Articles | Volume 22, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11381-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11381-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
06 Sep 2022
Research article |
| 06 Sep 2022
| 06 Sep 2022
Below-cloud scavenging of aerosol by rain: a review of numerical modelling approaches and sensitivity simulations with mineral dust in the Met Office's Unified Model
Anthony C. Jones
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Met Office, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Adrian Hill
Met Office, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
John Hemmings
Met Office, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Pascal Lemaitre
Institute for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN),
PSN-RES, SCA, LPMA, Fontenay-aux-Roses, 92260, France
Arnaud Quérel
Institute for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN),
PSE-SANTE, SESUC, BMCA, Fontenay-aux-Roses, 92260, France
Claire L. Ryder
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6BB, UK
Stephanie Woodward
Met Office, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Related authors
Prince Xavier, Martin Willett, Tim Graham, Paul Earnshaw, Dan Copsey, Nikesh Narayan, Charline Marzin, Alistair Sellar, Duncan Ackerley, Adam Blaker, Ed Blockley, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, Andrew Bushell, Nakbin Choi, Xin Rong Chua, Catherine Guiavarc'h, Muhammad Hassim, Julian Heming, Debra Hudson, Sarah Ineson, Anthony Jones, Colin Jones, Richard Keane, Kiwook Kim, Jiyeong Kim, Till Kuhlbrodt, Myong-In Lee, Richard Levine, Chen Li, Gill Martin, Alex Megann, Anne Mccabe, Aurel Moise, Leighton Regayre, Jeff Ridley, Luke Roberts, Sandeep Sahany, Reinhard K. H. Schiemann, David Storkey, Warren Tennant, Lorenzo Tomassini, Yoko Tsushima, Graham P. Weedon, Alex West, Matthew C. Wheeler, Keith Williams, Xiaobing Zhou, and Hongyan Zhu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4281, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4281, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
GC5 is the Met Office's newest climate and weather model, combining an updated atmosphere/land component with an improved ocean and sea-ice component. Compared to its predecessor GC4, it better simulates global temperatures, winds, monsoons over India and SE Asia, and African weather, and forecasts tropical cyclones more accurately. Southern Ocean errors shrank too. Some tropical patterns and regional biases worsened slightly. A lower-resolution version will underpin the UK's Earth System Model.
Rebecca L. Jackson, Matthew T. Woodhouse, Mark Baird, Clothilde Langlais, Mathieu Mongin, Anthony Jones, Daniel Partridge, Luke Harrison, Johanna Horchler, Joel Alroe, Luke Cravigan, Zoran Ristovski, and Daniel P. Harrison
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2761, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2761, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
ACCESS-EMS-GBR is a regional coupled atmosphere-ocean model of the Great Barrier Reef. It simulates aerosol and cloud processes in the atmosphere, plus hydrodynamics, biogeochemistry and ecological processes in the marine environment. Developed to assess the effects of Marine Cloud Brightening on coral bleaching, it is the first regional model able to simulate how aerosol emissions affect clouds, radiation and the underlying reef ecosystem and is ideal for a range of atmosphere-ocean studies.
Saffron Genise Heddell, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Graham W. Mann, Sandip S. Dhomse, Wuhu Feng, Xin Zhou, Masaru Yoshioka, and Anthony Jones
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3619, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3619, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
The 2022 Hunga eruption injected extraordinary amounts of water vapour into the stratosphere. Using a global model, we find a 7 % chemical increase in 2023 Antarctic ozone hole area, a modest increase limited by the cold Antarctic temperatures causing efficient removal of the Hunga water by polar stratospheric clouds. The impact on ozone was larger in the warmer, more sunlit vortex edge region. We highlight the value of natural events as test-cases for potential changes in the stratosphere.
Xu-Cheng He, Nathan Luke Abraham, Han Ding, Maria R. Russo, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Yao Ge, Xuemei Wang, Anthony C. Jones, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Benjamin Nault, Agnieszka Kupc, Donald Blake, Jose L. Jimenez, Christina J. Williamson, James Weber, Alexander T. Archibald, and Hamish Gordon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 3805–3851, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3805-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3805-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols affect clouds and climate. However, current climate models still struggle to simulate them accurately. We used aircraft data from a global mission to evaluate how well the UK Earth System Model represents aerosols and their precursors. Our results show that the model misses key formation processes in clean ocean regions, suggesting that future improvements should focus on better representing how aerosols form naturally in the atmosphere.
Shweta Bhati, Theethai-Jacob Anurose, Aravindakshan Jayakumar, Hamish Gordon, Anthony Jones, Saji Mohandas, and Vijapurapu Srinivasa Prasad
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6088, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6088, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that aerosols that absorb or scatter sunlight play a crucial role in the growth and sustenance of fog, with the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) as a case study. Five simulations a numerical weather prediction model exhibited that absorbing aerosols have a greater influence on shaping fog over the IGP compared to scattering aerosols. These insights can help with fog forecasts and pollution-control policies over IGP, which are known for high pollution and dense fog episodes in winters.
Natalie G. Ratcliffe, Claire L. Ryder, Nicolas Bellouin, Anthony Jones, Ben Johnson, Stephanie Woodward, Lisa-Maria Wieland, Josef Gasteiger, and Bernadett Weinzierl
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5143, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5143, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Observations show large dust particles travel much further than expected, which is not replicated in weather and climate models. We use a climate model to understand which processes dominantly impact large particle transport, and find that modelled large particle transport agrees with observations best after reducing the particle gravitational settling by ~ 80 %. We prove the presence of processes not represented accurately or at all in the model which act on large particles in the real-world.
Pratapaditya Ghosh, Ian Boutle, Paul Field, Adrian Hill, Anthony Jones, Marie Mazoyer, Katherine J. Evans, Salil Mahajan, Hyun-Gyu Kang, Min Xu, Wei Zhang, Noah Asch, and Hamish Gordon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 11129–11156, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11129-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11129-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We study aerosol–fog interactions near Paris using a weather and climate model with high spatial resolution. We show that our model can simulate the fog life cycle effectively. We find that the fog droplet number concentrations, the amount of liquid water in the fog, and the vertical structure of the fog are highly sensitive to the parameterization that simulates droplet formation and growth. The changes we propose could improve fog forecasts significantly without increasing computational costs.
Ashok K. Luhar, Anthony C. Jones, and Jonathan M. Wilkinson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 14005–14028, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14005-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14005-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrate aerosol is often omitted in global chemistry–climate models, partly due to the chemical complexity of its formation process. Using a global model, we show that including nitrate aerosol significantly impacts tropospheric composition fields, such as ozone, and radiation. Additionally, lightning-generated oxides of nitrogen influence both nitrate aerosol mass concentrations and aerosol size distribution, which has important implications for radiative fluxes and indirect aerosol effects.
Natalie G. Ratcliffe, Claire L. Ryder, Nicolas Bellouin, Stephanie Woodward, Anthony Jones, Ben Johnson, Lisa-Maria Wieland, Maximilian Dollner, Josef Gasteiger, and Bernadett Weinzierl
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12161–12181, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12161-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Large mineral dust particles are more abundant in the atmosphere than expected and have different impacts on the environment than small particles, which are better represented in climate models. We use aircraft measurements to assess a climate model representation of large-dust transport. We find that the model underestimates the amount of large dust at all stages of transport and that fast removal of the large particles increases this underestimation with distance from the Sahara.
Jim M. Haywood, Andy Jones, Anthony C. Jones, Paul Halloran, and Philip J. Rasch
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15305–15324, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The difficulties in ameliorating global warming and the associated climate change via conventional mitigation are well documented, with all climate model scenarios exceeding 1.5 °C above the preindustrial level in the near future. There is therefore a growing interest in geoengineering to reflect a greater proportion of sunlight back to space and offset some of the global warming. We use a state-of-the-art Earth-system model to investigate two of the most prominent geoengineering strategies.
Paul A. Barrett, Steven J. Abel, Hugh Coe, Ian Crawford, Amie Dobracki, James Haywood, Steve Howell, Anthony Jones, Justin Langridge, Greg M. McFarquhar, Graeme J. Nott, Hannah Price, Jens Redemann, Yohei Shinozuka, Kate Szpek, Jonathan W. Taylor, Robert Wood, Huihui Wu, Paquita Zuidema, Stéphane Bauguitte, Ryan Bennett, Keith Bower, Hong Chen, Sabrina Cochrane, Michael Cotterell, Nicholas Davies, David Delene, Connor Flynn, Andrew Freedman, Steffen Freitag, Siddhant Gupta, David Noone, Timothy B. Onasch, James Podolske, Michael R. Poellot, Sebastian Schmidt, Stephen Springston, Arthur J. Sedlacek III, Jamie Trembath, Alan Vance, Maria A. Zawadowicz, and Jianhao Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6329–6371, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To better understand weather and climate, it is vital to go into the field and collect observations. Often measurements take place in isolation, but here we compared data from two aircraft and one ground-based site. This was done in order to understand how well measurements made on one platform compared to those made on another. Whilst this is easy to do in a controlled laboratory setting, it is more challenging in the real world, and so these comparisons are as valuable as they are rare.
Anthony C. Jones, Adrian Hill, Samuel Remy, N. Luke Abraham, Mohit Dalvi, Catherine Hardacre, Alan J. Hewitt, Ben Johnson, Jane P. Mulcahy, and Steven T. Turnock
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15901–15927, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15901-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15901-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Ammonium nitrate is hard to model because it forms and evaporates rapidly. One approach is to relate its equilibrium concentration to temperature, humidity, and the amount of nitric acid and ammonia gases. Using this approach, we limit the rate at which equilibrium is reached using various condensation rates in a climate model. We show that ammonium nitrate concentrations are highly sensitive to the condensation rate. Our results will help improve the representation of nitrate in climate models.
Prince Xavier, Martin Willett, Tim Graham, Paul Earnshaw, Dan Copsey, Nikesh Narayan, Charline Marzin, Alistair Sellar, Duncan Ackerley, Adam Blaker, Ed Blockley, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, Andrew Bushell, Nakbin Choi, Xin Rong Chua, Catherine Guiavarc'h, Muhammad Hassim, Julian Heming, Debra Hudson, Sarah Ineson, Anthony Jones, Colin Jones, Richard Keane, Kiwook Kim, Jiyeong Kim, Till Kuhlbrodt, Myong-In Lee, Richard Levine, Chen Li, Gill Martin, Alex Megann, Anne Mccabe, Aurel Moise, Leighton Regayre, Jeff Ridley, Luke Roberts, Sandeep Sahany, Reinhard K. H. Schiemann, David Storkey, Warren Tennant, Lorenzo Tomassini, Yoko Tsushima, Graham P. Weedon, Alex West, Matthew C. Wheeler, Keith Williams, Xiaobing Zhou, and Hongyan Zhu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4281, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4281, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
GC5 is the Met Office's newest climate and weather model, combining an updated atmosphere/land component with an improved ocean and sea-ice component. Compared to its predecessor GC4, it better simulates global temperatures, winds, monsoons over India and SE Asia, and African weather, and forecasts tropical cyclones more accurately. Southern Ocean errors shrank too. Some tropical patterns and regional biases worsened slightly. A lower-resolution version will underpin the UK's Earth System Model.
Rebecca L. Jackson, Matthew T. Woodhouse, Mark Baird, Clothilde Langlais, Mathieu Mongin, Anthony Jones, Daniel Partridge, Luke Harrison, Johanna Horchler, Joel Alroe, Luke Cravigan, Zoran Ristovski, and Daniel P. Harrison
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2761, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2761, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
ACCESS-EMS-GBR is a regional coupled atmosphere-ocean model of the Great Barrier Reef. It simulates aerosol and cloud processes in the atmosphere, plus hydrodynamics, biogeochemistry and ecological processes in the marine environment. Developed to assess the effects of Marine Cloud Brightening on coral bleaching, it is the first regional model able to simulate how aerosol emissions affect clouds, radiation and the underlying reef ecosystem and is ideal for a range of atmosphere-ocean studies.
Saffron Genise Heddell, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Graham W. Mann, Sandip S. Dhomse, Wuhu Feng, Xin Zhou, Masaru Yoshioka, and Anthony Jones
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3619, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3619, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
The 2022 Hunga eruption injected extraordinary amounts of water vapour into the stratosphere. Using a global model, we find a 7 % chemical increase in 2023 Antarctic ozone hole area, a modest increase limited by the cold Antarctic temperatures causing efficient removal of the Hunga water by polar stratospheric clouds. The impact on ozone was larger in the warmer, more sunlit vortex edge region. We highlight the value of natural events as test-cases for potential changes in the stratosphere.
Thibaut Ménard, Emmanuel Reyes, Wojciech Aniszewski, Pascal Lemaitre, and Emmanuel Belut
Aerosol Research, 4, 211–229, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-211-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-211-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses advanced computer simulations to explore how falling water drops remove airborne particles. It shows that, when drops deform and oscillate, their motion strongly affects how efficiently aerosols are captured. The model accurately predicts drop speed and shape, but capture rates can differ from experiments by up to an order of magnitude. These gaps likely stem from missing physical effects (evaporation), uncertainties in aerosol measurements, and numerical inaccuracies.
Maria Kezoudi, Alkistis Papetta, Konrad Kandler, Claire L. Ryder, Andreas Leonidou, Christos Keleshis, Chris Stopford, Troy Thornberry, Rodanthi-Elisavet Mamouri, Jean Sciare, and Franco Marenco
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 7361–7385, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7361-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7361-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study demonstrates a cost-efficient methodology using Uncrewed Aerial Systems for quantitative characterization of airborne dust. It enables high-resolution vertical profiling of microphysical properties of dust layers from the Middle East and North Africa over Cyprus, improving understanding of regional dust transport, source-dependent variability, and impacts on air quality, radiation, and climate.
Xu-Cheng He, Nathan Luke Abraham, Han Ding, Maria R. Russo, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Yao Ge, Xuemei Wang, Anthony C. Jones, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Benjamin Nault, Agnieszka Kupc, Donald Blake, Jose L. Jimenez, Christina J. Williamson, James Weber, Alexander T. Archibald, and Hamish Gordon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 3805–3851, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3805-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3805-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols affect clouds and climate. However, current climate models still struggle to simulate them accurately. We used aircraft data from a global mission to evaluate how well the UK Earth System Model represents aerosols and their precursors. Our results show that the model misses key formation processes in clean ocean regions, suggesting that future improvements should focus on better representing how aerosols form naturally in the atmosphere.
Shweta Bhati, Theethai-Jacob Anurose, Aravindakshan Jayakumar, Hamish Gordon, Anthony Jones, Saji Mohandas, and Vijapurapu Srinivasa Prasad
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6088, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6088, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that aerosols that absorb or scatter sunlight play a crucial role in the growth and sustenance of fog, with the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) as a case study. Five simulations a numerical weather prediction model exhibited that absorbing aerosols have a greater influence on shaping fog over the IGP compared to scattering aerosols. These insights can help with fog forecasts and pollution-control policies over IGP, which are known for high pollution and dense fog episodes in winters.
Natalie G. Ratcliffe, Claire L. Ryder, Nicolas Bellouin, Anthony Jones, Ben Johnson, Stephanie Woodward, Lisa-Maria Wieland, Josef Gasteiger, and Bernadett Weinzierl
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5143, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5143, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Observations show large dust particles travel much further than expected, which is not replicated in weather and climate models. We use a climate model to understand which processes dominantly impact large particle transport, and find that modelled large particle transport agrees with observations best after reducing the particle gravitational settling by ~ 80 %. We prove the presence of processes not represented accurately or at all in the model which act on large particles in the real-world.
Pratapaditya Ghosh, Ian Boutle, Paul Field, Adrian Hill, Anthony Jones, Marie Mazoyer, Katherine J. Evans, Salil Mahajan, Hyun-Gyu Kang, Min Xu, Wei Zhang, Noah Asch, and Hamish Gordon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 11129–11156, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11129-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11129-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We study aerosol–fog interactions near Paris using a weather and climate model with high spatial resolution. We show that our model can simulate the fog life cycle effectively. We find that the fog droplet number concentrations, the amount of liquid water in the fog, and the vertical structure of the fog are highly sensitive to the parameterization that simulates droplet formation and growth. The changes we propose could improve fog forecasts significantly without increasing computational costs.
Ashok K. Luhar, Anthony C. Jones, and Jonathan M. Wilkinson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 14005–14028, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14005-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14005-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrate aerosol is often omitted in global chemistry–climate models, partly due to the chemical complexity of its formation process. Using a global model, we show that including nitrate aerosol significantly impacts tropospheric composition fields, such as ozone, and radiation. Additionally, lightning-generated oxides of nitrogen influence both nitrate aerosol mass concentrations and aerosol size distribution, which has important implications for radiative fluxes and indirect aerosol effects.
Alcide Zhao, Laura J. Wilcox, and Claire L. Ryder
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13385–13402, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13385-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13385-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models include desert dust aerosols, which cause atmospheric heating and can change circulation patterns. We assess the effect of dust on the Indian and east Asian summer monsoons through multi-model experiments isolating the effect of dust in current climate models for the first time. Dust atmospheric heating results in a southward shift of western Pacific equatorial rainfall and an enhanced Indian summer monsoon. This shows the importance of accurate dust representation in models.
Natalie G. Ratcliffe, Claire L. Ryder, Nicolas Bellouin, Stephanie Woodward, Anthony Jones, Ben Johnson, Lisa-Maria Wieland, Maximilian Dollner, Josef Gasteiger, and Bernadett Weinzierl
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12161–12181, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12161-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Large mineral dust particles are more abundant in the atmosphere than expected and have different impacts on the environment than small particles, which are better represented in climate models. We use aircraft measurements to assess a climate model representation of large-dust transport. We find that the model underestimates the amount of large dust at all stages of transport and that fast removal of the large particles increases this underestimation with distance from the Sahara.
Pascal Lemaitre, Arnaud Quérel, Alexis Dépée, Alice Guerra Devigne, Marie Monier, Thibault Hiron, Chloé Soto Minguez, Daniel Hardy, and Andrea Flossmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9713–9732, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9713-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9713-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A new in-cloud scavenging scheme is proposed. It is based on a microphysical model of cloud formation and may be applied to long-distance atmospheric transport models (> 100 km) and climatic models. This model is applied to the two most extreme precipitating cloud types in terms of both relative humidity and vertical extension: cumulonimbus and stratus.
Claire L. Ryder, Clément Bézier, Helen F. Dacre, Rory Clarkson, Vassilis Amiridis, Eleni Marinou, Emmanouil Proestakis, Zak Kipling, Angela Benedetti, Mark Parrington, Samuel Rémy, and Mark Vaughan
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2263–2284, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2263-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2263-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Desert dust poses a hazard to aircraft via degradation of engine components. This has financial implications for the aviation industry and results in increased fuel burn with climate impacts. Here we quantify dust ingestion by aircraft engines at airports worldwide. We find Dubai and Delhi in summer are among the dustiest airports, where substantial engine degradation would occur after 1000 flights. Dust ingestion can be reduced by changing take-off times and the altitude of holding patterns.
Emmanouil Proestakis, Antonis Gkikas, Thanasis Georgiou, Anna Kampouri, Eleni Drakaki, Claire L. Ryder, Franco Marenco, Eleni Marinou, and Vassilis Amiridis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3625–3667, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3625-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3625-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A new four-dimensional, multiyear, and near-global climate data record of the fine-mode (submicrometer diameter) and coarse-mode (supermicrometer diameter) components of atmospheric pure dust is presented. The dataset is considered unique with respect to a wide range of potential applications, including climatological, time series, and trend analysis over extensive geographical domains and temporal periods, validation of atmospheric dust models and datasets, and air quality.
Jonathan Elsey, Nicolas Bellouin, and Claire Ryder
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4065–4081, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4065-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4065-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols influence the Earth's energy balance. The uncertainty in this radiative forcing is large depending partly on uncertainty in measurements of aerosol optical properties. We have developed a freely available new framework of millions of radiative transfer simulations spanning aerosol uncertainty and assess the impact on radiative forcing uncertainty. We find that reducing these uncertainties would reduce radiative forcing uncertainty, but non-aerosol uncertainties must also be considered.
Jim M. Haywood, Andy Jones, Anthony C. Jones, Paul Halloran, and Philip J. Rasch
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15305–15324, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The difficulties in ameliorating global warming and the associated climate change via conventional mitigation are well documented, with all climate model scenarios exceeding 1.5 °C above the preindustrial level in the near future. There is therefore a growing interest in geoengineering to reflect a greater proportion of sunlight back to space and offset some of the global warming. We use a state-of-the-art Earth-system model to investigate two of the most prominent geoengineering strategies.
Jianyu Zheng, Zhibo Zhang, Hongbin Yu, Anne Garnier, Qianqian Song, Chenxi Wang, Claudia Di Biagio, Jasper F. Kok, Yevgeny Derimian, and Claire Ryder
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8271–8304, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8271-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8271-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a multi-year satellite-based retrieval of dust optical depth at 10 µm and the coarse-mode dust effective diameter over global oceans. It reveals climatological coarse-mode dust transport patterns and regional differences over the North Atlantic, the Indian Ocean and the North Pacific.
Stephanie Woodward, Alistair A. Sellar, Yongming Tang, Marc Stringer, Andrew Yool, Eddy Robertson, and Andy Wiltshire
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14503–14528, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14503-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14503-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We describe the dust scheme in the UKESM1 Earth system model and show generally good agreement with observations. Comparing with the closely related HadGEM3-GC3.1 model, we show that dust differences are not only due to inter-model differences but also to the dust size distribution. Under climate change, HadGEM3-GC3.1 dust hardly changes, but UKESM1 dust decreases because that model includes the vegetation response which, in our models, has a bigger impact on dust than climate change itself.
Paul A. Barrett, Steven J. Abel, Hugh Coe, Ian Crawford, Amie Dobracki, James Haywood, Steve Howell, Anthony Jones, Justin Langridge, Greg M. McFarquhar, Graeme J. Nott, Hannah Price, Jens Redemann, Yohei Shinozuka, Kate Szpek, Jonathan W. Taylor, Robert Wood, Huihui Wu, Paquita Zuidema, Stéphane Bauguitte, Ryan Bennett, Keith Bower, Hong Chen, Sabrina Cochrane, Michael Cotterell, Nicholas Davies, David Delene, Connor Flynn, Andrew Freedman, Steffen Freitag, Siddhant Gupta, David Noone, Timothy B. Onasch, James Podolske, Michael R. Poellot, Sebastian Schmidt, Stephen Springston, Arthur J. Sedlacek III, Jamie Trembath, Alan Vance, Maria A. Zawadowicz, and Jianhao Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6329–6371, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To better understand weather and climate, it is vital to go into the field and collect observations. Often measurements take place in isolation, but here we compared data from two aircraft and one ground-based site. This was done in order to understand how well measurements made on one platform compared to those made on another. Whilst this is easy to do in a controlled laboratory setting, it is more challenging in the real world, and so these comparisons are as valuable as they are rare.
Eleni Drakaki, Vassilis Amiridis, Alexandra Tsekeri, Antonis Gkikas, Emmanouil Proestakis, Sotirios Mallios, Stavros Solomos, Christos Spyrou, Eleni Marinou, Claire L. Ryder, Demetri Bouris, and Petros Katsafados
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12727–12748, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12727-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12727-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
State-of-the-art atmospheric dust models have limitations in accounting for a realistic dust size distribution (emission, transport). We modify the parameterization of the mineral dust cycle by including particles with diameter >20 μm, as indicated by observations over deserts. Moreover, we investigate the effects of reduced settling velocities of dust particles. Model results are evaluated using airborne and spaceborne dust measurements above Cabo Verde.
Arnaud Quérel, Khadija Meddouni, Denis Quélo, Thierry Doursout, and Sonia Chuzel
Adv. Geosci., 57, 109–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-57-109-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-57-109-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A radon long-range atmospheric transport modelling is set up from soil (exhalation) to soil (deposition of its progeny) and the consequent ambient gamma dose rate is evaluated. The whole is statistically assessed in regards to more than 15 000 gamma dose rate peaks. The model has proven to be of the correct magnitude, with room for substantial improvements. It may be used to validate an atmospheric transport modelling and to test any exhalation maps of radon at continental scale.
Alcide Zhao, Claire L. Ryder, and Laura J. Wilcox
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2095–2119, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2095-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2095-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The CMIP6 models' simulated dust processes are getting more uncertain as models become more sophisticated. Of particular challenge are the links between dust cycles and optical properties, and we recommend more detailed output relating to dust cycles in future intercomparison projects to constrain such links. Also, models struggle to capture certain key regional dust processes such as dust accumulation along the slope of the Himalayas and dust seasonal cycles in North China and North America.
Ian Boutle, Wayne Angevine, Jian-Wen Bao, Thierry Bergot, Ritthik Bhattacharya, Andreas Bott, Leo Ducongé, Richard Forbes, Tobias Goecke, Evelyn Grell, Adrian Hill, Adele L. Igel, Innocent Kudzotsa, Christine Lac, Bjorn Maronga, Sami Romakkaniemi, Juerg Schmidli, Johannes Schwenkel, Gert-Jan Steeneveld, and Benoît Vié
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 319–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Fog forecasting is one of the biggest problems for numerical weather prediction. By comparing many models used for fog forecasting with others used for fog research, we hoped to help guide forecast improvements. We show some key processes that, if improved, will help improve fog forecasting, such as how water is deposited on the ground. We also showed that research models were not themselves a suitable baseline for comparison, and we discuss what future observations are required to improve them.
Rachel E. Hawker, Annette K. Miltenberger, Jill S. Johnson, Jonathan M. Wilkinson, Adrian A. Hill, Ben J. Shipway, Paul R. Field, Benjamin J. Murray, and Ken S. Carslaw
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17315–17343, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17315-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17315-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We find that ice-nucleating particles (INPs), aerosols that can initiate the freezing of cloud droplets, cause substantial changes to the properties of radiatively important convectively generated anvil cirrus. The number concentration of INPs had a large effect on ice crystal number concentration while the INP temperature dependence controlled ice crystal size and cloud fraction. The results indicate information on INP number and source is necessary for the representation of cloud glaciation.
Anthony C. Jones, Adrian Hill, Samuel Remy, N. Luke Abraham, Mohit Dalvi, Catherine Hardacre, Alan J. Hewitt, Ben Johnson, Jane P. Mulcahy, and Steven T. Turnock
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15901–15927, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15901-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15901-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Ammonium nitrate is hard to model because it forms and evaporates rapidly. One approach is to relate its equilibrium concentration to temperature, humidity, and the amount of nitric acid and ammonia gases. Using this approach, we limit the rate at which equilibrium is reached using various condensation rates in a climate model. We show that ammonium nitrate concentrations are highly sensitive to the condensation rate. Our results will help improve the representation of nitrate in climate models.
Hongbin Yu, Qian Tan, Lillian Zhou, Yaping Zhou, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Claire L. Ryder, Robert C. Levy, Yaswant Pradhan, Yingxi Shi, Qianqian Song, Zhibo Zhang, Peter R. Colarco, Dongchul Kim, Lorraine A. Remer, Tianle Yuan, Olga Mayol-Bracero, and Brent N. Holben
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12359–12383, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12359-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12359-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study characterizes a historic African dust intrusion into the Caribbean Basin in June 2020 using satellites and NASA GEOS. Dust emissions in West Africa were large albeit not extreme. However, a unique synoptic system accumulated the dust near the coast for about 4 d before it was ventilated. Although GEOS reproduced satellite-observed plume tracks well, it substantially underestimated dust emissions and did not lift up dust high enough for ensuing long-range transport.
Cited articles
Abel, S. J. and Boutle, I. A.: An improved representation of the raindrop
size distribution for single-moment microphysics schemes, Q. J. Roy.
Meteorol. Soc., 138, 2151–2162, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1949, 2012.
Adebiyi, A. A., Kok, J. F., Wang, Y., Ito, A., Ridley, D. A., Nabat, P., and Zhao, C.: Dust Constraints from joint Observational-Modelling-experiMental analysis (DustCOMM): comparison with measurements and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 829–863, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-829-2020, 2020.
Andronache, C.: Diffusion and electric charge contributions to below-cloud
wet removal of atmospheric ultra-fine aerosol particles, J. Aerosol Sci.,
35, 1467–1482, 2004.
Andronache, C., Grönholm, T., Laakso, L., Phillips, V., and Venäläinen, A.: Scavenging of ultrafine particles by rainfall at a boreal site: observations and model estimations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4739–4754, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4739-2006, 2006.
Archibald, A. T., O'Connor, F. M., Abraham, N. L., Archer-Nicholls, S., Chipperfield, M. P., Dalvi, M., Folberth, G. A., Dennison, F., Dhomse, S. S., Griffiths, P. T., Hardacre, C., Hewitt, A. J., Hill, R. S., Johnson, C. E., Keeble, J., Köhler, M. O., Morgenstern, O., Mulcahy, J. P., Ordóñez, C., Pope, R. J., Rumbold, S. T., Russo, M. R., Savage, N. H., Sellar, A., Stringer, M., Turnock, S. T., Wild, O., and Zeng, G.: Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere–troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1223–1266, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1223-2020, 2020.
Bagnold, R. A.: The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes, Methuen, New
York, 265 pp., Methuen & Co., London, 1st Edition, 1941.
Baklanov, A. and Sørensen, J. H.: Parameterisation of radionuclide
deposition in atmospheric long-range transport modelling, Phys. Chem. Earth
B, 26, 787–799, 2001.
Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Claquin, T., and Guibert, S.: Reevaluation of Mineral aerosol radiative forcings suggests a better agreement with satellite and AERONET data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 81–95, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-81-2007, 2007.
Beard, K.: Experimental and numerical collision efficiencies for
sub-micrometer particles scavenged by small raindrops, J. Atmos. Sci., 31,
1595–1603, 1974.
Beard, K. V.: Terminal velocity and shape of cloud and precipitation drops
aloft, J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 851–864, 1976.
Beard, K. V. and Grover, S. N.: Numerical collision efficiencies for small
raindrops colliding with micron size particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 31,
543–550, 1974.
Bellouin, B., Boucher, O., Haywood, J., and Reddy, M. S.: Global estimates
of aerosol direct radiative forcing from satellite measurements, Nature,
438, 1138–1140, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04348, 2005.
Bellouin, N., Mann, G. W., Woodhouse, M. T., Johnson, C., Carslaw, K. S., and Dalvi, M.: Impact of the modal aerosol scheme GLOMAP-mode on aerosol forcing in the Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3027–3044, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3027-2013, 2013.
Berthet, S., Leriche, M., Pinty, J.-P., Cuesta, J., and Pigeon, G.:
Scavenging of aerosol particles by rain in a cloud resolving model, Atmos.
Res., 96, 325–336, 2010.
Blanco-Alegre, C., Castro, A., Calvo, A. I., Oduber, F., Alonso-Blanco, E.,
Fernández-González, D., Valencia-Barrera, R. M., Vega-Maray, A. M.,
and Fraile, R.: Below-cloud scavenging of fine and coarse aerosol particles
by rain: the role of raindrop size, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 144, 2715–2726,
2018.
Blanco-Alegre, C., Calvo, A.I., Castro, A., Oduber, F., Alonso-Blanco, E.,
and Fraile, R.: Scavenging of submicron aerosol particles in a suburban
atmosphere: The raindrop size factor, Environ. Pollut., 285, 117371, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117371, 2021.
Bodas-Salcedo, A., Mulcahy, J. P., Andrews, T., Williams, K. D., Ringer, M.
A., Field, P. R., and Elsaesser, G. S.: Strong dependence of atmospheric
feedbacks on mixed-phase microphysics and aerosol-cloud interactions in
HadGEM3, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 1735–1758.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001688, 2019.
Carslaw, K. S., Lee, L. A., Reddington, C. L., Pringle, K. J., Rap, A.,
Forster, P. M., Mann, G. W., Spracklen, D. V., Woodhouse, M. T., Regayre, L.
A., and Pierce, J. R.: Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty
in indirect forcing, Nature, 503, 67–71, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12674, 2013.
Checa-Garcia, R., Balkanski, Y., Albani, S., Bergman, T., Carslaw, K., Cozic, A., Dearden, C., Marticorena, B., Michou, M., van Noije, T., Nabat, P., O'Connor, F. M., Olivié, D., Prospero, J. M., Le Sager, P., Schulz, M., and Scott, C.: Evaluation of natural aerosols in CRESCENDO Earth system models (ESMs): mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10295–10335, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10295-2021, 2021.
Croft, B., Lohmann, U., Martin, R. V., Stier, P., Wurzler, S., Feichter, J., Posselt, R., and Ferrachat, S.: Aerosol size-dependent below-cloud scavenging by rain and snow in the ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4653–4675, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4653-2009, 2009.
Croft, B., Lohmann, U., Martin, R. V., Stier, P., Wurzler, S., Feichter, J., Hoose, C., Heikkilä, U., van Donkelaar, A., and Ferrachat, S.: Influences of in-cloud aerosol scavenging parameterizations on aerosol concentrations and wet deposition in ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1511–1543, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1511-2010, 2010.
Cugerone, K., De Michele, C., Ghezzi, A., and Gianelle, V.: Aerosol removal
due to precipitation and wind forcings in Milan urban area, J. Hydrol., 556,
1256–1262, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.06.033, 2018.
Davenport, H. M. and Peters, L. K.: Field studies of atmospheric particulate
concentration changes during precipitation, Atmos. Environ., 12, 997–1008,
1978.
Dehaoui, A., Issenmann, B., and Caupin, F.: Viscosity of deeply supercooled
water and its coupling to molecular diffusion, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112,
12020–12025, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508996112, 2015.
Fecan, F., Marticorena, B., and Bergametti, G.: Parametrization of the
increase of the aeolian erosion threshold wind friction velocity due to soil
moisture for arid and semi-arid areas, Ann. Geophys.-Atmos. Hydr., 17,
149–157, 1999.
Flossmann, A. I.: A theoretical investigation of the removal of atmospheric
trace constituents by means of a dynamic model, PhD thesis, Phys. Dep.,
Johannes Gutenberg-Univ. Mainz, Mainz, Germany, 186 pp., 1986.
Fredericks, S. and Saylor, J. R.: Parametric investigation of two aerosol
scavenging models in the inertial regime, J. Aerosol Sci., 101, 34–42,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.07.011, 2016.
Frei, C., Schöll, R., Fukutome, S., Schmidli, J., and Vidale, P. L.: Future change of precipitation
extremes in Europe: Intercomparison of scenarios from regional climate models, J. Geophys. Res.,
111, D06105, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005965, 2006.
Gliß, J., Mortier, A., Schulz, M., Andrews, E., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Benedictow, A. M. K., Bian, H., Checa-Garcia, R., Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Griesfeller, J. J., Heckel, A., Kipling, Z., Kirkevåg, A., Kokkola, H., Laj, P., Le Sager, P., Lund, M. T., Lund Myhre, C., Matsui, H., Myhre, G., Neubauer, D., van Noije, T., North, P., Olivié, D. J. L., Rémy, S., Sogacheva, L., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., and Tsyro, S. G.: AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 87–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-87-2021, 2021.
Greenfield, S.: Rain scavenging of radioactive particulate matter from the
atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 14, 115–125, 1957.
Hall, W. D.: A detailed microphysical model within a two dimensional dynamic
framework: Model description and preliminary results, J. Atmos. Sci., 37,
2486–2507, 1980.
Haywood, J. and Boucher, O.: Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative
forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review, Rev. Geophy., 38, 513–543,
https://doi.org/10.1029/1999rg000078, 2000.
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanre, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer, A.,
Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A.,
Kaufman, Y. J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F., Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET – A federated instrument network and data archive for
aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16, 1998.
Huneeus, N., Schulz, M., Balkanski, Y., Griesfeller, J., Prospero, J., Kinne, S., Bauer, S., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Grini, A., Horowitz, L., Koch, D., Krol, M. C., Landing, W., Liu, X., Mahowald, N., Miller, R., Morcrette, J.-J., Myhre, G., Penner, J., Perlwitz, J., Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Zender, C. S.: Global dust model intercomparison in AeroCom phase I, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7781–7816, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7781-2011, 2011.
Jones, A. C.: Python and fortran scripts to support “Below-cloud scavenging of aerosol by rain: A review of numerical modelling approaches and sensitivity simulations with mineral dust” by Anthony C. Jones, Adrian Hill, John Hemmings, Pascal Lemaitre, Arnaud Querel, Claire L. Ryder, and Stephanie Woodward, Submitted to Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, May, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6617052, 2022.
Jones, A. C., Hill, A., Remy, S., Abraham, N. L., Dalvi, M., Hardacre, C., Hewitt, A. J., Johnson, B., Mulcahy, J. P., and Turnock, S. T.: Exploring the sensitivity of atmospheric nitrate concentrations to nitric acid uptake rate using the Met Office's Unified Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15901–15927, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15901-2021, 2021.
Jones, A. C., Hill, A., Hemmings, J., Lemaitre, P., Querel, A., Ryder, C.,
and Woodward, S.: Data to support Below-cloud scavenging of aerosol by rain:
A review of numerical modelling approaches and sensitivity simulations with
mineral dust, NERC EDS Centre for Environmental Data Analysis [data set], 6 June 2022,
https://doi.org/10.5285/2e36fe8eb7ee4bd0a0833d3e1edd795a, 2022.
Jung, C. H., Kim, Y. P., and Lee, K. W.: A moment model for simulating
raindrop scavenging of aerosols, J. Aerosol Sci., 34, 1217–1233, 2003.
Kok, J. F., Adebiyi, A. A., Albani, S., Balkanski, Y., Checa-Garcia, R., Chin, M., Colarco, P. R., Hamilton, D. S., Huang, Y., Ito, A., Klose, M., Leung, D. M., Li, L., Mahowald, N. M., Miller, R. L., Obiso, V., Pérez García-Pando, C., Rocha-Lima, A., Wan, J. S., and Whicker, C. A.: Improved representation of the global dust cycle using observational constraints on dust properties and abundance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8127–8167, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8127-2021, 2021.
Laakso, L., Grönholm, T., Rannik, Ü., Kosmale, M., Fiedler, V.,
Vehkamäki, H., and Kulmala, M.: Ultrafine particle scavenging
coefficients calculated from 6 years field measurements, Atmos. Environ.,
37, 3605–3613, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00326-1, 2003.
Ladino, L., Stetzer, O., Hattendorf, B., Günther, D., Croft, B., and
Lohmann, U.: Experimental study of collection efficiencies between
sub-micrometer aerosols and cloud droplets, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 1853–1864,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-012.1, 2011.
Lemaitre, P., Querel, A., Monier, M., Menard, T., Porcheron, E., and Flossmann, A. I.: Experimental evidence of the rear capture of aerosol particles by raindrops, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4159–4176, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4159-2017, 2017.
Liu, Y., Daum, P. H., Guo, H., and Peng, Y.: Dispersion bias, dispersion
effect, and the aerosol-cloud conundrum, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 045021,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045021, 2008.
Loosmore, G. A. and Cederwall, R. T.: Precipitation scavenging of
atmospheric aerosols for emergency response applications: testing an updated
model with new real-time data, Atmos. Environ., 38, 993–1003, 2004.
Lu, X., Chan, S. C., Fung, J. C. H., and Lau, A. K. H.: To what extent can
the below-cloud washout effect influence the PM2.5? A combined observational
and modeling study, Environ. Pollut., 251, 338–343 2019.
Mahowald, N. M., Albani, S., Kok, J. F., Engelstaedter, S., Scanza, R.,
Ward, D. S., and Flanner, M. G.: The size distribution of desert dust
aerosols and its impact on the Earth system, Aeol. Res., 15, 53–71,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2013.09.002, 2014.
Mann, G. W., Carslaw, K. S., Spracklen, D. V., Ridley, D. A., Manktelow, P. T., Chipperfield, M. P., Pickering, S. J., and Johnson, C. E.: Description and evaluation of GLOMAP-mode: a modal global aerosol microphysics model for the UKCA composition-climate model, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 519–551, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-519-2010, 2010.
Maria, S. S. and Russell, L. M.: Organic and Inorganic Aerosol Below-Cloud
Scavenging by Suburban New Jersey Precipitation, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
39, 4793–4800, 2005.
Marticorena, B. and Bergametti, G.: Modeling the atmospheric dust cycle.1.
Design of a soil-derived emission scheme, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100,
16415–16430, 1995.
Met Office: Unified Model, Met Office [data set], http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/modelling-systems/unified-model, last access: 4 May 2022.
Mulcahy, J. P., Walters, D. N., Bellouin, N., and Milton, S. F.: Impacts of increasing the aerosol complexity in the Met Office global numerical weather prediction model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4749–4778, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4749-2014, 2014.
Mulcahy, J. P., Jones, C., Sellar, A., Johnson, B., Boutle, I. A., Jones,
A., Andrews, T., Rumbold, S., Mollard, J., Bellouin, N., Johnson, C.,
Williams, K., Grosvenor, D., and McCoy, D.: Improved aerosol processes and
effective radiative forcing in HadGEM3 and UKESM1, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.,
10, 2786–2805, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001464, 2018.
Mulcahy, J. P., Johnson, C., Jones, C. G., Povey, A. C., Scott, C. E., Sellar, A., Turnock, S. T., Woodhouse, M. T., Abraham, N. L., Andrews, M. B., Bellouin, N., Browse, J., Carslaw, K. S., Dalvi, M., Folberth, G. A., Glover, M., Grosvenor, D. P., Hardacre, C., Hill, R., Johnson, B., Jones, A., Kipling, Z., Mann, G., Mollard, J., O'Connor, F. M., Palmiéri, J., Reddington, C., Rumbold, S. T., Richardson, M., Schutgens, N. A. J., Stier, P., Stringer, M., Tang, Y., Walton, J., Woodward, S., and Yool, A.: Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6383–6423, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020, 2020.
Peng, Y., von Salzen, K., and Li, J.: Simulation of mineral dust aerosol with Piecewise Log-normal Approximation (PLA) in CanAM4-PAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6891–6914, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6891-2012, 2012.
Prospero, J. M. and Nees, R. T.: Impact of the North African drought and El
Niño on mineral dust in the Barbados trade winds, Nature, 320, 735–738,
https://doi.org/10.1038/320735a0, 1986.
Pruppacher H. R. and Klett, J. D.: Microphysics of clouds and precipitation;
2nd Edn., Springer, Dordrecht, 954 pp., ISBN 978-0-7923-4211-3, 2010.
Quérel, A., Lemaitre, P., Monier, M., Porcheron, E., Flossmann, A. I., and Hervo, M.: An experiment to measure raindrop collection efficiencies: influence of rear capture, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1321–1330, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1321-2014, 2014.
Radke, L. F., Hobbs, P. V., and Eltgroth, M. W.: Scavenging of Aerosol
Particles by Precipitation, J. Appl. Meteorol., 19, 715–722, 1980.
Reynolds, R. W., Smith, T. M., Liu, C., Chelton, D. B., Casey, K. S., and
Schlax, M. G.: Daily high-resolution blended analyses for sea surface
temperature, J. Climate, 20, 5473–5496, 2007.
Ridley, D. A., Heald, C. L., Kok, J. F., and Zhao, C.: An observationally constrained estimate of global dust aerosol optical depth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15097–15117, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15097-2016, 2016.
Rodríguez, S., Prospero, J. M., López-Darias, J.,
García-Alvarez, M. I., Zuidema, P., Nava, S., Lucarelli, F., Gaston, C.
J., Galindo, L., and Sosa, E.: Tracking the changes of iron solubility and
air pollutants traces as African dust transits the Atlantic in the Saharan
dust outbreaks, Atmos. Res., 246, 118092, https://doi.org/0.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118092, 2021.
Ryder, C. L., Highwood, E. J., Rosenberg, P. D., Trembath, J., Brooke, J. K., Bart, M., Dean, A., Crosier, J., Dorsey, J., Brindley, H., Banks, J., Marsham, J. H., McQuaid, J. B., Sodemann, H., and Washington, R.: Optical properties of Saharan dust aerosol and contribution from the coarse mode as measured during the Fennec 2011 aircraft campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 303–325, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-303-2013, 2013.
Ryder, C. L., Marenco, F., Brooke, J. K., Estelles, V., Cotton, R., Formenti, P., McQuaid, J. B., Price, H. C., Liu, D., Ausset, P., Rosenberg, P. D., Taylor, J. W., Choularton, T., Bower, K., Coe, H., Gallagher, M., Crosier, J., Lloyd, G., Highwood, E. J., and Murray, B. J.: Coarse-mode mineral dust size distributions, composition and optical properties from AER-D aircraft measurements over the tropical eastern Atlantic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17225–17257, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17225-2018, 2018.
Ryder, C. L., Highwood, E. J., Walser, A., Seibert, P., Philipp, A., and Weinzierl, B.: Coarse and giant particles are ubiquitous in Saharan dust export regions and are radiatively significant over the Sahara, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15353–15376, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15353-2019, 2019.
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Wiley,
New York, USA, ISBN-10 0471178152, ISBN-13 978-0471178156, 1998.
Sekhon, R. and Srivastava, R.: Doppler observations of drop size
distributions in a thunderstorm, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 983–994, 1971.
Sellar, A. A., Walton, J., Jones, C. G., Wood, R., Abraham, N. L.,
Andrejczuk, M., Andrews, M. B., Andrews, T., Archibald, A. T., de Mora, L.,
Dyson, H., Elkington, M., Ellis, R., Florek, P., Good, P., Gohar, L.,
Haddad, S., Hardiman, S. C., Hogan, E., Iwi, A., Jones, C. D., Johnson, B.,
Kelley, D. I., Kettleborough, J., Knight, J. R., Köhler, M. O.,
Kuhlbrodt, T., Liddicoat, S., Linova-Pavlova, I., Mizielinski, M. S.,
Morgenstern, O., Mulcahy, J., Neininger, E., O'Connor, F. M., Petrie, R.,
Ridley, J., Rioual, J.-C., Roberts, M., Robertson, E., Rumbold, S., Seddon,
J., Shepherd, H., Shim, S., Stephens, A., Teixiera, J. C., Tang, Y.,
Williams, J., Wiltshire, A., and Griffiths, P. T.: Implementation of U.K.
Earth System Models for CMIP6, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 12,
e2019MS001946, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001946, 2020.
Slinn, W. G. N. and Hales, J. M.: A reevaluation of the role of
thermophoresis as a mechanism of in- and below-cloud scavenging, J. Atmos.
Sci., 28, 1465–1471, 1971.
Slinn, W. G. N.: Precipitation Scavenging in Atmospheric Science and Power
Production, CH. 11, edited by: Randerson, D., Tech. Inf. Cent., Off. of Sci.
and Techn. Inf., Dep. of Energy, Washington DC, USA, 466–532, 1984.
Sparmacher, H., Fulber, K., and Bonka, H.: Below-cloud scavenging of aerosol
particles: Particle-bound radionuclides – Experimental, Atmos. Environ.,
27A, 605–618, 1993.
Spracklen, D. V., Pringle, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Chipperfield, M. P., and Mann, G. W.: A global off-line model of size-resolved aerosol microphysics: I. Model development and prediction of aerosol properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2227–2252, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2227-2005, 2005.
van Rossum, G., and Drake, F. L.: Python 3 Reference Manual, Scotts Valley,
CA: CreateSpace, 244 pp., ISBN-10 1441412697, ISBN-13 978-1441412690, 2009.
Vohl, O., Mitra, S. K., Diehl, K., Huber, G., Wurzler, S. C., Kratz K.-L.,
and Pruppacher, H. R.: A wind tunnel study of turbulence effects on the
scavenging of aerosol particles by water drops, J. Atmos. Sci., 58,
3064–3072, 2001.
Volken, M. and Schumann, T.: A critical review of below-cloud aerosol
scavenging results on Mt. Rigi, Water Air Soil Pollut., 68, 15–28, 1993.
Walser, A., Sauer, D., Spanu, A., Gasteiger, J., and Weinzierl, B.: On the parametrization of optical particle counter response including instrument-induced broadening of size spectra and a self-consistent evaluation of calibration measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4341–4361, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4341-2017, 2017.
Walters, D., Baran, A. J., Boutle, I., Brooks, M., Earnshaw, P., Edwards, J., Furtado, K., Hill, P., Lock, A., Manners, J., Morcrette, C., Mulcahy, J., Sanchez, C., Smith, C., Stratton, R., Tennant, W., Tomassini, L., Van Weverberg, K., Vosper, S., Willett, M., Browse, J., Bushell, A., Carslaw, K., Dalvi, M., Essery, R., Gedney, N., Hardiman, S., Johnson, B., Johnson, C., Jones, A., Jones, C., Mann, G., Milton, S., Rumbold, H., Sellar, A., Ujiie, M., Whitall, M., Williams, K., and Zerroukat, M.: The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1909–1963, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1909-2019, 2019.
Wang, P. K. and Pruppacher, H.: An experimental determination of the
efficiency with which aerosol particles are collected by water drops in
subsaturated air, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1664–1669, 1977.
Wang, X., Zhang, L., and Moran, M. D.: Uncertainty assessment of current size-resolved parameterizations for below-cloud particle scavenging by rain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5685–5705, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5685-2010, 2010.
Wang, X., Zhang, L., and Moran, M. D.: On the discrepancies between theoretical and measured below-cloud particle scavenging coefficients for rain – a numerical investigation using a detailed one-dimensional cloud microphysics model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11859–11866, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11859-2011, 2011.
Wang, X., Zhang, L., and Moran, M. D.: Development of a new semi-empirical parameterization for below-cloud scavenging of size-resolved aerosol particles by both rain and snow, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 799–819, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-799-2014, 2014.
Weber E.: Present state and aim of basic research in wet scrubbers, Staub,
Reinhaltung der Luft, 29, 12–18, 1969.
Weinzierl, B., Ansmann, A., Prospero, J. M., Althausen, D., Benker, N.,
Chouza, F., Dollner, M., Farrell, D., Fomba, W. K., Freudenthaler, V.,
Gasteiger, J., Gross, S., Haarig, M., Heinold, B., Kandler, K., Kristensen,
T. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Muller, T., Reitebuch, O., Sauer, D., Schafler,
A., Schepanski, K., Spanu, A., Tegen, I., Toledano, C., and Walser, A.: The
Saharan Aerosol Long-Range Transport and Aerosol–Cloud–Interaction
Experiment: Overview and Selected Highlights, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98,
1427–1451, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-15-00142.1, 2017.
Whitby, E. R., Stratmann, F., and Wilck, M.: Merging and remapping modes in
modal aerosol dynamics models: a Dynamic Mode Manager, J. Aerosol Sci.,
33, 623–645, 2002.
Williams, K. D., van Niekerk, A., Best, M. J., Lock, A. P., Brooke, J. K.,
Carvalho, M. J., Derbyshire, S. H., Dunstan, T. D., Rumbold, H. S., Sandu,
I., and Sexton, D. M. H.: Addressing the causes of large-scale circulation
errors in the Met Office Unified Model, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 146,
2597–2613, 2020.
Woodward, S.: Modelling the atmospheric life cycle and radiative impact of
mineral dust in the Hadley Centre climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
18155–18166, 2001.
Woodward, S., Sellar, A., Tang, Y., Stringer, M., Yool, A., Robertson, E., and Wiltshire, A.: The simulation of mineral dust in the United Kingdom Earth System Model UKESM1, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-228, in review, 2022.
Xu, D., Ge, B., Chen, X., Sun, Y., Cheng, N., Li, M., Pan, X., Ma, Z., Pan, Y., and Wang, Z.: Multi-method determination of the below-cloud wet scavenging coefficients of aerosols in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15569–15581, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15569-2019, 2019.
Zikova, N. and Zdimal, V.: Precipitation scavenging of aerosol particles at
a rural site in the Czech Republic, Tellus B, 68, 27343,
https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v68.27343, 2016.
Short summary
As raindrops fall to the ground, they capture aerosol (i.e. below-cloud scavenging or BCS). Many different BCS schemes are available to climate models, and it is unclear what the impact of selecting one scheme over another is. Here, various BCS models are outlined and then applied to mineral dust in climate model simulations. We find that dust concentrations are highly sensitive to the BCS scheme, with dust atmospheric lifetimes ranging from 5 to 44 d.
As raindrops fall to the ground, they capture aerosol (i.e. below-cloud scavenging or BCS). Many...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint