Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3151-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3151-2014
Research article
 | 
31 Mar 2014
Research article |  | 31 Mar 2014

The 2013 severe haze over southern Hebei, China: model evaluation, source apportionment, and policy implications

L. T. Wang, Z. Wei, J. Yang, Y. Zhang, F. F. Zhang, J. Su, C. C. Meng, and Q. Zhang

Related authors

Driving factors of aerosol acidity: a new hierarchical quantitative analysis framework and its application in Changzhou, China
Xiaolin Duan, Guangjie Zheng, Chuchu Chen, Qiang Zhang, and Kebin He
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3584,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3584, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
A full-coverage satellite-based global atmospheric CO2 dataset at 0.05° resolution from 2015 to 2021 for exploring global carbon dynamics
Zhige Wang, Ce Zhang, Kejian Shi, Yulin Shangguan, Bifeng Hu, Xueyao Chen, Danqing Wei, Songchao Chen, Peter M. Atkinson, and Qiang Zhang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-315,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-315, 2024
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Modeling fuel-, vehicle-type-, and age-specific CO2 emissions from global on-road vehicles in 1970–2020
Liu Yan, Qiang Zhang, Bo Zheng, and Kebin He
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 4497–4509, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4497-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4497-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring the sources of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols by integrating observational and modeling results: insights from Northeast China
Yuan Cheng, Xu-bing Cao, Sheng-qiang Zhu, Zhi-qing Zhang, Jiu-meng Liu, Hong-liang Zhang, Qiang Zhang, and Ke-bin He
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9869–9883, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9869-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9869-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of a high-resolution integrated emission inventory of air pollutants for China
Nana Wu, Guannan Geng, Ruochong Xu, Shigan Liu, Xiaodong Liu, Qinren Shi, Ying Zhou, Yu Zhao, Huan Liu, Yu Song, Junyu Zheng, Qiang Zhang, and Kebin He
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2893–2915, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2893-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2893-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Quantifying the impact of global nitrate aerosol on tropospheric composition fields and its production from lightning NOx
Ashok K. Luhar, Anthony C. Jones, and Jonathan M. Wilkinson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 14005–14028, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14005-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14005-2024, 2024
Short summary
Rapid oxidation of phenolic compounds by O3 and HO: effects of the air–water interface and mineral dust in tropospheric chemical processes
Yanru Huo, Mingxue Li, Xueyu Wang, Jianfei Sun, Yuxin Zhou, Yuhui Ma, and Maoxia He
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12409–12423, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12409-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12409-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling the contribution of leads to sea spray aerosol in the high Arctic
Rémy Lapere, Louis Marelle, Pierre Rampal, Laurent Brodeau, Christian Melsheimer, Gunnar Spreen, and Jennie L. Thomas
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12107–12132, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12107-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12107-2024, 2024
Short summary
Importance of aerosol composition and aerosol vertical profiles in global spatial variation in the relationship between PM2.5 and aerosol optical depth
Haihui Zhu, Randall V. Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar, Melanie S. Hammer, Chi Li, Jun Meng, Christopher R. Oxford, Xuan Liu, Yanshun Li, Dandan Zhang, Inderjeet Singh, and Alexei Lyapustin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11565–11584, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11565-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11565-2024, 2024
Short summary
The co-benefits of a low-carbon future for PM2.5 and O3 air pollution in Europe
Connor J. Clayton, Daniel R. Marsh, Steven T. Turnock, Ailish M. Graham, Kirsty J. Pringle, Carly L. Reddington, Rajesh Kumar, and James B. McQuaid
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10717–10740, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10717-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10717-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Binkowski, F. S. and Shankar, U.: The Regional Particulate Model. 1. Model Description and Preliminary Results, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 26191–26209, 1995.
Blackadar, A. K.: Modeling the Nocturnal Boundary Layer, in: Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Atmospheric Turbulence, Diffusion and Air Quality, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Raleigh, NC, USA, 19–22 October 1976, 46–49, 1976.
Boylan, J. W.: PM Model Performance Goal and Criteria. Presented at the National Regional Planning Organizations Modeling Meeting, Denver, CO, USA, 9–10 June, 2005.
Burr, M. B. and Zhang, Y.: Source Apportionment of PM2.5 over the Eastern U.S., Part I. Source Sensitivity Simulations using CMAQ with the Brute Force Method, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 2, 300–317, https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2011.037, 2011a.
Burr, M. B. and Zhang, Y.: Source Apportionment of PM2.5 over the Eastern U.S. using CMAQ, Part II: Source Apportionment Simulations using CAMx/PSAT and Comparisons with CMAQ Source Sensitivity Simulations, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 2, 318–336, https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2011.036, 2011b.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint