Articles | Volume 23, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023
Research article
 | 
24 Apr 2023
Research article |  | 24 Apr 2023

Evaluating Arctic clouds modelled with the Unified Model and Integrated Forecasting System

Gillian Young McCusker, Jutta Vüllers, Peggy Achtert, Paul Field, Jonathan J. Day, Richard Forbes, Ruth Price, Ewan O'Connor, Michael Tjernström, John Prytherch, Ryan Neely III, and Ian M. Brooks

Related authors

Summer subsurface temperature variability in the percolation zone of southwest Greenland: high resolution observations of the top meter of firn
Anne Sledd, Michael R. Gallagher, Matthew D. Shupe, Christopher J. Cox, Robert Hawley, Michael S. Town, Heather Guy, Hans-Peter Marshall, Ryan R. Neely III, Claire Pettersen, Von P. Walden, Catherine Hebson, Andrew Martin, Erik Olson, and Derek Pickell
The Cryosphere, 20, 6423–6452, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-6423-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-6423-2026, 2026
Short summary
Evaluation of a simplified double-moment aerosol scheme (SOL/INSOL) using satellite, airborne and ground based observations over the UK
Angela Mynard, Anthony C. Jones, Joseph Carton-Kelly, Paul Field, Steven J. Abel, and Florent Fabien Malavelle
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4611,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4611, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Sensitivities of a simulated Arctic stratocumulus to aerosol and microphysical parameters
Hannah Carolin Frostenberg, Jessie Creamean, Erik Schurch Thomson, Heather Guy, Roman Pohorsky, Camille Mavis, Ian Morley Brooks, Nicolas Fauré, Lea Haberstock, Julia Kojoj, Sonja Murto, Julia Schmale, Michael Tjernström, Paul Zieger, and Luisa Ickes
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 15495–15521, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15495-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15495-2026, 2026
Short summary
Secondary ice production affects tropical convective clouds under different aerosol conditions
Mengyu Sun, Paul J. Connolly, Paul R. Field, Declan L. Finney, and Alan M. Blyth
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 15349–15373, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15349-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15349-2026, 2026
Short summary
Dynamic and thermodynamic processes affecting atmospheric moisture transport to the Arctic during the ARTofMELT expedition in spring 2023
Tuomas Naakka, Sonja Murto-Menger, Timo Vihma, and Michael Tjernström
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5666,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5666, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A Parameterization of Aerosol Activation, Part II: Multiple Aerosol Types, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6837–6844, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901161, 2000. 
Achtert, P., O'Connor, E. J., Brooks, I. M., Sotiropoulou, G., Shupe, M. D., Pospichal, B., Brooks, B. J., and Tjernström, M.: Properties of Arctic liquid and mixed-phase clouds from shipborne Cloudnet observations during ACSE 2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14983–15002, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14983-2020, 2020. 
Allen, R. J., Sherwood, S. C., Norris, J. R., and Zender, C. S.: Recent Northern Hemisphere tropical expansion primarily driven by black carbon and tropospheric ozone, Nature, 485, 350–354, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11097, 2012. 
AMAP: Arctic Climate Change Update 2021: Key Trends and Impacts. Summary for Policy-makers, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Tromsø, Norway, 16 pp., https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/arctic-climate-change-update-2021-key-trends-and-impacts.-summary-for-policy-makers/3508 (last access: 19 March 2023), 2021. 
Baccarini, A., Karlsson, L., Dommen, J., Duplessis, P., Vüllers, J., Brooks, I. M., Saiz-Lopez, A., Salter, M., Tjernström, M., Baltensperger, U., Zieger, P., and Schmale, J.: Frequent new particle formation over the high Arctic pack ice by enhanced iodine emissions, Nat. Commun., 11, 4924, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18551-0, 2020. 
Download
Short summary
In this study, we show that recent versions of two atmospheric models – the Unified Model and Integrated Forecasting System – overestimate Arctic cloud fraction within the lower troposphere by comparison with recent remote-sensing measurements made during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition. The overabundance of cloud is interlinked with the modelled thermodynamic structure, with strong negative temperature biases coincident with these overestimated cloud layers.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint