Articles | Volume 23, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9963-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9963-2023
Research article
 | 
07 Sep 2023
Research article |  | 07 Sep 2023

Constraints on simulated past Arctic amplification and lapse rate feedback from observations

Olivia Linke, Johannes Quaas, Finja Baumer, Sebastian Becker, Jan Chylik, Sandro Dahlke, André Ehrlich, Dörthe Handorf, Christoph Jacobi, Heike Kalesse-Los, Luca Lelli, Sina Mehrdad, Roel A. J. Neggers, Johannes Riebold, Pablo Saavedra Garfias, Niklas Schnierstein, Matthew D. Shupe, Chris Smith, Gunnar Spreen, Baptiste Verneuil, Kameswara S. Vinjamuri, Marco Vountas, and Manfred Wendisch

Related authors

Summer subsurface temperature variability in the percolation zone of southwest Greenland: high resolution observations of the top meter of firn
Anne Sledd, Michael R. Gallagher, Matthew D. Shupe, Christopher J. Cox, Robert Hawley, Michael S. Town, Heather Guy, Hans-Peter Marshall, Ryan R. Neely III, Claire Pettersen, Von P. Walden, Catherine Hebson, Andrew Martin, Erik Olson, and Derek Pickell
The Cryosphere, 20, 6423–6452, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-6423-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-6423-2026, 2026
Short summary
The integrated aerosol–climate model CIESM-PAMT: Part 2. Evaluation of clouds, precipitation, radiation, and aerosol–cloud interactions
Hengqi Wang, Yiran Peng, Knut von Salzen, Husi Letu, Minqi Wang, Jiangnan Li, Hailing Jia, Huazhe Shang, Dabin Ji, Yuying Wang, Xin He, Luke Fraser-Leach, and Johannes Quaas
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6624,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6624, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
The integrated aerosol–climate model CIESM-PAMT: Part 1. Model description and aerosol evaluation
Hengqi Wang, Minqi Wang, Yiran Peng, Knut von Salzen, Jiangnan Li, Husi Letu, Luke Fraser-Leach, Jinyuan Xin, Xiaoye Zhang, and Johannes Quaas
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6615,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6615, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Cloud fraction driven thermal-infrared radiative effects of Arctic low-level clouds in marine cold air outbreaks
Sophie Rosenburg, Benjamin Kirbus, Anna Elizabeth Luebke, Michael Schäfer, André Ehrlich, Marcus Klingebiel, Joshua Jeremias Müller, and Manfred Wendisch
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5857,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5857, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Evaluation and improvement of CAMS-derived CCN number concentrations using in-situ measurements
Yannick Emanuel Anders, Karoline Block, Mira Pöhlker, and Johannes Quaas
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 10571–10593, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10571-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10571-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Amini, S. and Straus, D. M.: Control of storminess over the Pacific and North America by circulation regimes, Clim. Dynam., 52, 4749–4770, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4409-7, 2019. a
Becker, S., Ehrlich, A., Stapf, J., Lüpkes, C., Mech, M., Crewell, S., and Wendisch, M.: Meteorological measurements by dropsondes released from POLAR 5 during AFLUX 2019, PANGAEA – Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.921996, 2020. a, b
Bennartz, R., Shupe, M. D., Turner, D. D., Walden, V. P., Steffen, K., Cox, C. J., Kulie, M. S., Miller, N. B., and Pettersen, C.: July 2012 Greenland melt extent enhanced by low-level liquid clouds, Nature, 496, 83–86, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12002, 2013. a
Bentsen, M., Oliviè, D. J. L., Seland, y., Toniazzo, T., Gjermundsen, A., Graff, L. S., Debernard, J. B., Gupta, A. K., He, Y., Kirkevåg, A., Schwinger, J., Tjiputra, J., Aas, K. S., Bethke, I., Fan, Y., Griesfeller, J., Grini, A., Guo, C., Ilicak, M., Karset, I. H. H., Landgren, O. A., Liakka, J., Moseid, K. O., Nummelin, A., Spensberger, C., Tang, H., Zhang, Z., Heinze, C., Iversen, T., and Schulz, M.: NCC NorESM2-MM model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP, Earth System Grid Federation [data set], https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.506, 2019. a
Block, K., Schneider, F. A., Mülmenstädt, J., Salzmann, M., and Quaas, J.: Climate models disagree on the sign of total radiative feedback in the Arctic, Tellus A, 72, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2019.1696139, 2020. a, b
Download
Short summary
Lapse rate feedback (LRF) is a major driver of the Arctic amplification (AA) of climate change. It arises because the warming is stronger at the surface than aloft. Several processes can affect the LRF in the Arctic, such as the omnipresent temperature inversion. Here, we compare multimodel climate simulations to Arctic-based observations from a large research consortium to broaden our understanding of these processes, find synergy among them, and constrain the Arctic LRF and AA.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint