Articles | Volume 15, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5359-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5359-2015
Research article
 | 
18 May 2015
Research article |  | 18 May 2015

Mercury vapor air–surface exchange measured by collocated micrometeorological and enclosure methods – Part II: Bias and uncertainty analysis

W. Zhu, J. Sommar, C.-J. Lin, and X. Feng

Related authors

Atmospheric Mercury: Recent advances in theoretical, computational, experimental, observational and isotopic understanding to decipher its complex redox transformations in the upper and lower atmosphere and interaction with Earth surface reservoirs
Jonas O. Sommar, Xueling Tang, Xinyu Shi, Guangyi Sun, Che-Jen Lin, and Xinbin Feng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4190,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4190, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Dissolved organic matter fosters core mercury-methylating microbiome for methylmercury production in paddy soils
Qiang Pu, Bo Meng, Jen-How Huang, Kun Zhang, Jiang Liu, Yurong Liu, Mahmoud A. Abdelhafiz, and Xinbin Feng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-590,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-590, 2024
Short summary
The Multi-Compartment Hg Modeling and Analysis Project (MCHgMAP): Mercury modeling to support international environmental policy
Ashu Dastoor, Hélène Angot, Johannes Bieser, Flora Brocza, Brock Edwards, Aryeh Feinberg, Xinbin Feng, Benjamin Geyman, Charikleia Gournia, Yipeng He, Ian M. Hedgecock, Ilia Ilyin, Terry Keating, Jane Kirk, Che-Jen Lin, Igor Lehnherr, Robert Mason, David McLagan, Marilena Muntean, Peter Rafaj, Eric M. Roy, Andrei Ryjkov, Noelle E. Selin, Francesco De Simone, Anne L. Soerensen, Frits Steenhuisen, Oleg Travnikov, Shuxiao Wang, Xun Wang, Simon Wilson, Rosa Wu, Qingru Wu, Yanxu Zhang, Jun Zhou, Wei Zhu, and Scott Zolkos
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-65,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-65, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Speciated atmospheric mercury at the Waliguan Global Atmosphere Watch station in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau: implication of dust-related sources for particulate bound mercury
Hui Zhang, Xuewu Fu, Ben Yu, Baoxin Li, Peng Liu, Guoqing Zhang, Leiming Zhang, and Xinbin Feng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15847–15859, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15847-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15847-2021, 2021
Short summary
Isotopic compositions of atmospheric total gaseous mercury in 10 Chinese cities and implications for land surface emissions
Xuewu Fu, Chen Liu, Hui Zhang, Yue Xu, Hui Zhang, Jun Li, Xiaopu Lyu, Gan Zhang, Hai Guo, Xun Wang, Leiming Zhang, and Xinbin Feng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6721–6734, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6721-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6721-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Field Measurements | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
The ZiCOS-M CO2 sensor network: measurement performance and CO2 variability across Zurich
Stuart K. Grange, Pascal Rubli, Andrea Fischer, Dominik Brunner, Christoph Hueglin, and Lukas Emmenegger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2781–2806, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2781-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2781-2025, 2025
Short summary
Measurement report: The effects of SECA regulations on the atmospheric SO2 concentrations in the Baltic Sea, based on long-term observations on the Finnish island, Utö
Androniki Maragkidou, Tiia Grönholm, Laura Rautiainen, Juha Nikmo, Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen, Timo Mäkelä, Timo Anttila, Lauri Laakso, and Jaakko Kukkonen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2443–2457, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2443-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2443-2025, 2025
Short summary
Airborne in situ quantification of methane emissions from oil and gas production in Romania
Hossein Maazallahi, Foteini Stavropoulou, Samuel Jonson Sutanto, Michael Steiner, Dominik Brunner, Mariano Mertens, Patrick Jöckel, Antoon Visschedijk, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Stijn Dellaert, Nataly Velandia Salinas, Stefan Schwietzke, Daniel Zavala-Araiza, Sorin Ghemulet, Alexandru Pana, Magdalena Ardelean, Marius Corbu, Andreea Calcan, Stephen A. Conley, Mackenzie L. Smith, and Thomas Röckmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1497–1511, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1497-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1497-2025, 2025
Short summary
Interannual variations in the Δ(17O) signature of atmospheric CO2 at two mid-latitude sites suggest a close link to stratosphere–troposphere exchange
Pharahilda M. Steur, Hubertus A. Scheeren, Gerbrand Koren, Getachew A. Adnew, Wouter Peters, and Harro A. J. Meijer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11005–11027, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11005-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11005-2024, 2024
Short summary
Locating and quantifying CH4 sources within a wastewater treatment plant based on mobile measurements
Junyue Yang, Zhengning Xu, Zheng Xia, Xiangyu Pei, Yunye Yang, Botian Qiu, Shuang Zhao, Yuzhong Zhang, and Zhibin Wang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2522,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2522, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ammann, C.: On the Applicability of Relaxed Eddy Accumulation and Common Methods for Measuring Trace Gas Surface Fluxes, Ph. D. thesis, ETH, Zürich, 239 pp., 1998.
Ammann, C. and Meixner, F. X.: Stability dependence of the relaxed eddy accumulation coefficient for various scalar quantities, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4071, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000649, 2002.
Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D.: Eddy covariance: a Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2012.
Arnts, R. R., Mowry, F. L., and Hampton, G. A.: A high-frequency response relaxed eddy accumulation flux measurement system for sampling short-lived biogenic volatile organic compounds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 4860–4873, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50215, 2013.
Baker, J. M., Norman, J. M., and Bland, W. L.: Field-Scale Application of Flux Measurement by Conditional Sampling, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 62, 31–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(92)90004-N, 1992.
Short summary
Bias and uncertainty in Hg flux measured by micrometeorological methods (MM) and dynamic flux chambers (DFCs) are assessed from two field inter-comparison campaigns. DFC flux bias follows a diurnal cycle due to modified temperature and radiation balance inside the chamber. The precision in concentration difference measurements poses critical constraint on obtaining a larger fraction of significant MM flux. Asynchronous sampling impairs flux accuracy under varying atmospheric Hg concentration.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint