Articles | Volume 23, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14779-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14779-2023
Research article
 | 
01 Dec 2023
Research article |  | 01 Dec 2023

The Emissions Model Intercomparison Project (Emissions-MIP): quantifying model sensitivity to emission characteristics

Hamza Ahsan, Hailong Wang, Jingbo Wu, Mingxuan Wu, Steven J. Smith, Susanne Bauer, Harrison Suchyta, Dirk Olivié, Gunnar Myhre, Hitoshi Matsui, Huisheng Bian, Jean-François Lamarque, Ken Carslaw, Larry Horowitz, Leighton Regayre, Mian Chin, Michael Schulz, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Toshihiko Takemura, and Vaishali Naik

Related authors

Assessment of the Met Office Global Coupled model version 5 (GC5) configurations
Prince Xavier, Martin Willett, Tim Graham, Paul Earnshaw, Dan Copsey, Nikesh Narayan, Charline Marzin, Alistair Sellar, Duncan Ackerley, Adam Blaker, Ed Blockley, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, Andrew Bushell, Nakbin Choi, Xin Rong Chua, Catherine Guiavarc'h, Muhammad Hassim, Julian Heming, Debra Hudson, Sarah Ineson, Anthony Jones, Colin Jones, Richard Keane, Kiwook Kim, Jiyeong Kim, Till Kuhlbrodt, Myong-In Lee, Richard Levine, Chen Li, Gill Martin, Alex Megann, Anne Mccabe, Aurel Moise, Leighton Regayre, Jeff Ridley, Luke Roberts, Sandeep Sahany, Reinhard K. H. Schiemann, David Storkey, Warren Tennant, Lorenzo Tomassini, Yoko Tsushima, Graham P. Weedon, Alex West, Matthew C. Wheeler, Keith Williams, Xiaobing Zhou, and Hongyan Zhu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4281,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4281, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Fit-for-purpose assessment of satellite aerosol and cloud datasets for constraining and monitor aerosol–cloud interactions
Marta Luffarelli, Nicolas Misk, Analy Baltodano, Thomas Popp, Stefan Kinne, Ulrike Stöffelmair, Michael Schulz, Jan Griesfeller, Ove W. Haugvalstad, Martin Stengel, Sarah Brüning, Gareth Thomas, Elisa Carboni, Daniel Robbins, and Michael Eisinger
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-327,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-327, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
A multi-model approach to constrain the atmospheric hydrogen budget
Srinath Krishnan, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Øivind Hodnebrog, Gunnar Myhre, Maria Sand, Marit Sandstad, Hannah Bryant, Didier A. Hauglustaine, Fabien Paulot, Michael Prather, and David Stevenson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 9509–9539, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9509-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9509-2026, 2026
Short summary
Temperature and radiative responses to anthropogenic aerosols over the Mediterranean Basin based on CMIP6 Earth system models
Alkiviadis Kalisoras, Prodromos Zanis, Aristeidis K. Georgoulias, Dimitris Akritidis, Robert J. Allen, and Vaishali Naik
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 9413–9441, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9413-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9413-2026, 2026
Short summary
Benchmarking ozone stress parameterizations in CLM5: a global mechanistic assessment of thresholds and memory effects
Peng Zhou, Jieming Chou, Li Dan, Jean-François Lamarque, Muhammad Bilal, Fang Li, Mengting Sun, Rebecca Buchholz, Desneiges Murray, Zhaoxiang Cao, Jing Peng, Kai Li, Fuqiang Yang, Wei Pan, Jinyan Chen, and Liwen Xing
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 5491–5513, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-5491-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-5491-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Akingunola, A., Makar, P. A., Zhang, J., Darlington, A., Li, S.-M., Gordon, M., Moran, M. D., and Zheng, Q.: A chemical transport model study of plume-rise and particle size distribution for the Athabasca oil sands, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8667–8688, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8667-2018, 2018. 
Ahsan, H. and Smith, S. J.: CMIP6 historical anthropogenic emissions data, DataHub [data set], https://doi.org/10.25584/DataHub/1769948, 2021. 
Ahsan, H., Suchyta, H., and Smith, S. J.: Emissions-MIP climate model results (ESMValTool), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8374475, 2023. 
Baldwin, S., Asay-Davis, X., Lacinski, L., Zhang, J. C., and Kennedy, J. H.: E3SM-Project/e3sm_to_cmip: 1.6.1, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4697481, 2021. 
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
We examine the impact of the assumed effective height of SO2 injection, SO2 and BC emission seasonality, and the assumed fraction of SO2 emissions injected as SO4 on climate and chemistry model results. We find that the SO2 injection height has a large impact on surface SO2 concentrations and, in some models, radiative flux. These assumptions are a hidden source of inter-model variability and may be leading to bias in some climate model results.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint