Articles | Volume 23, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9911-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9911-2023
Research article
 | 
06 Sep 2023
Research article |  | 06 Sep 2023

A single-point modeling approach for the intercomparison and evaluation of ozone dry deposition across chemical transport models (Activity 2 of AQMEII4)

Olivia E. Clifton, Donna Schwede, Christian Hogrefe, Jesse O. Bash, Sam Bland, Philip Cheung, Mhairi Coyle, Lisa Emberson, Johannes Flemming, Erick Fredj, Stefano Galmarini, Laurens Ganzeveld, Orestis Gazetas, Ignacio Goded, Christopher D. Holmes, László Horváth, Vincent Huijnen, Qian Li, Paul A. Makar, Ivan Mammarella, Giovanni Manca, J. William Munger, Juan L. Pérez-Camanyo, Jonathan Pleim, Limei Ran, Roberto San Jose, Sam J. Silva, Ralf Staebler, Shihan Sun, Amos P. K. Tai, Eran Tas, Timo Vesala, Tamás Weidinger, Zhiyong Wu, and Leiming Zhang

Viewed

Total article views: 2,210 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,679 483 48 2,210 148 28 32
  • HTML: 1,679
  • PDF: 483
  • XML: 48
  • Total: 2,210
  • Supplement: 148
  • BibTeX: 28
  • EndNote: 32
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Mar 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Mar 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,210 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,207 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 May 2024
Download
Short summary
A primary sink of air pollutants is dry deposition. Dry deposition estimates differ across the models used to simulate atmospheric chemistry. Here, we introduce an effort to examine dry deposition schemes from atmospheric chemistry models. We provide our approach’s rationale, document the schemes, and describe datasets used to drive and evaluate the schemes. We also launch the analysis of results by evaluating against observations and identifying the processes leading to model–model differences.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint