Articles | Volume 20, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9459-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9459-2020
Research article
 | 
13 Aug 2020
Research article |  | 13 Aug 2020

Reformulating the bromine alpha factor and equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC): evolution of ozone destruction rates of bromine and chlorine in future climate scenarios

J. Eric Klobas, Debra K. Weisenstein, Ross J. Salawitch, and David M. Wilmouth

Related authors

UV spectroscopic determination of the chlorine monoxide (ClO) ∕ chlorine peroxide (ClOOCl) thermal equilibrium constant
J. Eric Klobas and David M. Wilmouth
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6205–6215, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6205-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6205-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Beyond self-healing: stabilizing and destabilizing photochemical adjustment of the ozone layer
Aaron Match, Edwin P. Gerber, and Stephan Fueglistaler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10305–10322, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10305-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10305-2024, 2024
Short summary
Solar FTIR measurements of NOx vertical distributions – Part 2: Experiment-based scaling factors describing the daytime variation in stratospheric NOx
Pinchas Nürnberg, Sarah A. Strode, and Ralf Sussmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10001–10012, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10001-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10001-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical note: Evaluation of the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service Cy48R1 upgrade of June 2023
Henk Eskes, Athanasios Tsikerdekis, Melanie Ades, Mihai Alexe, Anna Carlin Benedictow, Yasmine Bennouna, Lewis Blake, Idir Bouarar, Simon Chabrillat, Richard Engelen, Quentin Errera, Johannes Flemming, Sebastien Garrigues, Jan Griesfeller, Vincent Huijnen, Luka Ilić, Antje Inness, John Kapsomenakis, Zak Kipling, Bavo Langerock, Augustin Mortier, Mark Parrington, Isabelle Pison, Mikko Pitkänen, Samuel Remy, Andreas Richter, Anja Schoenhardt, Michael Schulz, Valerie Thouret, Thorsten Warneke, Christos Zerefos, and Vincent-Henri Peuch
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9475–9514, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9475-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9475-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analysis of a newly homogenised ozonesonde dataset from Lauder, New Zealand
Guang Zeng, Richard Querel, Hisako Shiona, Deniz Poyraz, Roeland Van Malderen, Alex Geddes, Penny Smale, Dan Smale, John Robinson, and Olaf Morgenstern
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6413–6432, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6413-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6413-2024, 2024
Short summary
The return to 1980 stratospheric halogen levels: A moving target in ozone assessments from 2006 to 2022
Megan Lickley, John S. Daniel, Laura A. McBride, Ross J. Salawitch, and Guus Velders
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1289,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1289, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Austin, J. and Wilson, R. J.: Ensemble simulations of the decline and recovery of stratospheric ozone, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D16314, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006907, 2006. a
Banerjee, A., Maycock, A. C., Archibald, A. T., Abraham, N. L., Telford, P., Braesicke, P., and Pyle, J. A.: Drivers of changes in stratospheric and tropospheric ozone between year 2000 and 2100, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2727–2746, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2727-2016, 2016. a
Braesicke, P., Neu, J., Fioletov, V., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hubert, D., Petropavlovskikh, I., Shiotani, M., and Sinnhuber, B.-M.: Update on Global Ozone: Past, Present, and Future, chap. 3, in: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2018, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project – Report No. 58, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. a
Brasseur, G. P., Granier, C., and Walters, S.: Future changes in stratospheric ozone and the role of heterogeneous chemistry, Nature, 348, 626–628, https://doi.org/10.1038/348626a0, 1990. a
Brune, W. H. and Anderson, J. G.: In situ observations of midlatitude stratospheric ClO and BrO, Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 1391–1394, https://doi.org/10.1029/GL013i013p01391, 1986. a
Download
Short summary
The rates of important ozone-destroying chemical reactions in the stratosphere are likely to change in the future. We employ a computer model to evaluate how the rates of ozone destruction by chlorine and bromine may evolve in four climate change scenarios with the introduction of the eta factor. We then show how these changing rates will impact the ozone-depleting power of the stratosphere with a new metric known as Equivalent Effective Stratospheric Benchmark-normalized Chlorine (EESBnC).
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint