Articles | Volume 18, issue 10
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7169–7187, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7169-2018

Special issue: The SPARC Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP) (ACP/ESSD...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7169–7187, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7169-2018
Research article
24 May 2018
Research article | 24 May 2018

A comparison of the momentum budget in reanalysis datasets during sudden stratospheric warming events

Patrick Martineau et al.

Related authors

Oceanic moisture sources contributing to wintertime Euro-Atlantic blocking
Ayako Yamamoto, Masami Nonaka, Patrick Martineau, Akira Yamazaki, Young-Oh Kwon, Hisashi Nakamura, and Bunmei Taguchi
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 819–840, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-819-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-819-2021, 2021
Short summary
Is our dynamical understanding of the circulation changes associated with the Antarctic ozone hole sensitive to the choice of reanalysis dataset?
Andrew Orr, Hua Lu, Patrick Martineau, Edwin P. Gerber, Gareth J. Marshall, and Thomas J. Bracegirdle
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7451–7472, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7451-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7451-2021, 2021
Short summary
Influence of ENSO on North American subseasonal surface air temperature variability
Patrick Martineau, Hisashi Nakamura, and Yu Kosaka
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 395–412, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-395-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-395-2021, 2021
Short summary
Surface temperature response to the major volcanic eruptions in multiple reanalysis data sets
Masatomo Fujiwara, Patrick Martineau, and Jonathon S. Wright
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 345–374, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-345-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-345-2020, 2020
Short summary
Quantifying the variability of the annular modes: reanalysis uncertainty vs. sampling uncertainty
Edwin P. Gerber and Patrick Martineau
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17099–17117, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17099-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17099-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Dynamics | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
How can Brewer–Dobson circulation trends be estimated from changes in stratospheric water vapour and methane?
Liubov Poshyvailo-Strube, Rolf Müller, Stephan Fueglistaler, Michaela I. Hegglin, Johannes C. Laube, C. Michael Volk, and Felix Ploeger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9895–9914, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9895-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9895-2022, 2022
Short summary
The semi-annual oscillation (SAO) in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS)
Ming Shangguan and Wuke Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9499–9511, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9499-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9499-2022, 2022
Short summary
Interactions between the stratospheric polar vortex and Atlantic circulation on seasonal to multi-decadal timescales
Oscar Dimdore-Miles, Lesley Gray, Scott Osprey, Jon Robson, Rowan Sutton, and Bablu Sinha
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4867–4893, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4867-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4867-2022, 2022
Short summary
Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
Mengdie Xie, John C. Moore, Liyun Zhao, Michael Wolovick, and Helene Muri
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4581–4597, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022, 2022
Short summary
Enhanced upward motion through the troposphere over the tropical western Pacific and its implications for the transport of trace gases from the troposphere to the stratosphere
Kai Qie, Wuke Wang, Wenshou Tian, Rui Huang, Mian Xu, Tao Wang, and Yifeng Peng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4393–4411, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4393-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4393-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Abalos, M., Legras, B., Ploeger, F., and Randel, W. J.: Evaluating the advective Brewer-Dobson circulation in three reanalyses for the period 1979–2012, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7534–7554, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023182, 2015. 
Ayarzaguena, B., Langematz, U., and Serrano, E.: Tropospheric forcing of the stratosphere: A comparative study of the two different major stratospheric warmings in 2009 and 2010, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015023, 2011. 
Baldwin, M. P.: Stratospheric Harbingers of Anomalous Weather Regimes, Science, 294, 581–584, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063315, 2001. 
Bancalá, S., Krüger, K., and Giorgetta, M.: The preconditioning of major sudden stratospheric warmings, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016769, 2012. 
Butler, A. H., Seidel, D. J., Hardiman, S. C., Butchart, N., Birner, T., and Match, A.: Defining Sudden Stratospheric Warmings, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1913–1928, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00173.1, 2015. 
Download
Short summary
This study evaluates the agreement between eight reanalysis datasets by comparing zonal-mean zonal winds and the forcing terms of the zonal-mean momentum equation during sudden stratospheric warming events. Results show that the spread between datasets increases exponentially with height and is largest during the most intense sudden stratospheric warming events. The largest uncertainties arise from differences in the mean meridional circulation and horizontal fluxes of momentum by eddies.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint