Articles | Volume 20, issue 20
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11893–11906, 2020

Special issue: In-depth study of air pollution sources and processes within...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11893–11906, 2020

Research article 22 Oct 2020

Research article | 22 Oct 2020

Using a coupled large-eddy simulation–aerosol radiation model to investigate urban haze: sensitivity to aerosol loading and meteorological conditions

Jessica Slater et al.

Related authors

Secondary organic aerosol phase behaviour in chamber photo-oxidation of mixed precursors
Yu Wang, Aristeidis Voliotis, Yunqi Shao, Taomou Zong, Xiangxinyue Meng, Mao Du, Dawei Hu, Ying Chen, Zhijun Wu, M. Rami Alfarra, and Gordon McFiggans
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,,, 2021
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary
Evaluating the sensitivity of radical chemistry and ozone formation to ambient VOCs and NOx in Beijing
Lisa K. Whalley, Eloise J. Slater, Robert Woodward-Massey, Chunxiang Ye, James D. Lee, Freya Squires, James R. Hopkins, Rachel E. Dunmore, Marvin Shaw, Jacqueline F. Hamilton, Alastair C. Lewis, Archit Mehra, Stephen D. Worrall, Asan Bacak, Thomas J. Bannan, Hugh Coe, Carl J. Percival, Bin Ouyang, Roderic L. Jones, Leigh R. Crilley, Louisa J. Kramer, William J. Bloss, Tuan Vu, Simone Kotthaus, Sue Grimmond, Yele Sun, Weiqi Xu, Siyao Yue, Lujie Ren, W. Joe F. Acton, C. Nicholas Hewitt, Xinming Wang, Pingqing Fu, and Dwayne E. Heard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2125–2147,,, 2021
Short summary
Observations on aerosol optical properties and scavenging during cloud events
Antti Ruuskanen, Sami Romakkaniemi, Harri Kokkola, Antti Arola, Santtu Mikkonen, Harri Portin, Annele Virtanen, Kari E. J. Lehtinen, Mika Komppula, and Ari Leskinen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1683–1695,,, 2021
Short summary
Low-NO atmospheric oxidation pathways in a polluted megacity
Mike J. Newland, Daniel J. Bryant, Rachel E. Dunmore, Thomas J. Bannan, W. Joe F. Acton, Ben Langford, James R. Hopkins, Freya A. Squires, William Dixon, William S. Drysdale, Peter D. Ivatt, Mathew J. Evans, Peter M. Edwards, Lisa K. Whalley, Dwayne E. Heard, Eloise J. Slater, Robert Woodward-Massey, Chunxiang Ye, Archit Mehra, Stephen D. Worrall, Asan Bacak, Hugh Coe, Carl J. Percival, C. Nicholas Hewitt, James D. Lee, Tianqu Cui, Jason D. Surratt, Xinming Wang, Alastair C. Lewis, Andrew R. Rickard, and Jacqueline F. Hamilton
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1613–1625,,, 2021
Short summary
PyCHAM (v2.1.1): a Python box model for simulating aerosol chambers
Simon Patrick O'Meara, Shuxuan Xu, David Topping, M. Rami Alfarra, Gerard Capes, Douglas Lowe, Yunqi Shao, and Gordon McFiggans
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 675–702,,, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Dynamics | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
The spring transition of the North Pacific jet and its relation to deep stratosphere-to-troposphere mass transport over western North America
Melissa L. Breeden, Amy H. Butler, John R. Albers, Michael Sprenger, and Andrew O'Neil Langford
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2781–2794,,, 2021
Short summary
Very long-period oscillations in the atmosphere (0–110 km)
Dirk Offermann, Christoph Kalicinsky, Ralf Koppmann, and Johannes Wintel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1593–1611,,, 2021
Short summary
Identification of molecular cluster evaporation rates, cluster formation enthalpies and entropies by Monte Carlo method
Anna Shcherbacheva, Tracey Balehowsky, Jakub Kubečka, Tinja Olenius, Tapio Helin, Heikki Haario, Marko Laine, Theo Kurtén, and Hanna Vehkamäki
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15867–15906,,, 2020
Short summary
The “urban meteorology island”: a multi-model ensemble analysis
Jan Karlický, Peter Huszár, Tereza Nováková, Michal Belda, Filip Švábik, Jana Ďoubalová, and Tomáš Halenka
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15061–15077,,, 2020
Short summary
Validation of reanalysis Southern Ocean atmosphere trends using sea ice data
William R. Hobbs, Andrew R. Klekociuk, and Yuhang Pan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14757–14768,,, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Ács, F., Mihailović, D. T., and Rajković, B.: A Coupled Soil Moisture and Surface Temperature Prediction Model, J. Appl. Meteorol., 30, 812–822,<0812:ACSMAS>2.0.CO;2, 1991. a, b
Andrejczuk, M., Gadian, A., and Blyth, A.: Numerical simulations of stratocumulus cloud response to aerosol perturbation, Atmos. Res., 140–141, 76–84,, 2014. a
Bellon, G. and Stevens, B.: Using the sensitivity of large-eddy simulations to evaluate atmospheric boundary layer models, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 1582–1601,, 2012. a
Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light absorption by carbonaceous particles: An investigative review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 27–67,, 2006. a
Byun, D. W.: Dynamically consistent formulations in meteorological and air quality models for multiscale atmospheric studies. Part II: Mass conservation issues, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 3808–3820,<3808:DCFIMA>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a
Short summary
The feedback effect between aerosol particles, radiation and meteorology reduces turbulent motion and results in increased surface aerosol concentrations during Beijing haze. Observational analysis and regional modelling studies have examined the feedback effect but these studies are limited. In this work, we set up a high-resolution model for the Beijing environment to examine the sensitivity of the aerosol feedback effect to initial meteorological conditions and aerosol loading.
Final-revised paper