Articles | Volume 10, issue 3
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1385–1400, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1385-2010
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1385–1400, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1385-2010

  08 Feb 2010

08 Feb 2010

Quantitative assessment of Southern Hemisphere ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations

A. Yu. Karpechko et al.

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Slow feedbacks resulting from strongly enhanced atmospheric methane mixing ratios in a chemistry–climate model with mixed-layer ocean
Laura Stecher, Franziska Winterstein, Martin Dameris, Patrick Jöckel, Michael Ponater, and Markus Kunze
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 731–754, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-731-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-731-2021, 2021
Short summary
Impact of the eruption of Mt Pinatubo on the chemical composition of the stratosphere
Markus Kilian, Sabine Brinkop, and Patrick Jöckel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11697–11715, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11697-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11697-2020, 2020
Short summary
Projecting ozone hole recovery using an ensemble of chemistry–climate models weighted by model performance and independence
Matt Amos, Paul J. Young, J. Scott Hosking, Jean-François Lamarque, N. Luke Abraham, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Alexander T. Archibald, Slimane Bekki, Makoto Deushi, Patrick Jöckel, Douglas Kinnison, Ole Kirner, Markus Kunze, Marion Marchand, David A. Plummer, David Saint-Martin, Kengo Sudo, Simone Tilmes, and Yousuke Yamashita
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9961–9977, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9961-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9961-2020, 2020
Short summary
Inconsistencies between chemistry–climate models and observed lower stratospheric ozone trends since 1998
William T. Ball, Gabriel Chiodo, Marta Abalos, Justin Alsing, and Andrea Stenke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9737–9752, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9737-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9737-2020, 2020
Short summary
Reformulating the bromine alpha factor and equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC): evolution of ozone destruction rates of bromine and chlorine in future climate scenarios
J. Eric Klobas, Debra K. Weisenstein, Ross J. Salawitch, and David M. Wilmouth
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9459–9471, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9459-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9459-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Akiyoshi, H., Sugita, T., Kanzawa, H., and Kawamoto, N.: Ozone perturbations in the Arctic summer lower stratosphere as a reflection of NOx chemistry and planetary scale wave activity, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D03304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003632, 2004.
Austin, J., Wilson, R. J., Li, F., and Vomel, H.: Evolution of water vapor concentrations and stratospheric age of air in coupled chemistry-climate model simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 905–921, 2006.
Bracegirdle, T. J., Connolley, W. M., and Turner J.: Antarctic climate change over the twenty first century, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D03103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008933, 2008.
Brühl, C., Crutzen, P. J., and Groo{ß}, J. U.: High-latitude, summertime NOx activation and seasonal ozone decline in the lower stratosphere: Model calculations based on observations by HALOE on UARS, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 3587–3597, 1998.
Cai, W., Shi, G., and Li, Y.: Multidecadal fluctuations of winter rainfall over southwest Western Australia simulated in the CSIRO Mark 3 coupled model. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L12701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022712, 2005.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint