Articles | Volume 24, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10225-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10225-2024
Research article
 | 
16 Sep 2024
Research article |  | 16 Sep 2024

Parameterizations for global thundercloud corona discharge distributions

Sergio Soler, Francisco J. Gordillo-Vázquez, Francisco J. Pérez-Invernón, Patrick Jöckel, Torsten Neubert, Olivier Chanrion, Victor Reglero, and Nikolai Østgaard

Related authors

Evaluation of atmospheric sulfur dioxide simulated with the EMAC (version 2.55) Chemistry–Climate Model using satellite and ground-based observations
Ismail Makroum, Patrick Jöckel, Martin Dameris, Nicolas Theys, and Johannes De Leeuw
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 447–476, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-447-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-447-2026, 2026
Short summary
Global transport of upper-tropospheric tropical tracers: multi-year insights from idealized simulations
Lianet Hernández Pardo, Joachim Curtius, Patrick Jöckel, Moritz Menken, and Anna Possner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4338,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4338, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Evaluation of stratospheric transport in three generations of Chemistry-Climate Models
Marta Abalos, Thomas Birner, Andreas Chrysanthou, Sean Davis, Alvaro de la Cámara, Sandip Dhomse, Hella Garny, Michaela I. Hegglin, Daan Hubert, Oksana Ivaniha, James Keeble, Marianna Linz, Daniele Minganti, Jessica Neu, David Plummer, Laura Saunders, Kasturi Shah, Gabriele Stiller, Kleareti Tourpali, Darryn Waugh, Nathan Luke Abraham, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Patrick Jöckel, Béatrice Josse, Olaf Morgenstern, Timofei Sukhodolov, Shingo Watanabe, and Yousuke Yamashita
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6549,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6549, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
CO2 variability and seasonal cycle in the UTLS: insights from EMAC model and AirCore observational data
Johannes Degen, Bianca C. Baier, Patrick Jöckel, J. Moritz Menken, Tanja J. Schuck, Colm Sweeney, and Andreas Engel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 15741–15763, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15741-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15741-2025, 2025
Short summary
Effects of different emission inventories on tropospheric ozone and methane lifetime
Catherine Acquah, Laura Stecher, Mariano Mertens, and Patrick Jöckel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 13665–13686, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13665-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13665-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, D. J. and Pickering, K. E.: Evaluation of lightning flash rate parameterizations for use in a global chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4711, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002066, 2002. a, b, c, d
ASIM facility science team (FST): https://asdc.space.dtu.dk, last access: 22 November 2023. a
Battan, L. J.: Some factors governing precipitation and lightning from convective clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 22, 79–84, 1965. a
Blakeslee, R. J., Lang, T. J., Koshak, W. J., Buechler, D., Gatlin, P., Mach, D. M., Stano, G. T., Virts, K. S., Walker, T. D., Cecil, D. J., Ellett, W., Goodman, S. J., Harrison, S., Hawkins, D. L., Heumesser, M., Lin, H., Maskey, M., Schultz, C. J., Stewart, M., Bateman, M., Chanrion, O., and Christian, H.: Three years of the Lightning Imaging Sensor onboard the International Space Station: Expanded global coverage and enhanced applications, Journal of Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032918, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032918, 2020. a, b
Brandvold, D. K., Martinez, P., and Hipsh, R.: Field measurements of O3 and N2O produced from corona discharge, Atmos. Environ., 30, 973–976, 1996. a
Download
Short summary
Sudden local ozone (O3) enhancements have been reported in different regions of the world since the 1970s. While the hot channel of lightning strokes directly produce significant amounts of nitrogen oxide, no direct emission of O3 is expected. Corona discharges in convective active regions could explain local O3 increases, which remains unexplained. We present the first mathematical functions that relate the global annual frequency of in-cloud coronas with four sets of meteorological variables.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint