Articles | Volume 25, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8613-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8613-2025
Research article
 | 
07 Aug 2025
Research article |  | 07 Aug 2025

Ozone dry deposition through plant stomata: multi-model comparison with flux observations and the role of water stress as part of AQMEII4 Activity 2

Anam M. Khan, Olivia E. Clifton, Jesse O. Bash, Sam Bland, Nathan Booth, Philip Cheung, Lisa Emberson, Johannes Flemming, Erick Fredj, Stefano Galmarini, Laurens Ganzeveld, Orestis Gazetas, Ignacio Goded, Christian Hogrefe, Christopher D. Holmes, László Horváth, Vincent Huijnen, Qian Li, Paul A. Makar, Ivan Mammarella, Giovanni Manca, J. William Munger, Juan L. Pérez-Camanyo, Jonathan Pleim, Limei Ran, Roberto San Jose, Donna Schwede, Sam J. Silva, Ralf Staebler, Shihan Sun, Amos P. K. Tai, Eran Tas, Timo Vesala, Tamás Weidinger, Zhiyong Wu, Leiming Zhang, and Paul C. Stoy

Related authors

HTAP3-OPNS: ozone, PM, nitrogen and sulphur deposition – multi-model experiments to support the revision of the CLRTAP Gothenburg Protocol
Tim Butler, Tabish Ansari, Claudio A. Belis, Elisa Bergas-Masso, Willem van Caspel, Hilde Fagerli, Johannes Flemming, Marta Garcia Vivanco, Paul Griffiths, Douglas S. Hamilton, Coralina Hernandez Trujillo, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Vincent Huijnen, Johannes W. Kaiser, Gerbrand Koren, Zbigniew Klimont, Florian Lindl, Aura Lupascu, Mariano Mertens, Martijn Schaap, Steven T. Turnock, Oliver Wild, Philipp Weiss, Jacek Kaminski, Rosa Wu, and Terry Keating
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 10023–10049, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10023-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10023-2026, 2026
Short summary
Drought responses of a Norway spruce forest on drained peat soil: combining sap-flow sensors, eddy-covariance, meteorological, soil and UAV data
Pavel Konstantinovich Alekseychik, Mikko Peltoniemi, Raisa Mäkipää, Ville Tuominen, Tuomas Laurila, Hamlyn Jones, Mitro Müller, Evgeny Lopatin, Helena Rautakoski, Timo Vesala, and Samuli Launiainen
Biogeosciences, 23, 7091–7127, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7091-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7091-2026, 2026
Short summary
Evaluation of HNO3, SO2, and NH3 in the Surface Tiled Aerosol and Gaseous Exchange (STAGE) option in the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model version 5.3.2 against field-scale, in situ and satellite observations
Jesse O. Bash, John T. Walker, Zhiyong Wu, Ian C. Rumsey, Ben Murphy, Christian Hogrefe, Kathleen M. Fahey, Havala O. T. Pye, Matthew R. Jones, K. Wyat Appel, Mark W. Shephard, Najwa I. Alnsour, and Karen E. Cady-Periera
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 9377–9393, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9377-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9377-2026, 2026
Short summary
Good performance of low-cost fast-response carbon dioxide sensor based on intercomparison with the standard eddy-covariance system
Üllar Rannik, Ivan Mammarella, Timo Vesala, Pirkko Väkimies, Hilkka Heiskari-Tuohiniemi, and Mika Korkiakoski
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 6159–6169, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-6159-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-6159-2026, 2026
Short summary
On spatial scales of local aerosol production in boreal ecosystems
Ekaterina Ezhova, Üllar Rannik, Santeri Tuovinen, Olga Garmash, Otso Peräkylä, Piaopiao Ke, Topi Laanti, Janne Lampilahti, Markus Lampimäki, Anna Lintunen, Veli-Matti Kerminen, Janne Rinne, Timo Vesala, and Markku Kulmala
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 13463–13483, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13463-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13463-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Anav, A., Proietti, C., Menut, L., Carnicelli, S., De Marco, A., and Paoletti, E.: Sensitivity of stomatal conductance to soil moisture: implications for tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5747–5763, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5747-2018, 2018. a
Andersson, C. and Engardt, M.: European ozone in a future climate: importance of changes in dry deposition and isoprene emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D02303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011690, 2010. a
Bachofen, C., Tumber-Dávila, S. J., Mackay, D. S., McDowell, N. G., Carminati, A., Klein, T., Stocker, B. D., Mencuccini, M., and Grossiord, C.: Tree water uptake patterns across the globe, New Phytol., 242, 1891–1910, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19762, 2024. a
Baier, M., Kandlbinder, A., Golldack, D., and Dietz, K.-J.: Oxidative stress and ozone: perception, signalling and response, Plant Cell Environ., 28, 1012–1020, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01326.x, 2005. a
Ball, J. T., Woodrow, I. E., and Berry, J. A.: A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions, in: Progress in Photosynthesis Research, edited by: Biggins, J., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48, 221–224, 1987. a, b, c
Download
Short summary
Vegetation removes tropospheric ozone through stomatal uptake, and accurately modeling the stomatal uptake of ozone is important for modeling dry deposition and air quality. We evaluated the stomatal component of ozone dry deposition modeled by atmospheric chemistry models at six sites. We find that models and observation-based estimates agree at times during the growing season at all sites, but some models overestimated the stomatal component during the dry summers at a seasonally dry site.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint