Articles | Volume 10, issue 19
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9451–9472, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9451-2010
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9451–9472, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9451-2010

  07 Oct 2010

07 Oct 2010

Multi-model assessment of stratospheric ozone return dates and ozone recovery in CCMVal-2 models

V. Eyring et al.

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Slow feedbacks resulting from strongly enhanced atmospheric methane mixing ratios in a chemistry–climate model with mixed-layer ocean
Laura Stecher, Franziska Winterstein, Martin Dameris, Patrick Jöckel, Michael Ponater, and Markus Kunze
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 731–754, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-731-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-731-2021, 2021
Short summary
Impact of the eruption of Mt Pinatubo on the chemical composition of the stratosphere
Markus Kilian, Sabine Brinkop, and Patrick Jöckel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11697–11715, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11697-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11697-2020, 2020
Short summary
Projecting ozone hole recovery using an ensemble of chemistry–climate models weighted by model performance and independence
Matt Amos, Paul J. Young, J. Scott Hosking, Jean-François Lamarque, N. Luke Abraham, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Alexander T. Archibald, Slimane Bekki, Makoto Deushi, Patrick Jöckel, Douglas Kinnison, Ole Kirner, Markus Kunze, Marion Marchand, David A. Plummer, David Saint-Martin, Kengo Sudo, Simone Tilmes, and Yousuke Yamashita
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9961–9977, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9961-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9961-2020, 2020
Short summary
Inconsistencies between chemistry–climate models and observed lower stratospheric ozone trends since 1998
William T. Ball, Gabriel Chiodo, Marta Abalos, Justin Alsing, and Andrea Stenke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9737–9752, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9737-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9737-2020, 2020
Short summary
Reformulating the bromine alpha factor and equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC): evolution of ozone destruction rates of bromine and chlorine in future climate scenarios
J. Eric Klobas, Debra K. Weisenstein, Ross J. Salawitch, and David M. Wilmouth
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9459–9471, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9459-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9459-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Akiyoshi, H., Zhou, L. B., Yamashita, Y., Sakamoto, K., Yoshiki, M., Nagashima, T., Takahashi, M., Kurokawa, J., Takigawa, M., and Imamura, T.: A CCM simulation of the breakup of the Antarctic polar vortex in the years 1980-2004 under the CCMVal scenarios, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D03103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009261, 2009.
Akiyoshi, H., Yamashita, Y., Sakamoto, K., Zhou, L. B., and Imamura, T.: Recovery of stratospheric ozone in calculations by the CCSR/NIES CCM under the CCMVal-REF-2 scenario and a no-climate-change run, J. Geophys. Res., https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012683, in press, 2010.
Austin, J. and Wilson, R. J.: Sensitivity of polar ozone to sea surface temperatures and halogen amounts, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D18303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013292, 2010.
Avallone, L. M. and Prather, M. J., Photochemical evolution of ozone in the lower tropical stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 1457–1461, 1996.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint