Articles | Volume 21, issue 13
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10393–10412, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10393-2021
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10393–10412, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10393-2021
Research article
 | Highlight paper
09 Jul 2021
Research article  | Highlight paper | 09 Jul 2021

Orographically induced spontaneous imbalance within the jet causing a large-scale gravity wave event

Markus Geldenhuys et al.

Related authors

Quantification and mitigation of the instrument effects and uncertainties of the airborne limb imaging FTIR GLORIA
Jörn Ungermann, Anne Kleinert, Guido Maucher, Irene Bartolomé, Felix Friedl-Vallon, Sören Johansson, Lukas Krasauskas, and Tom Neubert
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2503–2530, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2503-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2503-2022, 2022
Short summary
Redistribution of total reactive nitrogen in the lowermost Arctic stratosphere during the cold winter 2015/2016
Helmut Ziereis, Peter Hoor, Jens-Uwe Grooß, Andreas Zahn, Greta Stratmann, Paul Stock, Michael Lichtenstern, Jens Krause, Vera Bense, Armin Afchine, Christian Rolf, Wolfgang Woiwode, Marleen Braun, Jörn Ungermann, Andreas Marsing, Christiane Voigt, Andreas Engel, Björn-Martin Sinnhuber, and Hermann Oelhaf
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3631–3654, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3631-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3631-2022, 2022
Short summary
Biomass burning pollution in the South Atlantic upper troposphere: GLORIA trace gas observations and evaluation of the CAMS model
Sören Johansson, Gerald Wetzel, Felix Friedl-Vallon, Norbert Glatthor, Michael Höpfner, Anne Kleinert, Tom Neubert, Björn-Martin Sinnhuber, and Jörn Ungermann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3675–3691, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3675-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3675-2022, 2022
Short summary
Challenge of modelling GLORIA observations of upper troposphere–lowermost stratosphere trace gas and cloud distributions at high latitudes: a case study with state-of-the-art models
Florian Haenel, Wolfgang Woiwode, Jennifer Buchmüller, Felix Friedl-Vallon, Michael Höpfner, Sören Johansson, Farahnaz Khosrawi, Oliver Kirner, Anne Kleinert, Hermann Oelhaf, Johannes Orphal, Roland Ruhnke, Björn-Martin Sinnhuber, Jörn Ungermann, Michael Weimer, and Peter Braesicke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2843–2870, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2843-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2843-2022, 2022
Short summary
A case study on the impact of severe convective storms on the water vapor mixing ratio in the lower mid-latitude stratosphere observed in 2019 over Europe
Dina Khordakova, Christian Rolf, Jens-Uwe Grooß, Rolf Müller, Paul Konopka, Andreas Wieser, Martina Krämer, and Martin Riese
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1059–1079, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1059-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1059-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Dynamics | Research Activity: Field Measurements | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Momentum fluxes from airborne wind measurements in three cumulus cases over land
Ada Mariska Koning, Louise Nuijens, and Christian Mallaun
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-59,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-59, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary
Exploring the elevated water vapor signal associated with the free tropospheric biomass burning plume over the southeast Atlantic Ocean
Kristina Pistone, Paquita Zuidema, Robert Wood, Michael Diamond, Arlindo M. da Silva, Gonzalo Ferrada, Pablo E. Saide, Rei Ueyama, Ju-Mee Ryoo, Leonhard Pfister, James Podolske, David Noone, Ryan Bennett, Eric Stith, Gregory Carmichael, Jens Redemann, Connor Flynn, Samuel LeBlanc, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer, and Yohei Shinozuka
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9643–9668, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9643-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9643-2021, 2021
Short summary
Opinion: Gigacity – a source of problems or the new way to sustainable development
Markku Kulmala, Tom V. Kokkonen, Juha Pekkanen, Sami Paatero, Tuukka Petäjä, Veli-Matti Kerminen, and Aijun Ding
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8313–8322, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8313-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8313-2021, 2021
Short summary
The thermodynamic structures of the planetary boundary layer dominated by synoptic circulations and the regular effect on air pollution in Beijing
Yunyan Jiang, Jinyuan Xin, Ying Wang, Guiqian Tang, Yuxin Zhao, Danjie Jia, Dandan Zhao, Meng Wang, Lindong Dai, Lili Wang, Tianxue Wen, and Fangkun Wu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6111–6128, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6111-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6111-2021, 2021
Short summary
Turbulent and boundary layer characteristics during VOCALS-REx
Dillon S. Dodson and Jennifer D. Small Griswold
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1937–1961, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1937-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1937-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexander, M. J. and Pfister, L.: Gravity wave momentum flux in the lower stratosphere over convection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 2029–2032, https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL01984, 1995. a
Alexander, M. J., Geller, M., McLandress, C., Polavarapu, S., Preusse, P., Sassi, F., Sato, K., Eckermann, S., Ern, M., Hertzog, A., Kawatani, Y., Pulido, M., Shaw, T. A., Sigmond, M., Vincent, R., and Watanabe, S.: Recent developments in gravity-wave effects in climate models and the global distribution of gravity-wave momentum flux from observations and models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 1103–1124, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.637, 2010. a
Amemiya, A. and Sato, K.: A New Gravity Wave Parameterization Including Three-Dimensional Propagation, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 94, 237–256, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2016-013, 2016. a
Andrews, D. G., Holton, J. R., and Leovy, C. B.: Middle Atmosphere Dynamics, vol. 40, International Geophysics Series, Academic Press, 1987. a
Bacmeister, J. T., Newman, P. A., Gary, B. L., and Chan, K. R.: An algorithm for forecasting mountain wave-related turbulence in the stratosphere, Weather Forecast., 9, 241–253, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009<0241:AAFFMW>2.0.CO;2, 1994. a
Download
Short summary
A large-scale gravity wave (GW) was observed spanning the whole of Greenland. The GWs proposed in this paper come from a new jet–topography mechanism. The topography compresses the flow and triggers a change in u- and v-wind components. The jet becomes out of geostrophic balance and sheds energy in the form of GWs to restore the balance. This topography–jet interaction was not previously considered by the community, rendering the impact of the gravity waves largely unaccounted for.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint