Articles | Volume 13, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9607-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9607-2013
Research article
 | 
27 Sep 2013
Research article |  | 27 Sep 2013

The impact of emission and climate change on ozone in the United States under representative concentration pathways (RCPs)

Y. Gao, J. S. Fu, J. B. Drake, J.-F. Lamarque, and Y. Liu

Related authors

Modeling CMAQ dry deposition treatment over Western Pacific: A distinct characteristic of mineral dust and anthropogenic aerosol
Steven Soon-Kai Kong, Joshua S. Fu, Neng-Huei Lin, Guey-Rong Sheu, and Wei-Syun Huang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2549,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2549, 2024
Short summary
Recommendations on benchmarks for chemical transport model applications in China – Part 2: Ozone and Uncertainty Analysis
Ling Huang, Xinxin Zhang, Chris Emery, Qing Mu, Greg Yarwood, Hehe Zhai, Zhixu Sun, Shuhui Xue, Yangjun Wang, Joshua S. Fu, and Li Li
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2199,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2199, 2024
Short summary
Retrieving ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in China (2013–2021) with a numerical-model-informed testbed to mitigate sample-imbalance-induced biases
Siwei Li, Yu Ding, Jia Xing, and Joshua S. Fu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3781–3793, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3781-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3781-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluating modelled tropospheric columns of CH4, CO, and O3 in the Arctic using ground-based Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) measurements
Victoria A. Flood, Kimberly Strong, Cynthia H. Whaley, Kaley A. Walker, Thomas Blumenstock, James W. Hannigan, Johan Mellqvist, Justus Notholt, Mathias Palm, Amelie N. Röhling, Stephen Arnold, Stephen Beagley, Rong-You Chien, Jesper Christensen, Makoto Deushi, Srdjan Dobricic, Xinyi Dong, Joshua S. Fu, Michael Gauss, Wanmin Gong, Joakim Langner, Kathy S. Law, Louis Marelle, Tatsuo Onishi, Naga Oshima, David A. Plummer, Luca Pozzoli, Jean-Christophe Raut, Manu A. Thomas, Svetlana Tsyro, and Steven Turnock
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1079–1118, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1079-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1079-2024, 2024
Short summary
The Emissions Model Intercomparison Project (Emissions-MIP): quantifying model sensitivity to emission characteristics
Hamza Ahsan, Hailong Wang, Jingbo Wu, Mingxuan Wu, Steven J. Smith, Susanne Bauer, Harrison Suchyta, Dirk Olivié, Gunnar Myhre, Hitoshi Matsui, Huisheng Bian, Jean-François Lamarque, Ken Carslaw, Larry Horowitz, Leighton Regayre, Mian Chin, Michael Schulz, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Toshihiko Takemura, and Vaishali Naik
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14779–14799, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14779-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14779-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
A CO2–Δ14CO2 inversion setup for estimating European fossil CO2 emissions
Carlos Gómez-Ortiz, Guillaume Monteil, Sourish Basu, and Marko Scholze
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 397–424, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-397-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-397-2025, 2025
Short summary
Maximum ozone concentrations in the southwestern US and Texas: implications of the growing predominance of the background contribution
David D. Parrish, Ian C. Faloona, and Richard G. Derwent
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 263–289, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-263-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-263-2025, 2025
Short summary
Derivation of atmospheric reaction mechanisms for volatile organic compounds by the SAPRC mechanism generation system (MechGen)
William P. L. Carter, Jia Jiang, John J. Orlando, and Kelley C. Barsanti
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 199–242, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-199-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-199-2025, 2025
Short summary
Seasonal, regional, and vertical characteristics of high-carbon-monoxide plumes along with their associated ozone anomalies, as seen by IAGOS between 2002 and 2019
Thibaut Lebourgeois, Bastien Sauvage, Pawel Wolff, Béatrice Josse, Virginie Marécal, Yasmine Bennouna, Romain Blot, Damien Boulanger, Hannah Clark, Jean-Marc Cousin, Philippe Nedelec, and Valérie Thouret
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13975–14004, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13975-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13975-2024, 2024
Short summary
The potential of drone observations to improve air quality predictions by 4D-Var
Hassnae Erraji, Philipp Franke, Astrid Lampert, Tobias Schuldt, Ralf Tillmann, Andreas Wahner, and Anne Caroline Lange
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13913–13934, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13913-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13913-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aghedo, A. M., Bowman, K. W., Worden, H. M., Kulawik, S. S., Shindell, D. T., Lamarque, J. F., Faluvegi, G., Parrington, M., Jones, D. B. A., and Rast, S.: The vertical distribution of ozone instantaneous radiative forcing from satellite and chemistry climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D01305, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014243, 2011.
Annan, J. D. and Hargreaves, J. C.: Understanding the CMIP3 Multimodel Ensemble, J. Climate, 24, 4529–4538, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011jcli3873.1, 2011.
Bell, M., Goldberg, R., Hogrefe, C., Kinney, P., Knowlton, K., Lynn, B., Rosenthal, J., Rosenzweig, C., and Patz, J.: Climate change, ambient ozone, and health in 50 US cities, Climatic Change, 82, 61–76, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9166-7, 2007.
Byun, D. and Schere, K. L.: Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system, Appl. Mech. Rev., 59, 51–77, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2128636, 2006.
Caldwell, P., Chin, H.-N. S., Bader, D. C., and Bala, G.: Evaluation of a WRF dynamical downscaling simulation over California, Climatic Change, 95, 499–521, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9583-5, 2009.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint