Articles | Volume 23, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9963-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9963-2023
Research article
 | 
07 Sep 2023
Research article |  | 07 Sep 2023

Constraints on simulated past Arctic amplification and lapse rate feedback from observations

Olivia Linke, Johannes Quaas, Finja Baumer, Sebastian Becker, Jan Chylik, Sandro Dahlke, André Ehrlich, Dörthe Handorf, Christoph Jacobi, Heike Kalesse-Los, Luca Lelli, Sina Mehrdad, Roel A. J. Neggers, Johannes Riebold, Pablo Saavedra Garfias, Niklas Schnierstein, Matthew D. Shupe, Chris Smith, Gunnar Spreen, Baptiste Verneuil, Kameswara S. Vinjamuri, Marco Vountas, and Manfred Wendisch

Related authors

The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7 (ScenarioMIP-CMIP7)
Detlef P. Van Vuuren, Brian C. O'Neill, Claudia Tebaldi, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Louise P. Chini, Pierre Friedlingstein, Tomoko Hasegawa, Keywan Riahi, Bala Govindasamy, Nico Bauer, Veronika Eyring, Cheikh M. N. Fall, Katja Frieler, Matthew J. Gidden, Laila K. Gohar, Annika Högner, Andrew D. Jones, Jarmo Kikstra, Andrew King, Reto Knutti, Elmar Kriegler, Peter Lawrence, Chris Lennard, Jason Lowe, Camilla Mathison, Shahbaz Mehmood, Zebedee Nicholls, Luciana F. Prado, Qiang Zhang, Steven K. Rose, Alex C. Ruane, Marit Sandstad, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Roland Seferian, Jana Sillmann, Chris Smith, Anna A. Sörensson, Swapna Panickal, Kaoru Tachiiri, Naomi Vaughan, Saritha S. Vishwanathan, Tokuta Yokohata, Marco Zecchetto, and Tilo Ziehn
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 2627–2656, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2627-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2627-2026, 2026
Short summary
Evaluation and improvement of CAMS-derived CCN number concentrations using in-situ measurements
Yannick Emanuel Anders, Karoline Block, Mira Pöhlker, and Johannes Quaas
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1404,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1404, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Understanding the spring cloud onset over the Arctic sea-ice
Jean Lac, Hélène Chepfer, Matthew D. Shupe, and Hannes Griesche
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 4189–4213, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4189-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4189-2026, 2026
Short summary
TRAILS – A novel framework for time-height-resolved attribution of long-range transported wildfire smoke
Johanna Roschke, Benedikt Gast, Martin Radenz, Albert Ansmann, Patric Seifert, George McCosh, and Heike Kalesse-Los
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-718,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-718, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Observations of Coherent L-Band Emission from Snow-Covered Arctic Sea Ice
Ferran Hernández-Macià, Marcus Huntemann, Carolina Gabarró, Gunnar Spreen, and Randall K. Scharien
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1336,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1336, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary

Cited articles

Amini, S. and Straus, D. M.: Control of storminess over the Pacific and North America by circulation regimes, Clim. Dynam., 52, 4749–4770, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4409-7, 2019. a
Becker, S., Ehrlich, A., Stapf, J., Lüpkes, C., Mech, M., Crewell, S., and Wendisch, M.: Meteorological measurements by dropsondes released from POLAR 5 during AFLUX 2019, PANGAEA – Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.921996, 2020. a, b
Bennartz, R., Shupe, M. D., Turner, D. D., Walden, V. P., Steffen, K., Cox, C. J., Kulie, M. S., Miller, N. B., and Pettersen, C.: July 2012 Greenland melt extent enhanced by low-level liquid clouds, Nature, 496, 83–86, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12002, 2013. a
Bentsen, M., Oliviè, D. J. L., Seland, y., Toniazzo, T., Gjermundsen, A., Graff, L. S., Debernard, J. B., Gupta, A. K., He, Y., Kirkevåg, A., Schwinger, J., Tjiputra, J., Aas, K. S., Bethke, I., Fan, Y., Griesfeller, J., Grini, A., Guo, C., Ilicak, M., Karset, I. H. H., Landgren, O. A., Liakka, J., Moseid, K. O., Nummelin, A., Spensberger, C., Tang, H., Zhang, Z., Heinze, C., Iversen, T., and Schulz, M.: NCC NorESM2-MM model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.506, 2019. a
Block, K., Schneider, F. A., Mülmenstädt, J., Salzmann, M., and Quaas, J.: Climate models disagree on the sign of total radiative feedback in the Arctic, Tellus A, 72, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2019.1696139, 2020. a, b
Download
Short summary
Lapse rate feedback (LRF) is a major driver of the Arctic amplification (AA) of climate change. It arises because the warming is stronger at the surface than aloft. Several processes can affect the LRF in the Arctic, such as the omnipresent temperature inversion. Here, we compare multimodel climate simulations to Arctic-based observations from a large research consortium to broaden our understanding of these processes, find synergy among them, and constrain the Arctic LRF and AA.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint