Articles | Volume 16, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6335-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6335-2016
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
24 May 2016
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 24 May 2016

Will a perfect model agree with perfect observations? The impact of spatial sampling

Nick A. J. Schutgens, Edward Gryspeerdt, Natalie Weigum, Svetlana Tsyro, Daisuke Goto, Michael Schulz, and Philip Stier

Related authors

Assimilation of POLDER observations to estimate aerosol emissions
Athanasios Tsikerdekis, Otto P. Hasekamp, Nick A. J. Schutgens, and Qirui Zhong
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 9495–9524, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9495-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9495-2023, 2023
Short summary
Incorporation of aerosol into the COSPv2 satellite lidar simulator for climate model evaluation
Marine Bonazzola, Hélène Chepfer, Po-Lun Ma, Johannes Quaas, David M. Winker, Artem Feofilov, and Nick Schutgens
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1359–1377, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1359-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1359-2023, 2023
Short summary
Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions
Qirui Zhong, Nick Schutgens, Guido van der Werf, Twan van Noije, Kostas Tsigaridis, Susanne E. Bauer, Tero Mielonen, Alf Kirkevåg, Øyvind Seland, Harri Kokkola, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, David Neubauer, Zak Kipling, Hitoshi Matsui, Paul Ginoux, Toshihiko Takemura, Philippe Le Sager, Samuel Rémy, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Kai Zhang, Jialei Zhu, Svetlana G. Tsyro, Gabriele Curci, Anna Protonotariou, Ben Johnson, Joyce E. Penner, Nicolas Bellouin, Ragnhild B. Skeie, and Gunnar Myhre
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11009–11032, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022, 2022
Short summary
Important role of stratospheric injection height for the distribution and radiative forcing of smoke aerosol from the 2019–2020 Australian wildfires
Bernd Heinold, Holger Baars, Boris Barja, Matthew Christensen, Anne Kubin, Kevin Ohneiser, Kerstin Schepanski, Nick Schutgens, Fabian Senf, Roland Schrödner, Diego Villanueva, and Ina Tegen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9969–9985, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9969-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9969-2022, 2022
Short summary
A quadcopter unmanned aerial system (UAS)-based methodology for measuring biomass burning emission factors
Roland Vernooij, Patrik Winiger, Martin Wooster, Tercia Strydom, Laurent Poulain, Ulrike Dusek, Mark Grosvenor, Gareth J. Roberts, Nick Schutgens, and Guido R. van der Werf
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4271–4294, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4271-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4271-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Warming effects of reduced sulfur emissions from shipping
Masaru Yoshioka, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Ben B. B. Booth, Colin P. Morice, and Ken S. Carslaw
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13681–13692, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13681-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13681-2024, 2024
Short summary
The key role of atmospheric absorption in the Asian summer monsoon response to dust emissions in CMIP6 models
Alcide Zhao, Laura J. Wilcox, and Claire L. Ryder
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13385–13402, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13385-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13385-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multi-model effective radiative forcing of the 2020 sulfur cap for shipping
Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Rachael Byrom, Øivind Hodnebrog, Caroline Jouan, and Gunnar Myhre
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13361–13370, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13361-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13361-2024, 2024
Short summary
Representation of iron aerosol size distributions of anthropogenic emissions is critical in evaluating atmospheric soluble iron input to the ocean
Mingxu Liu, Hitoshi Matsui, Douglas S. Hamilton, Sagar D. Rathod, Kara D. Lamb, and Natalie M. Mahowald
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13115–13127, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13115-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13115-2024, 2024
Short summary
Revealing dominant patterns of aerosol regimes in the lower troposphere and their evolution from preindustrial times to the future in global climate model simulations
Jingmin Li, Mattia Righi, Johannes Hendricks, Christof G. Beer, Ulrike Burkhardt, and Anja Schmidt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12727–12747, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12727-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12727-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackermann, I. J., Hass, H., Memmesheimer, M., Ebel, A., Binkowski, F. S., and Shankar, U. M. A.: MODAL AEROSOL DYNAMICS MODEL FOR EUROPE: DEVELOPMENT AND FIRST APPLICATIONS, Atmos. Environ., 32, 2981–2999, 1998.
Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, 1989.
Anderson, T. E., Charlson, R. J., Winker, D. M., Ogren, J. A., and Holmen, K.: Mesoscale Variations of Tropospheric Aerosols, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 119–136, 2003.
Angstrom, B. A.: Atmospheric turbidity , global illumination and planetary albedo of the earth, Tellus, XIV, 435–450, 1962.
Ballester, J., Burns, J. C., Cayan, D., Nakamura, Y., Uehara, R., and Rodó, X.: Kawasaki disease and ENSO-driven wind circulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2284–2289, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50388, 2013.
Download
Short summary
We show that evaluating global aerosol model data with observations of very different spatial scales (200 vs. 10 km) can lead to large discrepancies, solely due to different spatial sampling. Strategies for reducing these sampling errors are developed and tested using a set of high-resolution model simulations.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint