Articles | Volume 15, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10399-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10399-2015
Research article
 | 
23 Sep 2015
Research article |  | 23 Sep 2015

Parameterizations for convective transport in various cloud-topped boundary layers

M. Sikma and H. G. Ouwersloot

Related authors

Revision of the convective transport module CVTRANS 2.4 in the EMAC atmospheric chemistry–climate model
H. G. Ouwersloot, A. Pozzer, B. Steil, H. Tost, and J. Lelieveld
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2435–2445, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2435-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2435-2015, 2015
Study of a prototypical convective boundary layer observed during BLLAST: contributions by large-scale forcings
H. P. Pietersen, J. Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, P. Augustin, A. van de Boer, O. de Coster, H. Delbarre, P. Durand, M. Fourmentin, B. Gioli, O. Hartogensis, F. Lohou, M. Lothon, H. G. Ouwersloot, D. Pino, and J. Reuder
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4241–4257, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4241-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4241-2015, 2015
A comparison of HONO budgets for two measurement heights at a field station within the boreal forest in Finland
R. Oswald, M. Ermel, K. Hens, A. Novelli, H. G. Ouwersloot, P. Paasonen, T. Petäjä, M. Sipilä, P. Keronen, J. Bäck, R. Königstedt, Z. Hosaynali Beygi, H. Fischer, B. Bohn, D. Kubistin, H. Harder, M. Martinez, J. Williams, T. Hoffmann, I. Trebs, and M. Sörgel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 799–813, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-799-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-799-2015, 2015
Short summary
Two perspectives on the coupled carbon, water and energy exchange in the planetary boundary layer
M. Combe, J. Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, H. G. Ouwersloot, C. M. J. Jacobs, and W. Peters
Biogeosciences, 12, 103–123, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-103-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-103-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Dynamics | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Meteorological modeling sensitivity to parameterizations and satellite-derived surface datasets during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study
Jason A. Otkin, Lee M. Cronce, Jonathan L. Case, R. Bradley Pierce, Monica Harkey, Allen Lenzen, David S. Henderson, Zac Adelman, Tsengel Nergui, and Christopher R. Hain
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7935–7954, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7935-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7935-2023, 2023
Short summary
Trajectory enhancement of low-earth orbiter thermodynamic retrievals to predict convection: a simulation experiment
Mark T. Richardson, Brian H. Kahn, and Peter Kalmus
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7699–7717, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7699-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7699-2023, 2023
Short summary
Lagrangian transport simulations using the extreme convection parameterization: an assessment for the ECMWF reanalyses
Lars Hoffmann, Paul Konopka, Jan Clemens, and Bärbel Vogel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7589–7609, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7589-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7589-2023, 2023
Short summary
Better-constrained climate sensitivity when accounting for dataset dependency on pattern effect estimates
Angshuman Modak and Thorsten Mauritsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7535–7549, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7535-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7535-2023, 2023
Short summary
Determination of the chemical equator from GEOS-Chem model simulation: a focus on the tropical western Pacific region
Xiaoyu Sun, Mathias Palm, Katrin Müller, Jonas Hachmeister, and Justus Notholt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7075–7090, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7075-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7075-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Arakawa, A.: The Cumulus Parameterization Problem: past, present and future, J. Climate, 17, 2493–2525, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2493:RATCPP>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Bechtold, P., Bazile, E., Guichard, F., Mascart, P., and Richard, E.: A mass-flux convection scheme for regional and global models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 869–886, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712757309, 2001.
Betts, A. K.: Non-precipitating cumulus convection and its parameterization, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 99, 178–196, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709941915, 1973.
Betts, A. K.: A new convective adjustment scheme, Part I: Observational and theoretical basis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 677–691, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711247307, 1986.
Boing, S. J., Jonker, H. J. J., Nawara, W., and Siebesma, A. P.: On the deceiving aspects of mixing diagrams of deep cumulus convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 56–68, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0127.1, 2014.
Download
Short summary
By using large-eddy simulation model data for 10 meteorological situations, we systematically studied the ability of current parameterizations to capture convective transport by clouds. We found that the currently applied parameterization for the cloud area fraction does not suffice and a novel parameterization is proposed. Furthermore, the scaling of the upward velocity and the parameterization for the concentrations of atmospheric reactants are improved.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint