counterflow section that removes small (interstitial) particles and enables the study of the activated fraction directly. A drawback of CVIs is the enrichment of the sample, as the input flow is larger than the sample flow (Twohy et al., 2003). The total and interstitial inlets sample particles smaller than their predetermined cut-off sizes, which enables us to get information about both cloud-scavenged and non-scavenged particles. It must be noted that since the two-inlet method relies on subtracting the properties of interstitial aerosol particles from those of total aerosol particles, some discrepancies may be seen if the studied property is not additive in its nature, or if there is a delay between the interstitial and total aerosol measurements, particularly in fast changing situations. Furthermore, aerosol particles may start growing already below 100 % RH due to water uptake and other microphysical processing (Ervens et al., 2011; Wonaschuetz et al., 2012), which may lead to a situation where a fraction of submicron aerosol particles is grown into cloud droplets with sizes of the order of several micrometres in diameter (Väisänen et al., 2016; Anttila et al., 2012) and are thus removed by the interstitial inlet and regarded as cloud scavenged although this is not the case. All in all, each of these systems has its pros and cons, and in finding a suitable method one must bear in mind the needs and the restrictions of the site and the sampling setup.

In this work, we used a combination of interstitial and total inlets, and we analysed the properties of activated particles as a difference between the two inlets. Beyond reporting typical aerosol properties, our aim was to clarify how ambient conditions and properties of aerosol population influence the scavenged fraction of light-absorbing and light-scattering aerosol particles.

2 Methods

2.1 Site description

The measurement site is located on the top of an observation and retransmitting tower at Puijo (625434′′ N, 273919′′ E) in Kuopio, Finland. The measurement height is 306 m above sea level (a.s.l.) and 224 m above the level of the surrounding lake. In the surroundings of the measurement site there are a few local pollutant sources, such as a paper mill, a district heating plant, traffic routes, and residential areas with biomass-fired combustion appliances. At this measurement site we can study how the properties of the fresh aerosol emissions from the local sources differ from aged aerosol observed at Puijo. Furthermore, the measurement site is inside low-level clouds approximately 8 % of the time, which enables us to study the aerosol–cloud interactions in a continuous, long-term manner. The cloudiest period is during autumn (Fig. 1), when the tower is inside clouds about 13 % of the time.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1683/2021/acp-21-1683-2021-f01

Figure 1(a) Average daily temperatures with minimum and maximum values over the studied period (left vertical axis) with occurred cloud event frequency (right vertical axis). The average temperature is presented with the black line, and the daily minimum and maximum temperatures are presented with the lines associated with blue and red areas, respectively. The occurrence of cloud events is presented with grey bars. (b) Data coverage of nephelometer (red), MAAP (green), and DMPS (blue) during the cloud event periods. The coverage also includes values below device detection limits.

Download

Approximately 91 000 people live in the urban area of Kuopio (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). The Puijo hill (elevation 150 m) and the measurement station are located ca. 2 km NW from the city centre. There are a few well-known local sources: the district heating plant 3.5 km SE, the paper mill 5 km NE, and a highway across the city. The distances and directions are in relation to the measurement station. Several residential areas are located nearby, but mostly east and south of the station. A more detailed description of the measurement site, the surroundings, and previous studies is given in Leskinen et al. (2009, 2012), Portin et al. (2009, 2014), Hao et al. (2014), Väisänen et al. (2016), and Romakkaniemi et al. (2017). An analysis of aerosol source areas is conducted in Väisänen et al. (2020)

2.2 Instrumentation

We measured temperature, relative humidity, horizontal wind direction, and visibility on the roof of the tower with a time resolution of 1 min, by using a temperature and humidity transmitter (Vaisala, model HMT330MIK), an ultrasonic wind anemometer (Thies, model UA2D), and a present weather sensor (Vaisala, model FD12P). We also measured the cloud base height at the nearby Savilahti weather station (2 km south-west from Puijo) with a ceilometer (Vaisala CT25K). An overall distribution of selected meteorological data over the calendar months of the measurement period is given in Fig. S2.

Aerosol measurement instruments were placed on the top floor inside the tower. The sample air for the instruments was drawn through two separate sampling lines: the interstitial and the total aerosol lines. The former is equipped with an impactor (Digitel DPM 10/01/00/16) whose cut-off size is 1.0 µm at its nominal flow rate of 1.0 m3 h−1 (16.7 L min−1). The impactor removes coarse particles and cloud droplets from the sample, and it has been characterised and calibrated by the manufacturer. The latter sampling line, in turn, has a snow hood and a heated inlet, with a cut-off size of 40 µm, characterised by Weingartner et al. (1999). Water on the cloud droplets evaporates in the total aerosol inlet and sampling line. The resulting total aerosol contains both the interstitial aerosol and cloud droplet residual. The properties of the cloud droplet residual can then be estimated, at least for additive parameters, by subtracting the property of the interstitial aerosol from that of the total aerosol. This so-called twin-inlet system makes it possible to compare the properties of non-activated and activated aerosols, making it a suitable method for studying how aerosol mixing state affects cloud droplet formation and aerosol scavenging. The inlet system has been characterised by comparing the interstitial and total particle size distributions during cloud-free weather, and they have been found, after particle loss corrections, to match well in the measured range of 3–800 nm of the differential mobility particle sizer (DMPS) described below.

We measured the aerosol scattering (at 450, 550, and 700 nm) coefficients by using a TSI model 3563 integrating nephelometer (Anderson et al., 1996) and absorption (at 637 nm) with a Thermo model 5012 multi-angle absorption photometer (MAAP; Petzold and Schönlinner, 2004). Both instruments took samples from both the interstitial and total line with the help of a controllable valve system (shown in Fig. 2). The system switched the sampling lines in 6 min intervals. In this configuration, the flow rate through both instruments was 8.0 L min−1, and we collected the data with a time resolution of 1 min from both devices.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1683/2021/acp-21-1683-2021-f02

Figure 2Schematic figure of the sampling line and valve system. Total (red) and interstitial (green) samples reach the valve system, where the samples are directed to the devices. Valve system switches the lines between two stages: in stage one a pair of devices sample from the total line and in stage two the same pair samples from the interstitial line. Naturally the other pair of devices samples vice versa.

Download

Particle number size distributions were measured using a twin DMPS (self-constructed) (Winklmayr et al., 1991; Jokinen and Mäkelä, 1997). The system was also used to get information about cloud activation of the particles and to determine the diameter (D50) at which half of the particles of that size are activated into cloud droplets. The measured size range was originally 7–800 nm and was extended to cover the range of 3–800 nm in February 2012. DMPSs were also part of the controllable valve system together with the nephelometer and MAAP. Throughout the measurements, we performed periodic flow checks and calibrations for the instruments to ensure the high quality of the measurements.

The overall raw data coverages for the nephelometer, MAAP, and DMPS were 64 %, 95 %, and 95 %, respectively. After removing invalid data caused by instrument malfunctions, contaminations, and periodic calibrations and flow checks, the valid data coverages were 35 %–85 %. More detailed valid monthly data coverage for each instrument is illustrated in Fig. 1b.

2.3 Data processing

The analysed dataset covered the period 5 October 2010–30 November 2014, including meteorological variables, and aerosol particle optical properties and size distributions for both the total and interstitial lines. All data were averaged for 12 min based on DMPS time resolution. First, we ruled out non-usable data during maintenance, calibrations, flow checks, and auto-zeroing (i.e. periodic automated measurement to determine the background noise) from the optical variables. In addition, data with abnormal peaks and negative values were removed. As in our earlier work (Leskinen et al., 2012), we omitted the scattering data when relative humidity (RH) exceeds 50 % in the integrating nephelometer inlet and corrected the scattering coefficient for truncation errors (Anderson and Ogren, 1998).

We categorised the data into three categories according to the cloudiness conditions and named them “no cloud”, “cloud”, and “intermediate”. The criteria for no cloud were RH < 80 % and visibility > 8000 m or, if either RH or visibility data were not available, cloud base height (CBH) > 500 m. For the cloud category, the visibility limit was < 200 m or, if visibility data were not available, measured RH > 99 %. The periods not meeting either of these criteria were labelled as intermediate. The fractions of each category from 5 October 2010 to 30 November 2014 were 44.6 %, 8.0 %, and 47.4 % for no cloud, cloud, and intermediate, respectively.

We calculated scavenging fractions, i.e. the fractions of the absorbing and scattering material in the activated (cloud) phase with the following equations:

(1) F scav , a = σ ap , λ , tot - σ ap , λ , int σ ap , λ , tot

and

(2) F scav , s = σ sp , λ , tot - σ sp , λ , int σ sp , λ , tot .

In Eqs. (1) and (2) σsp,λ is the scattering coefficient and σap,λ is the absorption coefficient at a given wavelength λ. Subscripts int and tot refer to the interstitial and total lines.

In this study we defined the accumulation mode number concentration (Nacc) as the number concentration of particles larger than 100 nm in diameter (electrical mobility diameter). Nacc is found to be a representative proxy for CCN in boundary layer stratified clouds in boreal conditions (Lihavainen et al., 2008). The total number concentration (Ntot) is defined as the number concentration of all particles ranging from 3 or 7 to 800 nm (see Sect. 2.2). In addition, we calculated volume concentrations (Vtot and Vacc) with the same particle diameter limits.

2.4 Observed clouds

Due to the low altitude of the observation location, all clouds are stratiform and capped with a temperature inversion. The criterion for an average visibility of less than 200 m over the 12 min period effectively excludes all broken clouds. The average cloud base height, estimated from the data of the nearby ceilometer, is 170 m, which would turn into an average (adiabatic) liquid water content of  0.06 g m−3 that is comparable to the average of  0.05 g m−3 obtained from cloud droplet size distribution observations at Puijo (Portin et al., 2009). At Puijo, we do not have continuous and reliable information on the cloud physical depth or possible clouds residing above the observed lowest boundary layer cloud, which could affect the radiative cooling of the lowest cloud top and subsequently the boundary layer dynamics (Leung et al., 2016). However, we used the present weather sensor data for separating precipitating and non-precipitating clouds, and we observed that removing the precipitating clouds had a negligible effect on the results because we studied instantaneous cloud scavenging instead of total wet scavenging. Thus, the data are also applicable to cases with precipitation, which amounts to 24 % of the cloud data.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Aerosol number concentrations

The aerosol emissions near the Puijo site have a large annual variability as the contribution of different emission sectors to the aerosol load is highly dependent on the season. To analyse the characteristics of size-dependent aerosol properties in different weather conditions, we studied the behaviour of total and accumulation mode particle number concentrations as a function of temperature in all measured cases (Fig. 3a, b, c) and in-cloud cases (Fig. 3d, e, f). Panels (a) and (d) present total number concentrations, panels (b) and (e) present accumulation number concentrations, and finally panels (c) and (f) present the ratio of the accumulation and total number concentrations. Note the different concentration ranges in each panel and lack of cloud event data in temperature ranges from 20 to 15 C and from 20 to 25 C.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1683/2021/acp-21-1683-2021-f03

Figure 3Box plots of (a) total number concentration, (b) accumulation mode number concentration, and (c) ratio of accumulation and total number concentrations in all measured cases. Similarly presented plots of (d) total number concentration, (e) accumulation mode number concentration, and (f) ratio of accumulation and total number concentrations in cloud cases. The boxes have the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles marked with black lines. The mean of each box is marked with a red circle. Data points per box are presented above the boxes. Panels (a)(f) are presented as a function of temperature.

Download

The total number concentration has a correlation to air temperature as seen from the all-data case (Fig. 3a) and from the cloud-only cases (Fig. 3d). However, at low temperatures the total particle number concentration increases (Fig. 3a), which can be caused by increased local anthropogenic emissions. The main reason during cold weather is the need of heating and electricity, whereas the effect of biogenic emissions is no longer relevant (Geron and Arnts, 2010; Tarvainen et al., 2005; Leaitch et al., 2011; Paasonen et al., 2013). In addition, it has been shown that vehicle emissions have a higher impact in cold than warm temperatures (Wang et al., 2017). While most of the time total number concentrations are relatively low, aerosol nucleation events with high total concentration occur, and this can be seen as the difference in median and average concentrations.

We can see a parabolic curve with a minimum around 0 C (Fig. 3b) in the number concentration of accumulation mode particles presented as a function of temperature (all-data case). Similar characteristics in accumulation mode number concentrations have also been reported in previous studies (Asmi et al., 2016; Paasonen et al., 2013; Hussein et al., 2006). In warm temperatures (above +10 C), the accumulation mode particle number concentration increases rapidly, which is likely caused by an increase in biogenic emissions (Ahlm et al., 2013). Additionally, wet deposition tends to decrease in extremely warm temperatures as precipitation decreases. However, the low concentrations at approximately 0 C temperatures are generally thought to be caused by lack of biogenic emissions (Heikkinen et al., 2020) as well as an increased amount of precipitation and thus wet deposition. Interestingly, the number concentration begins to increase towards colder temperatures in the all-data case but not in cloud event case. The increase could be explained by a decreased amount of deposition and lower height of the boundary layer together with an increasing amount of aerosol from local house heating and energy production.

In addition to total and accumulation particle number concentrations, we studied the fraction of accumulation-sized particles out of the total number. The ratio of accumulation to total particle number concentrations of all data (Fig. 3c) and cloud case data (Fig. 3f) shows a similar parabolic curve as in Fig. 3b. However, the curve is less pronounced in cloud case data, especially at cold temperatures. This backs up the notion made in the previous paragraph about accumulation particles. Precipitation can be one of the explaining factors since precipitation events are most frequent around 0 C. Another interesting notion is that the ratio is slightly higher on average during cloud cases, excluding the region below 5 C. This would imply faster coagulation–coalescence removal of nucleation and Aitken mode particles than that of accumulation mode particles (Laakso et al., 2003).

3.2 Influence of environmental parameters on the aerosol optical properties during cloud events

3.2.1 Relative humidity and scavenged particle volume fraction

Information about the composition size distribution, especially with respect to scattering and absorbing compounds, can be inferred by how their sampling in the interstitial line changes at different humidities. The compounds which are dominant in the largest particles are scavenged at high relative humidities even without any clouds present. These large particles are not considered to be cloud scavenged. Meanwhile, the scavenging of the compounds in smaller particle sizes is affected less by the increase in the relative humidity.

Here we present the scavenging efficiencies of scattering and absorbing material studied as a function of air relative humidity (Fig. 4a, c) and scavenged total aerosol volume (Fig. 4b, d). The box plots in Fig. 4a and c illustrate how the scavenged fraction changes when there is a transition from cloud-free to cloudy periods. The relative humidity subplots show an interesting effect of scavenging even at moderate air humidity. Approximately 40 % of scattering and 20 % of absorbing material is scavenged by the impactor already at 50 % RH. However, there is a large variability in the observed scavenging fractions because of different aerosol sizes and chemical compositions during the whole measurement period. This can be seen from the percentiles in the box plots. Interestingly, on average 20 % of aerosol absorption is caused by particles close to or bigger than 1 µm. The origin or composition of this aerosol is not known as it is larger than typically analysed with mass spectrometry for example. However, the fraction is very similar to the fraction of absorbing material in particles between 1 and 10 µm in Hyytiälä, Finland, as reported previously by Luoma et al. (2019). When reaching 100 % air humidity, the scavenging efficiencies of both scattering and absorbing material increase. This is the transition zone to cloud cases. On average 70 % of scattering material but only 30 % of absorbing material is scavenged when the cloudy period begins.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1683/2021/acp-21-1683-2021-f04

Figure 4Box plots of scavenging efficiency of scattering material as a function of (a) relative humidity and (b) fraction of scavenged total volume in cloud. Plots of scavenging efficiency of absorbing material as a function of (c) relative humidity and (d) fraction of scavenged total volume in cloud. Boxes are similar to those in Fig. 3.

Download

While Fig. 4a and c showed the change in the fraction of scavenged scattering and absorbing material in transition from cloud-free to cloudy conditions, Fig. 4b and d illustrate how the fraction changes further when the fraction of activated particles increases. Even in the wavering cloud cases, 70 % of scattering and nearly 30 % of absorbing material is scavenged by clouds. As expected, in more prominent cloud cases less scattering and absorption is measured from the interstitial sample line, which leads to higher scavenging fractions. In practice, all of the scattering and nearly 80 % of absorbing material is scavenged by clouds when more than 90 % of submicron aerosol volume is scavenged.

These results indicate a couple of notions regarding the sampling setup and data analysis. First, a sampling system with a 1.0 µm diameter cutoff can lose relevant particles (measurement site specific). Depending on the ambient conditions, hygroscopic and aged BC particles, which are expected to be sampled, are undetected by the interstitial line due to particle growth. Second, scattering is dominated by large particles, which is expected by scattering theory and is also reported in earlier studies (Anttila et al., 2012; Portin et al., 2014). However, the scattering data can greatly help in explaining the absorption data. As mentioned earlier, approximately a 40 % difference between the sampling lines even at moderate air humidity implies the presence of particles larger than 1 µm or growth of hygroscopic particles beyond 1 µm in size. The same applies to the absorbing material that has aged and is coated with hygroscopic coating (e.g. aged BC particles) and can be removed before cloud formation. However, BC typically resides in the particles that are much smaller than 1 µm, and thus the gradient in scavenging efficiency as a function of relative humidity is less steep than that for the scattering fraction. Another indication for absorbing material to reside in the smaller sizes is that more than 20 % of the absorbing material is not scavenged after more than 90 % of aerosol volume is scavenged by clouds.

It is clear from Fig. 4 that the dispersion of the data is fairly large and includes non-physical values such as scavenging efficiencies out of the range from 0 to 1. This cannot be avoided as there is a slight time difference between the measurement from the interstitial and total line, and this can introduce negative scavenging efficiency values when considering small absolute values of scattering and absorption coefficients. Another reason for the anomalous values is that the interstitial line values are practically zero in many of the cloud cases but, due to the measurement accuracies, can sometimes produce small negative values (especially for the scattering coefficient). This leads to situations where the estimated scavenging fraction is slightly over unity. The third and last possible source of dispersion resides in long-term measurements. Since the dataset is large, it is probable that similar kinds of meteorological conditions occur multiple times during the measurement period but with different kinds of aerosol properties.

In comparison to Cozic et al. (2007) and Motos et al. (2019), we did not observe the 1:1 line for scavenged absorption matter as a function of scavenged particle volume. It is worth noting that in our case the scavenged aerosol volume is calculated from the DMPS size distribution, thus including only submicron particles. However, while this has been taken into account, our results show that some amount of absorbing matter remains in the particle phase even with high particle volume scavenging efficiency. This difference is presumably caused by the vicinity of the BC source regions and relatively low supersaturation in the observed clouds, which limits the activation of small particles.

3.2.2 Impact of air temperature

One of the main objectives of this study was to investigate how the optical properties of aerosols change during cloud-scavenging events at different temperatures. In Fig. 5, cloud-scavenged fractions of scattering (a) and absorbing (b) material are presented as a function of temperature with box plots. The boxes have a fixed width of 5 C ranging from 15 to 20 C.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1683/2021/acp-21-1683-2021-f05

Figure 5Box plots of in cloud (a) scavenging efficiency of scattering material and (b) scavenging efficiency of absorbing material as a function of temperature. Boxes are similar to those in Fig. 3.

Download

We can see from Fig. 5 that there is a correlation between temperature and scavenging efficiencies of both scattering and absorbing aerosols. Linear fits were calculated to estimate the connection. As Pitkänen et al. (2016) and Mikkonen et al. (2019) showed, the errors in measured variables need to be taken properly into account in the linear fits. Thus, the slopes were calculated with the Deming regression (Deming, 1943). The slopes for scavenging efficiencies were calculated to be approximately 0.0052 (95 % confidence level (CL) for slope: 0.0042–0.0062) for scattering (Fig. 5a) and 0.0034 (0.0022–0.0046) for absorption (Fig. 5b). This means that the effects are statistically significant and corresponding to an approximately 5 % change for scattering and 3 for the absorbing material in the scavenged fraction at 10 C change in temperature, respectively. The efficiencies were observed to be 0.85 and 0.55 at 0 C for scattering and absorbing matter.

In both Fig. 5a and b a clear decrease in scavenging efficiency from 0 to 15 C can be seen. In the case of absorption, one explaining factor can be the increasing amount of fresh BC emissions from the local heating sources. Freshly emitted BC particles are known to be hydrophobic. However, since the effect is also seen in the scattering data, it is likely that there are some processes that prevent cloud activation. For example, when there are mixed-phase clouds, less numerous ice particles could cause the more numerous liquid cloud droplets to evaporate due to lower saturation vapour pressure over ice. On the other hand, mixed-phase clouds are not common in these temperatures. It is also possible that in colder conditions the radiative cooling from the cloud top is weaker and thus the negative buoyancy driving boundary layer mixing is also weaker. This would lead to lower updraughts at the cloud base, thus limiting the activation of cloud droplets. To study this further would require modelling exercise utilising, for example, large-eddy simulation models with detailed inputs for atmospheric vertical profiles and aerosol conditions. However, this is beyond the scope of the current study due to lack of both the profiling data and computational resources it would require for an observational period of several years.

When considering temperatures above 0 C, we can see a rather clear increase in the scavenging efficiency of scattering material. This could be explained by the increase in available water, increasing amount of hygroscopic material in particles, e.g. from biogenic sources, and a general increase in particle size which can also likely be attributed to condensation of semi- and non-volatile biogenic compounds on pre-existing particles. Over the boreal region, biogenic compounds do have a significant effect on the aerosol load during the warm months, and their emissions increase with increasing temperature (Liao et al., 2014). Overall, an increase in the biogenic contribution, decrease in the anthropogenic contribution (BC), and ageing of long-range BC increase the scavenging efficiency of scattering material.

Our results are qualitatively similar to the findings of Cozic et al. (2007) about the effects of temperature on the scavenging efficiency of absorbing material. At 0 C, the scavenging efficiency of black carbon was found to be 0.6 and it was seen to decrease towards colder temperatures. However, in our case the decrease in the scavenging efficiency is not as strong as the decrease reported by Cozic et al. (2007). In another study (Schneider et al., 2017) an average scavenging efficiency of 0.24 was observed over 14 campaigns with mean ambient temperatures varying from 3.0 to 9.2 C. On the other hand, in each study the impactors for differentiating interstitial particles were different. In our study, we used a PM1 impactor while Cozic et al. (2007) and Schneider et al. (2017) used PM2.5 and PM5 impactors, respectively. These could slightly affect the results as a higher cut-off could, on average, lead to smaller scavenging efficiency when the smallest cloud particles might be counted as aerosol particles.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/21/1683/2021/acp-21-1683-2021-f06

Figure 6D50 as a function of (a) temperature and (b) fraction of scavenged total volume. Additionally, the fraction of scavenged scattering (c) and absorption (d) as a function of D50 is shown. All plots are in cloud. Boxes are similar to those in Fig. 3.

Download

3.2.3 Impact of particle activation size

To obtain more information about the cloud activation potential of differently sized particles in different weather conditions, we studied how the D50 values behave in different conditions. Figure 6 illustrates D50 as a function of temperature (panel a) and as a function of the scavenged fraction of the total volume (panel b). Additionally, fractions of scavenged scattering (panel c) and absorption (panel d) are presented as a function of D50. D50 has a local minimum at approximately 0 C (Fig. 6a) which matches the peak in the scavenging efficiency of the absorbing matter (Fig. 5b). This can also be expected as Nacc has a minimum value close to 0 C, and thus a lower condensation sink during the activation process allows higher supersaturation.

Considering Fig. 6b, we can see that the D50 value seems to saturate at low fractions of scavenged aerosol volume. This phenomenon can also be seen in Fig. 4b and d. Excluding the saturated part, the D50 value decreases rather linearly with the scavenged aerosol volume. This is logical; as more of the aerosol population volume is scavenged, the smaller and smaller particles get scavenged into cloud droplets. It must be noted that the 1 µm cut-off impactor in the interstitial line may also influence the analysis. For example, a hygroscopic interstitial aerosol particle larger than 250 nm may grow larger than 1 µm due to the uptake of water within a cloud and may thus be removed by the impactor and counted as an activated particle. This may be true in the case of a radiation fog, for example, where activation diameters of up to 364–450 nm have been observed (Hammer et al., 2014). In addition, at our station, some of the clouds observed can be well-developed fogs. In our case, however, there are only a few observations in the unclear range where D50 is affected by the interstitial inlet, and thus the long-term statistics are not affected.

Scavenging efficiencies of scattering and absorbing material as a function of D50 support the idea that absorbing matter tends to be in relatively small sized particles, and most of the scattering is caused by large particles as mentioned in Sect. 3.2.1. This can be seen as high scavenging efficiency of scattering material even at D50 of > 300 nm while scavenging efficiency of absorbing material is low. In addition, only 70 % of the absorbing material is scavenged with D50 values higher than 50 nm. However, qualitatively the finding is similar to that of Motos et al. (2019) in the sense that more material is scavenged when D50 is small, which in turn corresponds to high supersaturations. However, our results differ from those of Motos et al. (2019) in the sense that in our study some of the BC is too small to be scavenged. This can be due to both fresher and less CCN active aerosol emissions close to Puijo or lower supersaturations typical of low-altitude clouds observed at the Puijo station. We further studied whether there is a difference in the partitioning of BC on differently sized particles in different temperatures by allocating Fig. 6d data on different temperature bins like Fig. 5b (Supplement Fig S3). However, no clear temperature correlation was observed, thus suggesting the relevant role of nearby emissions in cloudy conditions to be independent of air mass origins.

4 Conclusions

We investigated the size dependence of scattering and absorbing material in different conditions with a measurement setup which samples hydrated aerosol from two inlets. One inlet samples all-sized aerosol particles and droplets and the other particles that can be assumed to remain inactivated within a cloud (i.e. interstitial particles). The main findings can be summarised as follows.

  1. The measurements showed that aerosol number concentrations correlated with temperature. The total particle number concentrations increased with temperature likely due to an increase in the amount of biogenic aerosol. However, accumulation mode number concentrations exhibited a parabolic type correlation to temperature, reaching a minimum at approximately 0 C. The increase in the concentration with temperature is due to an increase in the amount of biogenic aerosol, and the increase in sub-zero temperatures is caused by an increase in aerosol emissions from local sources due to residential heating and inversion conditions limiting the vertical mixing.

  2. With measurement setup, we observed that a fraction of scavenged scattering and absorbing material remains constant up to 80 % to 90 % relative air humidity, above which their scavenged fraction increases. For scattering aerosol, this increase in the scavenged fraction initiates at a lower RH compared to absorbing material. This indicates that a higher fraction of absorbing material resides in smaller particles. However, on average 20 % of absorbing material is found in particles larger than 1 µm in diameter.

  3. In cloud cases, the measurements of the scavenged fraction of scattering and absorbing material showed the same tendency of absorbing material to reside in the smaller particles. The scavenged fraction of scattering material was found to be high for the whole range of D50 values, while the scavenged fraction of absorbing material reached 70 % only for the smallest D50 values of approximately 50 nm. A subtle linear temperature correlation was observed for average scavenging efficiencies of both scattering and absorbing aerosol. At 0 C temperature, the scavenging efficiencies were 0.85 and 0.55 for scattering and absorbing matter, respectively. The slopes were approximately 0.005 and 0.003 C−1.

The observations of D50 offer a useful dataset for large-scale aerosol modellers to evaluate the aerosol–cloud interactions in the models as they provide size-dependent information about aerosol activation to cloud droplets. Data for such validation are scarce and, for example, aerosol–cloud interaction parameters from satellite observations are highly derived and include large uncertainties (e.g. Grosvenor et al., 2018). In particular, wet deposition of absorbing material in global-scale models can be evaluated using this dataset. The methods used in this study could also be applied in different kinds of in situ sites. Overall, the data presented are especially useful for evaluating the cloud-scavenging parameterisations in atmospheric models as they provide information on size-dependent cloud-scavenging efficiency of both absorbing and scattering material. The data also provide long-term statistics on the concentration of CCN-relevant particles at different temperatures.

Data availability

Data are available from the authors upon request.

Supplement

The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1683-2021-supplement.

Author contributions

AR, AL, SR, and MK planned the study. AR, AL, and SM carried out the data analysis, and AR prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Financial support

This research has been supported by the Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation (grant nos. 201500134, 201600105, and 201700418), the Academy of Finland (grant nos. 283031, 285068 and 309127), the Centre of Excellence in Atmospheric Science (grant no. 307331), and the Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant no. 821205).

Review statement

This paper was edited by Manish Shrivastava and reviewed by two anonymous referees.

References

Ahlm, L., Shakya, K. M., Russell, L. M., Schroder, J. C., Wong, J. P. S., Sjostedt, S. J., Hayden, K. L., Liggio, J., Wentzell, J. J. B., Wiebe, H. A., Mihele, C., Leaitch, W. R., and Macdonald, A. M.: Temperature-dependent accumulation mode particle and cloud nuclei concentrations from biogenic sources during WACS 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3393–3407, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3393-2013, 2013. 

Anderson, T. and Ogren, J.: Determining aerosol radiative properties using the TSI 3563 integrating nephelometer, Aerosol. Sci. Technol., 29, 57–69, 1998. 

Anderson, T. L., Covert, D. S., Marshall, S. F., Laucks, M. L., Charlson, R. J., Waggoner, A. P., Ogren, J. A., Caldow, R., Holm, R. L., Quant, F. R., Sem, G. J., Wiedensohler, A., Ahlquist, N. A., and Bates, T. S.: Performance characteristics of a high-sensitivity, three-wavelength, total scatter/backscatter nephelometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 13, 967–986, 1996. 

Anttila, T., Brus, D., Jaatinen, A., Hyvärinen, A.-P., Kivekäs, N., Romakkaniemi, S., Komppula, M., and Lihavainen, H.: Relationships between particles, cloud condensation nuclei and cloud droplet activation during the third Pallas Cloud Experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11435–11450, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11435-2012, 2012. 

Asmi, A., Collaud Coen, M., Ogren, J. A., Andrews, E., Sheridan, P., Jefferson, A., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Bukowiecki, N., Lihavainen, H., Kivekäs, N., Asmi, E., Aalto, P. P., Kulmala, M., Wiedensohler, A., Birmili, W., Hamed, A., O'Dowd, C., G Jennings, S., Weller, R., Flentje, H., Fjaeraa, A. M., Fiebig, M., Myhre, C. L., Hallar, A. G., Swietlicki, E., Kristensson, A., and Laj, P.: Aerosol decadal trends – Part 2: In-situ aerosol particle number concentrations at GAW and ACTRIS stations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 895–916, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-895-2013, 2013. 

Asmi, E., Kondratyev, V., Brus, D., Laurila, T., Lihavainen, H., Backman, J., Vakkari, V., Aurela, M., Hatakka, J., Viisanen, Y., Uttal, T., Ivakhov, V., and Makshtas, A.: Aerosol size distribution seasonal characteristics measured in Tiksi, Russian Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1271–1287, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1271-2016, 2016. 

Bergstrom, R. W., Russell, P. B., and Hignett, P.: Wavelength dependence of the absorption of black carbon particles: Predictions and results from the TARFOX experiment and implications for the aerosol single scattering albedo, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 567–577, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0567:WDOTAO>2.0.CO;2, 2002. 

Berkowitz, C. M., Berg, L. K., Yu, X.-Y., Alexander, M. L., Laskin, A., Zaveri, R. A., Jobson, B. T., Andrews, E., and Ogren, J. A.: The influence of fog and airmass history on aerosol optical, physical and chemical properties at Pt. Reyes National Seashore, Atmos. Environ., 45, 2559–2568, 2011. 

Bond, T. C., Habib, G., and Bergstrom, R. W.: Limitations in the enhancement of visible light absorption due to mixing state, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D20211, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007315, 2006. 

Browse, J., Carslaw, K. S., Arnold, S. R., Pringle, K., and Boucher, O.: The scavenging processes controlling the seasonal cycle in Arctic sulphate and black carbon aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6775–6798, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6775-2012, 2012. 

Cappa, C. D., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Worsnop, D. R., Bates, T. S., Cross, E. S., Davidovits, P., Hakala, J., Hayden, K. L., Jobson, B. T., Kolesar, K. R., Lack, D. A., Lerner, B. M., Li, S. M., Mellon, D., Nuaaman, I., Olfert, J. S., Petaja, T., Quinn, P. K., Song, C., Subramanian, R., Williams, E. J., and Zaveri, R. A.: Radiative Absorption Enhancements Due to the Mixing State of Atmospheric Black Carbon, Science, 337, 1078–1081, 2012. 

Chaubey, J. P., Moorthy, K. K., Babu, S. S., Nair, V. S., and Tiwari, A.: Black carbon aerosols over coastal Antarctica and its scavenging by snow during the Southern Hemispheric summer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D10210, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013381, 2010. 

Collaud Coen, M., Andrews, E., Asmi, A., Baltensperger, U., Bukowiecki, N., Day, D., Fiebig, M., Fjaeraa, A. M., Flentje, H., Hyvärinen, A., Jefferson, A., Jennings, S. G., Kouvarakis, G., Lihavainen, H., Lund Myhre, C., Malm, W. C., Mihapopoulos, N., Molenar, J. V., O'Dowd, C., Ogren, J. A., Schichtel, B. A., Sheridan, P., Virkkula, A., Weingartner, E., Weller, R., and Laj, P.: Aerosol decadal trends – Part 1: In-situ optical measurements at GAW and IMPROVE stations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 869–894, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-869-2013, 2013. 

Cozic, J., Verheggen, B., Mertes, S., Connolly, P., Bower, K., Petzold, A., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Scavenging of black carbon in mixed phase clouds at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1797–1807, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1797-2007, 2007. 

Croft, B., Lohmann, U., Martin, R. V., Stier, P., Wurzler, S., Feichter, J., Posselt, R., and Ferrachat, S.: Aerosol size-dependent below-cloud scavenging by rain and snow in the ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4653–4675, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4653-2009, 2009. 

Deming, W. E.: Statistical adjustment of data, Wiley, New York, USA, 1943. 

Ervens, B., Turpin, B. J., and Weber, R. J.: Secondary organic aerosol formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of laboratory, field and model studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11069–11102, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11069-2011, 2011. 

Fors, E. O., Swietlicki, E., Svenningsson, B., Kristensson, A., Frank, G. P., and Sporre, M.: Hygroscopic properties of the ambient aerosol in southern Sweden – a two year study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8343–8361, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8343-2011, 2011. 

Geron, C. D. and Arnts, R. R.: Seasonal monoterpene and sesquiterpene emissions from Pinus taeda and Pinus virginiana, Atmos. Environ., 44, 4240–4251, 2010. 

Grosvenor, D. P., Sourdeval, O., Zuidema, P., Ackerman, A., Alexandrov, M. D., Bennartz, R., Boers, R., Cairns, B., Chiu, J. C., Christensen, M., Deneke, H., Diamond, M., Feingold, G., Fridlind, A., Hünerbein, A., Knist, C., Kollias, P., Marshak, A., McCoy, D., Merk, D., Painemal, D., Rausch, J., Rosenfeld, D., Russchenberg, H., Seifert, P., Sinclair, K., Stier, P., van Diedenhoven, B., Wendisch, M., Werner, F., Wood, R., Zhang, Z., and Quaas, J.: Remote sensing of droplet number concentration in warm clouds: A review of the current state of knowledge and perspectives, Rev. Geophys., 56, 409–453, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017RG000593, 2018. 

Hammer, E., Gysel, M., Roberts, G. C., Elias, T., Hofer, J., Hoyle, C. R., Bukowiecki, N., Dupont, J.-C., Burnet, F., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Size-dependent particle activation properties in fog during the ParisFog 2012/13 field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10517–10533, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10517-2014, 2014. 

Hao, L. Q., Kortelainen, A., Romakkaniemi, S., Portin, H., Jaatinen, A., Leskinen, A., Komppula, M., Miettinen, P., Sueper, D., Pajunoja, A., Smith, J. N., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Worsnop, D. R., Laaksonen, A., and Virtanen, A.: Atmospheric submicron aerosol composition and particulate organic nitrate formation in a boreal forestland–urban mixed region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13483–13495, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13483-2014, 2014. 

Heikkinen, L., Äijälä, M., Riva, M., Luoma, K., Dällenbach, K., Aalto, J., Aalto, P., Aliaga, D., Aurela, M., Keskinen, H., Makkonen, U., Rantala, P., Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D., and Ehn, M.: Long-term sub-micrometer aerosol chemical composition in the boreal forest: inter- and intra-annual variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3151–3180, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3151-2020, 2020. 

Hussein, T., Karppinen, A., Kukkonen, J., Härkönen, J., Aalto, P. P., Hämeri, K., Kerminen, V., and Kulmala, M.: Meteorological dependence of size-fractionated number concentrations of urban aerosol particles, Atmos. Environ., 40, 1427–1440, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.10.061, 2006. 

Hyvärinen, A.-P., Raatikainen, T., Komppula, M., Mielonen, T., Sundström, A.-M., Brus, D., Panwar, T. S., Hooda, R. K., Sharma, V. P., de Leeuw, G., and Lihavainen, H.: Effect of the summer monsoon on aerosols at two measurement stations in Northern India – Part 2: Physical and optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8283–8294, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8283-2011, 2011. 

Jokinen, V. and Mäkelä, J. M.: Closed loop arrangement with crit-ical orifice for DMA sheath/excess flow system, J. Aerosol Sci., 28, 643–648, 1997. 

Komppula, M., Lihavainen, H., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., and Viisanen, Y.: Measurements of cloud droplet activation of aerosol particle at a clean subarctic background site, J. Geophys. Res., 110, 06204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005200, 2005. 

Laakso, L., Grönholm, T., Rannik, Ü., Kosmale, M., Fiedler, V., Vehkamäki, H., and Kulmala, M.: Ultrafine particle scavenging coefficients calculated from 6 years field measurements, Atmos. Environ., 37, 3605–3613, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00326-1, 2003. 

Latha, K. M., Badarinath, K. V. S., and Reddy, P. M.: Scavenging efficiency of rainfall on black carbon aerosols over an urban environment, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 6, 148–151, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.108, 2005. 

Leaitch, W. R., Macdonald, A. M., Brickell, P. C., Liggio, J., Sjostedt, S. J., Vlasenko, A., Bottenheim, J. W., Huang, L., Li, S., Liu, P. S. K., Toom-Sauntry, D., Hayden, K. A., Sharma, S., Shantz, N. C., Wiebe, H. A., Zhang, W., Abbatt, J. P. D., Slowik, J. G., Chang, R. Y., Russell, L. M., Schwartz, R. E., Takahama, S., Jayne, J. T., and Ng, N. L.: Temperature response of the submicron organic aerosol from temperate forests, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6696–6704, 2011. 

Leskinen, A., Portin, H., Komppula, M., Miettinen, P., Arola, A., Lihavainen, H., Hatakka, J., Laaksonen, A., and Lehtinen, K. E. J.: Overview of the research activities and results at Puijo semi-urban measurement station, Boreal Env. Res., 14, 576–590, 2009. 

Leskinen, A., Arola, A., Komppula, M., Portin, H., Tiitta, P., Miettinen, P., Romakkaniemi, S., Laaksonen, A., and Lehtinen, K. E. J.: Seasonal cycle and source analyses of aerosol optical properties in a semi-urban environment at Puijo station in Eastern Finland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5647–5659, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5647-2012, 2012. 

Leung, W. Y. H., Savre, J., Bender, F. A.-M., Komppula, M., Portin, H., Romakkaniemi, S., Sedlar, J., Noone, K., and Ekman, A. M. L.: The sensitivity of a continental nighttime stratocumulustopped boundary layer to varying environmental conditions, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 2911–2924, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2877, 2016 

Liao, L., Kerminen, V.-M., Boy, M., Kulmala, M., and Dal Maso, M.: Temperature influence on the natural aerosol budget over boreal forests, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8295–8308, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8295-2014, 2014. 

Lihavainen, H., Kerminen, V.-M., Komppula, M., Hyvärinen, A.-P., Laakia, J., Saarikoski, S., Makkonen, U., Kivekäs, N., Hillamo, R., Kulmala, M., and Viisanen, Y.: Measurements of the relation between aerosol properties and microphysics and chemistry of low level liquid water clouds in Northern Finland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6925–6938, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6925-2008, 2008. 

Liu, D., Allan, J., Whitehead, J., Young, D., Flynn, M., Coe, H., McFiggans, G., Fleming, Z. L., and Bandy, B.: Ambient black carbon particle hygroscopic properties controlled by mixing state and composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2015–2029, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013, 2013. 

Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005, 2005. 

Luoma, K., Virkkula, A., Aalto, P., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Over a 10-year record of aerosol optical properties at SMEAR II, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11363–11382, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11363-2019, 2019. 

Marcq, S., Laj, P., Roger, J. C., Villani, P., Sellegri, K., Bonasoni, P., Marinoni, A., Cristofanelli, P., Verza, G. P., and Bergin, M.: Aerosol optical properties and radiative forcing in the high Himalaya based on measurements at the Nepal Climate Observatory-Pyramid site (5079 m a.s.l.), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5859–5872, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5859-2010, 2010. 

McMeeking, G. R., Good, N., Petters, M. D., McFiggans, G., and Coe, H.: Influences on the fraction of hydrophobic and hydrophilic black carbon in the atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5099–5112, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5099-2011, 2011. 

Mertes, S., Verheggen, B., Walter, S., Connolly, P., Ebert, M., Schneider, J., Bower, K. N., Cozic, J., Weinbruch, S., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Counterflow virtual impactor based collection of small ice particles in mixed-phase clouds for the physico-chemical characterization of tropospheric ice nuclei: Sampler description and first case study, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 848–864, 2007. 

Mikkonen, S., Pitkänen, M. R. A., Nieminen, T., Lipponen, A., Isokääntä, S., Arola, A., and Lehtinen, K. E. J.: Technical note: Effects of uncertainties and number of data points on line fitting – a case study on new particle formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12531–12543, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12531-2019, 2019. 

Motos, G., Schmale, J., Corbin, J. C., Modini, Rob. L., Karlen, N., Bertò, M., Baltensperger, U., and Gysel-Beer, M.: Cloud droplet activation properties and scavenged fraction of black carbon in liquid-phase clouds at the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch (3580 m a.s.l.), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3833–3855, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3833-2019, 2019. 

Noone, K. J., Ogren, J. A., Heintzenberg, J., Charlson, R. J., and Covert, D. S.: Design and calibration of a counterflow virtual impactor for sampling of atmospheric fog and cloud droplets, Aerosol. Sci. Tech., 8, 235–244, 1988. 

Paasonen, P., Asmi, A., Petaja, T., Kajos, M. K., Aijala, M., Junninen, H., Holst, T., Abbatt, J. P. D., Arneth, A., Birmili, W., Hamed, A., Hoffer, A., Laakso, L., Laaksonen, A., Richard Leaitch, W., Plass-Dulmer, C., Pryor, S. C., Raisanen, P., Swietlicki, E., Wiedensohler, A., Worsnop, D. R., Kerminen, V., and Kulmala, M.: Warming-induced increase in aerosol number concentration likely to moderate climate change, Nat. Geosci., 6, 438–442, 2013. 

Petzold, A. and Schönlinner, M.: Multi-angle absorption photometry – a new method for the measurement of aerosol light absorption and atmospheric black carbon, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 421–441, 2004. 

Pitkänen, M. R. A., Mikkonen, S., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Lipponen, A., and Arola, A.: Artificial bias typically neglected in comparisons of uncertain atmospheric data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 10003–10011, 2016 

Portin, H., Komppula, M., Leskinen, A. P., Romakkaniemi, S., Laaksonen, A., Lehtinen, K. E. J.: Observations of Aerosol-cloud Interactions at the Puijo Semi-Urban Measurement Station, Boreal Env. Res., 14, 641–653, 2009. 

Portin, H., Leskinen, A., Hao, L., Kortelainen, A., Miettinen, P., Jaatinen, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Romakkaniemi, S., and Komppula, M.: The effect of local sources on particle size and chemical composition and their role in aerosol–cloud interactions at Puijo measurement station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6021–6034, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6021-2014, 2014. 

Romakkaniemi, S., Maalick, Z., Hellsten, A., Ruuskanen, A., Väisänen, O., Ahmad, I., Tonttila, J., Mikkonen, S., Komppula, M., and Kühn, T.: Aerosol–landscape–cloud interaction: signatures of topography effect on cloud droplet formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7955–7964, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7955-2017, 2017. 

Schneider, J., Mertes, S., van Pinxteren, D., Herrmann, H., and Borrmann, S.: Uptake of nitric acid, ammonia, and organics in orographic clouds: mass spectrometric analyses of droplet residual and interstitial aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1571–1593, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1571-2017, 2017. 

Swietlicki, E., Hansson, H. C., Hameri, K., Svenningsson, B., Massling, A., McFiggans, G., McMurry, P. H., Petaja, T., Tunved, P., Gysel, M., Topping, D., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., Rissler, J., Wiedensohler, A., and Kulmala, M.: Hygroscopic properties of submicrometer atmospheric aerosol particles measured with H-TDMA instruments in various environments – a review, Tellus B, 60, 432–469, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00350.x, 2008. 

Tarvainen, V., Hakola, H., Hellén, H., Bäck, J., Hari, P., and Kulmala, M.: Temperature and light dependence of the VOC emissions of Scots pine, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 989–998, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-989-2005, 2005. 

Twohy, C. H., Strapp, J. W., and Wendisch, M.: Performance of a Counterflow Virtual Impactor in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 20, 781–790, 2003.  

Väisänen, O., Ruuskanen, A., Ylisirniö, A., Miettinen, P., Portin, H., Hao, L., Leskinen, A., Komppula, M., Romakkaniemi, S., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Virtanen, A.: In-cloud measurements highlight the role of aerosol hygroscopicity in cloud droplet formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10385–10398, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10385-2016, 2016. 

Väisänen, O., Hao, L., Virtane,n A., and Romakkaniemi, S.: Trajectory-based analysis on the source areas and transportation pathways of atmospheric particulate matter over Eastern Finland, Tellus B, 72, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2020.1799687, 2020. 

Verheggen, B., Cozic, J., Weingartner, E., Bower, K., Mertes, S., Connolly, P., Gallagher, M., Flynn, M., Choularton, T., and Baltensperger, U.: Aerosol partitioning between the interstitial and condensed phase in mixed-phase clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D23202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008714, 2007. 

Wang, J. M., Jeong, C., Zimmerman, N., Healy, R. M., Hilker, N., and Evans, G. J.: Real-World Emission of Particles from Vehicles: Volatility and the Effects of Ambient Temperature, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 4081–4090, 2017. 

Weingartner, E., Nyeki, S., and Baltensperger, U.: Seasonal and diurnal variation of aerosol size distributions (10 < D < 750 nm) at a high-alpine site (Jungfraujoch 3580 m asl), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 26809–26820, 1999. 

Winklmayr, W., Reischl, G. P., Lindner, A., and Berner, A.: A newelectromobility spectrometer for the measurement of aerosol sizedistributions in the size range from 1 to 1000 nm, J. Aerosol Sci., 22, 289–296, 1991. 

Wonaschuetz, A., Sorooshian, A., Ervens, B., Chuang, P. Y., Feingold, G., Murphy, S. M., de Gouw, J., Warneke, C., and Jonsson, H. H.: Aerosol and gas re-distribution by shallow cumulus clouds: An investigation using airborne measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D17202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018089, 2012. 

Yamagata, S., Kobayashi, D., Ohta, S., Murao, N., Shiobara, M., Wada, M., Yabuki, M., Konishi, H., and Yamanouchi, T.: Properties of aerosols and their wet deposition in the arctic spring during ASTAR2004 at Ny-Alesund, Svalbard, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 261–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-261-2009, 2009. 

Yang, Y., Fu, Y., Lin, Q., Jiang, F., Lian, X., Li, L., Wang, Z., Zhang, G., Bi, X., Wang, X., and Sheng, G.: Recent Advances in Quantifying Wet Scavenging Efficiency of Black Carbon Aerosol, Atmosphere, 10, 175, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040175, 2019. 

Zhang, X., Huang, Y., and Rao, R.: Aerosol characteristics including fumigation effect under weak precipitation over the southeastern coast of China, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 84/85, 25–36, 2012. 

Download
Short summary
The study focuses mainly on cloud-scavenging efficiency of absorbing particulate matter (mainly black carbon) but additionally covers cloud-scavenging efficiency of scattering particles and statistics of cloud condensation nuclei. The main findings give insight into how black carbon is distributed in different particle sizes and the sensitivity to cloud scavenged. The main findings are useful for large-scale modelling for evaluating cloud scavenging.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint