Articles | Volume 13, issue 14
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6845–6875, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6845-2013
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6845–6875, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6845-2013

Research article 22 Jul 2013

Research article | 22 Jul 2013

Application of WRF/Chem-MADRID and WRF/Polyphemus in Europe – Part 2: Evaluation of chemical concentrations and sensitivity simulations

Y. Zhang et al.

Related authors

Incorporation of volcanic SO2 emissions in the Hemispheric CMAQ (H-CMAQ) version 5.2 modeling system and assessing their impacts on sulfate aerosol over the Northern Hemisphere
Syuichi Itahashi, Rohit Mathur, Christian Hogrefe, Sergey L. Napelenok, and Yang Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5751–5768, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5751-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5751-2021, 2021
Short summary
Interpretable machine learning prediction of fire emissions and comparison with FireMIP process-based models
Sally S.-C. Wang, Yun Qian, L. Ruby Leung, and Yang Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-634,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-634, 2021
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary
Evaluation of the offline-coupled GFSv15–FV3–CMAQv5.0.2 in support of the next-generation National Air Quality Forecast Capability over the contiguous United States
Xiaoyang Chen, Yang Zhang, Kai Wang, Daniel Tong, Pius Lee, Youhua Tang, Jianping Huang, Patrick C. Campbell, Jeff Mcqueen, Havala O. T. Pye, Benjamin N. Murphy, and Daiwen Kang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3969–3993, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3969-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3969-2021, 2021
Short summary
Simulation of O3 and NOx in São Paulo street urban canyons with VEIN (v0.2.2) and MUNICH (v1.0)
Mario Eduardo Gavidia-Calderón, Sergio Ibarra-Espinosa, Youngseob Kim, Yang Zhang, and Maria de Fatima Andrade
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3251–3268, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3251-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3251-2021, 2021
Short summary
Reduced-complexity air quality intervention modelling over China: development of the InMAPv1.6.1-China and comparison with the CMAQv5.2 model
Ruili Wu, Christopher W. Tessum, Yang Zhang, Chaopeng Hong, Yixuan Zheng, and Qiang Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-87,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-87, 2021
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
A comprehensive observation-based multiphase chemical model analysis of sulfur dioxide oxidations in both summer and winter
Huan Song, Keding Lu, Can Ye, Huabin Dong, Shule Li, Shiyi Chen, Zhijun Wu, Mei Zheng, Limin Zeng, Min Hu, and Yuanhang Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13713–13727, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13713-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13713-2021, 2021
Short summary
Predicting gas–particle partitioning coefficients of atmospheric molecules with machine learning
Emma Lumiaro, Milica Todorović, Theo Kurten, Hanna Vehkamäki, and Patrick Rinke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13227–13246, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13227-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13227-2021, 2021
Short summary
Development of a new emission reallocation method for industrial sources in China
Yun Fat Lam, Chi Chiu Cheung, Xuguo Zhang, Joshua S. Fu, and Jimmy Chi Hung Fung
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12895–12908, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12895-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12895-2021, 2021
Short summary
Projections of shipping emissions and the related impact on air pollution and human health in the Nordic region
Camilla Geels, Morten Winther, Camilla Andersson, Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen, Jørgen Brandt, Lise M. Frohn, Ulas Im, Wing Leung, and Jesper H. Christensen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12495–12519, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12495-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12495-2021, 2021
Short summary
A predictive model for salt nanoparticle formation using heterodimer stability calculations
Sabrina Chee, Kelley Barsanti, James N. Smith, and Nanna Myllys
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11637–11654, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11637-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11637-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Anttila, P. and Salmi, T.: Characterizing temporal and spatial patterns of urban PM10 using six years of Finnish monitoring data, Boreal. Environ. Res., 11, 463–479, 2006.
Aphesis (Air Pollution and Health: A European Information System): Health impact assessment of air pollution In 26 European Cities, ENHIS-1 Project: WP5 Health impact assessment, Second-year Report, 2000–2001, http://www.apheis.org/index.html, 2006.
Arunachalam, S., Holland, A., Do, B., and Abraczinskas, M.: A quantitative assessment of the influence of grid resolution on predictions of future-year air quality in North Carolina, USA, Atmos. Environ., 40, 5010–5026, 2006.
Bailey, E. M., Gautney, L. L., Kelsoe, J. J., Jacobs, M. E., Condrey, J.W., Pun, B., Wu, S.-Y., Seigneur, C., Douglas, S., Haney, J., and Kumar, N.: A comparison of the performance of four air quality models for the Southern Oxidants Study episode in July 1999, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D05306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD007021, 2007.
Barmpadimos, I., Keller, J., Oderbolz, D., Hueglin, C., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: One decade of parallel fine (PM2.5) and coarse (PM10–PM2.5), particulate matter measurements in Europe: trends and variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3189–3203, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3189-2012, 2012.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint