Observational evidence of energetic particle precipitation NOx (EPP-NOx) interaction with chlorine curbing Antarctic ozone loss
We investigate the impact of the so-called energetic particle precipitation (EPP) indirect effect on lower stratospheric ozone, ClO, and ClONO2 in the Antarctic springtime. We use observations from the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) and Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on Aura, the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment – Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) on SCISAT, and the Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) on Envisat, covering the period from 2005 to 2017. Using the geomagnetic activity index Ap as a proxy for EPP, we find consistent ozone increases with elevated EPP during years with an easterly phase of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) in both OMI and MLS observations. While these increases are the opposite of what has previously been reported at higher altitudes, the pattern in the MLS O3 follows the typical descent patterns of EPP-NOx. The ozone enhancements are also present in the OMI total O3 column observations. Analogous to the descent patterns found in O3, we also found consistent decreases in springtime MLS ClO following winters with elevated EPP. To verify if this is due to a previously proposed mechanism involving the conversion of ClO to the reservoir species ClONO2 in reaction with NO2, we used ClONO2 observations from ACE-FTS and MIPAS. As ClO and NO2 are both catalysts in ozone destruction, the conversion to ClONO2 would result in an ozone increase. We find a positive correlation between EPP and ClONO2 in the upper stratosphere in the early spring and in the lower stratosphere in late spring, providing the first observational evidence supporting the previously proposed mechanism relating to EPP-NOx modulating Clx-driven ozone loss. Our findings suggest that EPP has played an important role in modulating ozone depletion in the last 15 years. As chlorine loading in the polar stratosphere continues to decrease in the future, this buffering mechanism will become less effective, and catalytic ozone destruction by EPP-NOx will likely become a major contributor to Antarctic ozone loss.
Our understanding of the causes of the Antarctic stratospheric ozone hole (Farman et al., 1985) relies on half a century of discoveries about the Earth's atmosphere: the Brewer–Dobson circulation (Brewer, 1949), which allows gases such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) emitted in the tropical troposphere to be drawn into the southern polar atmosphere; the strong polar vortex in the Southern Hemisphere, which allows the polar stratosphere to become very cold, with a net downwelling effect pulling gases from the mesosphere and upper stratosphere into the lower stratosphere (Schoeberl and Hartmann, 1991); and polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs), forming in the very cold lower stratosphere which, with the reintroduction of sunlight in the early spring, enable the breakdown of chlorine reservoirs into simpler Clx () molecules on the cloud surfaces (Solomon et al., 1986). Clx is effective at catalytically destroying ozone via one such chain of reactions:
In the lower stratosphere, Clx is, for most of the year, stored in reservoir species such as HCl and ClONO2. Clx is activated from these species in heterogeneous reactions in the springtime – hence the importance of PSCs providing solid and liquid particles. As PSCs disappear with warming of the stratosphere as spring progresses, Clx is converted back to these reservoirs via reactions such as
Reactions (R3)–(R5) require the presence of HOx () or NOx () gases. This indicates that the presence of HOx and NOx gases in the lower and middle stratosphere plays a critical role as a limiter in Clx-driven O3 loss until the eventual removal of Clx from the atmosphere via gravitational sedimentation of HCl.
In the context of polar ozone loss, in the past 20 years we have learned more about the impact of energetic particle precipitation (EPP). EPP is the flux of charged particles of solar and magnetospheric origin into the Earth's atmosphere. For the most part, this is made up of energetic electrons, with solar proton events (SPEs; the precipitation of energetic protons) being more sporadic (Seppälä et al., 2014). Energetic particles ionize the neutral atmosphere, and the resulting chain of reactions is a key source of NOx and HOx in the mesosphere and upper stratosphere. NOx and HOx act as catalysts in ozone-depleting reaction cycles such as
and this EPP-driven ozone loss has been the topic of a large number of studies in the past decades. Note here that this role of HOx and NOx in ozone balance is the opposite to their ozone-loss-limiting impact via the build-up of reservoirs such as ClONO2 in the lower and middle stratosphere.
The role of HOx and NOx in in situ EPP-driven ozone loss is now well known (see e.g. Jackman et al., 2008; Andersson et al., 2014). Polar ozone is also affected via the so-called “EPP indirect effect” (Randall et al., 2006). This refers to the process of transport of NOx, produced by energetic particles at altitudes above 50 km (“EPP-NOx”), to stratospheric altitudes, where it can contribute to ozone loss. When EPP occurs over the winter poles, the lack of sunlight results in an increased photochemical lifetime of NOx, and the stable atmosphere provides a route for downwelling to stratospheric altitudes. This mechanism for EPP-NOx descent is well-documented (see e.g. Siskind et al., 2000; Randall et al., 2005; Seppälä et al., 2007; Randall et al., 2007; Funke et al., 2014a, b; Gordon et al., 2020), and the depleting effect on ozone has been reported by a number of studies; for example, Randall et al. (2005) used observations from HALOE (HALogen Occultation Experiment), SAGE (Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment) II and III, POAM (Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement) II and III, MIPAS (Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding), and OSIRIS (Optical Spectrograph and InfraRed Imager System) to detect the NOx increases in the Northern Hemisphere in January to March 2004 and reported ozone loss in March 2004 in the polar stratosphere. This was attributed to the combination of geomagnetic activity occurring in the winter and the reformation of the polar vortex following a sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) earlier in the winter. Seppälä et al. (2007) used the geomagnetic index Ap as a proxy for EPP levels. They correlated the 4-month wintertime average Ap value with the wintertime NO2 data from GOMOS (Global Ozone Monitoring by Occultation of Stars) from 2002 to 2006 for both hemispheres, finding a robust linear relationship between the two. They also noted ozone loss and suggested that it is due to the descent of EPP-NOx. Damiani et al. (2016) looked directly at ozone observations from the Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet Radiometer (SBUV) and the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS, on the Aura satellite), together spanning the period from 1979 to 2014. They found ozone depletion of around 10 %–15% descending to 30 km (middle stratosphere) in September before disappearing. By comparing this with simultaneous HNO3 enhancements in the Aura period (2004–2014), they were able to attribute the ozone depletion to NOx increases from EPP (HNO3 is a reservoir of NOx).
Recent studies have looked at the descent of NOx in the Southern Hemisphere in more detail. Funke et al. (2014a) used tracer correlations to extract EPP-NOy (NOy refers to all reactive nitrogen) from total NOy and found that it reached altitudes as low as 20–25 km in the Southern Hemisphere by September. In the Antarctic spring, these correspond to altitudes where the ozone hole forms. Gordon et al. (2020) use a similar Ap scheme to Siskind et al. (2000) and Seppälä et al. (2007) to detect EPP-NO2 in the stratospheric total NO2 column using observations from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI). They found that the NO2 column is significantly correlated with Ap until November. This presence in the NO2 stratospheric column suggests that perturbations in EPP-NO2 contribute significantly to the overall amount of NO2 present in the stratosphere, as well as indicating that the EPP-NOy reported by Funke et al. (2014a) remains in the atmosphere longer, until the breakdown of the polar vortex. Gordon et al. (2020) also found that accounting for the phase of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) results in an increased correlation between Ap and the stratospheric NO2 column in years with an easterly phase of the QBO, whereas the inverse was found for the westerly QBO phase. They postulate that this modulation by the QBO could reflect the influence of the QBO on the primary (non-EPP) NOx source via transport from the equatorial region (see Strahan et al., 2015), combined with the effect that the QBO has on polar temperatures, which would influence the efficiency of removal of nitrogen species from the polar stratosphere. They show evidence that the QBO affects the temperature of the polar vortex in winter, with a warmer vortex in easterly QBO (eQBO) years. This leads to inhibited PSC formation and, hence, less effective removal of nitrogen species from the lower stratosphere.
Here, we investigate the effect of EPP-NOx on stratospheric ozone, focusing on the time of the ozone hole formation in the spring. Our analysis follows on from the results reported by Gordon et al. (2020), now focusing on the implications of the enhanced stratospheric NO2 column on the Antarctic stratospheric ozone balance. We use ozone and chlorine species observations from three different satellite platforms (and four instruments), spanning the time period from 2005 to 2017, to get a more cohesive view on interactions taking place with EPP-NOx, atmospheric chlorine, and ozone. We control our analysis for EPP levels (as proxied by the Ap index) and the phase of the QBO. Following from the initial analysis of ozone, we examine how EPP affects Clx activation in the springtime, by using ClO observations from MLS, and ClONO2 from Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment – Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) and MIPAS observations. We find that ozone tends to increase in years with high EPP and easterly QBO and suggest that this could be attributed to the combined effect of EPP and the QBO on the activation and deactivation of Clx.
We use ozone and ClO profiles (v4.2) from the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS), on the Aura satellite (Schwartz et al., 2015; Santee et al., 2015). The data have been sorted according to Livesey et al. (2017), i.e removing data that do not meet the recommended quality standards. The O3 profiles have been validated by Froidevaux et al. (2008), with further comparison to ground-based and other satellite measurements by Hubert et al. (2016). Here, we use stratospheric O3 observations (15 to 50 km) with a vertical resolution of around 3 km and an uncertainty of no more than 4 %.
MLS ClO is valid throughout the stratosphere, although the lowermost altitudes (15–18 km) suffer from a negative bias. The bias, which has been uniform throughout the MLS period, is least significant in the polar region and is also systematic: each latitude is affected in the same way. We mitigate the effect of the bias by looking at anomalies, as any systematic bias will not affect the overall trend. As anomalies are differences from a mean, any shift is cancelled in subtraction. The vertical resolution of stratospheric ClO is around 3 km, and the error on individual profiles is around ±0.1 ppbv (Livesey et al., 2017). We do not use ClO from dusk until dawn (i.e. night-time) due to rapid conversion of ClO to the Cl2O2 dimer at night-time (Brasseur and Solomon, 2005). Excluding these measurements avoids the change in partitioning between day and night. We sort for day by only using profiles with a solar zenith angle . MLS ClO profiles have been validated by Santee et al. (2008).
We analyse ozone total column data from the Dutch–Finnish-built Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), also on Aura (Bhartia, 2012). Here, we use the OMI O3 version 3, level 2 daily gridded product ( OMTO3G version 3). The algorithm is described by Bhartia (2002, 2007) with validation of OMI O3 reported by McPeters et al. (2008). OMI total O3 column measurements have an estimated error of around 1 %–2 %. The ozone column is provided in Dobson units (DU). Since 2007, OMI has been experiencing an issue known as the row anomaly, where certain fields of view are blocked (Schenkeveld et al., 2017). This issue has been accounted for in the data used here, and we exclude all row-anomaly-affected data in this study.
Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment – Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) is an instrument on the Canadian SCISAT satellite (see e.g. Boone et al., 2005). We use ACE ClONO2 level 2, version 4.0, sorted according to Boone et al. (2019), removing recommended outliers (Sheese et al., 2015). We use only profiles in the southern polar region (poleward of 60∘ S) for the months of August and September. Like MLS ClO, negative bias exists in ClONO2 but, as for MLS ClO, this is mitigated here through the use of anomalies as although the bias is altitude dependent, it is consistent in time throughout the dataset. ACE ClONO2 has been validated by Wolff et al. (2008) and more recently by Sheese et al. (2016).
Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) is a limb-sounding instrument on the European Space Agency's Envisat satellite. Here we use the Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung (IMK) at Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe and the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA) product. The algorithm is described by von Clarmann et al. (2009). MIPAS was fully operational from July 2002 until March 2004. An error with the instrument then resulted in reduced duty cycles and data holes, with full coverage resuming in January 2006, lasting until February 2012. For our analysis, we exclude observations from the years before the instrument error due to events that resulted in surges of NOx in the stratosphere owing to transport or in situ production during the Southern Hemisphere winter and spring (López-Puertas et al., 2005; Funke et al., 2014a), and we utilize MIPAS ClONO2 observations (V5R_CLONO2_222/223) for the Antarctic springtime from 2006 to 2011. MIPAS ClONO2 observations have been validated by Höpfner et al. (2007) and were found to be consistent with ACE-FTS ClONO2 by both Wolff et al. (2008) and Sheese et al. (2016).
2.5 EPP proxy
Analogous to Gordon et al. (2020), we use the geomagnetic activity index Ap as a proxy for the overall winter EPP levels. We take the mean Ap index from May to August of each individual year (consistent with previous studies such as Siskind et al., 2000, and Seppälä et al., 2007, and denote this 4-month mean Ap as . Explicitly, when investigating the Antarctic atmosphere in August–December of, for example, the year 2012, we would contrast it with the average Ap of the preceding winter, May–August of 2012.
The average for the study period was 8.3, and the values for each individual year are given in Table 1.
To account for the influence of the QBO in our analysis, we bin the years according to the phase of the QBO in May, as the QBO in this month captures the effect of the QBO on the polar vortex (see Gordon et al., 2020). To determine the phase of the QBO, we use the equatorial zonal mean zonal wind at the 25 hPa level (see Baldwin and Dunkerton, 1998, for an explanation of the use of this level in the Southern Hemisphere). Years where the zonal mean zonal wind is easterly are designated as easterly QBO (eQBO), whereas westerly winds are designated as westerly QBO (wQBO). The QBO phase for each year of the study is listed in Table 1.
2.7 Methods: anomalies and correlation
We analyse correlation between and various trace gases in the atmosphere. For this purpose, we use the Spearman rank correlation coefficient ρ, which correlates two non-normally distributed datasets (von Storch and Zwiers, 1999). For significance testing purposes, the correlation is characterized as significant if the p value is less than 0.05 – that is, the correlation is significant at 95 % or higher.
Correlation studies can be misleading in their results, as they view data through a purely statistical lens and do not account for underlying physics. Here, significance of a correlation is tested if we have a reason to speculate on a connection based on known physical or chemical properties or analysis of observational data. Thus, we first check for evidence in anomalies of observational data. As discussed in Sect. 1, work by Gordon et al. (2020) has shown evidence that EPP (as proxied by ) and the QBO affect trace gases in the stratosphere. Here, we will examine the composite anomalies for different combinations of QBO phase and level for each trace gas analysed. Years with are designated as high (h-), and years with are designated as low (l-). A value of 8.3 is chosen, as it is the mean for the study period. See Table 1 for more details.
In the time period under investigation there has been a reduction in equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC). This reduction in chlorine and the following gradual recovery of stratospheric ozone has been mitigated in the analysis by detrending the observations for all correlation calculations. Here, detrending was performed by calculating the yearly trend with a linear least squares fit and then subtracting this from the data. This was not applied to the results presenting composite anomalies, which are shown here as an indication of the overall variability in the volume mixing ratios.
We note that other factors can also pay a role in Antarctic stratospheric ozone levels, most notably solar spectral irradiance (SSI), varying with the 11-year solar cycle, and the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Due to the limited time series of observations, it is not possible to robustly control for all. However, we note that the effect of SSI has limited influence on springtime Antarctic ozone variability, and the effects are mainly limited to above the 10 hPa level (Matthes et al., 2017). Some studies have suggested that ENSO can both influence stratospheric ozone variability (Lin and Qian, 2019) and potentially be influenced by Antarctic ozone variability (Manatsa and Mukwada, 2017). However, as with solar irradiance, the ENSO influence on Antarctic ozone variability appears to be limited to the upper stratosphere, above the 10 hPa level (Lin and Qian, 2019).
3.1 MLS profile observations
To find the indirect effect of EPP on ozone in the springtime Antarctic stratosphere, we analyse the ozone anomaly for four different categories: high and eQBO, low and eQBO, high and wQBO, and low and wQBO (see Table 1). The average MLS polar (60–82∘ S) O3 from 2005 to 2017 is shown in Fig. 1a as a composite zonal 3 d running mean. Hereafter, all data averaged over a range of polar latitudes are area weighted by cos (latitude) to avoid emphasizing the highest latitudes. The y axis is pressure from 100 (approx. 18 km) to 1 hPa (approx. 50 km), and the x axis is time from early August until the end of December. Here, we can see the ozone hole forming at pressure levels below 20 hPa ( km) from September. Figure 1 b–e show the composite anomaly from the mean (panel a) for the four different combinations of and QBO phase. Years with high (panels b and d) exhibit a positive anomaly of around +0.1 ppmv in ozone in the middle stratosphere in August and September (∼20 hPa), whereas low- years (panels c and e) show the opposite (reduced ozone). This implies that a positive anomaly in the middle stratosphere in August and September could be linked to high . Years with eQBO (Fig. 1b, c) display a positive anomaly ( ppmv or <10 % increase from the mean) in the middle stratosphere in October, whereas wQBO years (Fig. 1d, e) show the opposite. This suggests that the anomaly is likely related to the QBO phase and could be linked to the effect noted by Garcia and Solomon (1987) and Lait et al. (1989): more ozone is present in the southern polar stratosphere in years with eQBO. In the lower stratosphere in November, positive (negative) anomaly occurs in high (low) years. This indicates that these changes are linked to EPP: high results in ozone increases in November. In the middle stratosphere (∼20 hPa) in December, high appears to result in a negative ozone anomaly ( ppmv or <10 % reduction from the mean). Overall, Fig. 1 provides evidence of the combined role of the QBO and EPP in ozone in the Antarctic stratosphere, with being important in the mid to upper stratosphere in early spring. However, the QBO tends to dominate in the lower stratosphere in mid-Spring (positive anomaly with eQBO, negative anomaly for wQBO) with EPP appearing to affect the signal in the lower stratosphere in mid-November (negative for high , positive for low ).
The above analysis indicates increases in ozone associated with high and, thus, high EPP, while also finding ozone decreases associated with the westerly phase of the QBO. We now look to see if the ozone increases linked to are correlated with levels and how this is modulated by the QBO phase. This is presented in Fig. 2 for all years (panel a), eQBO years (panel b), and wQBO years (panel c). There is significant anti-correlation ( to −0.6) in the upper stratosphere around 2 hPa in panels a and b. This suggests that increases in indeed result in ozone loss in this area, particularly during eQBO. These ozone reductions are consistent with O3 loss due to the EPP-NOx descending in the polar vortex, as the pattern of descending significant negative correlation is consistent with the reported descending EPP-NOx “tongue” (see e.g. Funke et al., 2014a). However, for eQBO conditions (Fig. 2b), the correlation pattern, which descends in time, is accompanied by a strong positive correlation (ρ>0.6) below ∼10 hPa in November. This indicates that EPP in eQBO years also contributes to ozone increases. At this time both Fig. a and b show positive correlation in the middle and lower stratosphere, although this is only statistically significant during eQBO years. We note that the positive correlation pattern does appear earlier and seems to descend with the negative pattern, but the positive correlation does not become statistically significant until November. A similar dipole pattern has previously been seen in model simulations with suggestions that it may be linked to chlorine and bromine chemistry (Jackman et al., 2009; Andersson et al., 2018). Our results here seem to suggest that increased results in ozone enhancement in November and that eQBO strengthens this relationship. There is little consistent correlation present in Fig. 2c; thus, there is no clear relation between polar springtime ozone profile variability and in wQBO years.
3.2 OMI column observations
We now repeat the analysis for the daily OMI total ozone column, instead of profile measurements. This is to verify whether the changes in ozone associated with EPP and the QBO are detectable in the ozone total column. While we lose the information contained in vertical profiles, we gain higher horizontal resolution. Note that the OMI data with 0.25∘ gridding has been averaged here over 1∘ latitude bins.
The composite 3 d running mean O3 column from 2005 to 2017 is presented in Fig. 3a. The figure shows zonal mean ozone for each latitude poleward of 50∘ S in 1∘ bins as spring progresses from early August to the end of the December. Note that (1) no area weighting is required here; and (2) there are no data for the polar night, as OMI O3 is measured with backscattered solar radiation. A key feature of Fig. 3a is the formation of the ozone hole in the springtime, with minimum ozone values of less than 150 DU in late September–early October at the pole. Figure 3b–e show the composite anomaly from the mean (panel a) for the same combinations of QBO phase and as before. Figure 3b corresponds to the anomaly for eQBO and h- years. In this case, the anomaly is almost entirely positive, with the largest values (>80 DU) occurring in mid-November. This implies that the combination of high and eQBO results in increased ozone throughout the springtime but especially in November. Figure 3c (eQBO, low ) is slightly more variable, especially in early spring. The easterly QBO appears to drive a positive ozone anomaly in October (as this appears in both eQBO panels); however, the sign of the anomaly changes in November, which seems to imply that low results in O3 decreases (up to DU) in November. Figure 3d (wQBO, high ) is again variable throughout early spring, with positive anomalies mainly present at highest polar latitudes. As in Fig. 3b for the eQBO, the positive anomaly (up to DU) in November for the wQBO may be an indication that high is linked to ozone increases at this time. Lastly, Fig. 3e (wQBO, low ) shows a consistent negative anomaly: low in wQBO years results in an anomalously low ozone column (–50 DU) throughout spring. These column ozone results are consistent with the MLS ozone profile anomalies below 20 hPa (Fig. 1): in October and November, the combination of high and eQBO results in anomalously high ozone, whereas low and wQBO results in anomalously low ozone.
We now examine the correlation between ozone column (detrended) and level. This is shown in Fig. 4, with the panels representing all years (panel a), eQBO (panel b), and wQBO (panel c). Overall, the correlation is everywhere, with little statistical significance, when all years are taken into account and no QBO-based binning is done. In Fig. 4b, for eQBO years, the correlation is positive poleward of 60∘ S for almost all of spring. Areas of significant positive correlation (ρ≥0.6) occur throughout the period from August to October, and early November shows a consistent significant positive correlation. This agrees with Fig. 3: elevated results in ozone increases at high southern latitudes, and this is more prevalent in eQBO years. At lower latitudes, between 50 and 60∘ S, there are patches of significant negative correlation. For wQBO years (Fig. 4c), the correlation is highly variable, with , and not significant. Any influence of EPP on the ozone column is generally weaker during wQBO years. This is consistent with Gordon et al. (2020), who reported significant correlation between stratospheric NO2 column and EPP (as proxied by Ap) during eQBO years. Note that the missing values in late September are due to missing values in the time series. We have chosen not to calculate the correlation coefficient for these points so as not to be misleading about the number of years in each correlation calculation.
To quantify the effect that enhanced EPP has on the total ozone column in the Southern Hemisphere spring, Fig. 5a presents the average polar (60–90∘ S) O3 column in November as a function of for the preceding winter. Note that the ozone here is both cos (latitude) area weighted and detrended in order to account for reduced EESC. Red triangles represent eQBO years, and blue circles indicate wQBO years. The figure also shows best-fit lines, with red fitting eQBO years, blue fitting wQBO, and yellow fitting all data. There is a robust linear relationship between and ozone in eQBO years with the linear fit indicating an increase in the November total ozone column of 5.8 , i.e. a 5.8 DU increase in the area-weighted O3 per unit increase in . The year-to-year variability in eQBO is in the range of 220–300 DU: 5.8 would correspond to about 2 % change in ozone per unit increase in . Note that the wQBO year with detrended polar ozone less than 200 DU corresponds to the year 2015, when the ozone hole has been reported to be particularly large in area (Solomon et al., 2016). The 2 wQBO years with the highest detrended ozone columns correspond to the years 2013 and 2016, the latter of which presented a disruption in the QBO phase in February (Newman et al., 2016). The eQBO year with lowest ozone column corresponds to the year 2010. The QBO phase in 2010 changed during the Antarctic winter season from eQBO to wQBO, and this may have contributed to the low polar ozone amount in November.
Figure 5a accounted for the polar average with average 5.8 . Figure 5b now shows the slope of the regression between and OMI ozone column in eQBO years for all points in the polar stratosphere with 1∘ latitude resolution. Stippling is taken from Fig. 4b. We find that the slope is positive throughout November poleward of 60∘ S. The maximum contribution of to column ozone occurs in mid-November poleward of 80∘ S, with increases of greater than 15 – for example, up to a 15 DU increase in ozone south of 80∘ S in mid-November per unit increase in . These contributions occur simultaneously with significant correlation between the OMI O3 column and in early to mid November.
Our results indicate ozone increases, both below 20 hPa in profile observations and in the total ozone column, with enhanced EPP. Traditionally, the long-term EPP effect on ozone has been considered to dominate via increased catalytic loss in NOx cycles. Earlier works of Jackman et al. (2000) and Funke et al. (2014a) have, however, suggested there may be a more complex interplay, with NOx interfering with ozone loss driving the halogen species ClO and BrO. To our knowledge, this effect has not been previously verified from observations.
Funke et al. (2014a) showed, using MIPAS observations, that in the Antarctic stratosphere, EPP-NOy reaches altitudes as low as 22–25 km by September. They speculated on the effect that this EPP-NOy might have on stratospheric ozone later in the spring, suggesting that EPP-NOy could interfere with the buffering between ClO and ClONO2 (via reaction (R5), that is changing the partitioning between ClO and ClONO2 by conversion of ClO to inactive ClONO2) and that “such EPP-induced buffering of ClO could even outweigh the ozone loss by EPP-NOx, resulting in a net reduction of the Antarctic chemical ozone loss” (Funke et al., 2014a). Gordon et al. (2020) provided additional evidence for the sustained descent of EPP-NOx, further suggesting that the phase of the QBO during the winter months plays a role in NOx descent. Here, we found ozone increases under the same conditions. Motivated by the hypothesis of Funke et al. (2014a), we will now explore the mechanism they proposed: that EPP-NOx modulates the amount of active chlorine in the springtime, but we will also account for the phase of the QBO.
4.1 MLS ClO observations
First, we investigate the composite mean ClO and the ClO anomaly from MLS observations. This is done for years with different combinations of and QBO phase as before and is presented in Fig. 6. Figure 6a illustrates the composite mean ClO averaged over 60–82∘ S. Large amounts of ClO are activated in the lower stratosphere in the early spring (50–20 hPa, August through late September). This is followed by a large reduction in the ClO mixing ratio, due to deactivation of chlorine with the reformation of its reservoirs (von Clarmann, 2013). Note that values below zero are a result of the known negative bias in MLS ClO. The split panels (Fig. 6b–e) show the composite anomaly for different combinations of and QBO phase. As the abundance of ClO in the stratosphere changes dramatically throughout spring, each panel is divided into two, with the corresponding scale for each half indicated by the colour bar at the bottom of the columns. Note that the anomaly (regardless of the sign) in all panels appears to go from being contained in the upper or middle stratosphere in early spring (i.e. the left column) to a signal propagating down into the lower stratosphere in late spring (the right column). The descending anomalies are opposite for high and low levels of : the ClO anomaly is negative (positive) for high (low) levels. Hence, high- years with negative ClO anomaly would indicate that EPP is associated with ClO decreases (−0.0050 to −0.0125 ppbv). This supports the above hypothesis that in years with high and, therefore, more EPP-NOx, we should find reduced ClO, as enhanced NO2 drives ClO to its ClONO2 reservoir. The downward-propagating signal closely resembles the typical descent pattern of EPP-NOx (see e.g. Funke et al., 2014a). Looking earlier in the season (left column), the descending anomalies can be traced up to the 5 hPa level. In the lower stratosphere in early spring, the anomalies generally appear to be more linked to the phase of the QBO with eQBO (wQBO) conditions leading to a reduction (enhancement) of ClO ( ppbv).
The correlation of MLS ClO and is presented in Fig. 7, in the same format as Fig. 2. Figure 7a (all years) and b (eQBO years) now show a similar downward-propagating anti-correlation, starting from about 2 hPa in the beginning of August and reaching almost 50 hPa by November. This again agrees well with downward descent patterns of EPP-NOx that are known to be occurring at this time (see e.g. Funke et al., 2014a; Gordon et al., 2020). ClO being anti-correlated with EPP-NOx aligns with the hypothesis that EPP-NOx acts to drive ClO to its reservoirs. Our results show that this is more prevalent in eQBO years ( with p≤0.05), with wQBO years showing little significance. We also find a small positive region of significant correlation in the lower stratosphere (∼70 hPa) in August. It is unlikely that any EPP-NOx has descended to such altitudes at this time. This could be related to some other mechanism, but it will not be investigated further here. Figure 7c (wQBO years) does not have the same significant anti-correlation descending in the stratosphere, but it does show a weak negative correlation following approximately the same descent pattern. We note that there is also a significant anti-correlation in the upper stratosphere in November to December, which is also present Fig. 7a and b. This may be related to the EPP-NOy that remains in the upper stratosphere (see Figure 11 of Funke et al., 2014a) while the bulk descends to lower stratosphere.
4.2 ClONO2 observations from ACE-FTS and MIPAS
With the MLS observations providing credible evidence that stratospheric ClO is decreasing in the spring following elevated EPP during the polar winter, we now look for evidence of this being linked to enhanced levels of NOx. The proposed buffering of ClO takes place via Reaction (R5) which converts the ClO to ClONO2. This would remove both NO2 and the active Clx from the catalytic ozone loss reactions, thereby resulting in overall ozone increase. To check whether ClONO2 is increasing while ClO is decreasing, we analyse both ACE and MIPAS ClONO2 in order to mitigate some of the coverage limitations of the observations.
Figure 8 presents the mean ACE-FTS ClONO2 as well as the anomalies for the different QBO phase and level combinations, as before. Figure 8a displays the composite mean of a 3 d running mean ClONO2 from the beginning of August to the end of September averaged over 60–90∘ S (weighted by cos (latitude)). The vertical scale here is altitude from 15 to 40 km (∼120–2 hPa). The orbit of ACE is designed to provide latitude patterns that repeat each year, allowing comparison between years, as yearly coverage is approximately the same. For the ACE-FTS and MIPAS analysis, we only include days where observations were recorded within 60–90∘ S each year of the study. As the second half of August is not consistently observed by ACE every year, these measurements were not included. Note that ACE observations from August are taken at sunrise, and September observations are from sunset. Figure 8a highlights the large diurnal variation in ClONO2: ClONO2 is photolysed by UV radiation; thus, there is more in the atmosphere at sunrise than at sunset times (i.e. higher maximum in August than in September). The minimum that occurs below 25 km around the beginning of September is due to heterogeneous chemistry destroying ClONO2 on the surface of PSCs (Brasseur and Solomon, 2005) while also inhibiting ClONO2 formation, as PSCs remove NO2 via denitrification in the lower stratosphere. ClONO2 recovers around the time PSCs begin to disappear in late September. The anomalies for the combinations of and QBO phase (as shown in previous figures) are shown in Fig. 8b–e. The anomaly is variable in all cases, except for the lower stratosphere in August, which shows positive anomaly in August of the eQBO years (Fig. 8b, c) and negative anomaly in wQBO years (Fig. 8d, e). The anomalies in September are much smaller and mainly appear to show patterns in the lower stratosphere in mid to late September, once again showing positive anomaly in eQBO years and negative anomaly in wQBO years.
The altitude-resolved correlation between ACE-FTS ClONO2 and is shown in Fig. 9. Here, areas of consistent positive correlation (ρ≥0.6) occur in September in panel a (all years) and panel b (eQBO). These are statistically significant mostly in the middle and upper stratosphere in panel a and in the lower stratosphere in panel b. Figure 9a appears to support the hypothesis that ClO decreases are due to reactions forming ClONO2. This is further supported by Fig. 9b which also shows that eQBO amplifies the signal. Figure 9c shows little consistent statistically significant correlation at this time.
Due to the limited coverage in the spring, it is difficult to draw conclusive statements from ACE-FTS observations alone. Thus, we also analyse MIPAS ClONO2 observations. Figure 10a presents the mean of ClONO2 from MIPAS (we only use years 2006–2011 here) averaged over 60–90∘ S, weighted by cos (latitude). Due to the relatively small number of years available, we only include regions that are observed every year; hence, white regions correspond to places that have missing coverage at some point from 2006 to 2011. Here, we see that ClONO2 decreases throughout November in the lower stratosphere, below 30 km. Figure 10b and c show the anomaly for the composite mean of high- years and low- years respectively. Note that as the time series is different, the designation of high and low changes slightly: the mean for 2005–2011 is 6.6, and we take this as limit for low and high . As this time period is shorter than that of OMI, MLS, and ACE-FTS, we do not sort for QBO here. Years with high (Fig. 10b) show a consistent positive anomaly (up to +0.06 ppbv) in the middle to upper stratosphere in early September, with this positive anomaly appearing to descend to around 23 km by late November–early December. This anomaly in late spring is consistent with the altitude range where we find ozone increasing with high (Fig. 2), although the anomaly is negative below ∼20 km. Similarly, we find descending negative anomaly in low- years (up to −0.06 ppbv). These results support the hypothesis that the O3 increases in high- years result from enhanced NO2 driving ClO to its ClONO2 reservoir.
The altitude correlation between and MIPAS ClONO2 is shown in Fig. 11. We again see a descending feature similar to those in Figs. 2 and 7. As this feature shows a positive (often significant) correlation (ρ>0.6), it is likely that this is again due to descending EPP-NOx. Note also that as the ClONO2 increases appear to coincide with ClO decreases, it is unlikely that this correlation is due to the decrease in EESC over this time period as that would result in each correlation having the same sign. Figure 11 shows that more ClONO2 forms in high- years and in the same area as ClO decreases (Fig. 7), implying that the ClO depletion found earlier is due to ClONO2 formation.
Overall, these results suggest that the arrival of EPP-NOx in the lower stratosphere by the late Antarctic springtime is contributing to faster conversion of active chlorine into reservoir species, which could bring about the end of the springtime ozone hole faster (as seen in the enhanced OMI total column ozone).
We have presented observational evidence that Antarctic springtime stratospheric ozone increases are associated with higher than average EPP during the preceding winter. Ozone increases due to the so-called EPP indirect effect had been previously suggested (Funke et al., 2014a), but, to our knowledge, this is the first time this has been shown in observations. Following the results of Gordon et al. (2020), we propose that this is due to EPP-NOx which remains the lower stratosphere at least until November, having originally been transported from the mesosphere within the polar vortex. We were able to trace this descent pattern in observations of O3, ClO, and ClONO2, finding it matched that of the previously reported descent of EPP-NOx (see e.g Randall et al., 2006). Jackman et al. (2000) and Funke et al. (2014a) further proposed that should this NOx reach the lower stratosphere (as shown by Gordon et al., 2020), it would react with ClO to form ClONO2, preventing some of the NOx- and Clx-driven catalytic ozone destruction. We examined polar ClO and ClONO2 during the Antarctic spring and found decreases in ClO with consistent increases in ClONO2 associated with above-average EPP. Thus, this provides direct observational evidence supporting the hypothesis of Jackman et al. (2000) and Funke et al. (2014a) that ozone loss may be decelerated in the Antarctic lower stratosphere following winters with high-EPP years due to excess NOx accelerating ClO back to its reservoirs.
As Gordon et al. (2020) proposed in the context of Antarctic NO2 column, we suggest that the reasons for the QBO modulating Antarctic ozone loss are also via its wave-forcing effect on the polar region (i.e. the Holton–Tan effect). Gordon et al. (2020) showed that eQBO years were more likely to have a warmer Antarctic vortex and proposed that this would lead to less denitrification in the lower stratosphere, resulting in a less suitable environment for PSC formation. As PSCs are crucial to springtime ozone loss in the lower stratosphere, we suggest that the inhibited PSC formation in eQBO years contributes to our findings that less chlorine is activated from reservoirs and, hence, less ozone loss in eQBO years, with EPP-NOx contributing to increased ClONO2 formation (see Reaction R5). This is similar to Sonkaew et al. (2013), who found that years with a warmer Arctic vortex resulted in less springtime ozone loss in the Northern Hemisphere. We suggest that this occurs in the Southern Hemisphere as well, but we also reinforce the important role played by EPP-NOx.
Here, we again see the importance of the QBO: correlations of ozone with are higher (≥0.6 in OMI total ozone) and with more occurrences of statistical significance in eQBO years. This is in agreement with the higher correlation found in eQBO years between NO2 and by Gordon et al. (2020). Our results further underline the appreciable effect of the QBO on the lower polar springtime stratosphere, and that the QBO phase should be accounted for in long-term studies of this region.
Our results have shown that the EPP indirect effect has indeed affected ozone over the period from 2005 to 2017, likely due to the interference of EPP-NOx in Clx-catalysed ozone destruction. This period has also been marked by the continuing formation of the ozone hole every spring, although following the Montreal Protocol, the size of the ozone hole is generally decreasing with time (Solomon et al., 2016). The mechanism suggested in this paper (NO2 buffering ClO) requires chlorine activation in the spring, but as chlorine loading in the polar stratosphere continues to decrease with the ban in CFC emissions, EPP-NO2 will no longer hinder ozone depletion, likely instead becoming a major contributor. As ozone itself plays a vital role in both atmospheric chemistry and dynamics, this reinforces the importance of accounting for EPP in predicting the future of the polar middle atmosphere.
All data used here are open-access and are available from the following sources: Ap – http://wdc.kugi.kyoto-u.ac.jp/kp (World Data Center for Geomagnetism, 2019); QBO – https://www.geo.fu-berlin.de/en/met/ag/strat/produkte/qbo (Freie Universität Berlin, 2019); OMI – https://doi.org/10.5067/Aura/OMI/DATA2025, (Bhartia, 2012); MLS – https://doi.org/10.5067/Aura/MLS/DATA2505, (Santee et al., 2020); ACE-FTS – http://www.ace.uwaterloo.ca (registration required, last access: 23 May 2019); MIPAS – the IMK/IAA MIPAS product is available directly from IAA, IMK, or https://www.imk-asf.kit.edu/english/308.php (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 2020).
EMG and AS planned the study, and EMG performed the analysis. EMG and AS prepared the paper with input from all authors. BF provided the IMK and IAA MIPAS observations, processed the data, and provided expertise on the use of MIPAS data. JT provided expertise on the use of OMI observations. KAW provided the expertise on the use of ACE-FTS observations.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
We acknowledge the World Data Center for Geomagnetism and the Freie Universität Berlin for the Ap and QBO data respectively. We are also grateful to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Canadian Space Agency, and the European Space Agency for providing and maintaining the high-quality, long-term satellite observations used in this study. Annika Seppälä would like to thank the Otago University Polar Environment Research Theme for the research grant that enabled completion of this work.
Emily M. Gordon was supported by a University of Otago postgraduate publishing bursary. The Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE), also known as SCISAT, is a Canadian-led mission mainly supported by the Canadian Space Agency.
This paper was edited by Andreas Engel and reviewed by Mark Weber and one anonymous referee.
Andersson, M. E., Verronen, P. T., Rodger, C. J., Clilverd, M. A., and Seppälä, A.: Missing driver in the Sun–Earth connection from energetic electron precipitation impacts mesospheric ozone, Nat. Commun., 5, 5197, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6197, 2014. a
Andersson, M. E., Verronen, P. T., Marsh, D. R., Seppälä, A., Päivärinta, S.-M., Rodger, C. J., Clilverd, M. A., Kalakoski, N., and van de Kamp, M.: Polar Ozone Response to Energetic Particle Precipitation Over Decadal Time Scales: The Role of Medium-Energy Electrons, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 607–622, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027605, 2018. a
Bhartia, P. K: OMI Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), available at: https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets/OMTO3G_003/summary (last access: 19 February 2021), 2002. a
Bhartia, P. K.: OMI/Aura Ozone (O3) Total Column Daily L2 Global Gridded 0.25 degree x 0.25 degree V3, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), https://doi.org/10.5067/Aura/OMI/DATA2025, 2012. a
Bhartia, P. K.: Total Ozone from Backscattered Ultraviolet Measurements, in: Observing Systems for Atmospheric Composition: Satellite, Aircraft, Sensor Web and Ground-Based Observational Methods and Strategies, edited by Visconti, G., Carlo, P. D., Brune, W. H., Wahner, A., and Schoeberl, M., Springer New York, New York, NY, 48–63, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35848-2_3, 2007. a
Bhartia, P. K.: OMI/Aura Ozone (O3) Total Column Daily L2 Global Gridded 0.25 degree × 0.25 degree V3, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), https://doi.org/10.5067/Aura/OMI/DATA2025, 2012. a
Boone, C. D., Nassar, R., Walker, K. A., Rochon, Y., McLeod, S. D., Rinsland, C. P., and Bernath, P. F.: Retrievals for the atmospheric chemistry experiment Fourier-transform spectrometer, Appl. Opt., 44, 7218–7231, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.007218, 2005. a
Boone, C., Jones, S., and Bernath, P.: Data usage guide and file format description for ACE-FTS level 2 data version 4.0 ASCII format, Tech. rep., Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Science Operations Center, https://databace.scisat.ca/level2/ace_v4.0/ACE-SOC-0033-ACE-FTS_ascii_data_usage_and_fileformat_for_v4.0.pdf (last access: 19 February 2021), 2019. a
Brewer, A. W.: Evidence for a world circulation provided by the measurements of helium and water vapour distribution in the stratosphere, Q. J. Roy Meteor. Soc., 75, 351–363, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707532603, 1949. a
Damiani, A., Funke, B., López Puertas, M., Santee, M. L., Cordero, R. R., and Watanabe, S.: Energetic particle precipitation: A major driver of the ozone budget in the Antarctic upper stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3554–3562, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068279, 2016. a
Freie Universität Berlin: QBO data, available at: https://www.geo.fu-berlin.de/en/met/ag/strat/produkte/qbo, last access: 27 December 2019. a
Froidevaux, L., Jiang, Y. B., Lambert, A., Livesey, N. J., Read, W. G., Waters, J. W., Browell, E. V., Hair, J. W., Avery, M. A., McGee, T. J., Twigg, L. W., Sumnicht, G. K., Jucks, K. W., Margitan, J. J., Sen, B., Stachnik, R. A., Toon, G. C., Bernath, P. F., Boone, C. D., Walker, K. A., Filipiak, M. J., Harwood, R. S., Fuller, R. A., Manney, G. L., Schwartz, M. J., Daffer, W. H., Drouin, B. J., Cofield, R. E., Cuddy, D. T., Jarnot, R. F., Knosp, B. W., Perun, V. S., Snyder, W. V., Stek, P. C., Thurstans, R. P., and Wagner, P. A.: Validation of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder stratospheric ozone measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15S20, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008771, 2008. a
Funke, B., López-Puertas, M., Stiller, G. P., and von Clarmann, T.: Mesospheric and stratospheric NOy produced by energetic particle precipitation during 2002–2012, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 4429–4446, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021404, 2014a. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o
Funke, B., López-Puertas, M., Holt, L., Randall, C. E., Stiller, G. P., and von Clarmann, T.: Hemispheric distributions and interannual variability of NOy produced by energetic particle precipitation in 2002–2012, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 13,565–13,582, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022423, 2014b. a
Garcia, R. R. and Solomon, S.: A possible relationship between interannual variability in Antarctic ozone and the quasi-biennial oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 14, 848–851, https://doi.org/10.1029/GL014i008p00848, 1987. a
Gordon, E. M., Seppälä, A., and Tamminen, J.: Evidence for energetic particle precipitation and quasi-biennial oscillation modulations of the Antarctic NO2 springtime stratospheric column from OMI observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6259–6271, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6259-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o
Höpfner, M., von Clarmann, T., Fischer, H., Funke, B., Glatthor, N., Grabowski, U., Kellmann, S., Kiefer, M., Linden, A., Milz, M., Steck, T., Stiller, G. P., Bernath, P., Blom, C. E., Blumenstock, Th., Boone, C., Chance, K., Coffey, M. T., Friedl-Vallon, F., Griffith, D., Hannigan, J. W., Hase, F., Jones, N., Jucks, K. W., Keim, C., Kleinert, A., Kouker, W., Liu, G. Y., Mahieu, E., Mellqvist, J., Mikuteit, S., Notholt, J., Oelhaf, H., Piesch, C., Reddmann, T., Ruhnke, R., Schneider, M., Strandberg, A., Toon, G., Walker, K. A., Warneke, T., Wetzel, G., Wood, S., and Zander, R.: Validation of MIPAS ClONO2 measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 257–281, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-257-2007, 2007. a
Hubert, D., Lambert, J.-C., Verhoelst, T., Granville, J., Keppens, A., Baray, J.-L., Bourassa, A. E., Cortesi, U., Degenstein, D. A., Froidevaux, L., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hoppel, K. W., Johnson, B. J., Kyrölä, E., Leblanc, T., Lichtenberg, G., Marchand, M., McElroy, C. T., Murtagh, D., Nakane, H., Portafaix, T., Querel, R., Russell III, J. M., Salvador, J., Smit, H. G. J., Stebel, K., Steinbrecht, W., Strawbridge, K. B., Stübi, R., Swart, D. P. J., Taha, G., Tarasick, D. W., Thompson, A. M., Urban, J., van Gijsel, J. A. E., Van Malderen, R., von der Gathen, P., Walker, K. A., Wolfram, E., and Zawodny, J. M.: Ground-based assessment of the bias and long-term stability of 14 limb and occultation ozone profile data records, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2497–2534, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2497-2016, 2016. a
Jackman, C. H., Fleming, E. L., and Vitt, F. M.: Influence of extremely large solar proton events in a changing stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 11659–11670, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900010, 2000. a, b, c
Jackman, C. H., Marsh, D. R., Vitt, F. M., Garcia, R. R., Fleming, E. L., Labow, G. J., Randall, C. E., López-Puertas, M., Funke, B., von Clarmann, T., and Stiller, G. P.: Short- and medium-term atmospheric constituent effects of very large solar proton events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 765–785, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-765-2008, 2008. a
Jackman, C. H., Marsh, D. R., Vitt, F. M., Garcia, R. R., Randall, C. E., Fleming, E. L., and Frith, S. M.: Long-term middle atmospheric influence of very large solar proton events, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 114, D11304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011415, 2009. a
Livesey, N. J., Read, W. G., Wagner, P. A., Froidevaux, L., Lambert, A., Manney, G. L., Millán Valle, L. F., Hugh C. Pumphrey, H. C., Santee, M. L., Schwartz, M. J., Wang, S., Fuller, R. A., Jarnot, R. F., Knosp, B. W., Martinez, E., and Lay, R. R.: Earth Observing System (EOS) Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) version 4.2× level 2 data quality and description document, available at: https://mls.jpl.nasa.gov/data/v4-2_data_quality_document.pdf (last access: 30 August 2019), 2017. a, b
López-Puertas, M., Funke, B., Gil-López, S., von Clarmann, T., Stiller, G. P., Höpfner, M., Kellmann, S., Fischer, H., and Jackman, C. H.: Observation of NOx enhancement and ozone depletion in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres after the October–November 2003 solar proton events, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A09S43, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011050, 2005. a
Matthes, K., Funke, B., Andersson, M. E., Barnard, L., Beer, J., Charbonneau, P., Clilverd, M. A., Dudok de Wit, T., Haberreiter, M., Hendry, A., Jackman, C. H., Kretzschmar, M., Kruschke, T., Kunze, M., Langematz, U., Marsh, D. R., Maycock, A. C., Misios, S., Rodger, C. J., Scaife, A. A., Seppälä, A., Shangguan, M., Sinnhuber, M., Tourpali, K., Usoskin, I., van de Kamp, M., Verronen, P. T., and Versick, S.: Solar forcing for CMIP6 (v3.2), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2247–2302, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2247-2017, 2017. a
McPeters, R., Kroon, M., Labow, G., Brinksma, E., Balis, D., Petropavlovskikh, I., Veefkind, J. P., Bhartia, P. K., and Levelt, P. F.: Validation of the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument total column ozone product, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15S14, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008802, 2008. a
Randall, C. E., Harvey, V. L., Manney, G. L., Orsolini, Y., Codrescu, M., Sioris, C., Brohede, S., Haley, C. S., Gordley, L. L., Zawodny, J. M., and Russell, J. M.: Stratospheric effects of energetic particle precipitation in 2003–2004, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L05802, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022003, 2005. a, b
Randall, C. E., Harvey, V. L., Singleton, C. S., Bernath, P. F., Boone, C. D., and Kozyra, J. U.: Enhanced NOx in 2006 linked to strong upper stratospheric Arctic vortex, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L18811, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027160, 2006. a, b
Randall, C. E., Harvey, V. L., Singleton, C. S., Bailey, S. M., Bernath, P. F., Codrescu, M., Nakajima, H., and Russell, J. M.: Energetic particle precipitation effects on the Southern Hemisphere stratosphere in 1992–2005, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D08308, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007696, 2007. a
Santee, M. L., Lambert, A., Read, W. G., Livesey, N. J., Manney, G. L., Cofield, R. E., Cuddy, D. T., Daffer, W. H., Drouin, B. J., Froidevaux, L., Fuller, R. A., Jarnot, R. F., Knosp, B. W., Perun, V. S., Snyder, W. V., Stek, P. C., Thurstans, R. P., Wagner, P. A., Waters, J. W., Connor, B., Urban, J., Murtagh, D., Ricaud, P., Barret, B., Kleinböhl, A., Kuttippurath, J., Küllmann, H., von Hobe, M., Toon, G. C., and Stachnik, R. A.: Validation of the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder ClO measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15S22, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008762, 2008. a
Santee, M., Livesey, N., and Read, W.: MLS/Aura Level 2 Chlorine Monoxide (ClO) Mixing Ratio V005, Greenbelt, MD, USA, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), https://doi.org/10.5067/Aura/MLS/DATA2505, 2020. a
Schenkeveld, V. M. E., Jaross, G., Marchenko, S., Haffner, D., Kleipool, Q. L., Rozemeijer, N. C., Veefkind, J. P., and Levelt, P. F.: In-flight performance of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1957–1986, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1957-2017, 2017. a
Schoeberl, M. R. and Hartmann, D. L.: The Dynamics of the Stratospheric Polar Vortex and Its Relation to Springtime Ozone Depletions, Science, 251, 46–52, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.251.4989.46, 1991. a
Seppälä, A., Verronen, P. T., Clilverd, M. A., Randall, C. E., Tamminen, J., Sofieva, V., Backman, L., and Kyölä, E.: Arctic and Antarctic polar winter NOx and energetic particle precipitation in 2002–2006, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L12810, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029733, 2007. a, b, c, d
Seppälä, A., Matthes, K., Randall, C. E., and Mironova, I. A.: What is the solar influence on climate? Overview of activities during CAWSES-II, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci., 1, 24, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-014-0024-3, 2014. a
Sheese, P. E., Boone, C. D., and Walker, K. A.: Detecting physically unrealistic outliers in ACE-FTS atmospheric measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 741–750, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-741-2015, 2015. a
Sheese, P. E., Walker, K. A., Boone, C. D., McLinden, C. A., Bernath, P. F., Bourassa, A. E., Burrows, J. P., Degenstein, D. A., Funke, B., Fussen, D., Manney, G. L., McElroy, C. T., Murtagh, D., Randall, C. E., Raspollini, P., Rozanov, A., Russell III, J. M., Suzuki, M., Shiotani, M., Urban, J., von Clarmann, T., and Zawodny, J. M.: Validation of ACE-FTS version 3.5 NOy species profiles using correlative satellite measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5781–5810, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5781-2016, 2016. a, b
Siskind, D. E., Nedoluha, G. E., Randall, C. E., Fromm, M., and Russell III, J. M.: An assessment of Southern Hemisphere stratospheric NOx enhancements due to transport from the upper atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 329–332, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL010940, 2000. a, b, c
Solomon, S., Ivy, D. J., Kinnison, D. E., Mills, M. J., Neely, R. R., and Schmidt, A.: Emergence of healing in the Antarctic ozone layer, Science, 353, 269–274, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aae0061, 2016. a, b
Sonkaew, T., von Savigny, C., Eichmann, K.-U., Weber, M., Rozanov, A., Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., and Grooß, J.-U.: Chemical ozone losses in Arctic and Antarctic polar winter/spring season derived from SCIAMACHY limb measurements 2002–2009, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1809–1835, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1809-2013, 2013. a
Strahan, S. E., Oman, L. D., Douglass, A. R., and Coy, L.: Modulation of Antarctic vortex composition by the quasi-biennial oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4216–4223, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063759, 2015. a
von Clarmann, T.: Chlorine in the stratosphere, Atmósphera, 26, 415–458, 2013. a
von Clarmann, T., Höpfner, M., Kellmann, S., Linden, A., Chauhan, S., Funke, B., Grabowski, U., Glatthor, N., Kiefer, M., Schieferdecker, T., Stiller, G. P., and Versick, S.: Retrieval of temperature, H2O, O3, HNO3, CH4, N2O, ClONO2 and ClO from MIPAS reduced resolution nominal mode limb emission measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 159–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-159-2009, 2009. a
von Storch, H. and Zwiers, F. W.: Statistical Analysis in Climate Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1999. a
Wolff, M. A., Kerzenmacher, T., Strong, K., Walker, K. A., Toohey, M., Dupuy, E., Bernath, P. F., Boone, C. D., Brohede, S., Catoire, V., von Clarmann, T., Coffey, M., Daffer, W. H., De Mazière, M., Duchatelet, P., Glatthor, N., Griffith, D. W. T., Hannigan, J., Hase, F., Höpfner, M., Huret, N., Jones, N., Jucks, K., Kagawa, A., Kasai, Y., Kramer, I., Küllmann, H., Kuttippurath, J., Mahieu, E., Manney, G., McElroy, C. T., McLinden, C., Mébarki, Y., Mikuteit, S., Murtagh, D., Piccolo, C., Raspollini, P., Ridolfi, M., Ruhnke, R., Santee, M., Senten, C., Smale, D., Tétard, C., Urban, J., and Wood, S.: Validation of HNO3, ClONO2, and N2O5 from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3529–3562, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3529-2008, 2008. a, b