Articles | Volume 23, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9963-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9963-2023
Research article
 | 
07 Sep 2023
Research article |  | 07 Sep 2023

Constraints on simulated past Arctic amplification and lapse rate feedback from observations

Olivia Linke, Johannes Quaas, Finja Baumer, Sebastian Becker, Jan Chylik, Sandro Dahlke, André Ehrlich, Dörthe Handorf, Christoph Jacobi, Heike Kalesse-Los, Luca Lelli, Sina Mehrdad, Roel A. J. Neggers, Johannes Riebold, Pablo Saavedra Garfias, Niklas Schnierstein, Matthew D. Shupe, Chris Smith, Gunnar Spreen, Baptiste Verneuil, Kameswara S. Vinjamuri, Marco Vountas, and Manfred Wendisch

Related authors

Observational ozone datasets over the global oceans and polar regions (version 2024)
Yugo Kanaya, Roberto Sommariva, Alfonso Saiz-Lopez, Andrea Mazzeo, Theodore K. Koenig, Kaori Kawana, James E. Johnson, Aurélie Colomb, Pierre Tulet, Suzie Molloy, Ian E. Galbally, Rainer Volkamer, Anoop Mahajan, John W. Halfacre, Paul B. Shepson, Julia Schmale, Hélène Angot, Byron Blomquist, Matthew D. Shupe, Detlev Helmig, Junsu Gil, Meehye Lee, Sean C. Coburn, Ivan Ortega, Gao Chen, James Lee, Kenneth C. Aikin, David D. Parrish, John S. Holloway, Thomas B. Ryerson, Ilana B. Pollack, Eric J. Williams, Brian M. Lerner, Andrew J. Weinheimer, Teresa Campos, Frank M. Flocke, J. Ryan Spackman, Ilann Bourgeois, Jeff Peischl, Chelsea R. Thompson, Ralf M. Staebler, Amir A. Aliabadi, Wanmin Gong, Roeland Van Malderen, Anne M. Thompson, Ryan M. Stauffer, Debra E. Kollonige, Juan Carlos Gómez Martin, Masatomo Fujiwara, Katie Read, Matthew Rowlinson, Keiichi Sato, Junichi Kurokawa, Yoko Iwamoto, Fumikazu Taketani, Hisahiro Takashima, Mónica Navarro-Comas, Marios Panagi, and Martin G. Schultz
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 4901–4932, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4901-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4901-2025, 2025
Short summary
Snow microphysical processes in orographic turbulence revealed by cloud radar and in situ snowfall camera observations
Anton Kötsche, Maximilian Maahn, Veronika Ettrichrätz, and Heike Kalesse-Los
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4517,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4517, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
High-resolution maps of Arctic surface skin temperature and type retrieved from airborne thermal infrared imagery collected during the HALO–(𝒜 𝒞)3 campaign
Joshua J. Müller, Michael Schäfer, Sophie Rosenburg, André Ehrlich, and Manfred Wendisch
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 4695–4708, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4695-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4695-2025, 2025
Short summary
Regional and seasonal evolution of melt ponds on Arctic sea ice
Hannah Niehaus, Gunnar Spreen, Larysa Istomina, and Marcel Nicolaus
The Cryosphere, 19, 3915–3938, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3915-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3915-2025, 2025
Short summary
The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP2.0) for CMIP7
Ryan Kramer, Chris Smith, and Timothy Andrews
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4378,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4378, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary

Cited articles

Amini, S. and Straus, D. M.: Control of storminess over the Pacific and North America by circulation regimes, Clim. Dynam., 52, 4749–4770, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4409-7, 2019. a
Becker, S., Ehrlich, A., Stapf, J., Lüpkes, C., Mech, M., Crewell, S., and Wendisch, M.: Meteorological measurements by dropsondes released from POLAR 5 during AFLUX 2019, PANGAEA – Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.921996, 2020. a, b
Bennartz, R., Shupe, M. D., Turner, D. D., Walden, V. P., Steffen, K., Cox, C. J., Kulie, M. S., Miller, N. B., and Pettersen, C.: July 2012 Greenland melt extent enhanced by low-level liquid clouds, Nature, 496, 83–86, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12002, 2013. a
Bentsen, M., Oliviè, D. J. L., Seland, y., Toniazzo, T., Gjermundsen, A., Graff, L. S., Debernard, J. B., Gupta, A. K., He, Y., Kirkevåg, A., Schwinger, J., Tjiputra, J., Aas, K. S., Bethke, I., Fan, Y., Griesfeller, J., Grini, A., Guo, C., Ilicak, M., Karset, I. H. H., Landgren, O. A., Liakka, J., Moseid, K. O., Nummelin, A., Spensberger, C., Tang, H., Zhang, Z., Heinze, C., Iversen, T., and Schulz, M.: NCC NorESM2-MM model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.506, 2019. a
Block, K., Schneider, F. A., Mülmenstädt, J., Salzmann, M., and Quaas, J.: Climate models disagree on the sign of total radiative feedback in the Arctic, Tellus A, 72, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2019.1696139, 2020. a, b
Download
Short summary
Lapse rate feedback (LRF) is a major driver of the Arctic amplification (AA) of climate change. It arises because the warming is stronger at the surface than aloft. Several processes can affect the LRF in the Arctic, such as the omnipresent temperature inversion. Here, we compare multimodel climate simulations to Arctic-based observations from a large research consortium to broaden our understanding of these processes, find synergy among them, and constrain the Arctic LRF and AA.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint