Articles | Volume 21, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3949-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3949-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
17 Mar 2021
Research article |
| 17 Mar 2021
| 17 Mar 2021
The prevalence of precipitation from polar supercooled clouds
Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, Pennsylvania State
University, University Park, PA, USA
Ann M. Fridlind
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA
Johannes Verlinde
Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, Pennsylvania State
University, University Park, PA, USA
Andrew S. Ackerman
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA
Grégory V. Cesana
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA
Center for Climate Systems Research, Earth Institute, Columbia
University, New York, NY, USA
Daniel A. Knopf
School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University,
Stony Brook, NY, USA
Related authors
Yijia Sun, Ann M. Fridlind, Israel Silber, Nicole Riemer, and Daniel A. Knopf
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3620, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3620, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
The role of Arctic clouds in the regional climate remains uncertain due to insufficient understanding of the amount of liquid droplets and ice crystals present in these clouds. An aerosol-cloud model is employed to examine the role of different aerosol types and freezing parameterizations on the number of ice crystals. The choice of freezing parameterization significantly changes the number of ice crystals impacting the interpretation of the evolution and warming effect of Arctic clouds.
Fan Mei, Qi Zhang, Damao Zhang, Jerome D. Fast, Gourihar Kulkarni, Mikhail S. Pekour, Christopher R. Niedek, Susanne Glienke, Israel Silber, Beat Schmid, Jason M. Tomlinson, Hardeep S. Mehta, Xena Mansoura, Zezhen Cheng, Gregory W. Vandergrift, Nurun Nahar Lata, Swarup China, and Zihua Zhu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3425–3444, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3425-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3425-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study highlights the unique capability of the ArcticShark, an uncrewed aerial system, in measuring vertically resolved atmospheric properties. Data from 32 research flights in 2023 reveal seasonal patterns and correlations with conventional measurements. The consistency and complementarity of in situ and remote sensing methods are highlighted. The study demonstrates the ArcticShark’s versatility in bridging data gaps and improving the understanding of vertical atmospheric structures.
Israel Silber, Jennifer M. Comstock, Michael R. Kieburtz, and Lynn M. Russell
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 29–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-29-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-29-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present ARMTRAJ, a set of multipurpose trajectory datasets, which augments cloud, aerosol, and boundary layer studies utilizing the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility data. ARMTRAJ data include ensemble run statistics that enhance consistency and serve as uncertainty metrics for air mass coordinates and state variables. ARMTRAJ will soon become a near real-time product that will accompany past, ongoing, and future ARM deployments.
Abigail S. Williams, Jeramy L. Dedrick, Lynn M. Russell, Florian Tornow, Israel Silber, Ann M. Fridlind, Benjamin Swanson, Paul J. DeMott, Paul Zieger, and Radovan Krejci
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11791–11805, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11791-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11791-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The measured aerosol size distribution modes reveal distinct properties characteristic of cold-air outbreaks in the Norwegian Arctic. We find higher sea spray number concentrations, smaller Hoppel minima, lower effective supersaturations, and accumulation-mode particle scavenging during cold-air outbreaks. These results advance our understanding of cold-air outbreak aerosol–cloud interactions in order to improve their accurate representation in models.
Grégory V. Cesana, Olivia Pierpaoli, Matteo Ottaviani, Linh Vu, Zhonghai Jin, and Israel Silber
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7899–7909, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7899-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7899-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Better characterizing the relationship between sea ice and clouds is key to understanding Arctic climate because clouds and sea ice affect surface radiation and modulate Arctic surface warming. Our results indicate that Arctic liquid clouds robustly increase in response to sea ice decrease. This increase has a cooling effect on the surface because more solar radiation is reflected back to space, and it should contribute to dampening future Arctic surface warming.
McKenna W. Stanford, Ann M. Fridlind, Israel Silber, Andrew S. Ackerman, Greg Cesana, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Alain Protat, Simon Alexander, and Adrian McDonald
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 9037–9069, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9037-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9037-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds play an important role in the Earth’s climate system as they modulate the amount of radiation that either reaches the surface or is reflected back to space. This study demonstrates an approach to robustly evaluate surface-based observations against a large-scale model. We find that the large-scale model precipitates too infrequently relative to observations, contrary to literature documentation suggesting otherwise based on satellite measurements.
Frederic Tridon, Israel Silber, Alessandro Battaglia, Stefan Kneifel, Ann Fridlind, Petros Kalogeras, and Ranvir Dhillon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12467–12491, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12467-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12467-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The role of ice precipitation in the Earth water budget is not well known because ice particles are complex, and their formation involves intricate processes. Riming of ice crystals by supercooled water droplets is an efficient process, but little is known about its importance at high latitudes. In this work, by exploiting the deployment of an unprecedented number of remote sensing systems in Antarctica, we find that riming occurs at much lower temperatures compared with the mid-latitudes.
Israel Silber, Robert C. Jackson, Ann M. Fridlind, Andrew S. Ackerman, Scott Collis, Johannes Verlinde, and Jiachen Ding
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 901–927, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-901-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-901-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth Model Column Collaboratory (EMC2) is an open-source ground-based (and air- or space-borne) lidar and radar simulator and subcolumn generator designed for large-scale models, in particular climate models, applicable also for high-resolution models. EMC2 emulates measurements while remaining faithful to large-scale models' physical assumptions implemented in their cloud or radiation schemes. We demonstrate the use of EMC2 to compare AWARE measurements with the NASA GISS ModelE3 and LES.
Stefanie Kremser, Mike Harvey, Peter Kuma, Sean Hartery, Alexia Saint-Macary, John McGregor, Alex Schuddeboom, Marc von Hobe, Sinikka T. Lennartz, Alex Geddes, Richard Querel, Adrian McDonald, Maija Peltola, Karine Sellegri, Israel Silber, Cliff S. Law, Connor J. Flynn, Andrew Marriner, Thomas C. J. Hill, Paul J. DeMott, Carson C. Hume, Graeme Plank, Geoffrey Graham, and Simon Parsons
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3115–3153, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3115-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3115-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol–cloud interactions over the Southern Ocean are poorly understood and remain a major source of uncertainty in climate models. This study presents ship-borne measurements, collected during a 6-week voyage into the Southern Ocean in 2018, that are an important supplement to satellite-based measurements. For example, these measurements include data on low-level clouds and aerosol composition in the marine boundary layer, which can be used in climate model evaluation efforts.
Peter Kuma, Adrian J. McDonald, Olaf Morgenstern, Richard Querel, Israel Silber, and Connor J. Flynn
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 43–72, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-43-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-43-2021, 2021
Yijia Sun, Ann M. Fridlind, Israel Silber, Nicole Riemer, and Daniel A. Knopf
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3620, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3620, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
The role of Arctic clouds in the regional climate remains uncertain due to insufficient understanding of the amount of liquid droplets and ice crystals present in these clouds. An aerosol-cloud model is employed to examine the role of different aerosol types and freezing parameterizations on the number of ice crystals. The choice of freezing parameterization significantly changes the number of ice crystals impacting the interpretation of the evolution and warming effect of Arctic clouds.
McKenna W. Stanford, Ann M. Fridlind, Andrew S. Ackerman, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Qian Xiao, Jian Wang, Toshihisa Matsui, Daniel Hernandez-Deckers, and Paul Lawson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 11199–11231, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11199-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11199-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The evolution of cloud droplets, from the point they are activated by atmospheric aerosol to the formation of precipitation, is an important process relevant to understanding cloud–climate feedbacks. This study demonstrates a benchmark framework for using novel airborne measurements and retrievals to constrain high-resolution simulations of moderately deep cumulus clouds and pathways for scaling results to large-scale models and space-based observational platforms.
Wenhan Tang, Sylwester Arabas, Jeffrey H. Curtis, Daniel A. Knopf, Matthew West, and Nicole Riemer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4326, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4326, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how aerosol particles help form ice in clouds. Using new theory and detailed computer simulations, we found that the way different materials are mixed within these particles has a strong impact on how much ice forms. When ice-forming material is spread across all particles, more droplets freeze than when it is only in a few. This result means that to better predict clouds and climate, models need to account for how particle materials are mixed.
Florian Tornow, Ann Fridlind, George Tselioudis, Brian Cairns, Andrew Ackerman, Seethala Chellappan, David Painemal, Paquita Zuidema, Christiane Voigt, Simon Kirschler, and Armin Sorooshian
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5053–5074, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5053-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5053-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The recent NASA campaign ACTIVATE (Aerosol Cloud meTeorology Interactions oVer the western ATlantic Experiment) performed 71 tandem flights in mid-latitude marine cold-air outbreaks off the US eastern seaboard. We provide meteorological and cloud transition stage context, allowing us to identify days that are most suitable for Lagrangian modeling and analysis. Surveyed cloud properties show signatures of cloud microphysical processes, such as cloud-top entrainment and secondary ice formation.
Albert Ansmann, Cristofer Jimenez, Johanna Roschke, Johannes Bühl, Kevin Ohneiser, Ronny Engelmann, Martin Radenz, Hannes Griesche, Julian Hofer, Dietrich Althausen, Daniel A. Knopf, Sandro Dahlke, Tom Gaudek, Patric Seifert, and Ulla Wandinger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4847–4866, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4847-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4847-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we focus on the potential impact of wildfire smoke on cirrus formation. For the first time, state-of-the-art aerosol and cirrus observations with lidar and radar, presented in this paper (Part 1 of a series of two articles), are closely linked to the comprehensive modeling of gravity-wave-induced ice nucleation in cirrus evolution processes, presented in a companion paper (Part 2). We found a clear impact of wildfire smoke on cirrus evolution.
Albert Ansmann, Cristofer Jimenez, Daniel A. Knopf, Johanna Roschke, Johannes Bühl, Kevin Ohneiser, and Ronny Engelmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4867–4884, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4867-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4867-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we focus on the potential impact of wildfire smoke on cirrus formation. Aerosol and cirrus observations with lidar and radar during the MOSAiC (Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate) expedition, presented in the companion paper (Ansmann et al., 2025), are closely linked to comprehensive modeling of ice nucleation in cirrus evolution processes, presented in this article. A clear impact of wildfire smoke on cirrus formation was found.
Fan Mei, Qi Zhang, Damao Zhang, Jerome D. Fast, Gourihar Kulkarni, Mikhail S. Pekour, Christopher R. Niedek, Susanne Glienke, Israel Silber, Beat Schmid, Jason M. Tomlinson, Hardeep S. Mehta, Xena Mansoura, Zezhen Cheng, Gregory W. Vandergrift, Nurun Nahar Lata, Swarup China, and Zihua Zhu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3425–3444, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3425-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3425-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study highlights the unique capability of the ArcticShark, an uncrewed aerial system, in measuring vertically resolved atmospheric properties. Data from 32 research flights in 2023 reveal seasonal patterns and correlations with conventional measurements. The consistency and complementarity of in situ and remote sensing methods are highlighted. The study demonstrates the ArcticShark’s versatility in bridging data gaps and improving the understanding of vertical atmospheric structures.
Cristofer Jimenez, Albert Ansmann, Kevin Ohneiser, Hannes Griesche, Ronny Engelmann, Martin Radenz, Julian Hofer, Dietrich Althausen, Daniel Alexander Knopf, Sandro Dahlke, Johannes Bühl, Holger Baars, Patric Seifert, and Ulla Wandinger
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-967, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-967, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using advanced remote sensing on the icebreaker Polarstern, we studied mixed-phase clouds (MPCs) in the central Arctic during the 2019–2020 MOSAiC (Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate) campaign. For the first time, lidar and radar techniques tracked the year-round evolution of liquid and ice phases in MPCs. The study provides cloud statistics and explores key processes driving cloud longevity, offering new insights into Arctic cloud formation and persistence.
Israel Silber, Jennifer M. Comstock, Michael R. Kieburtz, and Lynn M. Russell
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 29–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-29-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-29-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present ARMTRAJ, a set of multipurpose trajectory datasets, which augments cloud, aerosol, and boundary layer studies utilizing the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility data. ARMTRAJ data include ensemble run statistics that enhance consistency and serve as uncertainty metrics for air mass coordinates and state variables. ARMTRAJ will soon become a near real-time product that will accompany past, ongoing, and future ARM deployments.
Johannes Mülmenstädt, Andrew S. Ackerman, Ann M. Fridlind, Meng Huang, Po-Lun Ma, Naser Mahfouz, Susanne E. Bauer, Susannah M. Burrows, Matthew W. Christensen, Sudhakar Dipu, Andrew Gettelman, L. Ruby Leung, Florian Tornow, Johannes Quaas, Adam C. Varble, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, and Youtong Zheng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13633–13652, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13633-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13633-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Stratocumulus clouds play a large role in Earth's climate by reflecting incoming solar energy back to space. Turbulence at stratocumulus cloud top mixes in dry, warm air, which can lead to cloud dissipation. This process is challenging for coarse-resolution global models to represent. We show that global models nevertheless agree well with our process understanding. Global models also think the process is less important for the climate than other lines of evidence have led us to conclude.
Alexei Korolev, Zhipeng Qu, Jason Milbrandt, Ivan Heckman, Mélissa Cholette, Mengistu Wolde, Cuong Nguyen, Greg M. McFarquhar, Paul Lawson, and Ann M. Fridlind
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11849–11881, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11849-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11849-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The phenomenon of high ice water content (HIWC) occurs in mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) when a large number of small ice particles with typical sizes of a few hundred micrometers is found at high altitudes. It was found that secondary ice production in the vicinity of the melting layer plays a key role in the formation and maintenance of HIWC. This study presents a conceptual model of the formation of HIWC in tropical MCSs based on in situ observations and numerical simulation.
Abigail S. Williams, Jeramy L. Dedrick, Lynn M. Russell, Florian Tornow, Israel Silber, Ann M. Fridlind, Benjamin Swanson, Paul J. DeMott, Paul Zieger, and Radovan Krejci
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11791–11805, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11791-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11791-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The measured aerosol size distribution modes reveal distinct properties characteristic of cold-air outbreaks in the Norwegian Arctic. We find higher sea spray number concentrations, smaller Hoppel minima, lower effective supersaturations, and accumulation-mode particle scavenging during cold-air outbreaks. These results advance our understanding of cold-air outbreak aerosol–cloud interactions in order to improve their accurate representation in models.
Toshi Matsui, Daniel Hernandez-Deckers, Scott E. Giangrande, Thiago S. Biscaro, Ann Fridlind, and Scott Braun
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10793–10814, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10793-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10793-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Using computer simulations and real measurements, we discovered that storms over the Amazon were narrower but more intense during the dry periods, producing heavier rain and more ice particles in the clouds. Our research showed that cumulus bubbles played a key role in creating these intense storms. This study can improve the representation of the effect of continental and ocean environments on tropical regions' rainfall patterns in simulations.
Grégory V. Cesana, Olivia Pierpaoli, Matteo Ottaviani, Linh Vu, Zhonghai Jin, and Israel Silber
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7899–7909, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7899-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7899-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Better characterizing the relationship between sea ice and clouds is key to understanding Arctic climate because clouds and sea ice affect surface radiation and modulate Arctic surface warming. Our results indicate that Arctic liquid clouds robustly increase in response to sea ice decrease. This increase has a cooling effect on the surface because more solar radiation is reflected back to space, and it should contribute to dampening future Arctic surface warming.
Johannes Mülmenstädt, Edward Gryspeerdt, Sudhakar Dipu, Johannes Quaas, Andrew S. Ackerman, Ann M. Fridlind, Florian Tornow, Susanne E. Bauer, Andrew Gettelman, Yi Ming, Youtong Zheng, Po-Lun Ma, Hailong Wang, Kai Zhang, Matthew W. Christensen, Adam C. Varble, L. Ruby Leung, Xiaohong Liu, David Neubauer, Daniel G. Partridge, Philip Stier, and Toshihiko Takemura
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7331–7345, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7331-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7331-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Human activities release copious amounts of small particles called aerosols into the atmosphere. These particles change how much sunlight clouds reflect to space, an important human perturbation of the climate, whose magnitude is highly uncertain. We found that the latest climate models show a negative correlation but a positive causal relationship between aerosols and cloud water. This means we need to be very careful when we interpret observational studies that can only see correlation.
Daniel A. Knopf, Markus Ammann, Thomas Berkemeier, Ulrich Pöschl, and Manabu Shiraiwa
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3445–3528, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3445-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3445-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The initial step of interfacial and multiphase chemical processes involves adsorption and desorption of gas species. This study demonstrates the role of desorption energy governing the residence time of the gas species at the environmental interface. A parameterization is formulated that enables the prediction of desorption energy based on the molecular weight, polarizability, and oxygen-to-carbon ratio of the desorbing chemical species. Its application to gas–particle interactions is discussed.
Kamil Mroz, Alessandro Battaglia, and Ann M. Fridlind
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1577–1597, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1577-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1577-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we examine the extent to which radar measurements from space can inform us about the properties of clouds and precipitation. Surprisingly, our analysis showed that the amount of ice turning into rain was lower than expected in the current product. To improve on this, we came up with a new way to extract information about the size and concentration of particles from radar data. As long as we use this method in the right conditions, we can even estimate how dense the ice is.
Rodanthi-Elisavet Mamouri, Albert Ansmann, Kevin Ohneiser, Daniel A. Knopf, Argyro Nisantzi, Johannes Bühl, Ronny Engelmann, Annett Skupin, Patric Seifert, Holger Baars, Dragos Ene, Ulla Wandinger, and Diofantos Hadjimitsis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14097–14114, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14097-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14097-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
For the first time, rather clear evidence is found that wildfire smoke particles can trigger strong cirrus formation. This finding is of importance because intensive and large wildfires may occur increasingly often in the future as climate change proceeds. Based on lidar observations in Cyprus in autumn 2020, we provide detailed insight into the cirrus formation at the tropopause in the presence of aged wildfire smoke (here, 8–9 day old Californian wildfire smoke).
Albert Ansmann, Kevin Ohneiser, Ronny Engelmann, Martin Radenz, Hannes Griesche, Julian Hofer, Dietrich Althausen, Jessie M. Creamean, Matthew C. Boyer, Daniel A. Knopf, Sandro Dahlke, Marion Maturilli, Henriette Gebauer, Johannes Bühl, Cristofer Jimenez, Patric Seifert, and Ulla Wandinger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 12821–12849, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-12821-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-12821-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The 1-year MOSAiC (2019–2020) expedition with the German ice breaker Polarstern was the largest polar field campaign ever conducted. The Polarstern, with our lidar aboard, drifted with the pack ice north of 85° N for more than 7 months (October 2019 to mid-May 2020). We measured the full annual cycle of aerosol conditions in terms of aerosol optical and cloud-process-relevant properties. We observed a strong contrast between polluted winter and clean summer aerosol conditions.
McKenna W. Stanford, Ann M. Fridlind, Israel Silber, Andrew S. Ackerman, Greg Cesana, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Alain Protat, Simon Alexander, and Adrian McDonald
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 9037–9069, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9037-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9037-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds play an important role in the Earth’s climate system as they modulate the amount of radiation that either reaches the surface or is reflected back to space. This study demonstrates an approach to robustly evaluate surface-based observations against a large-scale model. We find that the large-scale model precipitates too infrequently relative to observations, contrary to literature documentation suggesting otherwise based on satellite measurements.
Daniel A. Knopf, Peiwen Wang, Benny Wong, Jay M. Tomlin, Daniel P. Veghte, Nurun N. Lata, Swarup China, Alexander Laskin, Ryan C. Moffet, Josephine Y. Aller, Matthew A. Marcus, and Jian Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8659–8681, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8659-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8659-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Ambient particle populations and associated ice-nucleating particles (INPs)
were examined from particle samples collected on board aircraft in the marine
boundary layer and free troposphere in the eastern North Atlantic during
summer and winter. Chemical imaging shows distinct differences in the
particle populations seasonally and with sampling altitudes, which are
reflected in the INP types. Freezing parameterizations are derived for
implementation in cloud-resolving and climate models.
Frederic Tridon, Israel Silber, Alessandro Battaglia, Stefan Kneifel, Ann Fridlind, Petros Kalogeras, and Ranvir Dhillon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12467–12491, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12467-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12467-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The role of ice precipitation in the Earth water budget is not well known because ice particles are complex, and their formation involves intricate processes. Riming of ice crystals by supercooled water droplets is an efficient process, but little is known about its importance at high latitudes. In this work, by exploiting the deployment of an unprecedented number of remote sensing systems in Antarctica, we find that riming occurs at much lower temperatures compared with the mid-latitudes.
Michael S. Diamond, Pablo E. Saide, Paquita Zuidema, Andrew S. Ackerman, Sarah J. Doherty, Ann M. Fridlind, Hamish Gordon, Calvin Howes, Jan Kazil, Takanobu Yamaguchi, Jianhao Zhang, Graham Feingold, and Robert Wood
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12113–12151, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12113-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12113-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Smoke from southern Africa blankets the southeast Atlantic from June-October, overlying a major transition region between overcast and scattered clouds. The smoke affects Earth's radiation budget by absorbing sunlight and changing cloud properties. We investigate these effects in regional climate and large eddy simulation models based on international field campaigns. We find that large-scale circulation changes more strongly affect cloud transitions than smoke microphysical effects in our case.
Albert Ansmann, Kevin Ohneiser, Alexandra Chudnovsky, Daniel A. Knopf, Edwin W. Eloranta, Diego Villanueva, Patric Seifert, Martin Radenz, Boris Barja, Félix Zamorano, Cristofer Jimenez, Ronny Engelmann, Holger Baars, Hannes Griesche, Julian Hofer, Dietrich Althausen, and Ulla Wandinger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11701–11726, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11701-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11701-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
For the first time we present a systematic study on the impact of wildfire smoke on ozone depletion in the Arctic (2020) and Antarctic stratosphere (2020, 2021). Two major fire events in Siberia and Australia were responsible for the observed record-breaking stratospheric smoke pollution. Our analyses were based on lidar observations of smoke parameters (Polarstern, Punta Arenas) and NDACC Arctic and Antarctic ozone profiles as well as on Antarctic OMI satellite observations of column ozone.
Kevin Ohneiser, Albert Ansmann, Bernd Kaifler, Alexandra Chudnovsky, Boris Barja, Daniel A. Knopf, Natalie Kaifler, Holger Baars, Patric Seifert, Diego Villanueva, Cristofer Jimenez, Martin Radenz, Ronny Engelmann, Igor Veselovskii, and Félix Zamorano
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7417–7442, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7417-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7417-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present and discuss 2 years of long-term lidar observations of the largest stratospheric perturbation by wildfire smoke ever observed. The smoke originated from the record-breaking Australian fires in 2019–2020 and affects climate conditions and even the ozone layer in the Southern Hemisphere. The obvious link between dense smoke occurrence in the stratosphere and strong ozone depletion found in the Arctic and in the Antarctic in 2020 can be regarded as a new aspect of climate change.
Daniel A. Knopf, Joseph C. Charnawskas, Peiwen Wang, Benny Wong, Jay M. Tomlin, Kevin A. Jankowski, Matthew Fraund, Daniel P. Veghte, Swarup China, Alexander Laskin, Ryan C. Moffet, Mary K. Gilles, Josephine Y. Aller, Matthew A. Marcus, Shira Raveh-Rubin, and Jian Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5377–5398, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5377-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5377-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Marine boundary layer aerosols collected in the remote region of the eastern North Atlantic induce immersion freezing and deposition ice nucleation under typical mixed-phase and cirrus cloud conditions. Corresponding ice nucleation parameterizations for model applications have been derived. Chemical imaging of ambient aerosol and ice-nucleating particles demonstrates that the latter is dominated by sea salt and organics while also representing a major particle type in the particle population.
Israel Silber, Robert C. Jackson, Ann M. Fridlind, Andrew S. Ackerman, Scott Collis, Johannes Verlinde, and Jiachen Ding
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 901–927, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-901-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-901-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth Model Column Collaboratory (EMC2) is an open-source ground-based (and air- or space-borne) lidar and radar simulator and subcolumn generator designed for large-scale models, in particular climate models, applicable also for high-resolution models. EMC2 emulates measurements while remaining faithful to large-scale models' physical assumptions implemented in their cloud or radiation schemes. We demonstrate the use of EMC2 to compare AWARE measurements with the NASA GISS ModelE3 and LES.
Daniel Hernandez-Deckers, Toshihisa Matsui, and Ann M. Fridlind
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 711–724, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-711-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-711-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate how the concentration of aerosols (small particles that serve as seeds for cloud droplets) affect the dynamics of simulated clouds using two different frameworks, i.e., the traditional selection of cloudy rising grid points and tracking small-scale coherent rising features (cumulus thermals). By doing so, we find that these cumulus thermals reveal useful information about the coupling between internal cloud circulations and cloud droplet and raindrop formation.
Jay M. Tomlin, Kevin A. Jankowski, Daniel P. Veghte, Swarup China, Peiwen Wang, Matthew Fraund, Johannes Weis, Guangjie Zheng, Yang Wang, Felipe Rivera-Adorno, Shira Raveh-Rubin, Daniel A. Knopf, Jian Wang, Mary K. Gilles, Ryan C. Moffet, and Alexander Laskin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18123–18146, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18123-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18123-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Analysis of individual atmospheric particles shows that aerosol transported from North America during meteorological dry intrusion episodes may have a substantial impact on the mixing state and particle-type population over the mid-Atlantic, as organic contribution and particle-type diversity are significantly enhanced during these periods. These observations need to be considered in current atmospheric models.
Daniel A. Knopf and Markus Ammann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15725–15753, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15725-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15725-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Adsorption on and desorption of gas molecules from solid or liquid surfaces or interfaces represent the initial interaction of gas-to-condensed-phase processes that can define the physicochemical evolution of the condensed phase. We apply a thermodynamic and microscopic treatment of these multiphase processes to evaluate how adsorption and desorption rates and surface accommodation depend on the choice of adsorption model and standard states with implications for desorption energy and lifetimes.
Florian Tornow, Andrew S. Ackerman, and Ann M. Fridlind
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12049–12067, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12049-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12049-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Cold air outbreaks affect the local energy budget by forming bright boundary layer clouds that, once it rains, evolve into dimmer, broken cloud fields that are depleted of condensation nuclei – an evolution consistent with closed-to-open cell transitions. We find that cloud ice accelerates this evolution, primarily via riming prior to rain onset, which (1) reduces liquid water, (2) reduces condensation nuclei, and (3) leads to early precipitation cooling and moistening below cloud.
Yang Wang, Guangjie Zheng, Michael P. Jensen, Daniel A. Knopf, Alexander Laskin, Alyssa A. Matthews, David Mechem, Fan Mei, Ryan Moffet, Arthur J. Sedlacek, John E. Shilling, Stephen Springston, Amy Sullivan, Jason Tomlinson, Daniel Veghte, Rodney Weber, Robert Wood, Maria A. Zawadowicz, and Jian Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11079–11098, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11079-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11079-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper reports the vertical profiles of trace gas and aerosol properties over the eastern North Atlantic, a region of persistent but diverse subtropical marine boundary layer (MBL) clouds. We examined the key processes that drive the cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) population and how it varies with season and synoptic conditions. This study helps improve the model representation of the aerosol processes in the remote MBL, reducing the simulated aerosol indirect effects.
Stefanie Kremser, Mike Harvey, Peter Kuma, Sean Hartery, Alexia Saint-Macary, John McGregor, Alex Schuddeboom, Marc von Hobe, Sinikka T. Lennartz, Alex Geddes, Richard Querel, Adrian McDonald, Maija Peltola, Karine Sellegri, Israel Silber, Cliff S. Law, Connor J. Flynn, Andrew Marriner, Thomas C. J. Hill, Paul J. DeMott, Carson C. Hume, Graeme Plank, Geoffrey Graham, and Simon Parsons
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3115–3153, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3115-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3115-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol–cloud interactions over the Southern Ocean are poorly understood and remain a major source of uncertainty in climate models. This study presents ship-borne measurements, collected during a 6-week voyage into the Southern Ocean in 2018, that are an important supplement to satellite-based measurements. For example, these measurements include data on low-level clouds and aerosol composition in the marine boundary layer, which can be used in climate model evaluation efforts.
Albert Ansmann, Kevin Ohneiser, Rodanthi-Elisavet Mamouri, Daniel A. Knopf, Igor Veselovskii, Holger Baars, Ronny Engelmann, Andreas Foth, Cristofer Jimenez, Patric Seifert, and Boris Barja
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9779–9807, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9779-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9779-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present retrievals of tropospheric and stratospheric height profiles of particle mass, volume, surface area concentration of wildfire smoke layers, and related cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice-nucleating particle (INP) concentrations. The new analysis scheme is applied to ground-based lidar observations of stratospheric Australian smoke over southern South America and to spaceborne lidar observations of tropospheric North American smoke.
Alexander Zaytsev, Martin Breitenlechner, Anna Novelli, Hendrik Fuchs, Daniel A. Knopf, Jesse H. Kroll, and Frank N. Keutsch
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2501–2513, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2501-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2501-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed an online method for speciated measurements of organic peroxy radicals and stabilized Criegee intermediates using chemical derivatization combined with chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Chemical derivatization prevents secondary radical reactions and eliminates potential interferences. Comparison between our measurements and results from numeric modeling shows that the method can be used for the quantification of a wide range of atmospheric radicals and intermediates.
Jens Redemann, Robert Wood, Paquita Zuidema, Sarah J. Doherty, Bernadette Luna, Samuel E. LeBlanc, Michael S. Diamond, Yohei Shinozuka, Ian Y. Chang, Rei Ueyama, Leonhard Pfister, Ju-Mee Ryoo, Amie N. Dobracki, Arlindo M. da Silva, Karla M. Longo, Meloë S. Kacenelenbogen, Connor J. Flynn, Kristina Pistone, Nichola M. Knox, Stuart J. Piketh, James M. Haywood, Paola Formenti, Marc Mallet, Philip Stier, Andrew S. Ackerman, Susanne E. Bauer, Ann M. Fridlind, Gregory R. Carmichael, Pablo E. Saide, Gonzalo A. Ferrada, Steven G. Howell, Steffen Freitag, Brian Cairns, Brent N. Holben, Kirk D. Knobelspiesse, Simone Tanelli, Tristan S. L'Ecuyer, Andrew M. Dzambo, Ousmane O. Sy, Greg M. McFarquhar, Michael R. Poellot, Siddhant Gupta, Joseph R. O'Brien, Athanasios Nenes, Mary Kacarab, Jenny P. S. Wong, Jennifer D. Small-Griswold, Kenneth L. Thornhill, David Noone, James R. Podolske, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Peter Pilewskie, Hong Chen, Sabrina P. Cochrane, Arthur J. Sedlacek, Timothy J. Lang, Eric Stith, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer, Richard A. Ferrare, Sharon P. Burton, Chris A. Hostetler, David J. Diner, Felix C. Seidel, Steven E. Platnick, Jeffrey S. Myers, Kerry G. Meyer, Douglas A. Spangenberg, Hal Maring, and Lan Gao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1507–1563, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1507-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1507-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Southern Africa produces significant biomass burning emissions whose impacts on regional and global climate are poorly understood. ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) is a 5-year NASA investigation designed to study the key processes that determine these climate impacts. The main purpose of this paper is to familiarize the broader scientific community with the ORACLES project, the dataset it produced, and the most important initial findings.
Peter Kuma, Adrian J. McDonald, Olaf Morgenstern, Richard Querel, Israel Silber, and Connor J. Flynn
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 43–72, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-43-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-43-2021, 2021
Johannes Quaas, Antti Arola, Brian Cairns, Matthew Christensen, Hartwig Deneke, Annica M. L. Ekman, Graham Feingold, Ann Fridlind, Edward Gryspeerdt, Otto Hasekamp, Zhanqing Li, Antti Lipponen, Po-Lun Ma, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Athanasios Nenes, Joyce E. Penner, Daniel Rosenfeld, Roland Schrödner, Kenneth Sinclair, Odran Sourdeval, Philip Stier, Matthias Tesche, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, and Manfred Wendisch
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15079–15099, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15079-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15079-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Anthropogenic pollution particles – aerosols – serve as cloud condensation nuclei and thus increase cloud droplet concentration and the clouds' reflection of sunlight (a cooling effect on climate). This Twomey effect is poorly constrained by models and requires satellite data for better quantification. The review summarizes the challenges in properly doing so and outlines avenues for progress towards a better use of aerosol retrievals and better retrievals of droplet concentrations.
Cited articles
Alpert, P. A., Aller, J. Y., and Knopf, D. A.: Initiation of the ice phase by
marine biogenic surfaces in supersaturated gas and supercooled aqueous
phases, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 19882–19894,
https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP21844A, 2011.
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: Balloon-Borne Sounding System (SONDEWNPN). 2011-11-01 to 2019-04-30, North Slope Alaska (NSA) Central Facility, Barrow AK (C1), compiled by: Keeler, E., Ritsche, M., Coulter, R., Kyrouac, J., and Holdridge, D., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1021460, 2002.
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: MWR Retrievals (MWRRET1LILJCLOU). 2011-11-01 to 2019-04-30, North Slope Alaska (NSA) Central Facility, Barrow AK (C1), compiled by: Gaustad, K., Riihimaki, L., and Zhang, D., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1285691, 2011a.
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: KAZR Corrected Data (KAZRCORGE). 2011-11-11 to 2014-02-07, North Slope Alaska (NSA) Central Facility, Barrow AK (C1), compiled by: Johnson, K., Toto, T., and Jensen, M., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1228770, 2011b.
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: KAZR Corrected Data (KAZRCORMD). 2011-11-11 to 2014-02-07, North Slope Alaska (NSA) Central Facility, Barrow AK (C1), compiled by: Giangrande, S., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1350634, 2011c.
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: Ka ARM Zenith Radar (KAZRSPECCMASKGECOPOL). 2015-01-19 to 2015-01-20, North Slope Alaska (NSA) Central Facility, Barrow AK (C1), compiled by: Lindenmaier, I., Bharadwaj, N., Johnson, K., Nelson, D., Isom, B., Hardin, J., Matthews, A., Wendler, T., and Castro, V., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1025218, 2011d.
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: KAZR Corrected Data (KAZRCORGE). 2014-02-08 to 2019-04-30, North Slope Alaska (NSA) Central Facility, Barrow AK (C1), compiled by: Johnson, K., Toto, T., and Giangrande, S., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1389054, 2014a.
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: KAZR Corrected Data (KAZRCORMD). 2014-02-08 to 2019-04-30, North Slope Alaska (NSA) Central Facility, Barrow AK (C1), compiled by: Fairless, T., Giangrande, S., and Johnson, K., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1350634, 2014b.
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: KAZR Corrected Data (KAZRCORGE). 2015-11-18 to 2017-01-02, ARM Mobile Facility (AWR) McMurdo Station Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica; AMF2 (M1), compiled by: Johnson, K., Toto, T., and Giangrande, S., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1389054, 2015a.
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: KAZR Corrected Data (KAZRCORMD). 2015-11-17 to 2017-01-02, ARM Mobile Facility (AWR) McMurdo Station Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica; AMF2 (M1), compiled by: Giangrande, S., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1350634, 2015b.
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: Balloon-Borne Sounding System (SONDEWNPN). 2015-11-30 to 2017-01-03, ARM Mobile Facility (AWR) McMurdo Station Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica; AMF2 (M1), compiled by: Keeler, E., Coulter, R., and Kyrouac, J., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1021460, 2015c.
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility: MWR Retrievals (MWRRET1LILJCLOU). 2016-01-30 to 2017-01-01, ARM Mobile Facility (AWR) McMurdo Station Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica; AMF2 (M1), compiled by: Zhang, D., ARM Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5439/1027369, 2016.
Avramov, A., Ackerman, A. S., Fridlind, A. M., van Diedenhoven, B., Botta,
G., Aydin, K., Verlinde, J., Korolev, A. V, Strapp, J. W., McFarquhar, G.
M., Jackson, R., Brooks, S. D., Glen, A., and Wolde, M.: Toward ice formation
closure in Arctic mixed-phase boundary layer clouds during ISDAC, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D00T08, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015910, 2011.
Belosi, F., Santachiara, G., and Prodi, F.: Ice-forming nuclei in Antarctica:
New and past measurements, Atmos. Res., 145–146, 105–111,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.03.030, 2014.
Bennartz, R., Fell, F., Pettersen, C., Shupe, M. D., and Schuettemeyer, D.: Spatial and temporal variability of snowfall over Greenland from CloudSat observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8101–8121, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8101-2019, 2019.
Bromwich, D. H., Nicolas, J. P., Hines, K. M., Kay, J. E., Key, E. L.,
Lazzara, M. A., Lubin, D., McFarquhar, G. M., Gorodetskaya, I. V.,
Grosvenor, D. P., Lachlan-Cope, T., and van Lipzig, N. P. M.: Tropospheric
clouds in Antarctica, Rev. Geophys., 50, RG1004,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000363, 2012.
Bühl, J., Seifert, P., Myagkov, A., and Ansmann, A.: Measuring ice- and liquid-water properties in mixed-phase cloud layers at the Leipzig Cloudnet station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10609–10620, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10609-2016, 2016.
Cadeddu, M. P., Payne, V. H., Clough, S. A., Cady-Pereira, K., and Liljegren,
J. C.: Effect of the Oxygen Line-Parameter Modeling on Temperature and
Humidity Retrievals From Ground-Based Microwave Radiometers, IEEE T.
Geosci. Remote, 45, 2216–2223, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.894063, 2007.
Cadeddu, M. P., Turner, D. D., and Liljegren, J. C.: A Neural Network for
Real-Time Retrievals of PWV and LWP From Arctic Millimeter-Wave Ground-Based
Observations, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 47, 1887–1900,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2009.2013205, 2009.
Cadeddu, M. P., Liljegren, J. C., and Turner, D. D.: The Atmospheric radiation measurement (ARM) program network of microwave radiometers: instrumentation, data, and retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2359–2372, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2359-2013, 2013.
Castellani, B. B., Shupe, M. D., Hudak, D. R., and Sheppard, B. E.: The
annual cycle of snowfall at Summit, Greenland, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
120, 6654–6668, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023072, 2015.
Cesana, G., Waliser, D. E., Jiang, X., and Li, J.-L. F.: Multimodel
evaluation of cloud phase transition using satellite and reanalysis data, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7871–7892, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022932, 2015.
Creamean, J. M., Primm, K. M., Tolbert, M. A., Hall, E. G., Wendell, J., Jordan, A., Sheridan, P. J., Smith, J., and Schnell, R. C.: HOVERCAT: a novel aerial system for evaluation of aerosol–cloud interactions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3969–3985, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3969-2018, 2018.
Creamean, J. M., de Boer, G., Telg, H., Mei, F., Dexheimer, D., Shupe, M. D., Solomon, A., and McComiskey, A.: Assessing the vertical structure of Arctic aerosols using balloon-borne measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1737–1757, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1737-2021, 2021.
Cronin, T. W. and Tziperman, E.: Low clouds suppress Arctic air formation
and amplify high-latitude continental winter warming, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 112, 11490–11495, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510937112, 2015.
de Boer, G., Morrison, H., Shupe, M. D., and Hildner, R.: Evidence of liquid
dependent ice nucleation in high-latitude stratiform clouds from surface
remote sensors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L01803, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046016, 2011.
DeMott, P. J.: Measurements and analysis of ice nuclei relevant to west
coast U.S. precipitation, DOE-CSU-14354, Department of Energy, United States, 2019.
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D.,
Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Predicting
global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107, 2010.
Dong, X., Xi, B., Crosby, K., Long, C. N., Stone, R. S., and Shupe, M. D.: A
10 year climatology of Arctic cloud fraction and radiative forcing at
Barrow, Alaska, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D17212, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013489,
2010.
Edel, L., Claud, C., Genthon, C., Palerme, C., Wood, N., L'Ecuyer, T., and
Bromwich, D.: Arctic Snowfall from CloudSat Observations and Reanalyses, J.
Climate, 33, 2093–2109, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0105.1, 2020.
Eloranta, E. W.: High spectral resolution lidar, in: Lidar: Range-Resolved
Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere, Springer New York,
New York, NY, 143–163, 2005.
Fountain, A. G. and Ohtake, T.: Concentrations and Source Areas of Ice
Nuclei in the Alaskan Atmosphere, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 24, 377–382,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1985)024<0377:CASAOI>2.0.CO;2,
1985.
Fridlind, A. M. and Ackerman, A. S.: Simulations of Arctic Mixed-Phase
Boundary Layer Clouds: Advances in Understanding and Outstanding Questions,
in Mixed-Phase Clouds Observations and Modeling, edited by: Andronache, C.,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 153–183, 2018.
Fridlind, A. M., van Diedenhoven, B., Ackerman, A. S., Avramov, A., Mrowiec,
A., Morrison, H., Zuidema, P., and Shupe, M. D.: A FIRE-ACE/SHEBA Case Study
of Mixed-Phase Arctic Boundary Layer Clouds: Entrainment Rate Limitations on
Rapid Primary Ice Nucleation Processes, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 365–389,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-052.1, 2012.
Fukuta, N. and Takahashi, T.: The Growth of Atmospheric Ice Crystals: A
Summary of Findings in Vertical Supercooled Cloud Tunnel Studies, J. Atmos.
Sci., 56, 1963–1979, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<1963:TGOAIC>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Grazioli, J., Madeleine, J.-B., Gallée, H., Forbes, R. M., Genthon, C.,
Krinner, G., and Berne, A.: Katabatic winds diminish precipitation
contribution to the Antarctic ice mass balance, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
114, 10858–10863, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707633114, 2017.
Hallett, J. and Mossop, S. C.: Production of secondary ice particles during
the riming process, Nature, 249, 26–28, https://doi.org/10.1038/249026a0, 1974.
Hamada, A. and Takayabu, Y. N.: Improvements in Detection of Light
Precipitation with the Global Precipitation Measurement Dual-Frequency
Precipitation Radar (GPM DPR), J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 33, 653–667,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0097.1, 2016.
Haynes, J. M., L'Ecuyer, T. S., Stephens, G. L., Miller, S. D., Mitrescu,
C., Wood, N. B., and Tanelli, S.: Rainfall retrieval over the ocean with
spaceborne W-band radar, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00A22,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009973, 2009.
Hegg, D. A. and Baker, M. B.: Nucleation in the atmosphere, Rep. Prog.
Phys., 72, 56801, https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/72/5/056801, 2009.
Heymsfield, A. J., Protat, A., Bouniol, D., Austin, R. T., Hogan, R. J.,
Delanoë, J., Okamoto, H., Sato, K., van Zadelhoff, G.-J., Donovan, D. P.,
and Wang, Z.: Testing IWC Retrieval Methods Using Radar and Ancillary
Measurements with In Situ Data, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 47,
135–163, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1606.1, 2008.
Hogan, R. J., Mittermaier, M. P., and Illingworth, A. J.: The Retrieval of
Ice Water Content from Radar Reflectivity Factor and Temperature and Its Use
in Evaluating a Mesoscale Model, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 45,
301–317, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2340.1, 2006.
Holdridge, D., Ritsche, M., Prell, J., and Coulter, R.: Balloon-Borne
Sounding System (SONDE) Handbook, ARM-TR-029, DOE Office of Science, Office
of Biological and Environmental Research, United States, 2011.
Hou, A. Y., Kakar, R. K., Neeck, S., Azarbarzin, A. A., Kummerow, C. D.,
Kojima, M., Oki, R., Nakamura, K., and Iguchi, T.: The Global Precipitation
Measurement Mission, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 701–722,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1, 2013.
Illingworth, A. J., Barker, H. W., Beljaars, A., Ceccaldi, M., Chepfer, H.,
Clerbaux, N., Cole, J., Delanoë, J., Domenech, C., Donovan, D. P.,
Fukuda, S., Hirakata, M., Hogan, R. J., Huenerbein, A., Kollias, P., Kubota,
T., Nakajima, T., Nakajima, T. Y., Nishizawa, T., Ohno, Y., Okamoto, H.,
Oki, R., Sato, K., Satoh, M., Shephard, M. W., Velázquez-Blázquez,
A., Wandinger, U., Wehr, T., and van Zadelhoff, G.-J.: The EarthCARE
Satellite: The Next Step Forward in Global Measurements of Clouds, Aerosols,
Precipitation, and Radiation, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1311–1332,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00227.1, 2015.
Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo,
D. J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of Ice Nucleating Particles, Meteorol.
Monogr., 58, 1.1–1.33, https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1, 2017.
Kay, J. E., L'Ecuyer, T., Pendergrass, A., Chepfer, H., Guzman, R., and
Yettella, V.: Scale-Aware and Definition-Aware Evaluation of Modeled
Near-Surface Precipitation Frequency Using CloudSat Observations, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 4294–4309, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD028213, 2018.
Knopf, D. A., Alpert, P. A., and Wang, B.: The Role of Organic Aerosol in
Atmospheric Ice Nucleation: A Review, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2, 168–202,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00120, 2018.
Kollias, P., Tanelli, S., Battaglia, A., and Tatarevic, A.: Evaluation of
EarthCARE Cloud Profiling Radar Doppler Velocity Measurements in Particle
Sedimentation Regimes, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 366–386,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00202.1, 2014.
Kollias, P., Puigdomènech Treserras, B., and Protat, A.: Calibration of the 2007–2017 record of Atmospheric Radiation Measurements cloud radar observations using CloudSat, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 4949–4964, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4949-2019, 2019.
Korolev, A., Heckman, I., Wolde, M., Ackerman, A. S., Fridlind, A. M., Ladino, L. A., Lawson, R. P., Milbrandt, J., and Williams, E.: A new look at the environmental conditions favorable to secondary ice production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1391–1429, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1391-2020, 2020.
Kulie, M. S. and Bennartz, R.: Utilizing Spaceborne Radars to Retrieve Dry
Snowfall, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 48, 2564–2580,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2193.1, 2009.
Lamer, K., Puigdomènech Treserras, B., Zhu, Z., Isom, B., Bharadwaj, N., and Kollias, P.: Characterization of shallow oceanic precipitation using profiling and scanning radar observations at the Eastern North Atlantic ARM observatory, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 4931–4947, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4931-2019, 2019.
Lamer, K., Kollias, P., Battaglia, A., and Preval, S.: Mind the gap – Part 1: Accurately locating warm marine boundary layer clouds and precipitation using spaceborne radars, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2363–2379, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2363-2020, 2020.
Lauber, A., Kiselev, A., Pander, T., Handmann, P., and Leisner, T.: Secondary
Ice Formation during Freezing of Levitated Droplets, J. Atmos. Sci., 75,
2815–2826, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0052.1, 2018.
Lawson, R. P. and Zuidema, P.: Aircraft Microphysical and Surface-Based
Radar Observations of Summertime Arctic Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 66,
3505–3529, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3177.1, 2009.
Lemonnier, F., Madeleine, J.-B., Claud, C., Palerme, C., Genthon, C.,
L'Ecuyer, T., and Wood, N. B.: CloudSat-Inferred Vertical Structure of
Snowfall Over the Antarctic Continent, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125,
e2019JD031399, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031399, 2020.
Li, H. and Moisseev, D.: Two Layers of Melting Ice Particles Within a Single
Radar Bright Band: Interpretation and Implications, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
47, e2020GL087499, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087499, 2020.
Lubin, D., Zhang, D., Silber, I., Scott, R. C., Kalogeras, P., Battaglia,
A., Bromwich, D. H., Cadeddu, M., Eloranta, E., Fridlind, A., Frossard, A.,
Hines, K. M., Kneifel, S., Leaitch, W. R., Lin, W., Nicolas, J., Powers, H.,
Quinn, P. K., Rowe, P., Russell, L. M., Sharma, S., Verlinde, J., and
Vogelmann, A. M.: AWARE: The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) West
Antarctic Radiation Experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101,
E1069–E1091, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0278.1, 2020.
Maahn, M., Burgard, C., Crewell, S., Gorodetskaya, I. V, Kneifel, S.,
Lhermitte, S., Van Tricht, K., and van Lipzig, N. P. M.: How does the
spaceborne radar blind zone affect derived surface snowfall statistics in
polar regions?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 13604–13620,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022079, 2014.
Matrosov, S. Y.: Modeling Backscatter Properties of Snowfall at Millimeter
Wavelengths, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 1727–1736, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3904.1, 2007.
McCoy, D. T., Hartmann, D. L., and Grosvenor, D. P.: Observed Southern Ocean
Cloud Properties and Shortwave Reflection. Part II: Phase Changes and Low
Cloud Feedback, J. Climate, 27, 8858–8868, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00288.1,
2014.
McCoy, D. T., Hartmann, D. L., Zelinka, M. D., Ceppi, P., and Grosvenor, D.
P.: Mixed-phase cloud physics and Southern Ocean cloud feedback in climate
models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 9539–9554,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023603, 2015.
McIlhattan, E. A., L'Ecuyer, T. S., and Miller, N. B.: Observational Evidence
Linking Arctic Supercooled Liquid Cloud Biases in CESM to Snowfall
Processes, J. Climate, 30, 4477–4495, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0666.1, 2017.
Miller, N. B., Shupe, M. D., Cox, C. J., Walden, V. P., Turner, D. D., and
Steffen, K.: Cloud Radiative Forcing at Summit, Greenland, J. Climate, 28,
6267–6280, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0076.1, 2015.
Morris, V. R.: Microwave radiometer (MWR) handbook, ARM-TR-016, DOE Office
of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, United States Department of Energy, United States, 2006.
Morrison, H., Zuidema, P., Ackerman, A. S., Avramov, A., de Boer, G., Fan,
J., Fridlind, A. M., Hashino, T., Harrington, J. Y., Luo, Y., Ovchinnikov,
M., and Shipway, B.: Intercomparison of cloud model simulations of Arctic
mixed-phase boundary layer clouds observed during SHEBA/FIRE-ACE, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., 3, M05001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS000066, 2011.
Mülmenstädt, J., Nam, C., Salzmann, M., Kretzschmar, J., L'Ecuyer,
T. S., Lohmann, U., Ma, P.-L., Myhre, G., Neubauer, D., Stier, P., Suzuki,
K., Wang, M., and Quaas, J.: Reducing the aerosol forcing uncertainty using
observational constraints on warm rain processes, Sci. Adv., 6,
eaaz6433, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz6433, 2020.
Nomokonova, T., Ebell, K., Löhnert, U., Maturilli, M., Ritter, C., and O'Connor, E.: Statistics on clouds and their relation to thermodynamic conditions at Ny-Ålesund using ground-based sensor synergy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4105–4126, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4105-2019, 2019.
Ovchinnikov, M., Ackerman, A. S., Avramov, A., Cheng, A., Fan, J., Fridlind,
A. M., Ghan, S., Harrington, J., Hoose, C., Korolev, A., McFarquhar, G. M.,
Morrison, H., Paukert, M., Savre, J., Shipway, B. J., Shupe, M. D., Solomon,
A., and Sulia, K.: Intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of Arctic
mixed-phase clouds: Importance of ice size distribution assumptions, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., 6, 223–248, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000282, 2014.
Pettersen, C., Bennartz, R., Merrelli, A. J., Shupe, M. D., Turner, D. D., and Walden, V. P.: Precipitation regimes over central Greenland inferred from 5 years of ICECAPS observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4715–4735, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4715-2018, 2018.
Pinsky, M., Khain, A., and Korolev, A.: Phase transformations in an ascending
adiabatic mixed-phase cloud volume, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
3329–3353, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023094, 2015.
Pithan, F., Svensson, G., Caballero, R., Chechin, D., Cronin, T. W., Ekman,
A. M. L., Neggers, R., Shupe, M. D., Solomon, A., Tjernström, M., and
Wendisch, M.: Role of air-mass transformations in exchange between the
Arctic and mid-latitudes, Nat. Geosci., 11, 805–812,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0234-1, 2018.
Quinn, P. K., Miller, T. L., Bates, T. S., Ogren, J. A., Andrews, E., and
Shaw, G. E.: A 3-year record of simultaneously measured aerosol chemical and
optical properties at Barrow, Alaska, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, AAC
8-1–AAC 8-15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001248, 2002.
Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Schulz, K., and Shaw, G. E.: Decadal trends in aerosol chemical composition at Barrow, Alaska: 1976–2008, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8883–8888, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8883-2009, 2009.
Rangno, A. L. and Hobbs, P. V: Ice particles in stratiform clouds in the
Arctic and possible mechanisms for the production of high ice
concentrations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 15065–15075,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900286, 2001.
Scott, R. C. and Lubin, D.: Unique manifestations of mixed-phase cloud
microphysics over Ross Island and the Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 43, 2936–2945, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067246, 2016.
Sedlar, J.: Implications of Limited Liquid Water Path on Static Mixing
within Arctic Low-Level Clouds, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 53,
2775–2789, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0065.1, 2014.
Sedlar, J. and Shupe, M. D.: Characteristic nature of vertical motions observed in Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3461–3478, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3461-2014, 2014.
Shupe, M. D.: Clouds at Arctic Atmospheric Observatories. Part II:
Thermodynamic Phase Characteristics, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 50,
645–661, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2468.1, 2011.
Shupe, M. D. and Intrieri, J. M.: Cloud Radiative Forcing of the Arctic
Surface: The Influence of Cloud Properties, Surface Albedo, and Solar Zenith
Angle, J. Climate, 17, 616–628, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0616:CRFOTA>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Shupe, M. D., Matrosov, S. Y., and Uttal, T.: Arctic mixed-phase cloud
properties derived from surface-based sensors at SHEBA, J. Atmos. Sci.,
63, 697–711, 2006.
Shupe, M. D., Kollias, P., Persson, P. O. G., and McFarquhar, G. M.: Vertical
Motions in Arctic Mixed-Phase Stratiform Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 65,
1304–1322, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2479.1, 2008a.
Shupe, M. D., Kollias, P., Poellot, M., and Eloranta, E.: On Deriving
Vertical Air Motions from Cloud Radar Doppler Spectra, J. Atmos. Ocean.
Tech., 25, 547–557, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHA1007.1, 2008b.
Shupe, M. D., Walden, V. P., Eloranta, E., Uttal, T., Campbell, J. R.,
Starkweather, S. M., and Shiobara, M.: Clouds at Arctic Atmospheric
Observatories. Part I: Occurrence and Macrophysical Properties, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Climatol., 50, 626–644, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2467.1, 2011.
Silber, I., Verlinde, J., Eloranta, E. W., and Cadeddu, M.: Antarctic cloud
macrophysical, thermodynamic phase, and atmospheric inversion coupling
properties at McMurdo Station. Part I: Principal data processing and
climatology, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 6099–6121, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028279, 2018a.
Silber, I., Verlinde, J., Eloranta, E. W., Flynn, C. J., and Flynn, D. M.:
HSRL Liquid cloud base height / MPL Liquid cloud base height, DOE ARM Data Archive,
https://doi.org/10.5439/1438194, 2018b.
Silber, I., Verlinde, J., Eloranta, E. W., Flynn, C. J., and Flynn, D. M.:
Polar liquid cloud base detection algorithms for high spectral resolution or
micropulse lidar data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 4310–4322, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD027840,
2018c.
Silber, I., Fridlind, A. M., Verlinde, J., Ackerman, A. S., Chen, Y.-S.,
Bromwich, D. H., Wang, S.-H., Cadeddu, M., and Eloranta, E. W.: Persistent
Supercooled Drizzle at Temperatures below −25 ∘C Observed at
McMurdo Station, Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 10878–10895,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030882, 2019a.
Silber, I., Verlinde, J., Cadeddu, M., Flynn, C. J., Vogelmann, A. M., and
Eloranta, E. W.: Antarctic cloud macrophysical, thermodynamic phase, and
atmospheric inversion coupling properties at McMurdo Station. Part II:
Radiative impact during different synoptic regimes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 1697–1719,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029471, 2019b.
Silber, I., Verlinde, J., and Eloranta, E. W.: HSRL Liquid cloud base height
(nsaC1), DOE ARM Data Archive, https://doi.org/10.5439/1532341, 2019c.
Silber, I., Verlinde, J., Wang, S.-H., Bromwich, D. H., Fridlind, A. M.,
Cadeddu, M., and Eloranta, E. W.: Cloud Influence on ERA5 and AMPS Surface
Downwelling Longwave Radiation Biases in West Antarctica, J. Climate, 32, 7935–7949,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0149.1, 2019d.
Silber, I., Fridlind, A. M., Verlinde, J., Russell, L. M., and Ackerman, A.
S.: Nonturbulent Liquid-Bearing Polar Clouds: Observed Frequency of
Occurrence and Simulated Sensitivity to Gravity Waves, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087099,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087099, 2020b.
Silber, I., Verlinde, J., Wen, G., and Eloranta, E. W.: Can Embedded Liquid
Cloud Layer Volumes Be Classified in Polar Clouds Using a Single-Frequency
Zenith-Pointing Radar?, IEEE Geosci. Remote S., 17, 222–226,
https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2019.2918727, 2020a.
Skofronick-Jackson, G., Kulie, M., Milani, L., Munchak, S. J., Wood, N. B.,
and Levizzani, V.: Satellite Estimation of Falling Snow: A Global
Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Core Observatory Perspective, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Climatol., 58, 1429–1448, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0124.1, 2019.
Smalley, M., L'Ecuyer, T., Lebsock, M., and Haynes, J.: A Comparison of
Precipitation Occurrence from the NCEP Stage IV QPE Product and the CloudSat
Cloud Profiling Radar, J. Hydrometeorol., 15, 444–458,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-048.1, 2014.
Solomon, A., Shupe, M. D., Persson, P. O. G., and Morrison, H.: Moisture and dynamical interactions maintaining decoupled Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus in the presence of a humidity inversion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10127–10148, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10127-2011, 2011.
Solomon, A., Feingold, G., and Shupe, M. D.: The role of ice nuclei recycling in the maintenance of cloud ice in Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10631–10643, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10631-2015, 2015.
Souverijns, N., Gossart, A., Lhermitte, S., Gorodetskaya, I. V, Kneifel, S.,
Maahn, M., Bliven, F. L., and van Lipzig, N. P. M.: Estimating radar
reflectivity - Snowfall rate relationships and their uncertainties over
Antarctica by combining disdrometer and radar observations, Atmos. Res.,
196, 211–223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.001, 2017.
Stephens, G. L., Vane, D. G., Boain, R. J., Mace, G. G., Sassen, K., Wang,
Z., Illingworth, A. J., O'Connor, E. J., Rossow, W. B., Durden, S. L.,
Miller, S. D., Austin, R. T., Benedetti, A., Mitrescu, C., and CloudSat
Science Team, T.: The Cloudsat Mission and the A-Train, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 83, 1771–1790, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-12-1771, 2002.
Tan, I. and Storelvmo, T.: Evidence of Strong Contributions From Mixed-Phase
Clouds to Arctic Climate Change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 2894–2902,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081871, 2019.
Tan, I., Storelvmo, T., and Zelinka, M. D.: Observational constraints on
mixed-phase clouds imply higher climate sensitivity, Science,
352, 224–227, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5300, 2016.
Tanelli, S., Durden, S. L., Im, E., Pak, K. S., Reinke, D. G., Partain, P.,
Haynes, J. M., and Marchand, R. T.: CloudSat's Cloud Profiling Radar After
Two Years in Orbit: Performance, Calibration, and Processing, IEEE T.
Geosci. Remote, 46, 3560–3573, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.2002030,
2008.
Tsushima, Y., Emori, S., Ogura, T., Kimoto, M., Webb, M. J., Williams, K.
D., Ringer, M. A., Soden, B. J., Li, B., and Andronova, N.: Importance of the
mixed-phase cloud distribution in the control climate for assessing the
response of clouds to carbon dioxide increase: a multi-model study, Clim.
Dyn., 27, 113–126, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0127-7, 2006.
Turner, D. D., Clough, S. A., Liljegren, J. C., Clothiaux, E. E.,
Cady-Pereira, K. E., and Gaustad, K. L.: Retrieving Liquid Water Path and
Precipitable Water Vapor From the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM)
Microwave Radiometers, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 45, 3680–3690,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.903703, 2007.
Turner, D. D., Shupe, M. D.,and Zwink, A. B.: Characteristic Atmospheric
Radiative Heating Rate Profiles in Arctic Clouds as Observed at Barrow,
Alaska, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 57, 953–968,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0252.1, 2018.
Ulbrich, C. W.: Natural Variations in the Analytical Form of the Raindrop
Size Distribution, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 22, 1764–1775,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1764:NVITAF>2.0.CO;2,
1983.
Vali, G., DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., and Whale, T. F.: Technical Note: A proposal for ice nucleation terminology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10263–10270, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015, 2015.
Vassel, M., Ickes, L., Maturilli, M., and Hoose, C.: Classification of Arctic multilayer clouds using radiosonde and radar data in Svalbard, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5111–5126, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5111-2019, 2019.
Vergara-Temprado, J., Miltenberger, A. K., Furtado, K., Grosvenor, D. P.,
Shipway, B. J., Hill, A. A., Wilkinson, J. M., Field, P. R., Murray, B. J.,
and Carslaw, K. S.: Strong control of Southern Ocean cloud reflectivity by
ice-nucleating particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 2687–2692,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721627115, 2018.
Verlinde, J., Rambukkange, M. P., Clothiaux, E. E., McFarquhar, G. M., and
Eloranta, E. W.: Arctic multilayered, mixed-phase cloud processes revealed
in millimeter-wave cloud radar Doppler spectra, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 13199–13213, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020183, 2013.
Verlinde, J., Zak, B. D., Shupe, M. D., Ivey, M. D., and Stamnes, K.: The ARM
North Slope of Alaska (NSA) Sites, Meteorol. Monogr., 57, 8.1–8.13,
https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-15-0023.1, 2016.
Villanueva, D., Heinold, B., Seifert, P., Deneke, H., Radenz, M., and Tegen, I.: The day-to-day co-variability between mineral dust and cloud glaciation: a proxy for heterogeneous freezing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2177–2199, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2177-2020, 2020.
Westbrook, C. D. and Illingworth, A. J.: The formation of ice in a
long-lived supercooled layer cloud, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 139,
2209–2221, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2096, 2013.
Westwater, E. R., Han, Y., Shupe, M. D., and Matrosov, S. Y.: Analysis of
integrated cloud liquid and precipitable water vapor retrievals from
microwave radiometers during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean
project, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 32019–32030,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000055, 2001.
Wex, H., Huang, L., Zhang, W., Hung, H., Traversi, R., Becagli, S., Sheesley, R. J., Moffett, C. E., Barrett, T. E., Bossi, R., Skov, H., Hünerbein, A., Lubitz, J., Löffler, M., Linke, O., Hartmann, M., Herenz, P., and Stratmann, F.: Annual variability of ice-nucleating particle concentrations at different Arctic locations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5293–5311, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5293-2019, 2019.
Widener, K. B., Bharadwaj, N., and Johnson, K.: Ka-Band ARM Zenith Radar
(KAZR) Instrument Handbook, ARM-TR-106, DOE Office of Science, Office of
Biological and Environmental Research, United States, 2012.
Wood, N. B.: Estimation of snow microphysical properties with application to
millimeter-wavelength radar retrievals for snowfall rate, Colorado State
University, 2011.
Wood, N. B., L'Ecuyer, T. S., Heymsfield, A. J., Stephens, G. L., Hudak, D.
R., and Rodriguez, P.: Estimating snow microphysical properties using
collocated multisensor observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119,
8941–8961, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021303, 2014.
Wood, R.: Stratocumulus Clouds, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 2373–2423,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00121.1, 2012.
Zhang, D., Wang, Z., and Liu, D.: A global view of midlevel liquid-layer
topped stratiform cloud distribution and phase partition from CALIPSO and
CloudSat measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00H13,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012143, 2010.
Zipori, A., Reicher, N., Erel, Y., Rosenfeld, D., Sandler, A., Knopf, D. A.,
and Rudich, Y.: The Role of Secondary Ice Processes in Midlatitude
Continental Clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 12712–62777,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029146, 2018.
Short summary
Long-term ground-based radar and sounding measurements over Alaska (Antarctica) indicate that more than 85 % (75 %) of supercooled clouds are precipitating at cloud base and that 75 % (50 %) are precipitating to the surface. Such high prevalence is reconciled with lesser spaceborne estimates by considering radar sensitivity. Results provide a strong observational constraint for polar cloud processes in large-scale models.
Long-term ground-based radar and sounding measurements over Alaska (Antarctica) indicate that...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint