Articles | Volume 22, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10875-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10875-2022
Research article
 | 
26 Aug 2022
Research article |  | 26 Aug 2022

Evaluating NOx emissions and their effect on O3 production in Texas using TROPOMI NO2 and HCHO

Daniel L. Goldberg, Monica Harkey, Benjamin de Foy, Laura Judd, Jeremiah Johnson, Greg Yarwood, and Tracey Holloway

Related authors

TROPOMI NO2 for urban and polluted areas globally from 2019 to 2024
Daniel E. Huber, Gaige H. Kerr, M. Omar Nawaz, Sara Runkel, Susan C. Anenberg, and Daniel L. Goldberg
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3178,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3178, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
NO2 concentration differences under clear versus cloudy skies and implications for applications of satellite measurements
Daniel L. Goldberg, M. Omar Nawaz, Congmeng Lyu, Jian He, Annmarie G. Carlton, Shobha Kondragunta, and Susan C. Anenberg
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1350,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1350, 2025
Short summary
An intercomparison of satellite, airborne, and ground-level observations with WRF–CAMx simulations of NO2 columns over Houston, Texas, during the September 2021 TRACER-AQ campaign
M. Omar Nawaz, Jeremiah Johnson, Greg Yarwood, Benjamin de Foy, Laura Judd, and Daniel L. Goldberg
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6719–6741, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6719-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6719-2024, 2024
Short summary
Declines and peaks in NO2 pollution during the multiple waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in the New York metropolitan area
Maria Tzortziou, Charlotte F. Kwong, Daniel Goldberg, Luke Schiferl, Róisín Commane, Nader Abuhassan, James J. Szykman, and Lukas C. Valin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2399–2417, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2399-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2399-2022, 2022
Short summary
Understanding and improving model representation of aerosol optical properties for a Chinese haze event measured during KORUS-AQ
Pablo E. Saide, Meng Gao, Zifeng Lu, Daniel L. Goldberg, David G. Streets, Jung-Hun Woo, Andreas Beyersdorf, Chelsea A. Corr, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Bruce Anderson, Johnathan W. Hair, Amin R. Nehrir, Glenn S. Diskin, Jose L. Jimenez, Benjamin A. Nault, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Jack Dibb, Eric Heim, Kara D. Lamb, Joshua P. Schwarz, Anne E. Perring, Jhoon Kim, Myungje Choi, Brent Holben, Gabriele Pfister, Alma Hodzic, Gregory R. Carmichael, Louisa Emmons, and James H. Crawford
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6455–6478, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6455-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6455-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Remote Sensing | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Satellite detection of NO2 distributions using TROPOMI and TEMPO and comparison with ground-based concentration measurements
Summer Acker, Tracey Holloway, and Monica Harkey
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8271–8288, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8271-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8271-2025, 2025
Short summary
Measurement report: Diurnal variability in NO2 and HCHO lower-tropospheric vertical profiles in southeastern Los Angeles
Peter K. Peterson, Lisa F. Hernandez, Leslie Tanaka, and Alejandro Dunnick
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7777–7788, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7777-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7777-2025, 2025
Short summary
Biosphere–atmosphere related processes influence trace-gas and aerosol satellite–model biases
Emma Sands, Ruth M. Doherty, Fiona M. O'Connor, Richard J. Pope, James Weber, and Daniel P. Grosvenor
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7269–7297, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7269-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7269-2025, 2025
Short summary
Estimation of diurnal emissions of CO2 from thermal power plants using spaceborne integrated path differential absorption (IPDA) lidar
Xuanye Zhang, Hailong Yang, Lingbing Bu, Zengchang Fan, Wei Xiao, Binglong Chen, Lu Zhang, Sihan Liu, Zhongting Wang, Jiqiao Liu, Weibiao Chen, and Xuhui Lee
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6725–6740, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6725-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6725-2025, 2025
Short summary
Increase in carbon monoxide (CO) and aerosol optical depth (AOD) observed by satellites in the Northern Hemisphere over the summers of 2008–2023, linked to an increase in wildfires
Antoine Ehret, Solène Turquety, Maya George, Juliette Hadji-Lazaro, and Cathy Clerbaux
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6365–6394, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6365-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6365-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Bauwens, M., Compernolle, S., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J. -F., Gent, J., Eskes, H. J., Levelt, P. F., van der A, R., Veefkind, J. P., Vlietinck, J., Yu, H., and Zehner, C.: Impact of coronavirus outbreak on NO2 pollution assessed using TROPOMI and OMI observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087978, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087978, 2020. 
Beirle, S., Boersma, K. F., Platt, U., Lawrence, M. G., and Wagner, T.: Megacity Emissions and Lifetimes of Nitrogen Oxides Probed from Space, Science, 333, 1737–1739, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207824, 2011. 
Beirle, S., Borger, C., Dörner, S., Li, A., Hu, Z., Liu, F., Wang, Y., and Wagner, T.: Pinpointing nitrogen oxide emissions from space, Sci. Adv., 5, eaax9800, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax9800, 2019. 
Beirle, S., Borger, C., Dörner, S., Eskes, H. J., Kumar, V., De Laat, A., and Wagner, T.: Catalog of NOx emissions from point sources as derived from the divergence of the NO2 flux for TROPOMI, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 2995–3012, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2995-2021, 2021. 
Boersma, K. F., Jacob, D. J., Eskes, H. J., Pinder, R. W., Wang, J., and Van Der A, R. J.: Intercomparison of SCIAMACHY and OMI tropospheric NO2 columns: Observing the diurnal evolution of chemistry and emissions from space, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008816, 2008. 
Download
Short summary
TROPOMI measurements offer a valuable means to validate emissions inventories and ozone formation regimes, with important limitations. Lightning NOx is important to account for in Texas and can contribute up to 24 % of the column NO2 in rural areas and 8 % in urban areas. Modeled NO2 in urban areas agrees with TROPOMI NO2 to within 20 % in most circumstances, with a small underestimate in Dallas (−13 %) and Houston (−20 %). Near Texas power plants, the satellite appears to underrepresent NO2.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint