Articles | Volume 23, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4045-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4045-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Dependency of vertical velocity variance on meteorological conditions in the convective boundary layer
Noviana Dewani
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Hans Ertel Centre for Weather Research, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany
Mirjana Sakradzija
Hans Ertel Centre for Weather Research, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany
Linda Schlemmer
Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany
Ronny Leinweber
Meteorologisches Observatorium Lindenberg – Richard-Aßmann-Observatorium, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Lindenberg, Germany
Juerg Schmidli
Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Hans Ertel Centre for Weather Research, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Hemanth Kumar Alladi, Julian Quimbayo-Duarte, Luca Bugliaro, Johanna Mayer, and Juerg Schmidli
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4401, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4401, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
Thunderstorms can transport moisture into the lower stratosphere, affecting climate. Over mountains, models fail to represent them due to underrepresentation of turbulent mixing and cloud microphysics. This study evaluates the operational TKE and new 2TE turbulence schemes, with single and double moment microphysics, in the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON) model against observations. ICON-TKE shows stronger mixing than 2TE, the DM scheme shows taller storms with more ice and transport than SM.
Ivan Basic, Harshwardhan Jadhav, Jaydeep Singh, and Juerg Schmidli
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4302, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4302, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how small mountains shape the daily growth of the lower atmosphere over the Tibetan Plateau, one of the highest regions on Earth. Using computer simulations, we compared flat terrain with realistic terrain and with added winds. We found that even modest hills make the air mix more quickly and rise higher, and winds further strengthen this effect. Our results show that overlooking small terrain features can lead to underestimating how strongly the atmosphere mixes over high plateaus.
Roshny Siri Jagan and Juerg Schmidli
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4308, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4308, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how air moves over mountains and creates waves that can cause turbulence, a safety risk for planes and a key factor for weather and climate. Using computer simulations, we found that very fine detail is needed to capture these waves realistically. Our results show that while small features require high resolution, overall patterns can be captured at slightly larger scales. This work can help improve flight safety and weather predictions by making turbulence forecasts more reliable.
Maleen Hanst, Carmen G. Köhler, Axel Seifert, and Linda Schlemmer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3312, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3312, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Condensation trails typically occur due to aircraft flying through certain cold and humid regions. In most cases, these contrails have a warming impact on the climate. Predicting these regions in advance allows flight planners to re-route airplanes. We show that an adaptation of the ice microphysics scheme in the ICON weather prediction model improves the prediction of these regions. Running multiple simulations (an ensemble) with this scheme improves the prediction quality even further.
Stefano Ubbiali, Christian Kühnlein, Christoph Schär, Linda Schlemmer, Thomas C. Schulthess, Michael Staneker, and Heini Wernli
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 529–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-529-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We explore a high-level programming model for porting numerical weather prediction (NWP) model codes to graphics processing units (GPUs). We present a Python rewrite with the domain-specific library GT4Py (GridTools for Python) of two renowned cloud microphysics schemes and the associated tangent-linear and adjoint algorithms. We find excellent portability, competitive GPU performance, robust execution on diverse computing architectures, and enhanced code maintainability and user productivity.
Julian Quimbayo-Duarte, Johannes Wagner, Norman Wildmann, Thomas Gerz, and Juerg Schmidli
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5195–5209, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5195-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5195-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The ultimate objective of this model evaluation is to improve boundary layer flow representation over complex terrain. The numerical model is tested against observations retrieved during the Perdigão 2017 field campaign (moderate complex terrain). We observed that the inclusion of a forest parameterization in the numerical model significantly improves the representation of the wind field in the atmospheric boundary layer.
Ian Boutle, Wayne Angevine, Jian-Wen Bao, Thierry Bergot, Ritthik Bhattacharya, Andreas Bott, Leo Ducongé, Richard Forbes, Tobias Goecke, Evelyn Grell, Adrian Hill, Adele L. Igel, Innocent Kudzotsa, Christine Lac, Bjorn Maronga, Sami Romakkaniemi, Juerg Schmidli, Johannes Schwenkel, Gert-Jan Steeneveld, and Benoît Vié
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 319–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Fog forecasting is one of the biggest problems for numerical weather prediction. By comparing many models used for fog forecasting with others used for fog research, we hoped to help guide forecast improvements. We show some key processes that, if improved, will help improve fog forecasting, such as how water is deposited on the ground. We also showed that research models were not themselves a suitable baseline for comparison, and we discuss what future observations are required to improve them.
Daniel Regenass, Linda Schlemmer, Elena Jahr, and Christoph Schär
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-426, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-426, 2021
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Weather and climate models need to represent the water cycle on land in order to provide accurate estimates of moisture and energy exchange between the land and the atmosphere. Infiltration of water into the soil is often modeled with an equation describing water transport in porous media. Here, we point out some challenges arising in the numerical solution of this equation and show the consequences for the representation of the water cycle in modern weather and climate models.
Cited articles
Ansmann, A., Fruntke, J., and Engelmann, R.: Updraft and downdraft characterization with Doppler lidar: cloud-free versus cumuli-topped mixed layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7845–7858, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7845-2010, 2010. a
Berg, L. K., Newsom, R. K., and Turner, D. D.: Year-Long Vertical Velocity Statistics Derived from Doppler Lidar Data for the Continental Convective Boundary Layer, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 56, 2441–2454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0359.1, 2017. a, b
Bonin, T. A., Newman, J. F., Klein, P. M., Chilson, P. B., and Wharton, S.: Improvement of vertical velocity statistics measured by a Doppler lidar through comparison with sonic anemometer observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5833–5852, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5833-2016, 2016. a
Chandra, A. S., Kollias, P., Giangrande, S. E., and Klein, S. A.: Long-Term
Observations of the Convective Boundary Layer Using Insect Radar Returns at
the SGP ARM Climate Research Facility, J. Climate, 23, 5699–5714,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3395.1, 2010. a, b, c, d
Cheliotis, I., Dieudonné, E., Delbarre, H., Sokolov, A., Dmitriev, E., Augustin, P., and Fourmentin, M.: Detecting turbulent structures on single Doppler lidar large datasets: an automated classification method for horizontal scans, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6579–6592, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6579-2020, 2020. a
Deardorff, J. W.: Convective Velocity and Temperature Scales for the Unstable Planetary Boundary Layer and for Rayleigh Convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 27, 1211–1213, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1970)027<1211:CVATSF>2.0.CO;2, 1970. a
Dewani, N. and Leinweber, R.: Vertical velocity data from vertical stare Doppler lidar, Falkenberg, FESSTVaL campaign 2020/2021, Universität Hamburg [data set], https://doi.org/10.25592/uhhfdm.10385, 2022. a
Ek, M. B. and Holtslag, A. A. M.: Influence of Soil Moisture on Boundary Layer Cloud Development, J. Hydrometeorol., 5, 86–99,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0086:IOSMOB>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Garratt, J.: The Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Cambridge Atmospheric and Space Science Series, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521380529, 1994. a
Gentine, P., Ferguson, C. R., and Holtslag, A. A. M.: Diagnosing evaporative fraction over land from boundary-layer clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 8185–8196, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50416, 2013. a
Hunter, J. D.: Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 90–95, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55, 2007. a
Koster, R. D., Dirmeyer, P. A., Guo, Z., Bonan, G., Chan, E., Cox, P., Gordon, C. T., Kanae, S., Kowalczyk, E., Lawrence, D., Liu, P., Lu, C.-H., Malyshev, S., McAvaney, B., Mitchell, K., Mocko, D., Oki, T., Oleson, K., Pitman, A., Sud, Y. C., Taylor, C. M., Verseghy, D., Vasic, R., Xue, Y., and Yamada, T.: Regions of Strong Coupling Between Soil Moisture and Precipitation, Science, 305, 1138–1140, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100217, 2004. a
Lenschow, D. H., Wulfmeyer, V., and Senff, C.: Measuring Second- through Fourth-Order Moments in Noisy Data, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 17, 1330–1347,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<1330:MSTFOM>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Lenschow, D. H., Lothon, M., Mayor, S. D., Sullivan, P. P., and Canut, G.: A Comparison of Higher-Order Vertical Velocity Moments in the Convective Boundary Layer from Lidar with In Situ Measurements and Large-Eddy Simulation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 143, 107–123, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9615-3, 2012. a, b, c, d, e, f
Maurer, V., Kalthoff, N., Wieser, A., Kohler, M., Mauder, M., and Gantner, L.: Observed spatiotemporal variability of boundary-layer turbulence over flat, heterogeneous terrain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1377–1400, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1377-2016, 2016. a
Moeng, C.-H. and Sullivan, P. P.: A Comparison of Shear- and Buoyancy-Driven
Planetary Boundary Layer Flows, J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 999–1022, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<0999:ACOSAB>2.0.CO;2, 1994.
a, b
Päschke, E., Leinweber, R., and Lehmann, V.: An assessment of the performance of a 1.5 µm Doppler lidar for operational vertical wind profiling based on a 1-year trial, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2251–2266, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2251-2015, 2015. a
Pauluis, O. and Held, I. M.: Entropy Budget of an Atmosphere in Radiative–Convective Equilibrium. Part I: Maximum Work and Frictional Dissipation, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 125–139,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0125:EBOAAI>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Sathe, A., Mann, J., Vasiljevic, N., and Lea, G.: A six-beam method to measure turbulence statistics using ground-based wind lidars, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 729–740, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-729-2015, 2015. a
Smalikho, I. N. and Banakh, V. A.: Measurements of wind turbulence parameters by a conically scanning coherent Doppler lidar in the atmospheric boundary layer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4191–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4191-2017, 2017. a
Suomi, I., Gryning, S.-E., O'Connor, E. J., and Vihma, T.: Methodology for obtaining wind gusts using Doppler lidar, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 2061–2072, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3059, 2017. a
Zhou, B., Sun, S., Sun, J., and Zhu, K.: The Universality of the Normalized Vertical Velocity Variance in Contrast to the Horizontal Velocity Variance in the Convective Boundary Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1437–1456, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0325.1, 2019. a
Short summary
A high daily variability of the normalized vertical velocity variance profiles in the convective boundary layer is observed using Doppler lidar data during the FESSTVaL campaign 2020–2021. The dependency of the normalized vertical velocity variance on several meteorological parameters explains that the moisture processes in the boundary layer contribute to the remaining variability. The finding suggests that a new vertical velocity scale that takes moist processes into account has to be defined.
A high daily variability of the normalized vertical velocity variance profiles in the convective...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint