Articles | Volume 9, issue 22
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8719–8733, 2009
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8719-2009
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8719–8733, 2009
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8719-2009

  16 Nov 2009

16 Nov 2009

Explicit calculation of indirect global warming potentials for halons using atmospheric models

D. Youn et al.

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Slow feedbacks resulting from strongly enhanced atmospheric methane mixing ratios in a chemistry–climate model with mixed-layer ocean
Laura Stecher, Franziska Winterstein, Martin Dameris, Patrick Jöckel, Michael Ponater, and Markus Kunze
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 731–754, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-731-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-731-2021, 2021
Short summary
Impact of the eruption of Mt Pinatubo on the chemical composition of the stratosphere
Markus Kilian, Sabine Brinkop, and Patrick Jöckel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11697–11715, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11697-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11697-2020, 2020
Short summary
Projecting ozone hole recovery using an ensemble of chemistry–climate models weighted by model performance and independence
Matt Amos, Paul J. Young, J. Scott Hosking, Jean-François Lamarque, N. Luke Abraham, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Alexander T. Archibald, Slimane Bekki, Makoto Deushi, Patrick Jöckel, Douglas Kinnison, Ole Kirner, Markus Kunze, Marion Marchand, David A. Plummer, David Saint-Martin, Kengo Sudo, Simone Tilmes, and Yousuke Yamashita
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9961–9977, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9961-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9961-2020, 2020
Short summary
Inconsistencies between chemistry–climate models and observed lower stratospheric ozone trends since 1998
William T. Ball, Gabriel Chiodo, Marta Abalos, Justin Alsing, and Andrea Stenke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9737–9752, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9737-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9737-2020, 2020
Short summary
Reformulating the bromine alpha factor and equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC): evolution of ozone destruction rates of bromine and chlorine in future climate scenarios
J. Eric Klobas, Debra K. Weisenstein, Ross J. Salawitch, and David M. Wilmouth
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9459–9471, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9459-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9459-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Briegleb, B. P.: Delta-Eddington Approximation for Solar Radiation in the NCAR Community Climate Model, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 7603–7612, 1992a.
Briegleb, B. P.: Longwave Band Model for Thermal Radiation in Climate Studies, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 11 475–11 485, 1992b.
Considine, D. B., Douglass, A. R., Connell, P. S., Kinnison, D. E., and Rotman, D. A.: A polar stratospheric cloud parameterization for the global modeling initiative three-dimensional model and its response to stratospheric aircraft, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 3955–3973, 10.1029/1999JD900932, 2000.
Coy, L. and Swinbank, R.: Characteristics of stratospheric winds and temperatures produced by data assimilation, J. Geophys. Res, 102, 25763–25781, 1997.
Daniel, J. S., Solomon, S., and Albritton, D. L.: On the Evaluation of Halocarbon Radiative Forcing and Global Warming Potentials, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 1271–1285, 1995.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint