Articles | Volume 17, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9697-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9697-2017
Research article
 | 
15 Aug 2017
Research article |  | 15 Aug 2017

Sources of springtime surface black carbon in the Arctic: an adjoint analysis for April 2008

Ling Qi, Qinbin Li, Daven K. Henze, Hsien-Liang Tseng, and Cenlin He

Related authors

Fossil fuel combustion and biomass burning sources of global black carbon from GEOS-Chem simulation and carbon isotope measurements
Ling Qi and Shuxiao Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11545–11557, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11545-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11545-2019, 2019
Short summary
Effects of the Wegener–Bergeron–Findeisen process on global black carbon distribution
Ling Qi, Qinbin Li, Cenlin He, Xin Wang, and Jianping Huang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7459–7479, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7459-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7459-2017, 2017
Short summary
Factors controlling black carbon distribution in the Arctic
Ling Qi, Qinbin Li, Yinrui Li, and Cenlin He
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1037–1059, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1037-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1037-2017, 2017
Short summary
Microphysics-based black carbon aging in a global CTM: constraints from HIPPO observations and implications for global black carbon budget
Cenlin He, Qinbin Li, Kuo-Nan Liou, Ling Qi, Shu Tao, and Joshua P. Schwarz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3077–3098, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3077-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3077-2016, 2016
Short summary
Estimates of black carbon emissions in the western United States using the GEOS-Chem adjoint model
Y. H. Mao, Q. B. Li, D. K. Henze, Z. Jiang, D. B. A. Jones, M. Kopacz, C. He, L. Qi, M. Gao, W.-M. Hao, and K.-N. Liou
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7685–7702, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7685-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7685-2015, 2015

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Increased importance of aerosol–cloud interactions for surface PM2.5 pollution relative to aerosol–radiation interactions in China with the anthropogenic emission reductions
Da Gao, Bin Zhao, Shuxiao Wang, Yuan Wang, Brian Gaudet, Yun Zhu, Xiaochun Wang, Jiewen Shen, Shengyue Li, Yicong He, Dejia Yin, and Zhaoxin Dong
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14359–14373, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14359-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14359-2023, 2023
Short summary
The role of temporal scales in extracting dominant meteorological drivers of major airborne pollutants
Miaoqing Xu, Jing Yang, Manchun Li, Xiao Chen, Qiancheng Lv, Qi Yao, Bingbo Gao, and Ziyue Chen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14065–14076, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14065-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14065-2023, 2023
Short summary
Biomass-burning smoke's properties and its interactions with marine stratocumulus clouds in WRF-CAM5 and southeastern Atlantic field campaigns
Calvin Howes, Pablo E. Saide, Hugh Coe, Amie Dobracki, Steffen Freitag, Jim M. Haywood, Steven G. Howell, Siddhant Gupta, Janek Uin, Mary Kacarab, Chongai Kuang, L. Ruby Leung, Athanasios Nenes, Greg M. McFarquhar, James Podolske, Jens Redemann, Arthur J. Sedlacek, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Jenny P. S. Wong, Robert Wood, Huihui Wu, Yang Zhang, Jianhao Zhang, and Paquita Zuidema
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13911–13940, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13911-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13911-2023, 2023
Short summary
Air pollution trapping in the Dresden Basin from gray-zone scale urban modeling
Michael Weger and Bernd Heinold
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13769–13790, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13769-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13769-2023, 2023
Short summary
The effect of atmospherically relevant aminium salts on water uptake
Noora Hyttinen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13809–13817, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13809-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13809-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

AMAP: Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA), Climate Change and the Cryosphere, Arctic Monitoring and As- sessment Programme (AMAP), Oslo, Narayana Press, Gylling, Denmark, ISBN-13: 978-82-7971-073-8, 538 pp., 2011.
Bond, T. C., Bhardwaj, E., Dong, R., Jogani, R., Jung, S. K., Roden, C., Streets, D. G., and Trautmann, N. M.: Historical emissions of black and organic carbon aerosol from energy-related combustion, 1850–2000, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB2018, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gb002840, 2007.
Bourgeois, Q. and Bey, I.: Pollution transport efficiency toward the Arctic: Sensitivity to aerosol scavenging and source regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, 5380–5552, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015096, 2011.
Download
Short summary
We find that Asian anthropogenic sources are the largest contributors (~ 40 %) to surface BC in spring in the Arctic, inconsistent with previous studies which repeatedly identified sources of surface BC as anthropogenic emissions from Europe and Russia. It takes 12–17 days for Asian anthropogenic emissions to be transported to the Arctic surface. Additionally, a large fraction (40–65 %) of Asian contribution is in the form of chronic pollution on 1- to 2-month timescales.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint