Articles | Volume 25, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8613-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8613-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
07 Aug 2025
Research article |
| 07 Aug 2025
| 07 Aug 2025
Ozone dry deposition through plant stomata: multi-model comparison with flux observations and the role of water stress as part of AQMEII4 Activity 2
Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
Olivia E. Clifton
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA
Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia Climate School, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, USA
Jesse O. Bash
Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
Sam Bland
Stockholm Environment Institute, Environment and Geography Department, University of York, York, UK
Nathan Booth
Environment and Geography Department, University of York, York, UK
Philip Cheung
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada
Lisa Emberson
Environment and Geography Department, University of York, York, UK
Johannes Flemming
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK
Erick Fredj
Department of Computer Science, The Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel
Stefano Galmarini
Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, Ispra, Italy
Laurens Ganzeveld
Meteorology and Air Quality, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Orestis Gazetas
Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, Ispra, Italy
now at: Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC), East Kilbride, UK
Ignacio Goded
Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, Ispra, Italy
Christian Hogrefe
Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
Christopher D. Holmes
Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
László Horváth
ELKH-SZTE Photoacoustic Research Group, Department of Optics and Quantum Electronics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
Vincent Huijnen
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, the Netherlands
Qian Li
The Institute of Environmental Sciences, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
Paul A. Makar
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada
Ivan Mammarella
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Giovanni Manca
Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, Ispra, Italy
J. William Munger
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Juan L. Pérez-Camanyo
Computer Science School, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain
Jonathan Pleim
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
Limei Ran
Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Greensboro, NC, USA
Roberto San Jose
Computer Science School, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain
Donna Schwede
Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
Sam J. Silva
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Ralf Staebler
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada
Shihan Sun
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
now at: National Centre for Earth Observation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FF, UK
Amos P. K. Tai
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Institute of Environment, Energy and Sustainability, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
The Institute of Environmental Sciences, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
Timo Vesala
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Tamás Weidinger
Department of Meteorology, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
Zhiyong Wu
ORISE Fellow at Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
now at: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
Leiming Zhang
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada
Paul C. Stoy
Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 2,605 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 09 Oct 2024)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,995 | 202 | 408 | 2,605 | 69 | 50 | 70 |
- HTML: 1,995
- PDF: 202
- XML: 408
- Total: 2,605
- Supplement: 69
- BibTeX: 50
- EndNote: 70
Total article views: 1,380 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 Aug 2025)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,274 | 93 | 13 | 1,380 | 27 | 27 | 31 |
- HTML: 1,274
- PDF: 93
- XML: 13
- Total: 1,380
- Supplement: 27
- BibTeX: 27
- EndNote: 31
Total article views: 1,225 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 09 Oct 2024)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 721 | 109 | 395 | 1,225 | 42 | 23 | 39 |
- HTML: 721
- PDF: 109
- XML: 395
- Total: 1,225
- Supplement: 42
- BibTeX: 23
- EndNote: 39
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,605 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,605 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,380 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,380 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,225 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,205 with geography defined
and 20 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
2 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Can atmospheric chemistry deposition schemes reliably simulate stomatal ozone flux across global land covers and climates? T. Emmerichs et al. 10.5194/bg-22-4823-2025
- A diagnostic intercomparison of modeled ozone dry deposition over North America and Europe using AQMEII4 regional-scale simulations C. Hogrefe et al. 10.5194/acp-25-12629-2025
2 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Can atmospheric chemistry deposition schemes reliably simulate stomatal ozone flux across global land covers and climates? T. Emmerichs et al. 10.5194/bg-22-4823-2025
- A diagnostic intercomparison of modeled ozone dry deposition over North America and Europe using AQMEII4 regional-scale simulations C. Hogrefe et al. 10.5194/acp-25-12629-2025
Latest update: 30 Oct 2025
Short summary
Vegetation removes tropospheric ozone through stomatal uptake, and accurately modeling the stomatal uptake of ozone is important for modeling dry deposition and air quality. We evaluated the stomatal component of ozone dry deposition modeled by atmospheric chemistry models at six sites. We find that models and observation-based estimates agree at times during the growing season at all sites, but some models overestimated the stomatal component during the dry summers at a seasonally dry site.
Vegetation removes tropospheric ozone through stomatal uptake, and accurately modeling the...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint