the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Characteristics of interannual variability in space-based XCO2 global observations
Yifan Guan
Gretchen Keppel-Aleks
Scott C. Doney
Christof Petri
Dave Pollard
Debra Wunch
Frank Hase
Hirofumi Ohyama
Isamu Morino
Justus Notholt
Kei Shiomi
Kim Strong
Rigel Kivi
Matthias Buschmann
Nicholas Deutscher
Paul Wennberg
Ralf Sussmann
Voltaire A. Velazco
Related authors
No articles found.
Saharan dust can reach the high Arctic within only a few days, but it was unclear whether such rapid transport occurs regularly. Using atmospheric models, satellite observations, and 21 years of air-mass trajectories, we identify a recurrent pathway across the North Atlantic. This pathway becomes increasingly important at higher Arctic latitudes and efficiently carries large dust particles northward, with potential consequences for Arctic clouds and climate.
Cities need accurate emission estimates for climate action. We compared five emission inventories over the Greater Tokyo Area using measurements from four sites and an atmospheric transport model. We found that measurements at the four sites show distinct features of the inventories in emission amount and spatial distribution. Site choice is important for evaluating urban emissions. These findings can help improve emission inventories, future urban observations and simulations.
The Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite-2 (GOSAT-2) is a satellite dedicated to measuring concentrations of greenhouse gases from space. Since its launch, the increase of CH4 and CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere is clear. The datasets obtained from GOSAT-2 are used in the Copernicus atmospheric services to monitor the climate, in light of the Paris Agreement. Here we present robust datasets of these gases from GOSAT-2, including a novel machine learning approach to data quality filtering.
Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurementissued by the JCGM, the error concept and the uncertainty concept are the same. Arguments in favor of the contrary were found not to be compelling. Neither was any evidence presented that
errorsand
uncertaintiesdefine a different relation between the measured and true values, nor is a Bayesian concept beyond the mere subjective probability referred to.