Articles | Volume 26, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8575-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8575-2026
Research article
 | 
19 Jun 2026
Research article |  | 19 Jun 2026

Aerosol source apportionment modelling using a coupled regional–urban scale system

Willem E. van Caspel, Olivier Favez, Jean-Luc Jaffrezo, Gaëlle Uzu, Kaspar R. Daellenbach, Imad El Haddad, and David Simpson

Related authors

HTAP3-OPNS: Ozone, PM, Nitrogen and Sulphur Deposition – multi-model experiments to support the revision of the CLRTAP Gothenburg Protocol
Tim Butler, Tabish Ansari, Claudio A. Belis, Elisa Bergas-Masso, Willem van Caspel, Hilde Fagerli, Johannes Flemming, Marta Garcia Vivanco, Paul Griffiths, Douglas S. Hamilton, Coralina Hernandez Trujillo, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Vincent Huijnen, Matthew Kasoar, Johannes W. Kaiser, Gerbrand Koren, Zbigniew Klimont, Florian Lindl, Aura Lupascu, Mariano Mertens, Martijn Schaap, Steven T. Turnock, Oliver Wild, Philipp Weiss, Jacek Kaminski, Rosa Wu, and Terry Keating
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1367,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1367, 2026
Short summary
Generalized local fractions – a method for the calculation of sensitivities to emissions from multiple sources for chemically active species, illustrated using the EMEP MSC-W model (rv5.5)
Peter Wind and Willem van Caspel
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5397–5411, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5397-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5397-2025, 2025
Short summary
Impact of methane and other precursor emission reductions on surface ozone in Europe: scenario analysis using the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) Meteorological Synthesizing Centre – West (MSC-W) model
Willem E. van Caspel, Zbigniew Klimont, Chris Heyes, and Hilde Fagerli
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11545–11563, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11545-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11545-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of modelled versus observed non-methane volatile organic compounds at European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme sites in Europe
Yao Ge, Sverre Solberg, Mathew R. Heal, Stefan Reimann, Willem van Caspel, Bryan Hellack, Thérèse Salameh, and David Simpson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7699–7729, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7699-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7699-2024, 2024
Short summary
Implementation and evaluation of updated photolysis rates in the EMEP MSC-W chemistry-transport model using Cloud-J v7.3e
Willem E. van Caspel, David Simpson, Jan Eiof Jonson, Anna M. K. Benedictow, Yao Ge, Alcide di Sarra, Giandomenico Pace, Massimo Vieno, Hannah L. Walker, and Mathew R. Heal
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7433–7459, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7433-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7433-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P. J., Canagaratna, M. R., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S. H., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Metzger, A., Baltensperger, U., and Jimenez, J. L.: O / C and OM / OC ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols with high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 4478–4485, https://doi.org/10.1021/es703009q, 2008. a
Amato, F., van Drooge, B., Jaffrezo, J., Favez, O., Colombi, C., Cuccia, E., Reche, C., Ippolito, F., Ridolfo, S., Lara, R., Uzu, G., Ngoc, T., Dominutti, P., Darfeuil, S., Albinet, A., Srivastava, D., Karanasiou, A., Lanzani, G., Alastuey, A., and Querol, X.: Aerosol source apportionment uncertainty linked to the choice of input chemical components, Environ. Int., 184, 108441, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108441, 2024. a
Bergström, R., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Prévôt, A. S. H., Yttri, K. E., and Simpson, D.: Modelling of organic aerosols over Europe (2002–2007) using a volatility basis set (VBS) framework: application of different assumptions regarding the formation of secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8499–8527, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8499-2012, 2012. a
Bergström, R., Hayman, G. D., Jenkin, M. E., and Simpson, D.: Update and comparison of atmospheric chemistry mechanisms for the EMEP MSC-W model system, Tech. rep., MSC-W, https://emep.int/publ/reports/2022/MSCW_technical_1_2022.pdf (last access: November 2024), 2022. a
Borlaza, L. J. S., Weber, S., Uzu, G., Jacob, V., Cañete, T., Micallef, S., Trébuchon, C., Slama, R., Favez, O., and Jaffrezo, J.-L.: Disparities in particulate matter (PM10) origins and oxidative potential at a city scale (Grenoble, France) – Part 1: Source apportionment at three neighbouring sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5415–5437, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5415-2021, 2021. a, b
Download
Short summary
Exposure to particulate matter (aerosols) is the most important environmental risk factor relating to negative health impacts. Understanding the sources of aerosols is thereby of great importance. This paper compares modelled aerosol source contributions to those from three European observationally derived datasets. Urban-scale modelling is shown to be impactful, although modelling of aerosols from some anthropogenic sources remains challenging.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint