Articles | Volume 18, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1593-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1593-2018
Research article
 | 
05 Feb 2018
Research article |  | 05 Feb 2018

Initiation of secondary ice production in clouds

Sylvia C. Sullivan, Corinna Hoose, Alexei Kiselev, Thomas Leisner, and Athanasios Nenes

Related authors

Sensitivity of ice cloud radiative heating to optical, macro- and microphysical properties
Edgardo I. Sepulveda Araya, Sylvia C. Sullivan, and Aiko Voigt
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3212,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3212, 2024
Short summary
Opinion: Tropical cirrus – from micro-scale processes to climate-scale impacts
Blaž Gasparini, Sylvia C. Sullivan, Adam B. Sokol, Bernd Kärcher, Eric Jensen, and Dennis L. Hartmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15413–15444, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15413-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15413-2023, 2023
Short summary
How does cloud-radiative heating over the North Atlantic change with grid spacing, convective parameterization, and microphysics scheme in ICON version 2.1.00?
Sylvia Sullivan, Behrooz Keshtgar, Nicole Albern, Elzina Bala, Christoph Braun, Anubhav Choudhary, Johannes Hörner, Hilke Lentink, Georgios Papavasileiou, and Aiko Voigt
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3535–3551, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3535-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3535-2023, 2023
Short summary
Cold cloud microphysical process rates in a global chemistry–climate model
Sara Bacer, Sylvia C. Sullivan, Odran Sourdeval, Holger Tost, Jos Lelieveld, and Andrea Pozzer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1485–1505, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1485-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1485-2021, 2021
Short summary
The impact of secondary ice production on Arctic stratocumulus
Georgia Sotiropoulou, Sylvia Sullivan, Julien Savre, Gary Lloyd, Thomas Lachlan-Cope, Annica M. L. Ekman, and Athanasios Nenes
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1301–1316, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1301-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1301-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds and Precipitation | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Evaluation of biases in mid-to-high-latitude surface snowfall and cloud phase in ERA5 and CMIP6 using satellite observations
Franziska Hellmuth, Tim Carlsen, Anne Sophie Daloz, Robert Oscar David, Haochi Che, and Trude Storelvmo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1353–1383, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1353-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1353-2025, 2025
Short summary
Dynamical imprints on precipitation cluster statistics across a hierarchy of high-resolution simulations
Claudia Christine Stephan and Bjorn Stevens
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1209–1226, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1209-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1209-2025, 2025
Short summary
Role of a key microphysical factor in mixed-phase stratocumulus clouds and their interactions with aerosols
Seoung Soo Lee, Chang Hoon Jung, Jinho Choi, Young Jun Yoon, Junshik Um, Youtong Zheng, Jianping Guo, Manguttathil G. Manoj, and Sang-Keun Song
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 705–726, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-705-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-705-2025, 2025
Short summary
Correction of ERA5 temperature and relative humidity biases by bivariate quantile mapping for contrail formation analysis
Kevin Wolf, Nicolas Bellouin, Olivier Boucher, Susanne Rohs, and Yun Li
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 157–181, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-157-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-157-2025, 2025
Short summary
Can pollen affect precipitation?
Marje Prank, Juha Tonttila, Xiaoxia Shang, Sami Romakkaniemi, and Tomi Raatikainen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 183–197, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-183-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-183-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Beard, K. V.: Ice initiation in warm-base convective clouds: an assessment of microphysical mechanisms, Atmos. Res., 28, 125–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(92)90024-5, 1992. a, b, c
Bogacki, P. and Shampine, L. F.: A 3(2) pair of Runge–Kutta formulas, Appl. Math. Lett., 2, 321–325, https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-9659(89)90079-7, 1989. a
Borys, D. R., Lowenthal, D. H., Cohn, S. A., and Brown, W. O. J.: Mountaintop and radar measurements of anthropogenic aerosol effects on snow growth and snowfall rate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1538, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016855, 2003. a
Cannon, T. D., Dye, J. E., and Toutenhoofd, V.: The mechanism of precipitation formation in Northeastern Colorado cumulus II. Sailplane measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 2148–2151, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031< 2152:TMOPFI> 2.0.CO;2, 1974. a
Chen, J.-P. and Lamb, D.: The theoretical basis for the parameterization of ice crystal habits: growth by vapor deposition, J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 1206–1221, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469, 1994. a
Download
Short summary
Ice multiplication (IM) processes can have a profound impact on cloud and precipitation development but are poorly understood. Here we study whether a lower limit of ice nuclei exists to initiate IM. The lower limit is found to be extremely low (0.01 per liter or less). A counterintuitive but profound conclusion thus emerges: IM requires cloud formation around a thermodynamic sweet spot and is sensitive to fluctuations in cloud condensation nuclei concentration alone.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint