Articles | Volume 26, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13267-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13267-2026
Research article
 | 
22 Sep 2026
Research article |  | 22 Sep 2026

The Cold-Air Outbreaks in the Marine Boundary Layer Experiment model-observation intercomparison project (COMBLE-MIP) – Part 1: Model specification, observational constraints, and preliminary findings

Timothy W. Juliano, Florian Tornow, Ann M. Fridlind, Andrew S. Ackerman, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Bart Geerts, Christian P. Lackner, David Painemal, Israel Silber, Mikhail Ovchinnikov, Gunilla Svensson, Michael Tjernström, Peng Wu, Alejandro Baró Pérez, Peter Bogenschutz, Dmitry Chechin, Kamal Kant Chandrakar, Jan Chylik, Andrey Debolskiy, Rostislav Fadeev, Anu Gupta, Luisa Ickes, Michail Karalis, Martin Köhler, Branko Kosović, Peter Kuma, Weiwei Li, Evgeny Mortikov, Hugh Morrison, Roel A. J. Neggers, Anna Possner, Tomi Raatikainen, Lea Raillard, Sami Romakkaniemi, Niklas Schnierstein, Shin-ichiro Shima, Nikita Silin, Mikhail Tolstykh, Étienne Vignon, Lulin Xue, Meng Zhang, and Xue Zheng

Related authors

Implementation of a three-dimensional planetary boundary layer parameterization in a coupled modeling system and evaluation of “gray zone” simulations of a wind-wave event off the US California Coast using observations
Eric A. Hendricks, Timothy W. Juliano, Branko Kosović, Sue Ellen Haupt, Brian J. Gaudet, and Geng Xia
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 7369–7387, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7369-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7369-2026, 2026
Short summary
The Cold-Air Outbreaks in the Marine Boundary Layer Experiment model-observation intercomparison project (COMBLE-MIP), Part I: Model specification, observational constraints, and preliminary findings
Timothy W. Juliano, Florian Tornow, Ann M. Fridlind, Andrew S. Ackerman, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Bart Geerts, Christian P. Lackner, David Painemal, Israel Silber, Mikhail Ovchinnikov, Gunilla Svensson, Michael Tjernström, Peng Wu, Alejandro Baró Pérez, Peter Bogenschutz, Dmitry Chechin, Kamal Kant Chandrakar, Jan Chylik, Andrey Debolskiy, Rostislav Fadeev, Anu Gupta, Luisa Ickes, Michail Karalis, Martin Köhler, Branko Kosović, Peter Kuma, Weiwei Li, Evgeny Mortikov, Hugh Morrison, Roel A. J. Neggers, Anna Possner, Tomi Raatikainen, Sami Romakkaniemi, Niklas Schnierstein, Shin-ichiro Shima, Nikita Silin, Mikhail Tolstykh, Lulin Xue, Meng Zhang, and Xue Zheng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6217,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6217, 2026
Preprint archived
Short summary
Model sensitivity across scales: a case study of simulating an offshore low-level jet
Patrick Hawbecker, William Lassman, Timothy W. Juliano, Branko Kosović, and Sue Ellen Haupt
Wind Energ. Sci., 11, 51–69, https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-51-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-11-51-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackerman, A., Fridlind, A., and Tornow, F.: DHARMA LES code and input files for COMBLE-MIP Part I, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21244123, 2026. a
Aemisegger, F. and Papritz, L.: A climatology of strong large-scale ocean evaporation events. Part I: Identification, global distribution, and associated climate conditions, J. Climate, 31, 7287–7312, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0591.1, 2018. a
Ahola, J., Korhonen, H., Tonttila, J., Romakkaniemi, S., Kokkola, H., and Raatikainen, T.: Modelling mixed-phase clouds with the large-eddy model UCLALES–SALSA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11639–11654, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11639-2020, 2020. a
ARM: Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) User Facility data [data set], https://armgov.svcs.arm.gov/data/ (last access: 17 December 2025), 2024. a
Bernardet, L., Bengtsson, L., Reinecke, P. A., Yang, F., Zhang, M., Hall, K., Doyle, J., Martini, M., Firl, G., and Xue, L.: Common community physics package: fostering collaborative development in physical parameterizations and suites, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 105, E1490–E1505, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-23-0227.1, 2024. a
Download
Short summary
Models struggle to capture cloud and precipitation processes and their radiative effects in marine cold-air outbreaks. We use a quasi-Lagrangian framework to compare large-eddy simulation (LES) and single-column model (SCM) output with field and satellite observations. With fixed droplet and ice numbers, LES and SCM agree in liquid-only tests. In mixed-phase conditions, LES plausibly capture cloud thinning and breakup, while SCMs largely remain overcast and thereby miss cloud radiative effects.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint