Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4289–4309, 2019
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4289–4309, 2019

Research article 03 Apr 2019

Research article | 03 Apr 2019

Ground-based ozone profiles over central Europe: incorporating anomalous observations into the analysis of stratospheric ozone trends

Leonie Bernet et al.

Related authors

Trends of atmospheric water vapour in Switzerland from ground-based radiometry, FTIR and GNSS data
Leonie Bernet, Elmar Brockmann, Thomas von Clarmann, Niklaus Kämpfer, Emmanuel Mahieu, Christian Mätzler, Gunter Stober, and Klemens Hocke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11223–11244,,, 2020
Short summary
Study of the dependence of long-term stratospheric ozone trends on local solar time
Eliane Maillard Barras, Alexander Haefele, Liliane Nguyen, Fiona Tummon, William T. Ball, Eugene V. Rozanov, Rolf Rüfenacht, Klemens Hocke, Leonie Bernet, Niklaus Kämpfer, Gerald Nedoluha, and Ian Boyd
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8453–8471,,, 2020
Short summary
Diurnal cycle of short-term fluctuations of integrated water vapour above Switzerland
Klemens Hocke, Leonie Bernet, Jonas Hagen, Axel Murk, Matthias Renker, and Christian Mätzler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12083–12090,,, 2019
Short summary
Geographical distributions of mesospheric gravity wave activity before and after major sudden stratospheric warmings observed by Aura/MLS
Klemens Hocke, Jonas Hagen, Franziska Schranz, and Leonie Bernet
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,,, 2019
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
The effect of cloud liquid water on tropospheric temperature retrievals from microwave measurements
Leonie Bernet, Francisco Navas-Guzmán, and Niklaus Kämpfer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4421–4437,,, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Remote Sensing | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
3-D tomographic observations of Rossby wave breaking over the Northern Atlantic during the WISE aircraft campaign in 2017
Lukas Krasauskas, Jörn Ungermann, Peter Preusse, Felix Friedl-Vallon, Andreas Zahn, Helmut Ziereis, Christian Rolf, Felix Plöger, Paul Konopka, Bärbel Vogel, and Martin Riese
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,,, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary
Is there a direct solar proton impact on lower-stratospheric ozone?
Jia Jia, Antti Kero, Niilo Kalakoski, Monika E. Szeląg, and Pekka T. Verronen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14969–14982,,, 2020
Short summary
Small-scale variability of stratospheric ozone during the sudden stratospheric warming 2018/2019 observed at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard
Franziska Schranz, Jonas Hagen, Gunter Stober, Klemens Hocke, Axel Murk, and Niklaus Kämpfer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10791–10806,,, 2020
Short summary
Seasonal stratospheric ozone trends over 2000–2018 derived from several merged data sets
Monika E. Szeląg, Viktoria F. Sofieva, Doug Degenstein, Chris Roth, Sean Davis, and Lucien Froidevaux
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7035–7047,,, 2020
Short summary
Evidence for energetic particle precipitation and quasi-biennial oscillation modulations of the Antarctic NO2 springtime stratospheric column from OMI observations
Emily M. Gordon, Annika Seppälä, and Johanna Tamminen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6259–6271,,, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Bai, K., Chang, N.-B., Shi, R., Yu, H., and Gao, W.: An inter-comparison of multi-decadal observational and reanalysis data sets for global total ozone trends and variability analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 1–21,, 2017. a
Ball, W. T., Alsing, J., Mortlock, D. J., Rozanov, E. V., Tummon, F., and Haigh, J. D.: Reconciling differences in stratospheric ozone composites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12269–12302,, 2017. a, b, c
Ball, W. T., Alsing, J., Mortlock, D. J., Staehelin, J., Haigh, J. D., Peter, T., Tummon, F., Stübi, R., Stenke, A., Anderson, J., Bourassa, A., Davis, S. M., Degenstein, D., Frith, S. M., Froidevaux, L., Roth, C., Sofieva, V., Wang, R., Wild, J., Yu, P., Ziemke, J. R., and Rozanov, E. V.: Evidence for continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsetting ozone layer recovery, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1379–1394,, 2018. a, b
Bates, B. C., Chandler, R. E., and Bowman, A. W.: Trend estimation and change point detection in individual climatic series using flexible regression methods, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, 1–9,, 2012. a
Bourassa, A. E., Roth, C. Z., Zawada, D. J., Rieger, L. A., McLinden, C. A., and Degenstein, D. A.: Drift-corrected Odin-OSIRIS ozone product: Algorithm and updated stratospheric ozone trends, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 489–498,, 2018. a
Short summary
After severe ozone depletion, upper stratospheric ozone has started to recover in recent years. However, stratospheric ozone trends from various data sets still show differences. To partly explain such differences, we investigate how the trends are affected by different factors, for example, anomalies in the data. We show how trend estimates can be improved by considering such anomalies and present updated stratospheric ozone trends from ground data measured in central Europe.
Final-revised paper