Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 15, issue 10
Articles | Volume 15, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5359-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5359-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 10
Research article
 | 
18 May 2015
Research article |  | 18 May 2015

Mercury vapor air–surface exchange measured by collocated micrometeorological and enclosure methods – Part II: Bias and uncertainty analysis

W. Zhu, J. Sommar, C.-J. Lin, and X. Feng

Viewed

Total article views: 3,812 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,004 1,690 118 3,812 147 180
  • HTML: 2,004
  • PDF: 1,690
  • XML: 118
  • Total: 3,812
  • BibTeX: 147
  • EndNote: 180
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Feb 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Feb 2015)
Latest update: 08 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Bias and uncertainty in Hg flux measured by micrometeorological methods (MM) and dynamic flux chambers (DFCs) are assessed from two field inter-comparison campaigns. DFC flux bias follows a diurnal cycle due to modified temperature and radiation balance inside the chamber. The precision in concentration difference measurements poses critical constraint on obtaining a larger fraction of significant MM flux. Asynchronous sampling impairs flux accuracy under varying atmospheric Hg concentration.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint