Articles | Volume 24, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13081-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13081-2024
Research article
 | 
27 Nov 2024
Research article |  | 27 Nov 2024

The return to 1980 stratospheric halogen levels: a moving target in ozone assessments from 2006 to 2022

Megan J. Lickley, John S. Daniel, Laura A. McBride, Ross J. Salawitch, and Guus J. M. Velders

Related authors

Bayesian assessment of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC), hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) and halon banks suggest large reservoirs still present in old equipment
Megan Jeramaz Lickley, John S. Daniel, Eric L. Fleming, Stefan Reimann, and Susan Solomon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11125–11136, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11125-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11125-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

AFEAS (Alternative Fluorocarbons Environmental Acceptability Study): Production, Sales and Calculated Emissions of Fluorocarbons Through 2000, AFEAS 2001 database, https://unfccc.int/files/methods/ (last access: 1 June 2021), 2001. 
Andersen, S. O., Gao, S., Carvalho, S., Ferris, T., Gonzalez, M., Sherman, N. J., Wei, Y., and Zaelke, D.: Narrowing feedstock exemptions under the Montreal Protocol has multiple environmental benefits, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2022668118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022668118, 2021. 
Ashford, P., Clodic, D., McCulloch, A., and Kuijpers, L.: Emission profiles from the foam and refrigeration sectors comparison with atmospheric concentrations, Part 1: Methodology and data, Int. J. Refrig., 27, 687–700, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2004.07.025, 2004. 
Bednarz, E. M., Hossaini, R., Chipperfield, M. P., Abraham, N. L., and Braesicke, P.: Atmospheric impacts of chlorinated very short-lived substances over the recent past – Part 1: Stratospheric chlorine budget and the role of transport, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10657–10676, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10657-2022, 2022. 
Benish, S. E., Salawitch, R. J., Ren, X., He, H., and Dickerson, R. R.: Airborne Observations of CFCs Over Hebei Province, China in Spring 2016, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035152, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
The expected ozone recovery date was delayed by 17 years between the 2006 and 2022 international scientific assessments of ozone depletion. We quantify the primary drivers of this delay. Changes in the metric used to estimate ozone recovery explain ca. 5 years of this delay. Of the remaining 12 years, changes in estimated banks, atmospheric lifetimes, and emission projections explain 4, 3.5, and 3 years of this delay, respectively.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint