Articles | Volume 23, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9911-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9911-2023
Research article
 | 
06 Sep 2023
Research article |  | 06 Sep 2023

A single-point modeling approach for the intercomparison and evaluation of ozone dry deposition across chemical transport models (Activity 2 of AQMEII4)

Olivia E. Clifton, Donna Schwede, Christian Hogrefe, Jesse O. Bash, Sam Bland, Philip Cheung, Mhairi Coyle, Lisa Emberson, Johannes Flemming, Erick Fredj, Stefano Galmarini, Laurens Ganzeveld, Orestis Gazetas, Ignacio Goded, Christopher D. Holmes, László Horváth, Vincent Huijnen, Qian Li, Paul A. Makar, Ivan Mammarella, Giovanni Manca, J. William Munger, Juan L. Pérez-Camanyo, Jonathan Pleim, Limei Ran, Roberto San Jose, Sam J. Silva, Ralf Staebler, Shihan Sun, Amos P. K. Tai, Eran Tas, Timo Vesala, Tamás Weidinger, Zhiyong Wu, and Leiming Zhang

Related authors

HTAP3-OPNS: ozone, PM, nitrogen and sulphur deposition – multi-model experiments to support the revision of the CLRTAP Gothenburg Protocol
Tim Butler, Tabish Ansari, Claudio A. Belis, Elisa Bergas-Masso, Willem van Caspel, Hilde Fagerli, Johannes Flemming, Marta Garcia Vivanco, Paul Griffiths, Douglas S. Hamilton, Coralina Hernandez Trujillo, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Vincent Huijnen, Johannes W. Kaiser, Gerbrand Koren, Zbigniew Klimont, Florian Lindl, Aura Lupascu, Mariano Mertens, Martijn Schaap, Steven T. Turnock, Oliver Wild, Philipp Weiss, Jacek Kaminski, Rosa Wu, and Terry Keating
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 10023–10049, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10023-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10023-2026, 2026
Short summary
Drought responses of a Norway spruce forest on drained peat soil: combining sap-flow sensors, eddy-covariance, meteorological, soil and UAV data
Pavel Konstantinovich Alekseychik, Mikko Peltoniemi, Raisa Mäkipää, Ville Tuominen, Tuomas Laurila, Hamlyn Jones, Mitro Müller, Evgeny Lopatin, Helena Rautakoski, Timo Vesala, and Samuli Launiainen
Biogeosciences, 23, 7091–7127, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7091-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7091-2026, 2026
Short summary
Evaluation of HNO3, SO2, and NH3 in the Surface Tiled Aerosol and Gaseous Exchange (STAGE) option in the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model version 5.3.2 against field-scale, in situ and satellite observations
Jesse O. Bash, John T. Walker, Zhiyong Wu, Ian C. Rumsey, Ben Murphy, Christian Hogrefe, Kathleen M. Fahey, Havala O. T. Pye, Matthew R. Jones, K. Wyat Appel, Mark W. Shephard, Najwa I. Alnsour, and Karen E. Cady-Periera
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 9377–9393, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9377-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9377-2026, 2026
Short summary
Good performance of low-cost fast-response carbon dioxide sensor based on intercomparison with the standard eddy-covariance system
Üllar Rannik, Ivan Mammarella, Timo Vesala, Pirkko Väkimies, Hilkka Heiskari-Tuohiniemi, and Mika Korkiakoski
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 6159–6169, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-6159-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-6159-2026, 2026
Short summary
On spatial scales of local aerosol production in boreal ecosystems
Ekaterina Ezhova, Üllar Rannik, Santeri Tuovinen, Olga Garmash, Otso Peräkylä, Piaopiao Ke, Topi Laanti, Janne Lampilahti, Markus Lampimäki, Anna Lintunen, Veli-Matti Kerminen, Janne Rinne, Timo Vesala, and Markku Kulmala
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 13463–13483, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13463-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13463-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Ainsworth, E. A., Yendrek, C. R., Sitch, S., Collins, W. J., and Emberson, L. D.: The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 63, 637–661, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103829, 2012. 
Anav, A., Proietti, C., Menut, L., Carnicelli, S., De Marco, A., and Paoletti, E.: Sensitivity of stomatal conductance to soil moisture: implications for tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5747–5763, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5747-2018, 2018. 
Andersson, C. and Engardt, M.: European ozone in a future climate: Importance of changes in dry deposition and isoprene emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D02303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011690, 2010. 
Baldocchi, D. D., Hicks, B. B., and Camara, P.: A canopy stomatal resistance model for gaseous deposition to vegetated surfaces, Atmos. Environ., 21, 91–101, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(87)90274-5, 1987. 
Download
Short summary
A primary sink of air pollutants is dry deposition. Dry deposition estimates differ across the models used to simulate atmospheric chemistry. Here, we introduce an effort to examine dry deposition schemes from atmospheric chemistry models. We provide our approach’s rationale, document the schemes, and describe datasets used to drive and evaluate the schemes. We also launch the analysis of results by evaluating against observations and identifying the processes leading to model–model differences.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint