Articles | Volume 22, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022
Review article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
29 Jul 2022
Review article | Highlight paper |  | 29 Jul 2022

Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane

Daniel J. Jacob, Daniel J. Varon, Daniel H. Cusworth, Philip E. Dennison, Christian Frankenberg, Ritesh Gautam, Luis Guanter, John Kelley, Jason McKeever, Lesley E. Ott, Benjamin Poulter, Zhen Qu, Andrew K. Thorpe, John R. Worden, and Riley M. Duren

Related authors

Satellite Remote Sensing of Methane Point Sources: A Review of Capabilities and Applications
Daniel Cusworth, Daniel Varon, Dylan Jervis, Jason McKeever, Alexander Turner, Christian Frankenberg, John Worden, Andrew Thorpe, Jay Fahlen, Sudhanshu Pandey, Joannes Maasakkers, Ilse Aben, Annmarie Eldering, Riley Duren, Bradley Conrad, Tia Scarpelli, Daniel Bon, Mackenzie Huffman, Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate, Luis Guanter, Jason Schroeder, Benjamin Hmiel, Evan Sherwin, Sean Crowell, Eric Kort, Adam Brandt, Frances Reuland, Maryann Sargent, James East, and Daniel Jacob
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6060,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6060, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Efficient computation of global high-resolution Jacobian matrices for analytical inversions of satellite observations of greenhouse gases: Application to the Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI) version 2.3
Dandan Zhang, Daniel J. Jacob, Elizabeth W. Lundgren, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Nicholas Balasus, Lucas A. Estrada, Emily Reidy, and Daniel J. Varon
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4399,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4399, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Quantifying national, state, and oil/gas field methane emissions and trends in the US (2019–2024) through high resolution inversion of satellite observations
Lucas A. Estrada, Daniel J. Jacob, Megan He, James D. East, Daniel J. Varon, Nicholas Balasus, Sarah E. Hancock, Melissa Sulprizio, Kevin W. Bowman, John R. Worden, Emily Reidy, and Benjamin R. K. Runkle
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 10629–10646, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10629-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10629-2026, 2026
Short summary
Applying satellite observations to improve bottom-up national emission inventories for methane: application to Colombia
Sarah E. Hancock, Daniel J. Jacob, Rodrigo Jimenez, Andrés Ardila, Luis Morales-Rincon, Néstor Rojas, Lucas A. Estrada, Nicholas Balasus, James D. East, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Xiaolin Wang, James L. France, Lauren Potyk, Elise Penn, Zichong Chen, Daniel J. Varon, Christian Frankenberg, Marci Baranski, Andreea Calcan, and Robert J. Parker
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 10455–10476, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10455-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10455-2026, 2026
Short summary
Top-down benchmark of US methane inventories reveals regional discrepancies in activity-based estimates
John Worden, Sudhanshu Pandey, Hannah Nesser, Kevin Bowman, Colin Harkins, Congmeng Lyu, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Deborah Gordon, Daniel Jacob, Lucas Estrada, Daniel J. Varon, James D. East, Lauren Schmeisser, and Zhen Qu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 8855–8873, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8855-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8855-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexe, M., Bergamaschi, P., Segers, A., Detmers, R., Butz, A., Hasekamp, O., Guerlet, S., Parker, R., Boesch, H., Frankenberg, C., Scheepmaker, R. A., Dlugokencky, E., Sweeney, C., Wofsy, S. C., and Kort, E. A.: Inverse modelling of CH4 emissions for 2010–2011 using different satellite retrieval products from GOSAT and SCIAMACHY, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 113–133, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-113-2015, 2015. 
Allen, D. T., Cardoso-Saldaña, F., and Kimura, Y.: Variability in spatially and temporally resolved emissions and hydrocarbon source fingerprints for oil and gas sources in shale gas production regions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 12016–12026, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.7b02202, 2017. 
Allen, D. T., Cardoso-Saldaña, F. J., Kimura, Y., Chen, Q., Xiang, Z., Zimmerle, D., Bell, C., Lute, C., Duggan, J., and Harrison, M.: A Methane Emission Estimation Tool (MEET) for predictions of emissions from upstream oil and gas well sites with fine scale temporal and spatial resolution: Model structure and applications, Sci. Total Environ., 829, 154277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154277, 2022. 
Angevine, W. M., Peischl, J., Crawford, A., Loughner, C. P., Pollack, I. B., and Thompson, C. R.: Errors in top-down estimates of emissions using a known source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11855–11868, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11855-2020, 2020. 
Ayasse, A. K., Thorpe, A. K., Roberts, D. A., Funk, C. C., Dennison, P. E., Frankenberg, C., Steffke, A., and Aubrey, A. D.: Evaluating the effects of surface properties on methane retrievals using a synthetic airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer next generation (AVIRIS-NG) image, Remote Sens. Environ., 215, 386–397, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.06.018, 2018. 
Editorial statement
Methane is a greenhouse gas that significantly contributes to global warming. Its sources are not well constrained as many point sources are missing in emission inventories that are built based on bottom-up approaches. Emissions include sources caused by human activities (oil/gas, lifestock) but also natural ones, e.g. wetlands. The current paper fills this gap by comprehensively reviewing the capabilities of current and forthcoming satellites as powerful top-down tools to observe atmospheric methane and quantify emissions. Their most important application is to quantify anthropogenic methane sources , where there is substantial interest in identifying hot spots to reduce emissions, closing the methane budget, and to ensure compliance with international climate agreements. This paper is of broad interest for the geoscience community, as it not only presents an overview of the existing discrepancies in the atmospheric methane budget and emissions but also addresses the difficulties in defining its emission inventories on various spatial scales.
Short summary
We review the capability of satellite observations of atmospheric methane to quantify methane emissions on all scales. We cover retrieval methods, precision requirements, inverse methods for inferring emissions, source detection thresholds, and observations of system completeness. We show that current instruments already enable quantification of regional and national emissions including contributions from large point sources. Coverage and resolution will increase significantly in coming years.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint