Articles | Volume 18, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9955-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9955-2018
Research article
 | 
13 Jul 2018
Research article |  | 13 Jul 2018

Investigating the yield of H2O and H2 from methane oxidation in the stratosphere

Franziska Frank, Patrick Jöckel, Sergey Gromov, and Martin Dameris

Related authors

Chemistry-climate feedback of atmospheric methane in a methane emission flux driven chemistry-climate model
Laura Stecher, Franziska Winterstein, Patrick Jöckel, Michael Ponater, Mariano Mertens, and Martin Dameris
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2938,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2938, 2024
Short summary
Updating the radiation infrastructure in MESSy (based on MESSy version 2.55)
Matthias Nützel, Laura Stecher, Patrick Jöckel, Franziska Winterstein, Martin Dameris, Michael Ponater, Phoebe Graf, and Markus Kunze
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5821–5849, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5821-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5821-2024, 2024
Short summary
Methane chemistry in a nutshell – the new submodels CH4 (v1.0) and TRSYNC (v1.0) in MESSy (v2.54.0)
Franziska Winterstein and Patrick Jöckel
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 661–674, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-661-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-661-2021, 2021
Short summary
Slow feedbacks resulting from strongly enhanced atmospheric methane mixing ratios in a chemistry–climate model with mixed-layer ocean
Laura Stecher, Franziska Winterstein, Martin Dameris, Patrick Jöckel, Michael Ponater, and Markus Kunze
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 731–754, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-731-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-731-2021, 2021
Short summary
Model simulations of atmospheric methane (1997–2016) and their evaluation using NOAA and AGAGE surface and IAGOS-CARIBIC aircraft observations
Peter H. Zimmermann, Carl A. M. Brenninkmeijer, Andrea Pozzer, Patrick Jöckel, Franziska Winterstein, Andreas Zahn, Sander Houweling, and Jos Lelieveld
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5787–5809, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5787-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5787-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
On the atmospheric budget of 1,2-dichloroethane and its impact on stratospheric chlorine and ozone (2002–2020)
Ryan Hossaini, David Sherry, Zihao Wang, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Wuhu Feng, David E. Oram, Karina E. Adcock, Stephen A. Montzka, Isobel J. Simpson, Andrea Mazzeo, Amber A. Leeson, Elliot Atlas, and Charles C.-K. Chou
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13457–13475, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13457-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13457-2024, 2024
Short summary
The return to 1980 stratospheric halogen levels: a moving target in ozone assessments from 2006 to 2022
Megan J. Lickley, John S. Daniel, Laura A. McBride, Ross J. Salawitch, and Guus J. M. Velders
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13081–13099, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13081-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13081-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impact of dehydration and extremely low HCl values in the Antarctic stratospheric vortex in mid-winter on ozone loss in spring
Yiran Zhang-Liu, Rolf Müller, Jens-Uwe Grooß, Sabine Robrecht, Bärbel Vogel, Abdul Mannan Zafar, and Ralph Lehmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12557–12574, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12557-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12557-2024, 2024
Short summary
Beyond self-healing: stabilizing and destabilizing photochemical adjustment of the ozone layer
Aaron Match, Edwin P. Gerber, and Stephan Fueglistaler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10305–10322, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10305-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10305-2024, 2024
Short summary
Solar FTIR measurements of NOx vertical distributions – Part 2: Experiment-based scaling factors describing the daytime variation in stratospheric NOx
Pinchas Nürnberg, Sarah A. Strode, and Ralf Sussmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10001–10012, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10001-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10001-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Austin, J., Wilson, J., Li, F., and Vömel, H.: Evolution of Water Vapor Concentrations and Stratospheric Age of Air in Coupled Chemistry-Climate Model Simulations, Am. Meteor. Soc., 905–921, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3866.1, 2007.
Boville, B. A., Kiehl, J. T., Rasch, P. J., and Bryan, F. O.: Improvements to the NCAR CSM-1 for Transient Climate Simulations, J. Climate, 14, 164–179, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<0164:ITTNCF>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Chiodo, G. and Polvani, L. M.: Reduced Southern Hemispheric circulation response to quadrupled CO2 due to stratospheric ozone feedback, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 465–474, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071011, 2017.
Download
Short summary
It is frequently assumed that one methane molecule produces two water molecules. Applying various modeling concepts, we find that the yield of water from methane is vertically not constantly 2. In the upper stratosphere and lower mesosphere, transport of intermediate H2 molecules even led to a yield greater than 2. We conclude that for a realistic chemical source of stratospheric water vapor, one must also take other sources (H2), intermediates and the chemical removal of water into account.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint