Articles | Volume 22, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane
Daniel J. Jacob
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University,
Cambridge, 02138, USA
Daniel J. Varon
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University,
Cambridge, 02138, USA
GHGSat, Inc., Montreal, H2W 1Y5, Canada
Daniel H. Cusworth
Arizona Institutes for Resilience, University of Arizona, Tucson,
85721, USA
Carbon Mapper, Pasadena, 91109, USA
Philip E. Dennison
Department of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 84112,
USA
Christian Frankenberg
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute
of Technology, Pasadena, 91125, USA
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, 91109, USA
Ritesh Gautam
Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, D.C., 20009, USA
Luis Guanter
Research Institute of Water and Environmental Engineering,
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, 46022, Spain
Environmental Defense Fund, Amsterdam, 1017, The Netherlands
John Kelley
GeoSapient, Inc., Cypress, 77429, USA
Jason McKeever
GHGSat, Inc., Montreal, H2W 1Y5, Canada
Lesley E. Ott
NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, 20771, USA
Benjamin Poulter
NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, 20771, USA
Zhen Qu
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University,
Cambridge, 02138, USA
Andrew K. Thorpe
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, 91109, USA
John R. Worden
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, 91109, USA
Riley M. Duren
Arizona Institutes for Resilience, University of Arizona, Tucson,
85721, USA
Carbon Mapper, Pasadena, 91109, USA
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, 91109, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 20,706 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Apr 2022)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
13,169 | 7,438 | 99 | 20,706 | 143 | 162 |
- HTML: 13,169
- PDF: 7,438
- XML: 99
- Total: 20,706
- BibTeX: 143
- EndNote: 162
Total article views: 16,352 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Jul 2022)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11,127 | 5,141 | 84 | 16,352 | 129 | 148 |
- HTML: 11,127
- PDF: 5,141
- XML: 84
- Total: 16,352
- BibTeX: 129
- EndNote: 148
Total article views: 4,354 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Apr 2022)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,042 | 2,297 | 15 | 4,354 | 14 | 14 |
- HTML: 2,042
- PDF: 2,297
- XML: 15
- Total: 4,354
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 14
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 20,706 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 21,035 with geography defined
and -329 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 16,352 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 16,744 with geography defined
and -392 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 4,354 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,291 with geography defined
and 63 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
99 citations as recorded by crossref.
- National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations L. Shen et al. 10.1038/s41467-023-40671-6
- Automatic detection of methane emissions in multispectral satellite imagery using a vision transformer B. Rouet-Leduc & C. Hulbert 10.1038/s41467-024-47754-y
- Atmospheric remote sensing for anthropogenic methane emissions: Applications and research opportunities S. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164701
- A methane monitoring station siting method based on WRF-STILT and genetic algorithm L. Fan et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1394281
- S2MetNet: A novel dataset and deep learning benchmark for methane point source quantification using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery A. Radman et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113708
- Verifying Methane Inventories and Trends With Atmospheric Methane Data J. Worden et al. 10.1029/2023AV000871
- Effect of Chicken Feather Hydrolysate on Growth and Yield of French Bean S. Devi et al. 10.1007/s12649-024-02532-1
- Response to Gallagher (2022)—the Australian Tidal Restoration for Blue Carbon method 2022—conservative, robust, and practical C. Lovelock et al. 10.1111/rec.14027
- Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants in China: A plant-level and technology-specific study H. Li et al. 10.1016/j.ese.2023.100345
- Geostationary satellite observations of extreme and transient methane emissions from oil and gas infrastructure M. Watine-Guiu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2310797120
- Performance and sensitivity of column-wise and pixel-wise methane retrievals for imaging spectrometers A. Ayasse et al. 10.5194/amt-16-6065-2023
- Space Imaging Point Source Detection and Characterization F. Ribeiro et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3420217
- Attribution of individual methane and carbon dioxide emission sources using EMIT observations from space A. Thorpe et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adh2391
- Calibration of Maxar Constellation Over Libya-4 Site Using MAIAC Technique M. Choi et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3367250
- Global observational coverage of onshore oil and gas methane sources with TROPOMI M. Gao et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-41914-8
- High-resolution US methane emissions inferred from an inversion of 2019 TROPOMI satellite data: contributions from individual states, urban areas, and landfills H. Nesser et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5069-2024
- Utilizing Remote Sensing and Data Analytics Techniques to Detect Methane Emissions from the Oil and Gas Industry and Assist with Sustainability Metrics Á. Esparza et al. 10.2118/215818-PA
- Offshore methane detection and quantification from space using sun glint measurements with the GHGSat constellation J. MacLean et al. 10.5194/amt-17-863-2024
- Developing a spatially explicit global oil and gas infrastructure database for characterizing methane emission sources at high resolution M. Omara et al. 10.5194/essd-15-3761-2023
- Single-photon laser methane detection methodology and initial validation S. Zhu et al. 10.3788/COL202422.100101
- Satellite-Derived Estimate of City-Level Methane Emissions from Calgary, Alberta, Canada Z. Xing et al. 10.3390/rs16071149
- Atmospheric Methane Retrieval Based on Back Propagation Neural Network and Simulated AVIRIS-NG Data Y. Huang et al. 10.1109/LGRS.2024.3379119
- Uvsq-Sat NG, a New CubeSat Pathfinder for Monitoring Earth Outgoing Energy and Greenhouse Gases M. Meftah et al. 10.3390/rs15194876
- U-Plume: automated algorithm for plume detection and source quantification by satellite point-source imagers J. Bruno et al. 10.5194/amt-17-2625-2024
- High-resolution assessment of coal mining methane emissions by satellite in Shanxi, China S. Peng et al. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108375
- The role of satellite remote sensing in mitigating and adapting to global climate change S. Zhao et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166820
- Development of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML) Models for Methane Emissions Forecasting in Seaweed C. Louime & T. Raza 10.3390/methane3030028
- Accounting for the effect of aerosols in GHGSat methane retrieval Q. Yu et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3347-2024
- From planetary scenarios to planetary sensing: Models, observations, and political legibility D. Pendergrass 10.1177/20530196241270716
- Single-blind validation of space-based point-source detection and quantification of onshore methane emissions E. Sherwin et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-30761-2
- Automated detection of regions with persistently enhanced methane concentrations using Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite data S. Vanselow et al. 10.5194/acp-24-10441-2024
- Exploiting the Matched Filter to Improve the Detection of Methane Plumes with Sentinel-2 Data H. Wang et al. 10.3390/rs16061023
- Air pollution accountability research: Moving from a chain to a web S. Ebelt et al. 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100128
- Methane retrieval from MethaneAIR using the CO2 proxy approach: a demonstration for the upcoming MethaneSAT mission C. Chan Miller et al. 10.5194/amt-17-5429-2024
- An Improved CH4 Profile Retrieving Method for Ground-Based Differential Absorption Lidar L. Fan et al. 10.3390/atmos15080937
- Evaluation of Sentinel-5P TROPOMI Methane Observations at Northern High Latitudes H. Lindqvist et al. 10.3390/rs16162979
- Current potential of CH4 emission estimates using TROPOMI in the Middle East M. Liu et al. 10.5194/amt-17-5261-2024
- Investigating high methane emissions from urban areas detected by TROPOMI and their association with untreated wastewater B. de Foy et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acc118
- Strong methane point sources contribute a disproportionate fraction of total emissions across multiple basins in the United States D. Cusworth et al. 10.1073/pnas.2202338119
- Constraining industrial ammonia emissions using hyperspectral infrared imaging L. Noppen et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113559
- Quantifying methane emissions from United States landfills D. Cusworth et al. 10.1126/science.adi7735
- Tiered Leak Detection and Repair Programs at Simulated Oil and Gas Production Facilities: Increasing Emission Reduction by Targeting High-Emitting Sources F. Cardoso-Saldaña 10.1021/acs.est.2c08582
- Investigation of U.S. landfill GHG reporting program methane emission models B. Stark et al. 10.1016/j.wasman.2024.05.037
- Reconciling Methane Emission Measurements for Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms with Detailed Emission Inventories: Accounting for Emission Intermittency Z. Chen et al. 10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00041
- Monitoring, classification and analysis of waste disposal sites using Machine Learning K. Sharma & M. Sood 10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.147
- A blended TROPOMI+GOSAT satellite data product for atmospheric methane using machine learning to correct retrieval biases N. Balasus et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3787-2023
- A new aerial approach for quantifying and attributing methane emissions: implementation and validation J. Dooley et al. 10.5194/amt-17-5091-2024
- Satellite quantification of methane emissions and oil–gas methane intensities from individual countries in the Middle East and North Africa: implications for climate action Z. Chen et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5945-2023
- Temperature dependence of the absorption of the R(6) manifold of the 2ν3 band of methane in air in support of the MERLIN mission S. Vasilchenko et al. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2023.108483
- Evaluating net life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions intensities from gas and coal at varying methane leakage rates D. Gordon et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ace3db
- Methane Retrieval Algorithms Based on Satellite: A Review Y. Jiang et al. 10.3390/atmos15040449
- Merging TROPOMI and eddy covariance observations to quantify 5-years of daily CH4 emissions over coal-mine dominated region W. Hu et al. 10.1007/s40789-024-00700-1
- Minimum detection limits of the TROPOMI satellite sensor across North America and their implications for measuring oil and gas methane emissions L. Dubey et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162222
- Bayesian inversion of HFC-134a emissions in southern China from a new AGAGE site: Results from an observing system simulation experiment J. Li et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120715
- Use of Assimilation Analysis in 4D-Var Source Inversion: Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) with GOSAT Methane and Hemispheric CMAQ S. Voshtani et al. 10.3390/atmos14040758
- CH4Net: a deep learning model for monitoring methane super-emitters with Sentinel-2 imagery A. Vaughan et al. 10.5194/amt-17-2583-2024
- A framework for describing and classifying methane reporting requirements, emission sources, and monitoring methods A. Connor et al. 10.1039/D4EA00120F
- Defining Detection Limits for Continuous Monitoring Systems for Methane Emissions at Oil and Gas Facilities Q. Chen et al. 10.3390/atmos15030383
- Review of Sources of Uncertainty and Techniques Used in Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis to Estimate Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ruminants E. Kimei et al. 10.3390/su16052219
- Assessing the Relative Importance of Satellite-Detected Methane Superemitters in Quantifying Total Emissions for Oil and Gas Production Areas in Algeria S. Naus et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c04746
- Understanding the potential of Sentinel-2 for monitoring methane point emissions J. Gorroño et al. 10.5194/amt-16-89-2023
- Implementation of a satellite-based tool for the quantification of CH4 emissions over Europe (AUMIA v1.0) – Part 1: forward modelling evaluation against near-surface and satellite data A. Vara-Vela et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-6413-2023
- Developing unbiased estimation of atmospheric methane via machine learning and multiobjective programming based on TROPOMI and GOSAT data K. Li et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114039
- La surveillance des émissions anthropiques de CO2 depuis l’espace : un enjeu géopolitique émergent G. Broquet & F. Chevallier 10.4000/12de3
- Deep learning for detecting and characterizing oil and gas well pads in satellite imagery N. Ramachandran et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-50334-9
- Breakthroughs in CH4 capture technologies: Key to reducing fugitive methane emissions in the energy sector W. Deng et al. 10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100316
- Modeling global indices for estimating non-photosynthetic vegetation cover P. Dennison et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113715
- Investigation of spectral bands and sensor parameters for methane emission detection imaging spectrometer H. Varchand et al. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2024.109100
- Revisiting the quantification of power plant CO2 emissions in the United States and China from satellite: A comparative study using three top-down approaches C. He et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114192
- Monitoring and regression analysis of landfill surface temperatures using remote sensing and image processing techniques K. Sharma et al. 10.1080/01431161.2024.2372081
- PRISMethaNet: A novel deep learning model for landfill methane detection using PRISMA satellite data M. Marjani et al. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.10.003
- East Asian methane emissions inferred from high-resolution inversions of GOSAT and TROPOMI observations: a comparative and evaluative analysis R. Liang et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8039-2023
- Evaluation of Uncertainties in the Anthropogenic SO2 Emissions in the USA from the OMI Point Source Catalog K. Narayan et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c07056
- Deployment-invariant probability of detection characterization for aerial LiDAR methane detection M. Thorpe et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114435
- Upscaling Wetland Methane Emissions From the FLUXNET‐CH4 Eddy Covariance Network (UpCH4 v1.0): Model Development, Network Assessment, and Budget Comparison G. McNicol et al. 10.1029/2023AV000956
- Temporal Variation and Persistence of Methane Emissions from Shallow Water Oil and Gas Production in the Gulf of Mexico K. Biener et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c08066
- Quantitative imaging of carbon dioxide plumes using a ground-based shortwave infrared spectral camera M. Knapp et al. 10.5194/amt-17-2257-2024
- Current and Near-Term Earth-Observing Environmental Satellites, Their Missions, Characteristics, Instruments, and Applications S. Ustin & E. Middleton 10.3390/s24113488
- High Spatial and Temporal Resolution Simulations of Methane Column Loadings Due to Routine Emissions and Emission Events in Oil and Gas Regions L. Huang et al. 10.1021/acsestair.4c00021
- Determination of Greenhouse Gas Concentrations from the 16U CubeSat Spacecraft Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy V. Mayorova et al. 10.3390/s23156794
- Continuous weekly monitoring of methane emissions from the Permian Basin by inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations D. Varon et al. 10.5194/acp-23-7503-2023
- Comparison of observation- and inventory-based methane emissions for eight large global emitters A. Petrescu et al. 10.5194/essd-16-4325-2024
- Multisatellite Data Depicts a Record-Breaking Methane Leak from a Well Blowout L. Guanter et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00399
- Spatio-temporal dynamics of methane concentration and its association to climatic and vegetation parameters: a case study of the Northern Cape Province, South Africa N. Mashiyi et al. 10.1080/10106049.2024.2306266
- A survey of methane point source emissions from coal mines in Shanxi province of China using AHSI on board Gaofen-5B Z. He et al. 10.5194/amt-17-2937-2024
- Impact of transport model resolution and a priori assumptions on inverse modeling of Swiss F-gas emissions I. Katharopoulos et al. 10.5194/acp-23-14159-2023
- Forecasting short-term methane based on corrected numerical weather prediction outputs S. Zhao et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142500
- Detecting Methane Emissions from Space Over India: Analysis Using EMIT and Sentinel-5P TROPOMI Datasets A. Siddiqui et al. 10.1007/s12524-024-01925-y
- US oil and gas system emissions from nearly one million aerial site measurements E. Sherwin et al. 10.1038/s41586-024-07117-5
- 大气甲烷卫星传感器和遥感算法研究综述 何. He Zhuo et al. 10.3788/AOS230429
- First validation of high-resolution satellite-derived methane emissions from an active gas leak in the UK E. Dowd et al. 10.5194/amt-17-1599-2024
- Single-blind test of nine methane-sensing satellite systems from three continents E. Sherwin et al. 10.5194/amt-17-765-2024
- Semantic segmentation of methane plumes with hyperspectral machine learning models V. Růžička et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-44918-6
- Monitoring greenhouse gases (GHGs) in China: status and perspective Y. Sun et al. 10.5194/amt-15-4819-2022
- Automated detection and monitoring of methane super-emitters using satellite data B. Schuit et al. 10.5194/acp-23-9071-2023
- Constructing a measurement-based spatially explicit inventory of US oil and gas methane emissions (2021) M. Omara et al. 10.5194/essd-16-3973-2024
- 煤炭行业甲烷排放卫星遥感研究进展与展望 秦. Qin Kai et al. 10.3788/AOS231293
- Derivation of Emissions From Satellite‐Observed Column Amounts and Its Application to TROPOMI NO2 and CO Observations K. Sun 10.1029/2022GL101102
- Recent Advances Toward Transparent Methane Emissions Monitoring: A Review B. Erland et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c02136
97 citations as recorded by crossref.
- National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations L. Shen et al. 10.1038/s41467-023-40671-6
- Automatic detection of methane emissions in multispectral satellite imagery using a vision transformer B. Rouet-Leduc & C. Hulbert 10.1038/s41467-024-47754-y
- Atmospheric remote sensing for anthropogenic methane emissions: Applications and research opportunities S. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164701
- A methane monitoring station siting method based on WRF-STILT and genetic algorithm L. Fan et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1394281
- S2MetNet: A novel dataset and deep learning benchmark for methane point source quantification using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery A. Radman et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113708
- Verifying Methane Inventories and Trends With Atmospheric Methane Data J. Worden et al. 10.1029/2023AV000871
- Effect of Chicken Feather Hydrolysate on Growth and Yield of French Bean S. Devi et al. 10.1007/s12649-024-02532-1
- Response to Gallagher (2022)—the Australian Tidal Restoration for Blue Carbon method 2022—conservative, robust, and practical C. Lovelock et al. 10.1111/rec.14027
- Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants in China: A plant-level and technology-specific study H. Li et al. 10.1016/j.ese.2023.100345
- Geostationary satellite observations of extreme and transient methane emissions from oil and gas infrastructure M. Watine-Guiu et al. 10.1073/pnas.2310797120
- Performance and sensitivity of column-wise and pixel-wise methane retrievals for imaging spectrometers A. Ayasse et al. 10.5194/amt-16-6065-2023
- Space Imaging Point Source Detection and Characterization F. Ribeiro et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3420217
- Attribution of individual methane and carbon dioxide emission sources using EMIT observations from space A. Thorpe et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adh2391
- Calibration of Maxar Constellation Over Libya-4 Site Using MAIAC Technique M. Choi et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3367250
- Global observational coverage of onshore oil and gas methane sources with TROPOMI M. Gao et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-41914-8
- High-resolution US methane emissions inferred from an inversion of 2019 TROPOMI satellite data: contributions from individual states, urban areas, and landfills H. Nesser et al. 10.5194/acp-24-5069-2024
- Utilizing Remote Sensing and Data Analytics Techniques to Detect Methane Emissions from the Oil and Gas Industry and Assist with Sustainability Metrics Á. Esparza et al. 10.2118/215818-PA
- Offshore methane detection and quantification from space using sun glint measurements with the GHGSat constellation J. MacLean et al. 10.5194/amt-17-863-2024
- Developing a spatially explicit global oil and gas infrastructure database for characterizing methane emission sources at high resolution M. Omara et al. 10.5194/essd-15-3761-2023
- Single-photon laser methane detection methodology and initial validation S. Zhu et al. 10.3788/COL202422.100101
- Satellite-Derived Estimate of City-Level Methane Emissions from Calgary, Alberta, Canada Z. Xing et al. 10.3390/rs16071149
- Atmospheric Methane Retrieval Based on Back Propagation Neural Network and Simulated AVIRIS-NG Data Y. Huang et al. 10.1109/LGRS.2024.3379119
- Uvsq-Sat NG, a New CubeSat Pathfinder for Monitoring Earth Outgoing Energy and Greenhouse Gases M. Meftah et al. 10.3390/rs15194876
- U-Plume: automated algorithm for plume detection and source quantification by satellite point-source imagers J. Bruno et al. 10.5194/amt-17-2625-2024
- High-resolution assessment of coal mining methane emissions by satellite in Shanxi, China S. Peng et al. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108375
- The role of satellite remote sensing in mitigating and adapting to global climate change S. Zhao et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166820
- Development of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML) Models for Methane Emissions Forecasting in Seaweed C. Louime & T. Raza 10.3390/methane3030028
- Accounting for the effect of aerosols in GHGSat methane retrieval Q. Yu et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3347-2024
- From planetary scenarios to planetary sensing: Models, observations, and political legibility D. Pendergrass 10.1177/20530196241270716
- Single-blind validation of space-based point-source detection and quantification of onshore methane emissions E. Sherwin et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-30761-2
- Automated detection of regions with persistently enhanced methane concentrations using Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite data S. Vanselow et al. 10.5194/acp-24-10441-2024
- Exploiting the Matched Filter to Improve the Detection of Methane Plumes with Sentinel-2 Data H. Wang et al. 10.3390/rs16061023
- Air pollution accountability research: Moving from a chain to a web S. Ebelt et al. 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100128
- Methane retrieval from MethaneAIR using the CO2 proxy approach: a demonstration for the upcoming MethaneSAT mission C. Chan Miller et al. 10.5194/amt-17-5429-2024
- An Improved CH4 Profile Retrieving Method for Ground-Based Differential Absorption Lidar L. Fan et al. 10.3390/atmos15080937
- Evaluation of Sentinel-5P TROPOMI Methane Observations at Northern High Latitudes H. Lindqvist et al. 10.3390/rs16162979
- Current potential of CH4 emission estimates using TROPOMI in the Middle East M. Liu et al. 10.5194/amt-17-5261-2024
- Investigating high methane emissions from urban areas detected by TROPOMI and their association with untreated wastewater B. de Foy et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acc118
- Strong methane point sources contribute a disproportionate fraction of total emissions across multiple basins in the United States D. Cusworth et al. 10.1073/pnas.2202338119
- Constraining industrial ammonia emissions using hyperspectral infrared imaging L. Noppen et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113559
- Quantifying methane emissions from United States landfills D. Cusworth et al. 10.1126/science.adi7735
- Tiered Leak Detection and Repair Programs at Simulated Oil and Gas Production Facilities: Increasing Emission Reduction by Targeting High-Emitting Sources F. Cardoso-Saldaña 10.1021/acs.est.2c08582
- Investigation of U.S. landfill GHG reporting program methane emission models B. Stark et al. 10.1016/j.wasman.2024.05.037
- Reconciling Methane Emission Measurements for Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms with Detailed Emission Inventories: Accounting for Emission Intermittency Z. Chen et al. 10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00041
- Monitoring, classification and analysis of waste disposal sites using Machine Learning K. Sharma & M. Sood 10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.147
- A blended TROPOMI+GOSAT satellite data product for atmospheric methane using machine learning to correct retrieval biases N. Balasus et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3787-2023
- A new aerial approach for quantifying and attributing methane emissions: implementation and validation J. Dooley et al. 10.5194/amt-17-5091-2024
- Satellite quantification of methane emissions and oil–gas methane intensities from individual countries in the Middle East and North Africa: implications for climate action Z. Chen et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5945-2023
- Temperature dependence of the absorption of the R(6) manifold of the 2ν3 band of methane in air in support of the MERLIN mission S. Vasilchenko et al. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2023.108483
- Evaluating net life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions intensities from gas and coal at varying methane leakage rates D. Gordon et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ace3db
- Methane Retrieval Algorithms Based on Satellite: A Review Y. Jiang et al. 10.3390/atmos15040449
- Merging TROPOMI and eddy covariance observations to quantify 5-years of daily CH4 emissions over coal-mine dominated region W. Hu et al. 10.1007/s40789-024-00700-1
- Minimum detection limits of the TROPOMI satellite sensor across North America and their implications for measuring oil and gas methane emissions L. Dubey et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162222
- Bayesian inversion of HFC-134a emissions in southern China from a new AGAGE site: Results from an observing system simulation experiment J. Li et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120715
- Use of Assimilation Analysis in 4D-Var Source Inversion: Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) with GOSAT Methane and Hemispheric CMAQ S. Voshtani et al. 10.3390/atmos14040758
- CH4Net: a deep learning model for monitoring methane super-emitters with Sentinel-2 imagery A. Vaughan et al. 10.5194/amt-17-2583-2024
- A framework for describing and classifying methane reporting requirements, emission sources, and monitoring methods A. Connor et al. 10.1039/D4EA00120F
- Defining Detection Limits for Continuous Monitoring Systems for Methane Emissions at Oil and Gas Facilities Q. Chen et al. 10.3390/atmos15030383
- Review of Sources of Uncertainty and Techniques Used in Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis to Estimate Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ruminants E. Kimei et al. 10.3390/su16052219
- Assessing the Relative Importance of Satellite-Detected Methane Superemitters in Quantifying Total Emissions for Oil and Gas Production Areas in Algeria S. Naus et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c04746
- Understanding the potential of Sentinel-2 for monitoring methane point emissions J. Gorroño et al. 10.5194/amt-16-89-2023
- Implementation of a satellite-based tool for the quantification of CH4 emissions over Europe (AUMIA v1.0) – Part 1: forward modelling evaluation against near-surface and satellite data A. Vara-Vela et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-6413-2023
- Developing unbiased estimation of atmospheric methane via machine learning and multiobjective programming based on TROPOMI and GOSAT data K. Li et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114039
- La surveillance des émissions anthropiques de CO2 depuis l’espace : un enjeu géopolitique émergent G. Broquet & F. Chevallier 10.4000/12de3
- Deep learning for detecting and characterizing oil and gas well pads in satellite imagery N. Ramachandran et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-50334-9
- Breakthroughs in CH4 capture technologies: Key to reducing fugitive methane emissions in the energy sector W. Deng et al. 10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100316
- Modeling global indices for estimating non-photosynthetic vegetation cover P. Dennison et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113715
- Investigation of spectral bands and sensor parameters for methane emission detection imaging spectrometer H. Varchand et al. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2024.109100
- Revisiting the quantification of power plant CO2 emissions in the United States and China from satellite: A comparative study using three top-down approaches C. He et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114192
- Monitoring and regression analysis of landfill surface temperatures using remote sensing and image processing techniques K. Sharma et al. 10.1080/01431161.2024.2372081
- PRISMethaNet: A novel deep learning model for landfill methane detection using PRISMA satellite data M. Marjani et al. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.10.003
- East Asian methane emissions inferred from high-resolution inversions of GOSAT and TROPOMI observations: a comparative and evaluative analysis R. Liang et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8039-2023
- Evaluation of Uncertainties in the Anthropogenic SO2 Emissions in the USA from the OMI Point Source Catalog K. Narayan et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c07056
- Deployment-invariant probability of detection characterization for aerial LiDAR methane detection M. Thorpe et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114435
- Upscaling Wetland Methane Emissions From the FLUXNET‐CH4 Eddy Covariance Network (UpCH4 v1.0): Model Development, Network Assessment, and Budget Comparison G. McNicol et al. 10.1029/2023AV000956
- Temporal Variation and Persistence of Methane Emissions from Shallow Water Oil and Gas Production in the Gulf of Mexico K. Biener et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c08066
- Quantitative imaging of carbon dioxide plumes using a ground-based shortwave infrared spectral camera M. Knapp et al. 10.5194/amt-17-2257-2024
- Current and Near-Term Earth-Observing Environmental Satellites, Their Missions, Characteristics, Instruments, and Applications S. Ustin & E. Middleton 10.3390/s24113488
- High Spatial and Temporal Resolution Simulations of Methane Column Loadings Due to Routine Emissions and Emission Events in Oil and Gas Regions L. Huang et al. 10.1021/acsestair.4c00021
- Determination of Greenhouse Gas Concentrations from the 16U CubeSat Spacecraft Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy V. Mayorova et al. 10.3390/s23156794
- Continuous weekly monitoring of methane emissions from the Permian Basin by inversion of TROPOMI satellite observations D. Varon et al. 10.5194/acp-23-7503-2023
- Comparison of observation- and inventory-based methane emissions for eight large global emitters A. Petrescu et al. 10.5194/essd-16-4325-2024
- Multisatellite Data Depicts a Record-Breaking Methane Leak from a Well Blowout L. Guanter et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00399
- Spatio-temporal dynamics of methane concentration and its association to climatic and vegetation parameters: a case study of the Northern Cape Province, South Africa N. Mashiyi et al. 10.1080/10106049.2024.2306266
- A survey of methane point source emissions from coal mines in Shanxi province of China using AHSI on board Gaofen-5B Z. He et al. 10.5194/amt-17-2937-2024
- Impact of transport model resolution and a priori assumptions on inverse modeling of Swiss F-gas emissions I. Katharopoulos et al. 10.5194/acp-23-14159-2023
- Forecasting short-term methane based on corrected numerical weather prediction outputs S. Zhao et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142500
- Detecting Methane Emissions from Space Over India: Analysis Using EMIT and Sentinel-5P TROPOMI Datasets A. Siddiqui et al. 10.1007/s12524-024-01925-y
- US oil and gas system emissions from nearly one million aerial site measurements E. Sherwin et al. 10.1038/s41586-024-07117-5
- 大气甲烷卫星传感器和遥感算法研究综述 何. He Zhuo et al. 10.3788/AOS230429
- First validation of high-resolution satellite-derived methane emissions from an active gas leak in the UK E. Dowd et al. 10.5194/amt-17-1599-2024
- Single-blind test of nine methane-sensing satellite systems from three continents E. Sherwin et al. 10.5194/amt-17-765-2024
- Semantic segmentation of methane plumes with hyperspectral machine learning models V. Růžička et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-44918-6
- Monitoring greenhouse gases (GHGs) in China: status and perspective Y. Sun et al. 10.5194/amt-15-4819-2022
- Automated detection and monitoring of methane super-emitters using satellite data B. Schuit et al. 10.5194/acp-23-9071-2023
- Constructing a measurement-based spatially explicit inventory of US oil and gas methane emissions (2021) M. Omara et al. 10.5194/essd-16-3973-2024
- 煤炭行业甲烷排放卫星遥感研究进展与展望 秦. Qin Kai et al. 10.3788/AOS231293
Latest update: 17 Nov 2024
Executive editor
Methane is a greenhouse gas that significantly contributes to global warming.
Its sources are not well constrained as many point sources are missing in
emission inventories that are built based on bottom-up approaches. Emissions
include sources caused by human activities (oil/gas, lifestock) but also natural ones, e.g.
wetlands. The current paper fills this gap by comprehensively reviewing the
capabilities of current and forthcoming satellites as powerful top-down tools
to observe atmospheric methane and quantify emissions.
Their most important application is to quantify anthropogenic
methane sources , where there is substantial interest in identifying hot spots to reduce
emissions, closing the methane budget, and to ensure compliance with
international climate agreements. This paper is of broad interest for the
geoscience community, as it not only presents an overview of the existing
discrepancies in the atmospheric methane budget and emissions but also addresses the
difficulties in defining its emission inventories on various spatial scales.
Methane is a greenhouse gas that significantly contributes to global warming.
Its sources are...
Short summary
We review the capability of satellite observations of atmospheric methane to quantify methane emissions on all scales. We cover retrieval methods, precision requirements, inverse methods for inferring emissions, source detection thresholds, and observations of system completeness. We show that current instruments already enable quantification of regional and national emissions including contributions from large point sources. Coverage and resolution will increase significantly in coming years.
We review the capability of satellite observations of atmospheric methane to quantify methane...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint