Articles | Volume 20, issue 9
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5837–5859, 2020
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5837–5859, 2020
Research article
15 May 2020
Research article | 15 May 2020

Simulating age of air and the distribution of SF6 in the stratosphere with the SILAM model

Rostislav Kouznetsov et al.

Related authors

Characterization the properties of VOCs and submicron organic aerosol at a street canyon environment
Sanna Saarikoski, Heidi Hellén, Arnaud P. Praplan, Simon Schallhart, Petri Clusius, Jarkko V. Niemi, Anu Kousa, Toni Tykkä, Rostislav Kouznetsov, Minna Aurela, Laura Salo, Topi Rönkkö, Luis M. F. Barreira, Liisa Pirjola, and Hilkka Timonen
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,,, 2022
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary
Effects of temperature and salinity on sea-spray-aerosol formation simulated with a bubble-generating chamber
Svetlana Sofieva, Eija Asmi, Nina S. Atanasova, Aino E. Heikkinen, Emeline Vidal, Jonathan Duplissy, Martin Romantschuk, Rostislav Kouznetsov, Jaakko Kukkonen, Dennis H. Bamford, Antti-Pekka Hyvärinen, and Mikhail Sofiev
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss.,,, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
The effect of accounting for public holidays on the skills of the atmospheric composition model SILAM v.5.7
Yalda Fatahi, Rostislav Kouznetsov, and Mikhail Sofiev
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7459–7475,,, 2021
Short summary
Estimating lockdown-induced European NO2 changes using satellite and surface observations and air quality models
Jérôme Barré, Hervé Petetin, Augustin Colette, Marc Guevara, Vincent-Henri Peuch, Laurence Rouil, Richard Engelen, Antje Inness, Johannes Flemming, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Dene Bowdalo, Frederik Meleux, Camilla Geels, Jesper H. Christensen, Michael Gauss, Anna Benedictow, Svetlana Tsyro, Elmar Friese, Joanna Struzewska, Jacek W. Kaminski, John Douros, Renske Timmermans, Lennart Robertson, Mario Adani, Oriol Jorba, Mathieu Joly, and Rostislav Kouznetsov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7373–7394,,, 2021
Short summary
A note on precision-preserving compression of scientific data
Rostislav Kouznetsov
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 377–389,,, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Dynamics | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Ozone–gravity wave interaction in the upper stratosphere/lower mesosphere
Axel Gabriel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10425–10441,,, 2022
Short summary
How can Brewer–Dobson circulation trends be estimated from changes in stratospheric water vapour and methane?
Liubov Poshyvailo-Strube, Rolf Müller, Stephan Fueglistaler, Michaela I. Hegglin, Johannes C. Laube, C. Michael Volk, and Felix Ploeger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9895–9914,,, 2022
Short summary
The semi-annual oscillation (SAO) in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS)
Ming Shangguan and Wuke Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9499–9511,,, 2022
Short summary
Dynamics of ENSO-driven stratosphere-to-troposphere transport of ozone over North America
John R. Albers, Amy H. Butler, Andrew O. Langford, Dillon Elsbury, and Melissa L. Breeden
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,,, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary
Interactions between the stratospheric polar vortex and Atlantic circulation on seasonal to multi-decadal timescales
Oscar Dimdore-Miles, Lesley Gray, Scott Osprey, Jon Robson, Rowan Sutton, and Bablu Sinha
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4867–4893,,, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Abalos, M., Legras, B., Ploeger, F., and Randel, W. J.: Evaluating the advective Brewer-Dobson circulation in three reanalyses for the period 1979–2012, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7534–7554,, 2015. a
Allen, M., Yung, Y. L., and Waters, J. W.: Vertical transport and photochemistry in the terrestrial mesosphere and lower thermosphere (50–120 km), J. Geophys. Res., 86, 3617–3627,, 1981. a
Andrews, A. E., Boering, K. A., Daube, B. C., Wofsy, S. C., Loewenstein, M., Jost, H., Podolske, J. R., Webster, C. R., Herman, R. L., Scott, D. C., Flesch, G. J., Moyer, E. J., Elkins, J. W., Dutton, G. S., Hurst, D. F., Moore, F. L., Ray, E. A., Romashkin, P. A., and Strahan, S. E.: Mean ages of stratospheric air derived from in situ observations of CO2, CH4, and N2O, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 32295–32314,, 2001. a, b, c
Bhandari, N., Lal, D., and Rama, D.: Stratospheric circulation studies based on natural and artificial radioactive tracer elements, Tellus, 18, 391–406,, 1966. a
Boering, K., Wofsy, S., Daube, B., Schneider, H., Loewenstein, M., Podolske, J., and Conway, T.: Stratospheric mean ages and transport rates from observations of carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide, Science, 274, 1340–1343,, 1996. a
Short summary
Estimates of the age of stratospheric air (AoA), its distribution, and trends, obtained by different experimental methods, differ among each other. AoA derived form MIPAS satellite observations, the richest observational dataset on sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) in the stratosphere, are a clear outlier. With multi-decade simulations of AoA and SF6 in the stratosphere, we show that the origin of the discrepancy is in a methodology of deriving AoA from observations rather than in observational data.
Final-revised paper