Articles | Volume 20, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15585-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15585-2020
Research article
 | 
15 Dec 2020
Research article |  | 15 Dec 2020

Reappraising the appropriate calculation of a common meteorological quantity: potential temperature

Manuel Baumgartner, Ralf Weigel, Allan H. Harvey, Felix Plöger, Ulrich Achatz, and Peter Spichtinger

Related authors

Impact of formulations of the homogeneous nucleation rate on ice nucleation events in cirrus
Peter Spichtinger, Patrik Marschalik, and Manuel Baumgartner
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2035–2060, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2035-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2035-2023, 2023
Short summary
On numerical broadening of particle-size spectra: a condensational growth study using PyMPDATA 1.0
Michael A. Olesik, Jakub Banaśkiewicz, Piotr Bartman, Manuel Baumgartner, Simon Unterstrasser, and Sylwester Arabas
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3879–3899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3879-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3879-2022, 2022
Short summary
New investigations on homogeneous ice nucleation: the effects of water activity and water saturation formulations
Manuel Baumgartner, Christian Rolf, Jens-Uwe Grooß, Julia Schneider, Tobias Schorr, Ottmar Möhler, Peter Spichtinger, and Martina Krämer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 65–91, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-65-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-65-2022, 2022
Short summary
High homogeneous freezing onsets of sulfuric acid aerosol at cirrus temperatures
Julia Schneider, Kristina Höhler, Robert Wagner, Harald Saathoff, Martin Schnaiter, Tobias Schorr, Isabelle Steinke, Stefan Benz, Manuel Baumgartner, Christian Rolf, Martina Krämer, Thomas Leisner, and Ottmar Möhler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14403–14425, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14403-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14403-2021, 2021
Short summary
In situ observation of new particle formation (NPF) in the tropical tropopause layer of the 2017 Asian monsoon anticyclone – Part 2: NPF inside ice clouds
Ralf Weigel, Christoph Mahnke, Manuel Baumgartner, Martina Krämer, Peter Spichtinger, Nicole Spelten, Armin Afchine, Christian Rolf, Silvia Viciani, Francesco D'Amato, Holger Tost, and Stephan Borrmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13455–13481, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13455-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13455-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Dynamics | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Stratospherically induced circulation changes under the extreme conditions of the no-Montreal-Protocol scenario
Franziska Zilker, Timofei Sukhodolov, Gabriel Chiodo, Marina Friedel, Tatiana Egorova, Eugene Rozanov, Jan Sedlacek, Svenja Seeber, and Thomas Peter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13387–13411, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13387-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13387-2023, 2023
Short summary
Vortex preconditioning of the 2021 sudden stratospheric warming: barotropic–baroclinic instability associated with the double westerly jets
Ji-Hee Yoo, Hye-Yeong Chun, and Min-Jee Kang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10869–10881, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10869-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10869-2023, 2023
Short summary
On the pattern of interannual polar vortex–ozone co-variability during northern hemispheric winter
Frederik Harzer, Hella Garny, Felix Ploeger, Harald Bönisch, Peter Hoor, and Thomas Birner
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10661–10675, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10661-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10661-2023, 2023
Short summary
A mountain ridge model for quantifying oblique mountain wave propagation and distribution
Sebastian Rhode, Peter Preusse, Manfred Ern, Jörn Ungermann, Lukas Krasauskas, Julio Bacmeister, and Martin Riese
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7901–7934, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7901-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7901-2023, 2023
Short summary
Weakening of the tropical tropopause layer cold trap with global warming
Stephen Bourguet and Marianna Linz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7447–7460, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7447-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7447-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Ambaum, M. H. P.: Thermal Physics of the Atmosphere, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470710364, 2010. a, b, c
Awano, S.: JS-Diagrams for Air, Report of Aeronautical Research Institute, Tokyo Imperial University, 11, available at: https://jaxa.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=35290&file_id=31&file_no=1 (last access: 11 December 2020), 1936. a, b, c
Bauer, L. A.: The relation between “potential temperature” and “entropy”, Phys. Rev., 26, 177–183, 1908. a
Bohren, C., Albrecht, B., and Albrecht, P.: Atmospheric Thermodynamics, Oxford University Press, New York, USA, Oxford, UK, 1998. a
Bolton, D.: The Computation of Equivalent Potential Temperature, Mon. Weather Rev., 108, 1046–1053, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<1046:TCOEPT>2.0.CO;2, 1980. a
Download
Short summary
The potential temperature is routinely used in atmospheric science. We review its derivation and suggest a new potential temperature, based on a temperature-dependent parameterization of the dry air's specific heat capacity. Moreover, we compare the new potential temperature to the common one and discuss the differences which become more important at higher altitudes. Finally, we indicate some consequences of using the new potential temperature in typical applications.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint