Articles | Volume 23, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9963-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9963-2023
Research article
 | 
07 Sep 2023
Research article |  | 07 Sep 2023

Constraints on simulated past Arctic amplification and lapse rate feedback from observations

Olivia Linke, Johannes Quaas, Finja Baumer, Sebastian Becker, Jan Chylik, Sandro Dahlke, André Ehrlich, Dörthe Handorf, Christoph Jacobi, Heike Kalesse-Los, Luca Lelli, Sina Mehrdad, Roel A. J. Neggers, Johannes Riebold, Pablo Saavedra Garfias, Niklas Schnierstein, Matthew D. Shupe, Chris Smith, Gunnar Spreen, Baptiste Verneuil, Kameswara S. Vinjamuri, Marco Vountas, and Manfred Wendisch

Related authors

Measurement Report: Differences in cloud optical and microphysical properties in the Arctic and Antarctic derived using thermal infrared spectroscopy
Joseph Hung, Penny M. Rowe, Christopher J. Cox, Emily M. McCullough, Liam Kroll, Raia Ottenheimer, Matthew D. Shupe, Von P. Walden, and Kimberly Strong
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1906,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1906, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Frequent occurrence of newly formed aerosol particles over wide geographical areas in the Arctic free troposphere and atmospheric boundary layer
David J. Simon, Jonas Schaefer, Jörg Hartmann, Benjamin Kirbus, Joshua Müller, Markus Hartmann, Bruno Wetzel, Laura Köhler, Anna-Marie Jörss, Kay Weinhold, Andreas Herber, Zsófia Jurányi, Silvia Henning, Gregory C. Roberts, Manfred Wendisch, Mira L. Pöhlker, and Frank Stratmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2215,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2215, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Cloud liquid water path at the North Slope of Alaska is largely insensitive to local meteorology in Arctic winter
Kara Hartig, John J. Cassano, Matthew D. Shupe, and Amy Solomon
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2426,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2426, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Bias in satellite-derived cloud radiative effect over Arctic sea ice relative to aircraft measurements during ARCSIX
Sebastian Becker, Konrad Sebastian Schmidt, Hong Chen, Yu-Wen Chen, Kerry G. Meyer, Colten A. Peterson, and Manfred Wendisch
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2210,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2210, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Characterisation of cloud shadow transition signatures using a dense pyranometer network
Jonas Witthuhn, Hartwig Deneke, Andreas Macke, Oscar Ritter, Jens Redemann, Connor J. Flynn, Abdulamid A. Fakoya, Bradley F. Lamkin, Emily D. Lenhardt, Logan T. Mitchell, Emily K. West, David M. Romps, Rusen Öktem, and Heike Kalesse-Los
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 5727–5745, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5727-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5727-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Amini, S. and Straus, D. M.: Control of storminess over the Pacific and North America by circulation regimes, Clim. Dynam., 52, 4749–4770, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4409-7, 2019. a
Becker, S., Ehrlich, A., Stapf, J., Lüpkes, C., Mech, M., Crewell, S., and Wendisch, M.: Meteorological measurements by dropsondes released from POLAR 5 during AFLUX 2019, PANGAEA – Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.921996, 2020. a, b
Bennartz, R., Shupe, M. D., Turner, D. D., Walden, V. P., Steffen, K., Cox, C. J., Kulie, M. S., Miller, N. B., and Pettersen, C.: July 2012 Greenland melt extent enhanced by low-level liquid clouds, Nature, 496, 83–86, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12002, 2013. a
Bentsen, M., Oliviè, D. J. L., Seland, y., Toniazzo, T., Gjermundsen, A., Graff, L. S., Debernard, J. B., Gupta, A. K., He, Y., Kirkevåg, A., Schwinger, J., Tjiputra, J., Aas, K. S., Bethke, I., Fan, Y., Griesfeller, J., Grini, A., Guo, C., Ilicak, M., Karset, I. H. H., Landgren, O. A., Liakka, J., Moseid, K. O., Nummelin, A., Spensberger, C., Tang, H., Zhang, Z., Heinze, C., Iversen, T., and Schulz, M.: NCC NorESM2-MM model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.506, 2019. a
Block, K., Schneider, F. A., Mülmenstädt, J., Salzmann, M., and Quaas, J.: Climate models disagree on the sign of total radiative feedback in the Arctic, Tellus A, 72, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2019.1696139, 2020. a, b
Download
Short summary
Lapse rate feedback (LRF) is a major driver of the Arctic amplification (AA) of climate change. It arises because the warming is stronger at the surface than aloft. Several processes can affect the LRF in the Arctic, such as the omnipresent temperature inversion. Here, we compare multimodel climate simulations to Arctic-based observations from a large research consortium to broaden our understanding of these processes, find synergy among them, and constrain the Arctic LRF and AA.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint