Articles | Volume 16, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6335-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6335-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Will a perfect model agree with perfect observations? The impact of spatial sampling
Nick A. J. Schutgens
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK
Edward Gryspeerdt
Institute for Meteorology, University of Leipzig, Stephanstr. 3, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
Natalie Weigum
Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK
Svetlana Tsyro
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, O313 Oslo, Norway
Daisuke Goto
National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, 305-8568, Japan
Michael Schulz
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, O313 Oslo, Norway
Philip Stier
Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 8,141 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Jan 2016)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6,177 | 1,798 | 166 | 8,141 | 155 | 169 |
- HTML: 6,177
- PDF: 1,798
- XML: 166
- Total: 8,141
- BibTeX: 155
- EndNote: 169
Total article views: 7,261 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 24 May 2016)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5,634 | 1,471 | 156 | 7,261 | 148 | 159 |
- HTML: 5,634
- PDF: 1,471
- XML: 156
- Total: 7,261
- BibTeX: 148
- EndNote: 159
Total article views: 880 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Jan 2016)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
543 | 327 | 10 | 880 | 7 | 10 |
- HTML: 543
- PDF: 327
- XML: 10
- Total: 880
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 10
Cited
81 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Investigation of global particulate nitrate from the AeroCom phase III experiment H. Bian et al. 10.5194/acp-17-12911-2017
- Calibrating a global atmospheric chemistry transport model using Gaussian process emulation and ground-level concentrations of ozone and carbon monoxide E. Ryan & O. Wild 10.5194/gmd-14-5373-2021
- Site representativity of AERONET and GAW remotely sensed aerosol optical thickness and absorbing aerosol optical thickness observations N. Schutgens 10.5194/acp-20-7473-2020
- Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
- Observational operator for fair model evaluation with ground NO2 measurements L. Fang et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-8267-2024
- Do new sea spray aerosol source functions improve the results of a regional aerosol model? S. Barthel et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.016
- Representation Uncertainty in the Earth Sciences C. Bulgin et al. 10.1029/2021EA002129
- On the spatio-temporal representativeness of observations N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-17-9761-2017
- Effect of discrepancies caused by model resolution on model-measurement comparison for surface black carbon T. Sun et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118178
- Model calibration using ESEm v1.1.0 – an open, scalable Earth system emulator D. Watson-Parris et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-7659-2021
- How should we aggregate data? Methods accounting for the numerical distributions, with an assessment of aerosol optical depth A. Sayer & K. Knobelspiesse 10.5194/acp-19-15023-2019
- How Long Is Too Long? Variogram Analysis of AERONET Data to Aid Aerosol Validation and Intercomparison Studies A. Sayer 10.1029/2020EA001290
- “Traffic intervention” policy fails to mitigate air pollution in megacity Delhi S. Chowdhury et al. 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.018
- Impact of the ‘13th Five-Year Plan’ Policy on Air Quality in Pearl River Delta, China: A Case Study of Haizhu District in Guangzhou City Using WRF-Chem J. Zhan et al. 10.3390/app10155276
- Description and evaluation of a secondary organic aerosol and new particle formation scheme within TM5-MP v1.2 T. Bergman et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-683-2022
- On the representation error in data assimilation T. Janjić et al. 10.1002/qj.3130
- Aircraft measurements of black carbon vertical profiles show upper tropospheric variability and stability J. Schwarz et al. 10.1002/2016GL071241
- Modelling and Analysis of Aerosol and Cloud-Precipitable Water Inter-Hemispheric Interactions of Aerosol-Satellite Data Using Ground Observation C. Anoruo 10.1007/s41810-020-00078-y
- Concentrations and radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols from 1750 to 2014 simulated with the Oslo CTM3 and CEDS emission inventory M. Lund et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-4909-2018
- Biomass burning aerosol over the Amazon: analysis of aircraft, surface and satellite observations using a global aerosol model C. Reddington et al. 10.5194/acp-19-9125-2019
- Assessment of aerosol–cloud–radiation correlations in satellite observations, climate models and reanalysis F. Bender et al. 10.1007/s00382-018-4384-z
- Modelling mineral dust emissions and atmospheric dispersion with MADE3 in EMAC v2.54 C. Beer et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020
- AEROCOM and AEROSAT AAOD and SSA study – Part 1: Evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021
- Aerosol Absorption: Progress Towards Global and Regional Constraints B. Samset et al. 10.1007/s40641-018-0091-4
- Development and Evaluation of an Explicit Treatment of Aerosol Processes at Cloud Scale Within a Multi‐Scale Modeling Framework (MMF) G. Lin et al. 10.1029/2018MS001287
- Robust observational constraint of uncertain aerosol processes and emissions in a climate model and the effect on aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. 10.5194/acp-20-9491-2020
- Constraints on global aerosol number concentration, SO<sub>2</sub> and condensation sink in UKESM1 using ATom measurements A. Ranjithkumar et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4979-2021
- Towards improved and more routine Earth system model evaluation in CMIP V. Eyring et al. 10.5194/esd-7-813-2016
- Estimating Source Region Influences on Black Carbon Abundance, Microphysics, and Radiative Effect Observed Over South Korea K. Lamb et al. 10.1029/2018JD029257
- Ocean Temperature Profiling Lidar: Analysis of Technology and Potential for Rapid Ocean Observations J. Moisan et al. 10.3390/rs16071236
- In situ constraints on the vertical distribution of global aerosol D. Watson-Parris et al. 10.5194/acp-19-11765-2019
- The 3D biogeochemical marine mercury cycling model MERCY v2.0 – linking atmospheric Hg to methylmercury in fish J. Bieser et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-2649-2023
- Spatial Coverage of Monitoring Networks: A Climate Observing System Simulation Experiment E. Weatherhead et al. 10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0040.1
- Factors controlling black carbon distribution in the Arctic L. Qi et al. 10.5194/acp-17-1037-2017
- The Evaluation of the North Atlantic Climate System in UKESM1 Historical Simulations for CMIP6 J. Robson et al. 10.1029/2020MS002126
- Bridging the gap: integrating models and observations for better ecosystem understanding M. Skogen et al. 10.3354/meps14616
- Sources of uncertainty in atmospheric dispersion modeling in support of Comprehensive Nuclear–Test–Ban Treaty monitoring and verification system S. Mekhaimr & M. Abdel Wahab 10.1016/j.apr.2019.03.008
- Multi-model simulations of aerosol and ozone radiative forcing due to anthropogenic emission changes during the period 1990–2015 G. Myhre et al. 10.5194/acp-17-2709-2017
- The Radiative Forcing of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in Liquid Clouds: Wrestling and Embracing Uncertainty J. Mülmenstädt & G. Feingold 10.1007/s40641-018-0089-y
- Absorbing aerosols over Asia – an inter-model and model-observation comparison study using CAM5.3-Oslo L. Frey et al. 10.1080/16000889.2021.1909815
- Machine learning based bias correction for numerical chemical transport models M. Xu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118022
- Strong Contrast in Remote Black Carbon Aerosol Loadings Between the Atlantic and Pacific Basins J. Katich et al. 10.1029/2018JD029206
- Global aerosol modeling with MADE3 (v3.0) in EMAC (based on v2.53): model description and evaluation J. Kaiser et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019
- Jury is still out on the radiative forcing by black carbon O. Boucher et al. 10.1073/pnas.1607005113
- A Coupled Evaluation of Operational MODIS and Model Aerosol Products for Maritime Environments Using Sun Photometry: Evaluation of the Fine and Coarse Mode J. Reid et al. 10.3390/rs14132978
- Unveiling aerosol–cloud interactions – Part 1: Cloud contamination in satellite products enhances the aerosol indirect forcing estimate M. Christensen et al. 10.5194/acp-17-13151-2017
- Global distribution of maritime low clouds with an emphasis on different aerosol types and meteorological parameters inferred from multi-satellite and reanalysis data during 2007–2016 B. Pan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118082
- Is Black Carbon an Unimportant Ice‐Nucleating Particle in Mixed‐Phase Clouds? J. Vergara‐Temprado et al. 10.1002/2017JD027831
- Worldwide impact of aerosol’s time scale on the predicted long-term concentrating solar power potential J. Ruiz-Arias et al. 10.1038/srep30546
- SALSA2.0: The sectional aerosol module of the aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0 H. Kokkola et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-3833-2018
- Global aerosol simulations using NICAM.16 on a 14 km grid spacing for a climate study: improved and remaining issues relative to a lower-resolution model D. Goto et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-3731-2020
- Validation of SOAR VIIRS Over‐Water Aerosol Retrievals and Context Within the Global Satellite Aerosol Data Record A. Sayer et al. 10.1029/2018JD029465
- Community Intercomparison Suite (CIS) v1.4.0: a tool for intercomparing models and observations D. Watson-Parris et al. 10.5194/gmd-9-3093-2016
- Assimilation of MODIS Dark Target and Deep Blue observations in the dust aerosol component of NMMB-MONARCH version 1.0 E. Di Tomaso et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-1107-2017
- Evaluation of aerosol–cloud interactions in E3SM using a Lagrangian framework M. Christensen et al. 10.5194/acp-23-2789-2023
- The importance of the representation of air pollution emissions for the modeled distribution and radiative effects of black carbon in the Arctic J. Schacht et al. 10.5194/acp-19-11159-2019
- Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Tropospheric ozone from 1877 to 2016, observed levels, trends and uncertainties D. Tarasick et al. 10.1525/elementa.376
- Spatial Representativeness of Surface‐Measured Variations of Downward Solar Radiation M. Schwarz et al. 10.1002/2017JD027261
- A review and framework for the evaluation of pixel-level uncertainty estimates in satellite aerosol remote sensing A. Sayer et al. 10.5194/amt-13-373-2020
- Improving forest sampling strategies for assessment of fuel reduction burning M. Gharun et al. 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.001
- Short Black Carbon lifetime inferred from a global set of aircraft observations M. Lund et al. 10.1038/s41612-018-0040-x
- Evaluation of global simulations of aerosol particle and cloud condensation nuclei number, with implications for cloud droplet formation G. Fanourgakis et al. 10.5194/acp-19-8591-2019
- Limitations of passive remote sensing to constrain global cloud condensation nuclei P. Stier 10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016
- Evaluating errors due to unresolved scales in convection‐permitting numerical weather prediction J. Waller et al. 10.1002/qj.4043
- Accounting for observation uncertainty and bias due to unresolved scales with the Schmidt-Kalman filter Z. Bell et al. 10.1080/16000870.2020.1831830
- Spatial Representativeness Error in the Ground‐Level Observation Networks for Black Carbon Radiation Absorption R. Wang et al. 10.1002/2017GL076817
- Numerical simulation and evaluation of global ultrafine particle concentrations at the Earth's surface M. Kohl et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13191-2023
- Development of a global aerosol model using a two‐dimensional sectional method: 2. Evaluation and sensitivity simulations H. Matsui & N. Mahowald 10.1002/2017MS000937
- Anthropogenic Perturbations to the Atmospheric Molybdenum Cycle M. Wong et al. 10.1029/2020GB006787
- Global and Regional Evaluation of the CERES Edition-4A Surface Solar Radiation and Its Uncertainty Quantification K. Zhang et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3164471
- Using modelled relationships and satellite observations to attribute modelled aerosol biases over biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-33680-4
- Advancing global aerosol simulations with size-segregated anthropogenic particle number emissions F. Xausa et al. 10.5194/acp-18-10039-2018
- Machine learning for observation bias correction with application to dust storm data assimilation J. Jin et al. 10.5194/acp-19-10009-2019
- An AeroCom–AeroSat study: intercomparison of satellite AOD datasets for aerosol model evaluation N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-20-12431-2020
- Direct radiative effect of aerosols based on PARASOL and OMI satellite observations C. Lacagnina et al. 10.1002/2016JD025706
- Aerosols at the poles: an AeroCom Phase II multi-model evaluation M. Sand et al. 10.5194/acp-17-12197-2017
- The importance of comprehensive parameter sampling and multiple observations for robust constraint of aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. 10.5194/acp-18-13031-2018
- Constraining global aerosol emissions using POLDER/PARASOL satellite remote sensing observations C. Chen et al. 10.5194/acp-19-14585-2019
- Observational constraint on cloud susceptibility weakened by aerosol retrieval limitations P. Ma et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-05028-4
- High Potential of Asian Dust to Act as Ice Nucleating Particles in Mixed‐Phase Clouds Simulated With a Global Aerosol‐Climate Model K. Kawai et al. 10.1029/2020JD034263
- Bioindication and modelling of atmospheric deposition in forests enable exposure and effect monitoring at high spatial density across scales W. Schröder et al. 10.1007/s13595-017-0621-6
80 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Investigation of global particulate nitrate from the AeroCom phase III experiment H. Bian et al. 10.5194/acp-17-12911-2017
- Calibrating a global atmospheric chemistry transport model using Gaussian process emulation and ground-level concentrations of ozone and carbon monoxide E. Ryan & O. Wild 10.5194/gmd-14-5373-2021
- Site representativity of AERONET and GAW remotely sensed aerosol optical thickness and absorbing aerosol optical thickness observations N. Schutgens 10.5194/acp-20-7473-2020
- Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
- Observational operator for fair model evaluation with ground NO2 measurements L. Fang et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-8267-2024
- Do new sea spray aerosol source functions improve the results of a regional aerosol model? S. Barthel et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.016
- Representation Uncertainty in the Earth Sciences C. Bulgin et al. 10.1029/2021EA002129
- On the spatio-temporal representativeness of observations N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-17-9761-2017
- Effect of discrepancies caused by model resolution on model-measurement comparison for surface black carbon T. Sun et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118178
- Model calibration using ESEm v1.1.0 – an open, scalable Earth system emulator D. Watson-Parris et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-7659-2021
- How should we aggregate data? Methods accounting for the numerical distributions, with an assessment of aerosol optical depth A. Sayer & K. Knobelspiesse 10.5194/acp-19-15023-2019
- How Long Is Too Long? Variogram Analysis of AERONET Data to Aid Aerosol Validation and Intercomparison Studies A. Sayer 10.1029/2020EA001290
- “Traffic intervention” policy fails to mitigate air pollution in megacity Delhi S. Chowdhury et al. 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.018
- Impact of the ‘13th Five-Year Plan’ Policy on Air Quality in Pearl River Delta, China: A Case Study of Haizhu District in Guangzhou City Using WRF-Chem J. Zhan et al. 10.3390/app10155276
- Description and evaluation of a secondary organic aerosol and new particle formation scheme within TM5-MP v1.2 T. Bergman et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-683-2022
- On the representation error in data assimilation T. Janjić et al. 10.1002/qj.3130
- Aircraft measurements of black carbon vertical profiles show upper tropospheric variability and stability J. Schwarz et al. 10.1002/2016GL071241
- Modelling and Analysis of Aerosol and Cloud-Precipitable Water Inter-Hemispheric Interactions of Aerosol-Satellite Data Using Ground Observation C. Anoruo 10.1007/s41810-020-00078-y
- Concentrations and radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols from 1750 to 2014 simulated with the Oslo CTM3 and CEDS emission inventory M. Lund et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-4909-2018
- Biomass burning aerosol over the Amazon: analysis of aircraft, surface and satellite observations using a global aerosol model C. Reddington et al. 10.5194/acp-19-9125-2019
- Assessment of aerosol–cloud–radiation correlations in satellite observations, climate models and reanalysis F. Bender et al. 10.1007/s00382-018-4384-z
- Modelling mineral dust emissions and atmospheric dispersion with MADE3 in EMAC v2.54 C. Beer et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020
- AEROCOM and AEROSAT AAOD and SSA study – Part 1: Evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021
- Aerosol Absorption: Progress Towards Global and Regional Constraints B. Samset et al. 10.1007/s40641-018-0091-4
- Development and Evaluation of an Explicit Treatment of Aerosol Processes at Cloud Scale Within a Multi‐Scale Modeling Framework (MMF) G. Lin et al. 10.1029/2018MS001287
- Robust observational constraint of uncertain aerosol processes and emissions in a climate model and the effect on aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. 10.5194/acp-20-9491-2020
- Constraints on global aerosol number concentration, SO<sub>2</sub> and condensation sink in UKESM1 using ATom measurements A. Ranjithkumar et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4979-2021
- Towards improved and more routine Earth system model evaluation in CMIP V. Eyring et al. 10.5194/esd-7-813-2016
- Estimating Source Region Influences on Black Carbon Abundance, Microphysics, and Radiative Effect Observed Over South Korea K. Lamb et al. 10.1029/2018JD029257
- Ocean Temperature Profiling Lidar: Analysis of Technology and Potential for Rapid Ocean Observations J. Moisan et al. 10.3390/rs16071236
- In situ constraints on the vertical distribution of global aerosol D. Watson-Parris et al. 10.5194/acp-19-11765-2019
- The 3D biogeochemical marine mercury cycling model MERCY v2.0 – linking atmospheric Hg to methylmercury in fish J. Bieser et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-2649-2023
- Spatial Coverage of Monitoring Networks: A Climate Observing System Simulation Experiment E. Weatherhead et al. 10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0040.1
- Factors controlling black carbon distribution in the Arctic L. Qi et al. 10.5194/acp-17-1037-2017
- The Evaluation of the North Atlantic Climate System in UKESM1 Historical Simulations for CMIP6 J. Robson et al. 10.1029/2020MS002126
- Bridging the gap: integrating models and observations for better ecosystem understanding M. Skogen et al. 10.3354/meps14616
- Sources of uncertainty in atmospheric dispersion modeling in support of Comprehensive Nuclear–Test–Ban Treaty monitoring and verification system S. Mekhaimr & M. Abdel Wahab 10.1016/j.apr.2019.03.008
- Multi-model simulations of aerosol and ozone radiative forcing due to anthropogenic emission changes during the period 1990–2015 G. Myhre et al. 10.5194/acp-17-2709-2017
- The Radiative Forcing of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in Liquid Clouds: Wrestling and Embracing Uncertainty J. Mülmenstädt & G. Feingold 10.1007/s40641-018-0089-y
- Absorbing aerosols over Asia – an inter-model and model-observation comparison study using CAM5.3-Oslo L. Frey et al. 10.1080/16000889.2021.1909815
- Machine learning based bias correction for numerical chemical transport models M. Xu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118022
- Strong Contrast in Remote Black Carbon Aerosol Loadings Between the Atlantic and Pacific Basins J. Katich et al. 10.1029/2018JD029206
- Global aerosol modeling with MADE3 (v3.0) in EMAC (based on v2.53): model description and evaluation J. Kaiser et al. 10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019
- Jury is still out on the radiative forcing by black carbon O. Boucher et al. 10.1073/pnas.1607005113
- A Coupled Evaluation of Operational MODIS and Model Aerosol Products for Maritime Environments Using Sun Photometry: Evaluation of the Fine and Coarse Mode J. Reid et al. 10.3390/rs14132978
- Unveiling aerosol–cloud interactions – Part 1: Cloud contamination in satellite products enhances the aerosol indirect forcing estimate M. Christensen et al. 10.5194/acp-17-13151-2017
- Global distribution of maritime low clouds with an emphasis on different aerosol types and meteorological parameters inferred from multi-satellite and reanalysis data during 2007–2016 B. Pan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118082
- Is Black Carbon an Unimportant Ice‐Nucleating Particle in Mixed‐Phase Clouds? J. Vergara‐Temprado et al. 10.1002/2017JD027831
- Worldwide impact of aerosol’s time scale on the predicted long-term concentrating solar power potential J. Ruiz-Arias et al. 10.1038/srep30546
- SALSA2.0: The sectional aerosol module of the aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0 H. Kokkola et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-3833-2018
- Global aerosol simulations using NICAM.16 on a 14 km grid spacing for a climate study: improved and remaining issues relative to a lower-resolution model D. Goto et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-3731-2020
- Validation of SOAR VIIRS Over‐Water Aerosol Retrievals and Context Within the Global Satellite Aerosol Data Record A. Sayer et al. 10.1029/2018JD029465
- Community Intercomparison Suite (CIS) v1.4.0: a tool for intercomparing models and observations D. Watson-Parris et al. 10.5194/gmd-9-3093-2016
- Assimilation of MODIS Dark Target and Deep Blue observations in the dust aerosol component of NMMB-MONARCH version 1.0 E. Di Tomaso et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-1107-2017
- Evaluation of aerosol–cloud interactions in E3SM using a Lagrangian framework M. Christensen et al. 10.5194/acp-23-2789-2023
- The importance of the representation of air pollution emissions for the modeled distribution and radiative effects of black carbon in the Arctic J. Schacht et al. 10.5194/acp-19-11159-2019
- Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Tropospheric ozone from 1877 to 2016, observed levels, trends and uncertainties D. Tarasick et al. 10.1525/elementa.376
- Spatial Representativeness of Surface‐Measured Variations of Downward Solar Radiation M. Schwarz et al. 10.1002/2017JD027261
- A review and framework for the evaluation of pixel-level uncertainty estimates in satellite aerosol remote sensing A. Sayer et al. 10.5194/amt-13-373-2020
- Improving forest sampling strategies for assessment of fuel reduction burning M. Gharun et al. 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.001
- Short Black Carbon lifetime inferred from a global set of aircraft observations M. Lund et al. 10.1038/s41612-018-0040-x
- Evaluation of global simulations of aerosol particle and cloud condensation nuclei number, with implications for cloud droplet formation G. Fanourgakis et al. 10.5194/acp-19-8591-2019
- Limitations of passive remote sensing to constrain global cloud condensation nuclei P. Stier 10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016
- Evaluating errors due to unresolved scales in convection‐permitting numerical weather prediction J. Waller et al. 10.1002/qj.4043
- Accounting for observation uncertainty and bias due to unresolved scales with the Schmidt-Kalman filter Z. Bell et al. 10.1080/16000870.2020.1831830
- Spatial Representativeness Error in the Ground‐Level Observation Networks for Black Carbon Radiation Absorption R. Wang et al. 10.1002/2017GL076817
- Numerical simulation and evaluation of global ultrafine particle concentrations at the Earth's surface M. Kohl et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13191-2023
- Development of a global aerosol model using a two‐dimensional sectional method: 2. Evaluation and sensitivity simulations H. Matsui & N. Mahowald 10.1002/2017MS000937
- Anthropogenic Perturbations to the Atmospheric Molybdenum Cycle M. Wong et al. 10.1029/2020GB006787
- Global and Regional Evaluation of the CERES Edition-4A Surface Solar Radiation and Its Uncertainty Quantification K. Zhang et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3164471
- Using modelled relationships and satellite observations to attribute modelled aerosol biases over biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-33680-4
- Advancing global aerosol simulations with size-segregated anthropogenic particle number emissions F. Xausa et al. 10.5194/acp-18-10039-2018
- Machine learning for observation bias correction with application to dust storm data assimilation J. Jin et al. 10.5194/acp-19-10009-2019
- An AeroCom–AeroSat study: intercomparison of satellite AOD datasets for aerosol model evaluation N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-20-12431-2020
- Direct radiative effect of aerosols based on PARASOL and OMI satellite observations C. Lacagnina et al. 10.1002/2016JD025706
- Aerosols at the poles: an AeroCom Phase II multi-model evaluation M. Sand et al. 10.5194/acp-17-12197-2017
- The importance of comprehensive parameter sampling and multiple observations for robust constraint of aerosol radiative forcing J. Johnson et al. 10.5194/acp-18-13031-2018
- Constraining global aerosol emissions using POLDER/PARASOL satellite remote sensing observations C. Chen et al. 10.5194/acp-19-14585-2019
- Observational constraint on cloud susceptibility weakened by aerosol retrieval limitations P. Ma et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-05028-4
- High Potential of Asian Dust to Act as Ice Nucleating Particles in Mixed‐Phase Clouds Simulated With a Global Aerosol‐Climate Model K. Kawai et al. 10.1029/2020JD034263
Saved (preprint)
Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Short summary
We show that evaluating global aerosol model data with observations of very different spatial scales (200 vs. 10 km) can lead to large discrepancies, solely due to different spatial sampling. Strategies for reducing these sampling errors are developed and tested using a set of high-resolution model simulations.
We show that evaluating global aerosol model data with observations of very different spatial...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint