Articles | Volume 10, issue 7
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3235–3246, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3235-2010
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3235–3246, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3235-2010

  06 Apr 2010

06 Apr 2010

Total aerosol effect: radiative forcing or radiative flux perturbation?

U. Lohmann et al.

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Factors controlling marine aerosol size distributions and their climate effects over the northwest Atlantic Ocean region
Betty Croft, Randall V. Martin, Richard H. Moore, Luke D. Ziemba, Ewan C. Crosbie, Hongyu Liu, Lynn M. Russell, Georges Saliba, Armin Wisthaler, Markus Müller, Arne Schiller, Martí Galí, Rachel Y.-W. Chang, Erin E. McDuffie, Kelsey R. Bilsback, and Jeffrey R. Pierce
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1889–1916, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1889-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1889-2021, 2021
Short summary
Mass accommodation and gas–particle partitioning in secondary organic aerosols: dependence on diffusivity, volatility, particle-phase reactions, and penetration depth
Manabu Shiraiwa and Ulrich Pöschl
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1565–1580, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1565-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1565-2021, 2021
Short summary
Evident PM2.5 drops in the east of China due to the COVID-19 quarantine measures in February
Zhicong Yin, Yijia Zhang, Huijun Wang, and Yuyan Li
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1581–1592, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1581-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1581-2021, 2021
Short summary
Wildfire smoke-plume rise: a simple energy balance parameterization
Nadya Moisseeva and Roland Stull
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1407–1425, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1407-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1407-2021, 2021
Short summary
Effective radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols – a multi-model comparison
Gillian D. Thornhill, William J. Collins, Ryan J. Kramer, Dirk Olivié, Ragnhild B. Skeie, Fiona M. O'Connor, Nathan Luke Abraham, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Susanne E. Bauer, Makoto Deushi, Louisa K. Emmons, Piers M. Forster, Larry W. Horowitz, Ben Johnson, James Keeble, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Martine Michou, Michael J. Mills, Jane P. Mulcahy, Gunnar Myhre, Pierre Nabat, Vaishali Naik, Naga Oshima, Michael Schulz, Christopher J. Smith, Toshihiko Takemura, Simone Tilmes, Tongwen Wu, Guang Zeng, and Jie Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 853–874, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-853-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-853-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, T. L., Charlson, R. J., Schwartz, S. E., Knutti, R., Boucher, O., Rodhe, H., and Heintzenberg, J.: Climate forcing by Aerosols – a hazy picture, Science, 300, 1103–1104, 2003.
Andrews, T. and Forster, P. M.: CO2 forcing induces semi-direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, https://doi.org/ 10.1029/2007GL032 273, l04802, 2008.
Andronova, N. G. and Schlesinger, M. E.: Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivity, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 22605–22611, 2001.
Boucher, O. and Lohmann, U.: The sulfate-{CCN}-cloud albedo effect: A sensitivity study with two general circulation models, Tellus B, 47, 281–300, 1995.
Chen, Y. and Penner, J. E.: Uncertainty analysis for estimates of the first indirect aerosol effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2935–2948, 2005.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint