Articles | Volume 11, issue 17
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9089–9139, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9089-2011

Special issue: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) (ACP/GMD inter-journal...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9089–9139, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9089-2011

Research article 05 Sep 2011

Research article | 05 Sep 2011

Composition changes after the "Halloween" solar proton event: the High Energy Particle Precipitation in the Atmosphere (HEPPA) model versus MIPAS data intercomparison study

B. Funke et al.

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Slow feedbacks resulting from strongly enhanced atmospheric methane mixing ratios in a chemistry–climate model with mixed-layer ocean
Laura Stecher, Franziska Winterstein, Martin Dameris, Patrick Jöckel, Michael Ponater, and Markus Kunze
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 731–754, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-731-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-731-2021, 2021
Short summary
Impact of the eruption of Mt Pinatubo on the chemical composition of the stratosphere
Markus Kilian, Sabine Brinkop, and Patrick Jöckel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11697–11715, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11697-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11697-2020, 2020
Short summary
Projecting ozone hole recovery using an ensemble of chemistry–climate models weighted by model performance and independence
Matt Amos, Paul J. Young, J. Scott Hosking, Jean-François Lamarque, N. Luke Abraham, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Alexander T. Archibald, Slimane Bekki, Makoto Deushi, Patrick Jöckel, Douglas Kinnison, Ole Kirner, Markus Kunze, Marion Marchand, David A. Plummer, David Saint-Martin, Kengo Sudo, Simone Tilmes, and Yousuke Yamashita
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9961–9977, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9961-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9961-2020, 2020
Short summary
Inconsistencies between chemistry–climate models and observed lower stratospheric ozone trends since 1998
William T. Ball, Gabriel Chiodo, Marta Abalos, Justin Alsing, and Andrea Stenke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9737–9752, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9737-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9737-2020, 2020
Short summary
Reformulating the bromine alpha factor and equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC): evolution of ozone destruction rates of bromine and chlorine in future climate scenarios
J. Eric Klobas, Debra K. Weisenstein, Ross J. Salawitch, and David M. Wilmouth
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9459–9471, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9459-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9459-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Baumgaertner, A. J. G., Jöckel, P., Riede, H., Stiller, G., and Funke, B.: Energetic particle precipitation in ECHAM5/MESSy – Part 2: Solar proton events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7285–7302, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7285-2010, 2010.
B{ö}hringer, H., Fahey, D. W., Fehsenfeld, F. C., and Ferguson, E. E.: The role of ion–molecule reactions in the conversion of N2O5 to {HNO}3 in the stratosphere, Planet. Space. Sci., 31, 185–191, 1983.
Chipperfield, M. P. and Feng, W.: Comment on: Stratospheric Ozone Depletion at northern mid–latitudes in the 21st century: The importance of future concentrations of greenhouse gases nitrous oxide and methane, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1389, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016353, 2003.
Chipperfield, M. P. and Jones, R. L.: Relative influences of atmospheric chemistry and transport on {A}rctic ozone trends, Nature, 400, 551–554, 1999.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint