Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1479–1489, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1479-2016

Special issue: The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP):...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1479–1489, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1479-2016

Research article 10 Feb 2016

Research article | 10 Feb 2016

Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate

L. Xia et al.

Related authors

Climate engineering to mitigate the projected 21st-century terrestrial drying of the Americas: a direct comparison of carbon capture and sulfur injection
Yangyang Xu, Lei Lin, Simone Tilmes, Katherine Dagon, Lili Xia, Chenrui Diao, Wei Cheng, Zhili Wang, Isla Simpson, and Lorna Burnell
Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 673–695, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-673-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-673-2020, 2020
Short summary
Reaching 1.5 and 2.0 °C global surface temperature targets using stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
Simone Tilmes, Douglas G. MacMartin, Jan T. M. Lenaerts, Leo van Kampenhout, Laura Muntjewerf, Lili Xia, Cheryl S. Harrison, Kristen M. Krumhardt, Michael J. Mills, Ben Kravitz, and Alan Robock
Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 579–601, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-579-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-579-2020, 2020
Short summary
Impacts of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering on tropospheric ozone
Lili Xia, Peer J. Nowack, Simone Tilmes, and Alan Robock
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11913–11928, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11913-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11913-2017, 2017
Short summary
The G4Foam Experiment: global climate impacts of regional ocean albedo modification
Corey J. Gabriel, Alan Robock, Lili Xia, Brian Zambri, and Ben Kravitz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 595–613, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-595-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-595-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Biosphere Interactions | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
CO2-equivalence metrics for surface albedo change based on the radiative forcing concept: a critical review
Ryan M. Bright and Marianne T. Lund
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9887–9907, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9887-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9887-2021, 2021
Short summary
Effects of aerosol dynamics and gas–particle conversion on dry deposition of inorganic reactive nitrogen in a temperate forest
Genki Katata, Kazuhide Matsuda, Atsuyuki Sorimachi, Mizuo Kajino, and Kentaro Takagi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4933–4949, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4933-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4933-2020, 2020
Short summary
Ozone–vegetation feedback through dry deposition and isoprene emissions in a global chemistry–carbon–climate model
Cheng Gong, Yadong Lei, Yimian Ma, Xu Yue, and Hong Liao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3841–3857, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3841-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3841-2020, 2020
Short summary
Pathway dependence of ecosystem responses in China to 1.5 °C global warming
Xu Yue, Hong Liao, Huijun Wang, Tianyi Zhang, Nadine Unger, Stephen Sitch, Zhaozhong Feng, and Jia Yang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2353–2366, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2353-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2353-2020, 2020
Short summary
A model-based analysis of foliar NOx deposition
Erin R. Delaria and Ronald C. Cohen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2123–2141, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2123-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2123-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen Jr., L. H., Boote, K. J., Jones, J. W., Jones, P. H., Valle, R. R., Acock, B., Rogers, H. H., and Dahlman, R. C.: Response of vegetation to rising carbon dioxide: Photosynthesis, biomass, and seed yield of soybean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 1, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1029/GB001i001p00001, 1987.
Angel, R.: Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1), P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 17184–17189, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608163103, 2006.
Bala, G., Duffy, P. B., and Taylor, K. E.: Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 105, 7664–7669, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711648105, 2008.
Berdahl, M., Robock, A., Ji, D., Moore, J. C., Jones, A., Kravitz, B., and Watanabe, S.: Arctic cryosphere response in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G3 and G4 scenarios, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 1308–1321, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020627, 2014.
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Climate model simulations show that stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could impact the terrestrial carbon cycle by enhancing the carbon sink. Enhanced downward diffuse radiation, combined with cooling, could stimulate plants to grow more and absorb more carbon dioxide. This beneficial impact of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering would need to be balanced by a large number of potential risks in any future decisions about implementation of geoengineering.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint