Articles | Volume 15, issue 18
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10619–10629, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10619-2015
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10619–10629, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10619-2015

Research article 25 Sep 2015

Research article | 25 Sep 2015

Motion-correlated flow distortion and wave-induced biases in air–sea flux measurements from ships

J. Prytherch et al.

Related authors

Evaluating Arctic clouds modelled with the Unified Model and Integrated Forecasting System
Gillian Young, Jutta Vüllers, Peggy Achtert, Paul Field, Jonathan J. Day, Richard Forbes, Ruth Price, Ewan O'Connor, Michael Tjernström, John Prytherch, Ryan Neely III, and Ian M. Brooks
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-662,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-662, 2021
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary
Meteorological and cloud conditions during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition
Jutta Vüllers, Peggy Achtert, Ian M. Brooks, Michael Tjernström, John Prytherch, Annika Burzik, and Ryan Neely III
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 289–314, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-289-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-289-2021, 2021
Short summary
Comparison of two closed-path cavity-based spectrometers for measuring air–water CO2 and CH4 fluxes by eddy covariance
Mingxi Yang, John Prytherch, Elena Kozlova, Margaret J. Yelland, Deepulal Parenkat Mony, and Thomas G. Bell
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5509–5522, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5509-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5509-2016, 2016
Short summary
Measurement of wind profiles by motion-stabilised ship-borne Doppler lidar
P. Achtert, I. M. Brooks, B. J. Brooks, B. I. Moat, J. Prytherch, P. O. G. Persson, and M. Tjernström
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4993–5007, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4993-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4993-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Dynamics | Research Activity: Field Measurements | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Orographically induced spontaneous imbalance within the jet causing a large-scale gravity wave event
Markus Geldenhuys, Peter Preusse, Isabell Krisch, Christoph Zülicke, Jörn Ungermann, Manfred Ern, Felix Friedl-Vallon, and Martin Riese
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10393–10412, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10393-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10393-2021, 2021
Short summary
Exploring the elevated water vapor signal associated with the free tropospheric biomass burning plume over the southeast Atlantic Ocean
Kristina Pistone, Paquita Zuidema, Robert Wood, Michael Diamond, Arlindo M. da Silva, Gonzalo Ferrada, Pablo E. Saide, Rei Ueyama, Ju-Mee Ryoo, Leonhard Pfister, James Podolske, David Noone, Ryan Bennett, Eric Stith, Gregory Carmichael, Jens Redemann, Connor Flynn, Samuel LeBlanc, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer, and Yohei Shinozuka
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9643–9668, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9643-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9643-2021, 2021
Short summary
Opinion: Gigacity – a source of problems or the new way to sustainable development
Markku Kulmala, Tom V. Kokkonen, Juha Pekkanen, Sami Paatero, Tuukka Petäjä, Veli-Matti Kerminen, and Aijun Ding
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8313–8322, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8313-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8313-2021, 2021
Short summary
The thermodynamic structures of the planetary boundary layer dominated by synoptic circulations and the regular effect on air pollution in Beijing
Yunyan Jiang, Jinyuan Xin, Ying Wang, Guiqian Tang, Yuxin Zhao, Danjie Jia, Dandan Zhao, Meng Wang, Lindong Dai, Lili Wang, Tianxue Wen, and Fangkun Wu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6111–6128, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6111-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6111-2021, 2021
Short summary
Turbulent and boundary layer characteristics during VOCALS-REx
Dillon S. Dodson and Jennifer D. Small Griswold
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1937–1961, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1937-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1937-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Bigorre, S. P., Weller, R. A., Edson, J. B., and Ware, J. D.: A Surface Mooring for Air–Sea Interaction Research in the Gulf Stream. Part II: Analysis of the Observations and Their Accuracies, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 30, 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00078.1, 2013.
Blomquist, B. W., Huebert, B. J., Fairall, C. W., Bariteau, L., Edson, J. B., Hare, J. E., and McGillis, W. R.: Advances in air-sea CO2 flux measurement by eddy correlation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 152, 245–276, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9926-2, 2014.
Brooks, I. M.: Spatially Distributed Measurements of Platform Motion for the Correction of Ship-Based Turbulent Fluxes, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 2007–2017, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHA1086.1, 2008.
Brut, A., Butet, A., Durand, P., Caniaux, G., and Planton, S.: Air–sea exchanges in the equatorial area from the EQUALANT99 dataset: Bulk parameterizations of turbulent fluxes corrected for airflow distortion, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 2497–2538, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.185, 2005.
Businger, J. A.: A note on the Businger–Dyer profiles, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 42, 145–151, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2935-7_11, 1988.
Download
Short summary
Signals at scales associated with wave and platform motion are often apparent in ship-based turbulent flux measurements, but it has been uncertain whether this is due to measurement error or to wind-wave interactions. We show that the signal has a dependence on horizontal ship velocity and that removing the signal reduces the dependence of the momentum flux on the orientation of the ship to the wind. We conclude that the signal is a bias due to time-varying motion-dependent flow distortion.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint