Articles | Volume 23, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14779-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14779-2023
Research article
 | 
01 Dec 2023
Research article |  | 01 Dec 2023

The Emissions Model Intercomparison Project (Emissions-MIP): quantifying model sensitivity to emission characteristics

Hamza Ahsan, Hailong Wang, Jingbo Wu, Mingxuan Wu, Steven J. Smith, Susanne Bauer, Harrison Suchyta, Dirk Olivié, Gunnar Myhre, Hitoshi Matsui, Huisheng Bian, Jean-François Lamarque, Ken Carslaw, Larry Horowitz, Leighton Regayre, Mian Chin, Michael Schulz, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Toshihiko Takemura, and Vaishali Naik

Related authors

Assessing COVID-19 lockdowns' impacts on global urban PM2.5 air quality with observations and modeling
Claire M. Yu, Mian Chin, Qian Tan, Huisheng Bian, Peter R. Colarco, and Hongbin Yu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 14411–14434, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-14411-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-14411-2025, 2025
Short summary
A multi-model approach to constrain the atmospheric hydrogen budget
Srinath Krishnan, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Øivind Hodnebrog, Gunnar Myhre, Maria Sand, Marit Sandstad, Hannah Bryant, Didier A. Hauglustaine, Fabien Paulot, Michael Prather, and David Stevenson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4898,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4898, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Review of interactive open-access publishing with community-based open peer review for improved scientific discourse and quality assurance
Barbara Ervens, Ken S. Carslaw, Thomas Koop, and Ulrich Pöschl
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 13903–13952, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13903-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13903-2025, 2025
Short summary
Dust radiative forcing in CMIP6 Earth System models: insights from the AerChemMIP piClim-2xdust experiment
Ove W. Haugvaldstad, Dirk Olivié, Trude Storelvmo, and Michael Schulz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 13199–13219, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13199-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13199-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantifying the impacts of atmospheric rivers on the surface energy budget of the Arctic based on reanalysis
Chen Zhang, John J. Cassano, Mark W. Seefeldt, Hailong Wang, Weiming Ma, and Wen-wen Tung
The Cryosphere, 19, 4671–4699, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4671-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4671-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Akingunola, A., Makar, P. A., Zhang, J., Darlington, A., Li, S.-M., Gordon, M., Moran, M. D., and Zheng, Q.: A chemical transport model study of plume-rise and particle size distribution for the Athabasca oil sands, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8667–8688, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8667-2018, 2018. 
Ahsan, H. and Smith, S. J.: CMIP6 historical anthropogenic emissions data, DataHub [data set], https://doi.org/10.25584/DataHub/1769948, 2021. 
Ahsan, H., Suchyta, H., and Smith, S. J.: Emissions-MIP climate model results (ESMValTool), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8374475, 2023. 
Baldwin, S., Asay-Davis, X., Lacinski, L., Zhang, J. C., and Kennedy, J. H.: E3SM-Project/e3sm_to_cmip: 1.6.1, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4697481, 2021. 
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
We examine the impact of the assumed effective height of SO2 injection, SO2 and BC emission seasonality, and the assumed fraction of SO2 emissions injected as SO4 on climate and chemistry model results. We find that the SO2 injection height has a large impact on surface SO2 concentrations and, in some models, radiative flux. These assumptions are a hidden source of inter-model variability and may be leading to bias in some climate model results.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint