Articles | Volume 22, issue 1
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 197–214, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-197-2022
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 197–214, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-197-2022
Research article
07 Jan 2022
Research article | 07 Jan 2022

Specified dynamics scheme impacts on wave-mean flow dynamics, convection, and tracer transport in CESM2 (WACCM6)

Nicholas A. Davis et al.

Related authors

The role of tropical upwelling in explaining discrepancies between recent modeled and observed lower stratospheric ozone trends
Sean Davis, Nicholas Davis, Robert Portmann, Eric Ray, and Karen Rosenlof
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1267,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1267, 2022
Short summary
A comprehensive assessment of tropical stratospheric upwelling in the specified dynamics Community Earth System Model 1.2.2 – Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (CESM (WACCM))
Nicholas A. Davis, Sean M. Davis, Robert W. Portmann, Eric Ray, Karen H. Rosenlof, and Pengfei Yu
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 717–734, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-717-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-717-2020, 2020
Short summary
Changes in the width of the tropical belt due to simple radiative forcing changes in the GeoMIP simulations
Nicholas A. Davis, Dian J. Seidel, Thomas Birner, Sean M. Davis, and Simone Tilmes
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10083–10095, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10083-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10083-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Dynamics | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Exploring the link between austral stratospheric polar vortex anomalies and surface climate in chemistry-climate models
Nora Bergner, Marina Friedel, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Darryn Waugh, and Gabriel Chiodo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13915–13934, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13915-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13915-2022, 2022
Short summary
The impact of improved spatial and temporal resolution of reanalysis data on Lagrangian studies of the tropical tropopause layer
Stephen Bourguet and Marianna Linz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13325–13339, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13325-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13325-2022, 2022
Short summary
Dynamics of ENSO-driven stratosphere-to-troposphere transport of ozone over North America
John R. Albers, Amy H. Butler, Andrew O. Langford, Dillon Elsbury, and Melissa L. Breeden
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13035–13048, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13035-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13035-2022, 2022
Short summary
Ozone–gravity wave interaction in the upper stratosphere/lower mesosphere
Axel Gabriel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10425–10441, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10425-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10425-2022, 2022
Short summary
How can Brewer–Dobson circulation trends be estimated from changes in stratospheric water vapour and methane?
Liubov Poshyvailo-Strube, Rolf Müller, Stephan Fueglistaler, Michaela I. Hegglin, Johannes C. Laube, C. Michael Volk, and Felix Ploeger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9895–9914, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9895-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9895-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Abalos, M., Randel, W. J., Kinnison, D. E., and Serrano, E.: Quantifying tracer transport in the tropical lower stratosphere using WACCM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10591–10607, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10591-2013, 2013. a
Akiyoshi, H., Nakamura, T., Miyasaka, T., Shiotani, M., and Suzuki, M.: A nudged chemistry-climate model simulation of chemical constituent distribution at northern high-latitude stratosphere observed by SMILES and MLS during the 2009/2010 stratospheric sudden warming, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1361–1380, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023334, 2016. a, b
Allen, R., Sherwood, S., Norris, J., and Zender, C. S.: Recent Northern Hemisphere tropical expansion primarily driven by black carbon and tropospheric ozone, Nature, 485, 350–354, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11097, 2012. a
Ball, W. T., Alsing, J., Mortlock, D. J., Staehelin, J., Haigh, J. D., Peter, T., Tummon, F., Stübi, R., Stenke, A., Anderson, J., Bourassa, A., Davis, S. M., Degenstein, D., Frith, S., Froidevaux, L., Roth, C., Sofieva, V., Wang, R., Wild, J., Yu, P., Ziemke, J. R., and Rozanov, E. V.: Evidence for a continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsetting ozone layer recovery, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1379–1394, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1379-2018, 2018. a, b
Barnes, E. A. and Fiore, A. M.: Surface ozone variability and the jet position: Implications for projecting future air quality, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50411, 2013. a
Download
Short summary
Specified dynamics schemes attempt to constrain the atmospheric circulation in a climate model to isolate the role of transport in chemical variability, evaluate model physics, and interpret field campaign observations. We show that the specified dynamics scheme in CESM2 erroneously suppresses convection and induces circulation errors that project onto errors in tracers, even using the most optimal settings. Development of a more sophisticated scheme is necessary for future progress.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint