Articles | Volume 17, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13103-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13103-2017
Research article
 | 
07 Nov 2017
Research article |  | 07 Nov 2017

Ensemble prediction of air quality using the WRF/CMAQ model system for health effect studies in China

Jianlin Hu, Xun Li, Lin Huang, Qi Ying, Qiang Zhang, Bin Zhao, Shuxiao Wang, and Hongliang Zhang

Related authors

Estimation of secondary PM2.5 in China and the United States using a multi-tracer approach
Haoran Zhang, Nan Li, Keqin Tang, Hong Liao, Chong Shi, Cheng Huang, Hongli Wang, Song Guo, Min Hu, Xinlei Ge, Mindong Chen, Zhenxin Liu, Huan Yu, and Jianlin Hu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5495–5514, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5495-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5495-2022, 2022
Short summary
Local and regional contributions to fine particulate matter in the 18 cities of Sichuan Basin, southwestern China
Xue Qiao, Hao Guo, Ya Tang, Pengfei Wang, Wenye Deng, Xing Zhao, Jianlin Hu, Qi Ying, and Hongliang Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5791–5803, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5791-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5791-2019, 2019
Short summary
Source contributions and potential reductions to health effects of particulate matter in India
Hao Guo, Sri Harsha Kota, Kaiyu Chen, Shovan Kumar Sahu, Jianlin Hu, Qi Ying, Yuan Wang, and Hongliang Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15219–15229, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15219-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15219-2018, 2018
Short summary
Long-term particulate matter modeling for health effect studies in California – Part 2: Concentrations and sources of ultrafine organic aerosols
Jianlin Hu, Shantanu Jathar, Hongliang Zhang, Qi Ying, Shu-Hua Chen, Christopher D. Cappa, and Michael J. Kleeman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5379–5391, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5379-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5379-2017, 2017
Short summary
Modeling biogenic and anthropogenic secondary organic aerosol in China
Jianlin Hu, Peng Wang, Qi Ying, Hongliang Zhang, Jianjun Chen, Xinlei Ge, Xinghua Li, Jingkun Jiang, Shuxiao Wang, Jie Zhang, Yu Zhao, and Yingyi Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 77–92, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-77-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-77-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Impacts of meteorology and emission reductions on haze pollution during the lockdown in the North China Plain
Lang Liu, Xin Long, Yi Li, Zengliang Zang, Fengwen Wang, Yan Han, Zhier Bao, Yang Chen, Tian Feng, and Jinxin Yang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1569–1585, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1569-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1569-2025, 2025
Short summary
Impact of mineral dust on the global nitrate aerosol direct and indirect radiative effect
Alexandros Milousis, Klaus Klingmüller, Alexandra P. Tsimpidi, Jasper F. Kok, Maria Kanakidou, Athanasios Nenes, and Vlassis A. Karydis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1333–1351, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1333-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1333-2025, 2025
Short summary
The surface tension and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activation of sea spray aerosol particles
Judith Kleinheins, Nadia Shardt, Ulrike Lohmann, and Claudia Marcolli
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 881–903, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-881-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-881-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring the processes controlling secondary inorganic aerosol: evaluating the global GEOS-Chem simulation using a suite of aircraft campaigns
Olivia G. Norman, Colette L. Heald, Solomon Bililign, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Hugh Coe, Marc N. Fiddler, Jaime R. Green, Jose L. Jimenez, Katharina Kaiser, Jin Liao, Ann M. Middlebrook, Benjamin A. Nault, John B. Nowak, Johannes Schneider, and André Welti
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 771–795, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-771-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-771-2025, 2025
Short summary
Influence of land cover change on atmospheric organic gases, aerosols, and radiative effects
Ryan Vella, Matthew Forrest, Andrea Pozzer, Alexandra P. Tsimpidi, Thomas Hickler, Jos Lelieveld, and Holger Tost
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 243–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-243-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-243-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Akimoto, H., Ohara, T., Kurokawa, J.-i., and Horii, N.: Verification of energy consumption in China during 1996–2003 by using satellite observational data, Atmos. Environ., 40, 7663–7667, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.052, 2006.
Boylan, J. W. and Russell, A. G.: PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4946–4959, 2006.
Byun, D. and Schere, K. L.: Review of the Governing Equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System, Appl. Mech. Rev., 59, 51–77, 2006.
Carter, W. P. L. and Heo, G.: Development of revised SAPRC aromatics mechanisms, Final Report to the California Air Resources Board, Contracts No. 07-730 and 08-326, 12 April 2012, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, College of Engineering, University of California, USA, 2012.
Download
Short summary
The model performance of CMAQ with WRF using four different emission inventories in China was validated and compared to obtain the best air pollutants prediction for health effect studies of severe air pollution. The differences in performance of chemical transport model were analyzed for different months and regions in the vast part of China and ensemble predictions were firstly obtained from different inventories for health analysis with minimized errors for pollutants including PM2.5 and O3.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint