Articles | Volume 19, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-577-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-577-2019
Research article
 | 
16 Jan 2019
Research article |  | 16 Jan 2019

Stratospheric ozone loss in the Arctic winters between 2005 and 2013 derived with ACE-FTS measurements

Debora Griffin, Kaley A. Walker, Ingo Wohltmann, Sandip S. Dhomse, Markus Rex, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Wuhu Feng, Gloria L. Manney, Jane Liu, and David Tarasick

Related authors

The Global Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System version 1.0
Kerry Anderson, Jack Chen, Peter Englefield, Debora Griffin, Paul Makar, and Dan Thompson
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-31,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-31, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
The differences between remote sensing and in situ air pollutants measurements over the Canadian Oil Sands
Xiaoyi Zhao, Vitali Fioletov, Debora Griffin, Chris McLinden, Ralf Staebler, Cristian Mihele, Kevin Strawbridge, Jonathan Davies, Ihab Abboud, Sum Chi Lee, Alexander Cede, Martin Tiefengraber, and Robert Swap
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-27,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-27, 2024
Preprint under review for AMT
Short summary
Spherical air mass factors in one and two dimensions with SASKTRAN 1.6.0
Lukas Fehr, Chris McLinden, Debora Griffin, Daniel Zawada, Doug Degenstein, and Adam Bourassa
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7491–7507, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7491-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7491-2023, 2023
Short summary
Estimation of anthropogenic and volcanic SO2 emissions from satellite data in the presence of snow/ice on the ground
Vitali E. Fioletov, Chris A. McLinden, Debora Griffin, Nickolay A. Krotkov, Can Li, Joanna Joiner, Nicolas Theys, and Simon Carn
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5575–5592, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5575-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5575-2023, 2023
Short summary
Towards an improved understanding of wildfire CO emissions: a satellite remote-sensing perspective
Debora Griffin, Jack Chen, Kerry Anderson, Paul Makar, Chris A. McLinden, Enrico Dammers, and Andre Fogal
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-649,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-649, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Remote Sensing | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
The Antarctic stratospheric nitrogen hole: Southern Hemisphere and Antarctic springtime total nitrogen dioxide and total ozone variability as observed by Sentinel-5p TROPOMI
Adrianus de Laat, Jos van Geffen, Piet Stammes, Ronald van der A, Henk Eskes, and J. Pepijn Veefkind
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4511–4535, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4511-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4511-2024, 2024
Short summary
Solar FTIR measurements of NOx vertical distributions – Part 1: First observational evidence of a seasonal variation in the diurnal increasing rates of stratospheric NO2 and NO
Pinchas Nürnberg, Markus Rettinger, and Ralf Sussmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3743–3757, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3743-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3743-2024, 2024
Short summary
Trends in polar ozone loss since 1989: potential sign of recovery in the Arctic ozone column
Andrea Pazmiño, Florence Goutail, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Alain Hauchecorne, Jean-Pierre Pommereau, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Wuhu Feng, Franck Lefèvre, Audrey Lecouffe, Michel Van Roozendael, Nis Jepsen, Georg Hansen, Rigel Kivi, Kimberly Strong, and Kaley A. Walker
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15655–15670, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15655-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15655-2023, 2023
Short summary
No severe ozone depletion in the tropical stratosphere in recent decades
Jayanarayanan Kuttippurath, Gopalakrishna Pillai Gopikrishnan, Rolf Müller, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, and Jerome Brioude
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2574,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2574, 2023
Short summary
Climatology, sources, and transport characteristics of observed water vapor extrema in the lower stratosphere
Emily N. Tinney and Cameron R. Homeyer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14375–14392, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14375-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14375-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, C., Strong, K., Batchelor, R. L., Bernath, P. F., Brohede, S., Boone, C., Degenstein, D., Daffer, W. H., Drummond, J. R., Fogal, P. F., Farahani, E., Fayt, C., Fraser, A., Goutail, F., Hendrick, F., Kolonjari, F., Lindenmaier, R., Manney, G., McElroy, C. T., McLinden, C. A., Mendonca, J., Park, J.-H., Pavlovic, B., Pazmino, A., Roth, C., Savastiouk, V., Walker, K. A., Weaver, D., and Zhao, X.: Severe 2011 ozone depletion assessed with 11 years of ozone, NO2, and OClO measurements at 80 N, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L05806, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050478, 2012. a, b
Adams, C., Strong, K., Zhao, X., Bourassa, A. E., Daffer, W. H., Degenstein, D., Drummond, J. R., Farahani, E. E., Fraser, A., Lloyd, N. D., Manney, G. L., McLinden, C. A., Rex, M., Roth, C., Strahan, S. E., Walker, K. A., and Wohltmann, I.: The spring 2011 final stratospheric warming above Eureka: anomalous dynamics and chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 611–624, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-611-2013, 2013. a
Andrews, D. G.: Some comparisons between the middle atmosphere dynamics for the southern and northern hemispheres, Pure Appl. Geophys., 130, 213–232, 1989. a
Arnold, F.: Stratospheric aerosol increases and ozone destruction: Implications from mass spectrometer measurements, Ber. Bunsen Ges. Phys. Chem., 96, 339–350, 1992. a
Arnone, E., Castelli, E., Papandrea, E., Carlotti, M., and Dinelli, B. M.: Extreme ozone depletion in the 2010–2011 Arctic winter stratosphere as observed by MIPAS/ENVISAT using a 2-D tomographic approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9149–9165, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9149-2012, 2012. a
Download
Short summary
Ozone in the stratosphere is important to protect the Earth from UV radiation. Using measurements taken by the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment satellite between 2005 and 2013, we examine different methods to calculate the ozone loss in the high Arctic and establish the altitude at which most of the ozone is destroyed. Our results show that the different methods agree within the uncertainties. Recommendations are made on which methods are most appropriate to use.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint