Articles | Volume 23, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023
Research article
 | 
24 Apr 2023
Research article |  | 24 Apr 2023

Evaluating Arctic clouds modelled with the Unified Model and Integrated Forecasting System

Gillian Young McCusker, Jutta Vüllers, Peggy Achtert, Paul Field, Jonathan J. Day, Richard Forbes, Ruth Price, Ewan O'Connor, Michael Tjernström, John Prytherch, Ryan Neely III, and Ian M. Brooks

Viewed

Total article views: 3,437 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,631 748 58 3,437 415 56 46
  • HTML: 2,631
  • PDF: 748
  • XML: 58
  • Total: 3,437
  • Supplement: 415
  • BibTeX: 56
  • EndNote: 46
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Sep 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Sep 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,437 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,413 with geography defined and 24 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 17 Feb 2025
Download
Short summary
In this study, we show that recent versions of two atmospheric models – the Unified Model and Integrated Forecasting System – overestimate Arctic cloud fraction within the lower troposphere by comparison with recent remote-sensing measurements made during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition. The overabundance of cloud is interlinked with the modelled thermodynamic structure, with strong negative temperature biases coincident with these overestimated cloud layers.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint